10.25.18

Gemini version available ♊︎

The Litigation ‘Industry’ Pays the Media for ‘Sponsored’ (Paid-for) Articles That Sway Public Opinion on Patent Policy

Posted in America, Courtroom, Deception, Law, Patents at 6:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When these people’s blogs aren’t enough they literally pay lobbyists like Kappos (former USPTO Director) and the media to spread their lies and spin

Kappos in Center for American Progress
Photo credit: Center for American Progress

Summary: The latest twists and spin in media owned by the patent microcosm and media that is simply being ‘bought’ by the patent microcosm to discredit the courts and prop up litigious ‘ideals’

THE USPTO‘s management seems intent and determined to bypass high courts such as the Federal Circuit and SCOTUS (or merely cherry-pick such courts’ decisions). The ITC adopted a similar attitude, whereby it simply disregards decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) after inter partes reviews (IPRs). This is highly problematic because if one branch disregards and disobeys another there’s a state of lawlessness (e.g. granting a patent monopoly/injunction order in spite of it being invalid as per the law/courts).

Yesterday CCIA noted that the Founding Fathers of the United States “were themselves frequently quite skeptical of that patent system,” alluding to a particular vision of it. To quote:

Two hundred and ten years later, in KSR v. Teleflex the Supreme Court reiterated this point, holding that there’s no patentable invention when two known things are combined in the normal way.

So when you hear someone talk about the patent system our Founders created, remember that the Founders were themselves frequently quite skeptical of that patent system. The patent system has the potential to incentivize invention—but when the PTO issues patents on old inventions or when patents are used to threaten ideas that aren’t actually covered by the patent, that potential is left untapped.

Michael Loney at a patent maximalists’ publication meanwhile speaks to a software patents booster about KSR (the above case). He speaks to a patenting professional (for profit, he has a whole blog dedicated to teaching people how to overcome Section 101) Charles Bieneman as if that would shed light on what’s really happening rather than offer illusionary spin. To quote the introduction:

Despite the landmark KSR ruling on obviousness a decade ago, it is still possible to argue inability to combine two references in patent prosecution

Charles Bieneman of Bejin Bieneman describes obviousness as “the oldest topic in patents, but also always the most current topic in patent law”.

Most if not all software patents are pretty obvious if “obviousness” is defined in particular terms. There’s a good reason why algorithms had long been excluded from patentability; that was until the Federal Circuit changed that. Nowadays the Federal Circuit, led by a relatively new chief judge, is undoing this mistake (made decades earlier) and Joseph Herndon has just taken note of another bogus patent biting the dust at PTAB and then at the Federal Circuit because of prior art (neither obviousness or scope). This means that American patent clerks/examiners must improve the examination process; they need more time to study prior art and avoid such mistakes (which can cost millions of dollars in legal bills to correct, with expenses rarely being remediable). In this particular case (Nobel Biocare Services AG v Instradent USA, Inc.) the defendant leveraged prior art/35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rather than 35 U.S.C. § 101 that’s often used to throw away bogus software patents or applications in the US. It’s all about prior art contrary to lies lawyers like to tell. To quote:

Nobel Biocare Services AG appealed from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review (IPR) holding claims 1–5 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,714,977 invalid based on an ABT Catalog. Many issues were presented, and here, we review the opinion with respect to whether the ABT Catalog qualifies as a prior art printed publication under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).

[...]

The Federal Circuit addressed the sufficiency of the corroboration of the testimony and found the testimony of Messrs. Hantman and Chakir not only to be corroborated by each other, but also by a) the actual copy of the ABT Catalog, dated March 2003, submitted as evidence and b) Dr. Fromovich’s testimony that ABT operated a booth at the March 2003 IDS conference.

The fact that Hantman had a copy of the ABT Catalog in his files further corroborates his testimony that he obtained a copy of the same document asserted to be prior art in the IPR.

Thus, although much of the evidence relied upon was based on testimony of biased witnesses regarding events that took place over 10-15 years ago, the Federal Circuit found no reason that the testimony was problematic. As a result, the ABT Catalog was found to be prior art.

