12.09.17

Gemini version available ♊︎

Like the EPO, Taiwan/China (SIPO) Harm SMEs With a Policy of Patent Maximalism Which Fosters Litigation, Not Innovation

Posted in Asia, Europe, Patents at 7:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Related and recent: “Legal and Administrative Rules at the EPO Are Similar to Those at SIPO” (China)

SIPO and Battistelli

Summary: A culture of patent maximalism breeds plenty of lawsuits in China (good for the legal ‘industry’), but small companies that are innovative lose focus and resources, just like in Europe where SMEs are discriminated against

THE LAW of China is widely regarded as oppressive. Patent law too is increasingly being viewed as oppressive because companies that are innocent of infringement can get in a lot of trouble and even go under.

Managing IP, a site by (and for) the patent microcosm, published this interview a few days ago. “We have witnessed that Chinese courts are more willing to grant higher damages in civil IP lawsuits, thereby increasing the cost of counterfeiters in their illegal business,” says the ‘article’ (more like self-promotion).

This may be good for Adidas (which is advertised in this interview), but what about much smaller companies? Adidas can afford plenty of lawyers, others cannot.

“This may be good for Adidas (which is advertised in this interview), but what about much smaller companies? Adidas can afford plenty of lawyers, others cannot.”A few days ago Foxconn’s patents person was given a platform by IAM, another site by (and for) the patent microcosm. Foxconn is a truly massive corporation, unlike the vast majority of companies in Taiwan/China. Should we not be hearing the voices of those on the receiving end of endless litigation and fear?

Inadvertently, the patent trolls’ lobby (IAM) recognises that China grants too many rubbish quality patents. It’s too much to keep abreast of, especially for small companies which lack a legal department. Here is what IAM wrote:

China is a particular challenge, especially when it comes to what is publically [sic] available in official information. For example, as things stand, it is often a lot more difficult to find user-friendly platforms on a par with what’s available to follow things like patent assignments in the US. This is no doubt an area that will improve as the country’s IP industry matures; while in fields like the use of big data, there are indications that China is ahead of other jurisdictions, something Jou himself has discussed with IAM.

Well, Foxconn has the human and financial resources to wade through and find patents of relevance to its products. What about companies with 5 orders of magnitude fewer employees? China seems to have taken nepotism, especially for large corporations, to unprecedented levels. As we noted last month, China proudly protects state-connected giants, even with embargoes of the competition.

Unfortunately, the EPO is trying to mimic China and UPC (with broad injunctions) is a symptom of that. A few days ago it wrote: “You can still join the “Patent information from the BRICS countries: China” webinar. It starts in one hour…”

The EPO’s management wants to believe [1, 2] that receiving more patent applications from China might save the EPO. It also relies on giving preferential treatment to massive multinational monopolies while only attempting to maintain the illusion of catering for SMEs. #IPforSMEs is a hashtag that the EPO repeats every day this month.

“The EPO’s management wants to believe that receiving more patent applications from China might save the EPO.”“Litigation is a last but important resort when it comes to fighting wilful infringement,” it said some days ago, adding the obligatory #IPforSMEs hashtag. The first two tweets of Thursday [1, 2] had the hashtag and said: “Developing an IP strategy might have much more benefits than you’d expect.”

No connection whatsoever to SMEs. The first two tweets and also the last of the day just keep talking about “SMEs”, but very much like in China, the EPO tries hard to distract from its harm to SMEs (the UPC, for example, would be a huge blow to SMEs; it be of no benefit to them as they often operate locally, not EU-wide). The first tweet of Friday was also accompanied by the #IPforSMEs hashtag.

Get the pattern?

“A long time ago we warned that China’s (or Xi’s) approach to patents would come to haunt and harm China. We were right.”Remember that China’s patents are rubbish in terms of quality. Totally garbage. This isn’t a secret and it’s not an insult. The country is just trying to game the numbers at SIPO and WIPO. And guess what… it’s working. As IP Watch put it 3 days ago: “Innovators around the world filed 3.1 million patent applications in 2016, up 8.3 percent in a seventh straight yearly increase, WIPO’s annual World Intellectual Property Indicators (WIPI) report shows. The report, WIPO’s annual report, released at the United Nations in Geneva today, showed China topping patent, trademark and design filings in 2016.”

Well, it’s all about China, but the above yardstick is totally oblivious to quality or uniqueness of patents. They muddy the water.

A long time ago we warned that China’s (or Xi’s) approach to patents would come to haunt and harm China. We were right. China has become ‘home’ to a parasite no other country in the world actually wants; it’s now full of patent trolls and sharks; locals are complaining. Here is how IAM put it:

The introduction of specialised IP courts has ushered in a new era in Chinese patent litigation. Recent statistics from the Beijing IP Court lift the veil on an enticing jurisdiction for patent owners

The term “patent owners” is a euphemism; these are firms which have nothing but patents. They’re empty shells. As we noted earlier this year, Microsoft will quite likely unleash patent trolls in China and hope that everyone pays ‘protection’ money in the form of Azure tax. Here is what IAM wrote about it in its latest issue: (magazine, hence paywall)

Today, we are announcing that Microsoft Azure IP Advantage will be available in China beginning October 1, 2017, ensuring that Azure customers in China can enjoy the same great IP protection benefits as customers in the rest of the world. Microsoft chief IP counsel Erich Andersen, writing on the Microsoft Azure blog….

We already wrote many articles about Microsoft Azure IP Advantage, e.g. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. It’s a shrewdly-disguised patent extortion scheme.

Over in Taiwan, according to two other blog posts from IAM [1, 2], things are becoming as bad as in (mainland) China. Basically, patent aggression in China begets more aggression. It’s a bubble of low-quality patents and litigation, so HTC caves in. To quote IAM:

A report in Chinese media states that an HTC-owned invention patent with a relatively recent grant date recently emerged from an invalidation proceeding before China’s SIPO Patent Re-examination Board (PRB) largely unscathed. The challenger was Chinese smartphone maker Gionee – a relatively small player in the domestic market that also sells devices in India and Southeast Asia. The patent, a grant covering “Mobile device and antenna structure” issued by SIPO in December 2016, also has US family members.

The other blog post speaks of “Taiwan IP Court hand[ing] record $50 million victory to a crucial smartphone supplier in trade secret case”. It’s not about patents, but “[t]he ruling is one of the most visible IP wins to date for a company that has kept a low profile and eschewed collaboration, leaning heavily on trade secrets to protect its technological edge.”

“Over-regulation in the form of over-patenting tends to suppress and depress innovation/production.”China has traditionally been stigmatised as a “pirate”, “thief” or “imitator” with “knockoffs” and “counterfeits”. China seems eager to change that perception, but at what cost? What actually gave China plenty of competitive edge was the lack of bureaucratic red tape. Over-regulation in the form of over-patenting tends to suppress and depress innovation/production.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. How Oppressive Governments and Web Monopolists Might Try to Discourage Adoption of Internet Protocols Like Gemini

    Popular movements and even some courageous publications have long been subverted by demonisation tactics, splits along unrelated grounds (such as controversial politics) and — failing that — technical sabotage and censorship; one must familiarise oneself with commonly-recurring themes of social control by altercation



  2. [Meme] Strike Triangulations, Reception Issues

    Financial strangulations for Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations”? The EPO will come to regret 2013…



  3. [Meme] Is Saying “No!” to Unlawful Proposals Considered “Impolite”?

    A ‘toxic mix’ of enablers and cowards (who won’t vote negatively on EPO proposals which they know to be unlawful) can serve to show that the EPO isn’t a “social democracy” as Benoît Battistelli liked to call it; it’s just a dictatorship, currently run by the son of a person who actually fought dictatorship



  4. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 20, 2021



  5. [Meme] EPO Legal Sophistry and Double Dipping

    An imaginary EPO intercept of Administrative Council discussions in June 2013...



  6. Links 21/10/2021: PostgreSQL JDBC 42.3.0 and Maui Report

    Links for the day



  7. [Meme] [Teaser] “Judge a Person Both by His Friends and Enemies”

    Fervent supporters of Team Battistelli or Team Campinos (a dark EPO era) are showing their allegiances; WIPO and EPO have abused staff similarly over the past decade or so



  8. 'Cluster-Voting' in the European Patent Office/Organisation (When a Country With 1.9 Million Citizens Has the Same Voting Power as a Country With 83.1 Million Citizens)

    Today we examine who has been running the Finnish patent office and has moreover voted in the EPO during the ballot on unlawful "Strike Regulations"; they voted in favour of manifestly illegal rules and for 8.5 years after that (including last Wednesday) they continued to back a shady regime which undermines the EPO's mission statement



  9. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki's Accord

    The Finnish outpost has long been strategic to the EPO because it can help control the vote of four or more nations; evidence suggests this has not changed



  10. [Meme] Living as a Human Resource, Working for Despots

    The EPO has become a truly awful place/employer to work for; salary is 2,000 euros for some (despite workplace stress, sometimes relocation to a foreign country)



  11. Links 20/10/2021: New Redcore Linux and Hospital Adoption of GNU Health

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 19, 2021



  13. Links 19/10/2021: Karanbir Singh Leaves CentOS Board, GPL Violations at Vizio

    Links for the day



  14. [Meme] Giving the Knee

    The 'knee' champion Kratochvìl and 'kneel' champion Erlingsdóttir are simply crushing the law; they’re ignoring the trouble of EPO staff and abuses of the Office, facilitated by the Council itself (i.e. facilitated by themselves)



  15. Josef Kratochvìl Rewarded Again for Covering Up EPO Corruption and the EPO Bribes the Press for Lies Whilst Also Lying About Its Colossal Privacy Violations

    Corrupt officials and officials who actively enable the crimes still control the Office and also the body which was supposed to oversee it; it's pretty evident and clear judging by this week's press statements at the EPO's official Web site



  16. [Meme] Sorry, Wrong Country (Or: Slovenia isn't Great Britain)

    Team UPC is trying to go ahead with a total hoax which a high-level European court would certainly put an end to (if or when a referral is initiated)



  17. How Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden Voted on Patently Unlawful Regulations at the EPO

    We look back and examine what happened 8 years ago when oppressed staff was subjected to unlawful new “regulations” (long enjoyed by António Campinos, the current EPO autocrat)



  18. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc

    We start our investigation of how countries in northern Europe ended up voting on the unlawful “Strike Regulations” at the EPO and why



  19. Proof That Windows “11” is a Hoax

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  20. Firefox Becomes as Morally Reprehensible as Apple, Facebook, or Uber

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  21. Links 19/10/2021: GNU dbm 1.22 and Godot 3.4 RC 1

    Links for the day



  22. [Meme] [Teaser] GitHub an Expensive and Dangerous Trap (Also: Misogyny Hub)

    The ongoing Microsoft GitHub exposé will give people compelling reasons to avoid GitHub, which is basically just a subsidised (at a loss) trap



  23. Norway Should Have Voted Against Benoît Battistelli's Illegal (Anti-)'Strike Regulations' at the European Patent Office

    Benoît Battistelli‘s EPO faced no real and potent opposition from Norwegian delegates, who chose to abstain from the vote on the notorious and illegal so-called ‘Strike Regulations’ (they’re just an attack on strikes, an assault on basic rights of labourers)



  24. Links 19/10/2021: Sequoia PGP LGPL 2.0+, Open RAN Adoption

    Links for the day



  25. [Meme] [Teaser] Benoît Battistelli, King of Iceland

    Later today we shall see how the current deputy of the head of the EPO‘s overseeing body was in fact likely rewarded for her complicity in Benoît Battistelli‘s abuses against EPO staff, including staff from Iceland



  26. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, October 18, 2021



  27. Links 19/10/2021: MyGNUHealth 1.0.5 and Ubuntu 22.04 Now Developed

    Links for the day



  28. [Meme] [Teaser] Thrown Under the Bus

    Tomorrow we shall look at Danish enablers of unlawful EPO regulations, Jesper Kongstad and Anne Rejnhold Jørgensen



  29. The World Needs to Know What Many Austrians Already Know About Rude Liar, the Notorious 'Double-Dipper'

    Today we publish many translations (from German) about the Austrian double-dipper, who already became the subject of unfavourable press coverage in his home country; he’s partly responsible for crushing fundamental rights at the EPO under Benoît Battistelli‘s regime



  30. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVI: The Demise of the Austrian Double-Dipper

    Friedrich ‘Rude Liar’ Rödler is notorious in the eyes of EPO staff, whom he was slandering and scandalising for ages while he himself was the real scandal


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts