Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Federal Circuit's Decision on Ancora Technologies v HTC America is the Rare Exception, Not the Norm

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) didn't even disagree

"Let me make my position on the patentability of software clear. I believe that software per se should not be allowed patent protection. […] We take this position because it is the best policy for maintaining a healthy software industry, where innovation can prosper."

--Adobe Systems (old position explained by Douglas Brotz)



Summary: Even though the PTAB does not automatically reject every patent when 35 U.S.C. ۤ 101 gets invoked we're supposed to think that somehow things are changing in favour of patent maximalists; but all they do is obsess over something old (as old as a month ago) and hardly controversial

BEGRUDGINGLY adopting 35 U.S.C. ۤ 101, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) nowadays rejects quite a few applications for software patents. Even before any inter partes review (IPR) gets filed.

Patent maximalists keep hoping that the Federal Circuit will get 'tired' of invalidating software patents, but in reality it has gotten even stricter than PTAB, as we've been pointing out in recent weeks. There are rarely any exceptions, but when they do happen the patent maximalists will carry on obsessing over them for months. Stephen J. Kontos complains that, in his own words, "[e]ven the PTAB thought this was patent eligible," before the Federal Circuit:

The Federal Circuit found that a method for increasing computer security is patent eligible under ۤ101. The decision is Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1404 (Fed. Cir. 2018).

The patent at issue can be found here. The Federal Circuit treated claim 1 as representative.

The concept has to do with using a modifiable part of the computer’s BIOS to determine whether the program is licensed to run on the computer.

[...]

It makes sense. If the PTAB institutes and invalidates the patent, the District Court can dismiss the lawsuit without risk of being overturned at the Federal Circuit.

Anyway, the patent owner appealed to the Federal Circuit, which resulted in the opinion linked above. So maybe the District Court should have given the PTAB’s decision more weight?


We expect this to be brought up again and again in months to come. They've already written dozens of articles about this while totally ignoring dozens of cases whose outcome didn't suit their agenda. Mr. Gross has just taken note of this old IPR nearly a month late and said it proves "once again, that if you can finesse SOME kind of GUI element into your patent claims, you will should be able to overcome 101 rejections at PTAB: https://e-foia.uspto.gov/Foia/RetrievePdf?system=BPAI&flNm=fd2018004423-11-13-2018-1 …"

The Federal Circuit's bias on GUI patents is a subject we wrote about a great deal about a year ago and then again months ago in relation to Corel. That was back in October.

Those are, suffice to say, rare exceptions. It is meanwhile being pointed out by Robert Jain that they're invalidating the patent of a patent troll called Mobility Workx, which is suing in the Eastern District of Texas. The patent has been deemed or "found likely unpatentable" a few days ago:

On December 3, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted trial on all challenged claims in an IPR filed by Unified against U.S. Patent 8,213,417 owned and asserted by Mobility Workx, LLC, an NPE. This decision marks the third time the Board has rejected arguments that Unified’s members are real parties-in-interest since the Federal Circuit addressed RPI in Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX. The '417 patent, directed to a "system, apparatus, and methods for proactive allocation of wireless communication resources," has been asserted in the Eastern District of Texas against Verizon and T-Mobile.


These patent trolls are a dying breed. They typically rely on very shallow patents and only courts like the ones in the Eastern District of Texas (that are harder to approach after TC Heartland) facilitate blackmail/income sources. PTAB makes it cheaper to challenge and Unified can further reduce financial burden by fronting for multiple defendants.

Recent Techrights' Posts

SoylentNews Grows Up, Registers as a Business, Site Traffic Reportedly Grows
More people realise that social control media may in fact be a passing fad
 
Richard Stallman's Talks in Switzerland This Week
We need to put an end to 'cancer culture'; it's trying to kill people and it is even swatting people
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, March 28, 2024
IRC logs for Thursday, March 28, 2024
[Meme] EPO's New Ways of Working (NWoW), a.k.a. You Don't Even Get a Desk at Work and Cannot be Near Known Colleagues
Seems more like union-busting (divide and rule)
Hiding Microsoft's Culpability in Security Breaches and Other Major Blunders (in the United Kingdom, This May Mean You Can't Get Food)
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is vast
Giving back to the community
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 28/03/2024: Sega, Nintendo, and Bell Layoffs
Links for the day
Open letter to the ACM regarding Codes of Conduct impersonating the Code of Ethics
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
With 9 Mentions of Azure In Its Latest Blog Post, Canonical is Again Promoting Microsoft and Intel Vendor Lock-in, Surveillance, Back Doors, Considerable Power Waste, and Defects That Cannot be Fixed
Microsoft did not even have to buy Canonical (for Canonical to act like it happened)
Links 28/03/2024: GAFAM Replacing Full-Time Workers With Interns Now
Links for the day
Consent & Debian's illegitimate constitution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
The Time Our Server Host Died in a Car Accident
If Debian has internal problems, then they need to be illuminated and then tackled, at the very least in order to ensure we do not end up with "Deadian"
China's New 'IT' Rules Are a Massive Headache for Microsoft
On the issue of China we're neutral except when it comes to human rights issues
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 27, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 27, 2024
WeMakeFedora.org: harassment decision, victory for volunteers and Fedora Foundations
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 27/03/2024: Terrorism Grows in Africa, Unemployment in Finland Rose Sharply in a Year, Chinese Aggression Escalates
Links for the day
Links 27/03/2024: Ericsson and Tencent Layoffs
Links for the day
Amid Online Reports of XBox Sales Collapsing, Mass Layoffs in More Teams, and Windows Making Things Worse (Admission of Losses, Rumours About XBox Canceled as a Hardware Unit)...
Windows has loads of issues, also as a gaming platform
Links 27/03/2024: BBC Resorts to CG Cruft, Akamai Blocking Blunders in Piracy Shield
Links for the day
Android Approaches 90% of the Operating Systems Market in Chad (Windows Down From 99.5% 15 Years Ago to Just 2.5% Right Now)
Windows is down to about 2% on the Web-connected client side as measured by statCounter
Sainsbury's: Let Them Eat Yoghurts (and Microsoft Downtimes When They Need Proper Food)
a social control media 'scandal' this week
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 26, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Windows/Client at Microsoft Falling Sharply (Well Over 10% Decline Every Quarter), So For His Next Trick the Ponzi in Chief Merges Units, Spices Everything Up With "AI"
Hiding the steep decline of Windows/Client at Microsoft?
Free technology in housing and construction
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
We Need Open Standards With Free Software Implementations, Not "Interoperability" Alone
Sadly we're confronting misguided managers and a bunch of clowns trying to herd us all - sometimes without consent - into "clown computing"
Microsoft's Collapse in the Web Server Space Continued This Month
Microsoft is the "2%", just like Windows in some countries