The moral of the story is, had examiners done their work properly/better (or had been given more time to do the work thoroughly), years of legal disputes would be spared, leaving ‘poor’ lawyers jobless and actual inventors better off financially.

But of course those lawyers will just carry on whining and whining (we’ll say more about it in the weekend) because no amount of patents and lawsuits is ever enough for them.

“But of course those lawyers will just carry on whining and whining (we’ll say more about it in the weekend) because no amount of patents and lawsuits is ever enough for them.”“The Alice 101 Test Has Turned Patent Claims Into the Legal Equivalent of Schrodinger’s Cat— Derivative Trading Is Both Patentable Subject Matter and Non-Patentable Subject Matter,” Janal Kalis wrote. He’s a patent maximalist. He’s an anti Alice/Section 101 ‘activist’. It’s all about money to these people.

Speaking of propaganda for money, days ago we saw Greater Wilmington Business Journal publishing an article titled “The Battle Over Biotech Inventions”. It didn’t take long to spot the text (in all caps) “SPONSORED CONTENT PROVIDED BY RUSSELL NUGENT – ATTORNEY, THE HUMPHRIES LAW FIRM” (so once again the news reports about patents are literally marketing from law firms that lobby for particular outcomes).

“It’s all about money (legal bills), not about innovation or science or technology or whatever.”Watch this rant about the Federal Circuit: “In essence, patent owners [sic] have been caught in ideological battle between the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – the government body that issues patents – and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals – the court that has jurisdiction over most patent appeals, on one side and the U.S. Supreme Court on the other.”

It is not an “ideological battle” (as the “sponsored content” above puts it) but the rule of law versus dodgy (self-serving) officials like Iancu, who were elevated by Donald Trump after they had worked for him. The whole thing is quite sickening and seeing that the press is nowadays composed (for a fee) by patent law firms discredits the media in general. It’s all about money (legal bills), not about innovation or science or technology or whatever.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] [Teaser] Miguel de Icaza on CEO of Microsoft GitHub

    Our ongoing series, which is very long, will shed much-needed light on GitHub and its goals (the dark side is a lot darker than people care to realise)



  2. Gemini Protocol and Gemini Space Are Not a Niche; for Techrights, Gemini Means Half a Million Page Requests a Month

    Techrights on gemini:// has become very big and we’ll soon regenerate all the pages (about 37,500 of them) to improve clarity, consistency, and general integrity



  3. 'Satellite States' of EPO Autocrats

    Today we look more closely at how Baltic states were rendered 'voting fodder' by large European states, looking to rubber-stamp new and oppressive measures which disempower the masses



  4. [Meme] Don't Mention 'Brexit' to Team UPC

    It seems perfectly clear that UPC cannot start, contrary to what the EPO‘s António Campinos told the Council last week (lying, as usual) and what the EPO insinuates in Twitter; in fact, a legal challenge to this should be almost trivial



  5. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States

    How unlawful EPO rules were unsurprisingly supported by Benoît Battistelli‘s friends in Baltic states; António Campinos maintained those same unlawful rules and Baltic connections, in effect liaising with offices known for their corruption (convicted officials, too; they did not have diplomatic immunity, unlike Battistelli and Campinos)



  6. Links 21/10/2021: GIMP 2.99.8 Released, Hardware Shortages, Mozilla Crisis

    Links for the day



  7. How Oppressive Governments and Web Monopolists Might Try to Discourage Adoption of Internet Protocols Like Gemini

    Popular movements and even some courageous publications have long been subverted by demonisation tactics, splits along unrelated grounds (such as controversial politics) and — failing that — technical sabotage and censorship; one must familiarise oneself with commonly-recurring themes of social control by altercation



  8. [Meme] Strike Triangulations, Reception Issues

    Financial strangulations for Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations”? The EPO will come to regret 2013…



  9. [Meme] Is Saying “No!” to Unlawful Proposals Considered “Impolite”?

    A ‘toxic mix’ of enablers and cowards (who won’t vote negatively on EPO proposals which they know to be unlawful) can serve to show that the EPO isn’t a “social democracy” as Benoît Battistelli liked to call it; it’s just a dictatorship, currently run by the son of a person who actually fought dictatorship



  10. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 20, 2021



  11. [Meme] EPO Legal Sophistry and Double Dipping

    An imaginary EPO intercept of Administrative Council discussions in June 2013...



  12. Links 21/10/2021: PostgreSQL JDBC 42.3.0 and Maui Report

    Links for the day



  13. [Meme] [Teaser] “Judge a Person Both by His Friends and Enemies”

    Fervent supporters of Team Battistelli or Team Campinos (a dark EPO era) are showing their allegiances; WIPO and EPO have abused staff similarly over the past decade or so



  14. 'Cluster-Voting' in the European Patent Office/Organisation (When a Country With 1.9 Million Citizens Has the Same Voting Power as a Country With 83.1 Million Citizens)

    Today we examine who has been running the Finnish patent office and has moreover voted in the EPO during the ballot on unlawful "Strike Regulations"; they voted in favour of manifestly illegal rules and for 8.5 years after that (including last Wednesday) they continued to back a shady regime which undermines the EPO's mission statement



  15. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki's Accord

    The Finnish outpost has long been strategic to the EPO because it can help control the vote of four or more nations; evidence suggests this has not changed



  16. [Meme] Living as a Human Resource, Working for Despots

    The EPO has become a truly awful place/employer to work for; salary is 2,000 euros for some (despite workplace stress, sometimes relocation to a foreign country)



  17. Links 20/10/2021: New Redcore Linux and Hospital Adoption of GNU Health

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 19, 2021



  19. Links 19/10/2021: Karanbir Singh Leaves CentOS Board, GPL Violations at Vizio

    Links for the day



  20. [Meme] Giving the Knee

    The 'knee' champion Kratochvìl and 'kneel' champion Erlingsdóttir are simply crushing the law; they’re ignoring the trouble of EPO staff and abuses of the Office, facilitated by the Council itself (i.e. facilitated by themselves)



  21. Josef Kratochvìl Rewarded Again for Covering Up EPO Corruption and the EPO Bribes the Press for Lies Whilst Also Lying About Its Colossal Privacy Violations

    Corrupt officials and officials who actively enable the crimes still control the Office and also the body which was supposed to oversee it; it's pretty evident and clear judging by this week's press statements at the EPO's official Web site



  22. [Meme] Sorry, Wrong Country (Or: Slovenia isn't Great Britain)

    Team UPC is trying to go ahead with a total hoax which a high-level European court would certainly put an end to (if or when a referral is initiated)



  23. How Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden Voted on Patently Unlawful Regulations at the EPO

    We look back and examine what happened 8 years ago when oppressed staff was subjected to unlawful new “regulations” (long enjoyed by António Campinos, the current EPO autocrat)



  24. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc

    We start our investigation of how countries in northern Europe ended up voting on the unlawful “Strike Regulations” at the EPO and why



  25. Proof That Windows “11” is a Hoax

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  26. Firefox Becomes as Morally Reprehensible as Apple, Facebook, or Uber

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  27. Links 19/10/2021: GNU dbm 1.22 and Godot 3.4 RC 1

    Links for the day



  28. [Meme] [Teaser] GitHub an Expensive and Dangerous Trap (Also: Misogyny Hub)

    The ongoing Microsoft GitHub exposé will give people compelling reasons to avoid GitHub, which is basically just a subsidised (at a loss) trap



  29. Norway Should Have Voted Against Benoît Battistelli's Illegal (Anti-)'Strike Regulations' at the European Patent Office

    Benoît Battistelli‘s EPO faced no real and potent opposition from Norwegian delegates, who chose to abstain from the vote on the notorious and illegal so-called ‘Strike Regulations’ (they’re just an attack on strikes, an assault on basic rights of labourers)



  30. Links 19/10/2021: Sequoia PGP LGPL 2.0+, Open RAN Adoption

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts