Rare Admission That Some Vaccine Patents Are Simply Bogus

Posted in Patents at 10:30 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz


Summary: Patents are being granted on incomplete things with no practical application/value; that helps reveal the degree to which patents have drifted towards monopoly instead of publication of solutions

THERE hasn’t been much going on lately at the EPO and USPTO. They’re both busy granting as many patents as they can, even when the underlying patents aren’t legal. António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli call it “production” and “quality” as if patents are being manufactured and speed is quality.

We’ve often focused on software patents in Europe (not legal; in the US they’re of dubious legitimacy too, owing to 35 U.S.C. § 101), but what about the gold rush for patents on COVID-19 cures and/or prevention? Lots of money can be made by producing billions of units. This new article says: “Risky.Biz asked a C-Level executive of a multinational biopharmaceutical company: could drugs like these be precisely reproduced based only on the contents of a patent document?

“This also harms public health as it’s all about denying access to medicine, especially when so many people need it.”““That’s a lie,” the exec replied.”

Well, “then the patent documents are incomplete and thereby invalid,” an associate of ours remarked.

The very purpose of patents certainly wasn’t pure monopoly or restriction of competition; patents were put forth as means of publishing ideas and explanation of how to reproduce these ideas (or machines). What’s being told above is that they’re not disclosing what they actually do, so why are patents being granted at all? This is a distortion of the very concept (and purpose) of patents. This also harms public health as it’s all about denying access to medicine, especially when so many people need it.

AWS is Not GNU/Linux and AWS Certification is a Bezos-Leaning Ploy That Rewards People for Memorising Proprietary Interfaces (Vendor Lock-in)

Posted in Free/Libre Software, GNU/Linux, Servers at 7:00 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

BHO-DJT Side-by-Side: They don't agree on anything... Except spying on the whole world and their own citizens

Summary: Clown computing is a scam and a trap; in practice it means outsourcing one’s programs and data to computers one does not own, does not truly control, and everything is subjected to change (spying, billing, interfaces, features, patent aspects); we need to move away from centralised clowns (“The Cloud”)

THE fact that Amazon started making its own distros was overlooked or overshadowed somewhat because of the timing of the announcement. It coincided with the date the media was almost 90% “COVID COVID COVID”…

And nevertheless, for about a week following the announcement we’ve managed to fish about a dozen articles (also in Daily Links at that time).

Is Amazon a friend of GNU/Linux? No, not really.

“Is Amazon a friend of GNU/Linux? No, not really.”Amazon’s technical/practical contributions to the platform that makes Mr. Bezos so rich aren’t noteworthy. Linus Torvalds recently blasted one patch from their direction, using strong language to describe that “stupidity”…

Clown computing is generally a massive threat to Software Freedom; Richard Stallman foresaw this threat and drafted (A)GPLv3 (along with others who recognised the threat). When the mainstream/corporate media started rebranding servers and “SaaS” as something like “cloud” (few other terms were attempted, but they did not catch on) Stallman blasted the trend and dismissed it — even in the media — as mere hype.

And guess what… Stallman was right. He’s usually right. He wasn’t born yesterday and he had plenty of time to think about the intricacies; he also speaks to rather knowledgeable people about it (in person and over E-mail).

“Clown computing is generally a massive threat to Software Freedom; Richard Stallman foresaw this threat and drafted (A)GPLv3 (along with others who recognised the threat).”AWS is perhaps the biggest ‘collective’ datacentre with GNU/Linux; Wikileaks exposed some locations of the pertinent datacentres a couple of years ago. As of half a decade ago, Amazon’s AWS (or similar) datacentres were spread across about a dozen countries. Many are US-based, where military-funded lawmakers draft bills called “cloud” something and give special powers (including data access) to the US government/authorities (US Army included).

Having said that, my main issue with AWS isn’t lack of returns (very minimal). They contribute almost nothing to development; they’re known to be exploiting lots of Free software projects, grabbing support contracts away from people and firms that actually develop the software. There were several controversies to that effect in recent months and Amazon is sponsoring/supporting events that strive to make it mainstream and “normal”… as if exploitation is to be celebrated as “success” (it’s rather unethical).

“GNU/Linux on the other hand (like UNIX/POSIX) is modular, standard and universal.”But here’s the thing that’s even worse; many people nowadays pursue certifications named after buzzwords. Or brands. They basically spend a lot of time and money joining some corporate cult without even being salaried by the respective corporation/s. One example of this is AWS certification. Putting aside the dynamic nature of their interfaces (which I’ve seen and used for almost a decade at work), those are proprietary and certification means training — and moreover training for things that change over time and thus render the certification obsolete or outdated.

GNU/Linux on the other hand (like UNIX/POSIX) is modular, standard and universal. It hardly changes over time. The same GNU scripts you put together back in the 1980s probably still work today (the opposite isn’t true; it’s not likely that a program or script you write today would work with a 1980s GNU toolchain). So once a person acquires the skills, they’re portable and globally useful. One can even switch from GNU/Linux to BSDs without great difficulty; the adaptations may be minor and there’s plenty of documentation about it online (not without out-of-date GUI screenshots).

“An Amazon empire of virtual machines and containers is certainly helpful to Mr. Bezos. But is that what we want for ourselves?”The bottom line is, don’t be misled into thinking that all those “GAFAM” certifications are worth much; you invest a lot in merely making the likes of Mr. Bezos a lot richer. You reinforce lock-in if not monopoly (memorising GUIs). The same can be said about GitHub. And sending more money to Amazon (AWS bills) isn’t contributing to Software Freedom, even if all running instances are basically GNU/Linux images.

Sure, GNU/Linux is dominant (probably de facto standard in today’s servers), but if we strive to accomplish more than just branding (“Linux everywhere”), then let’s think ahead and consider what a world we wish to live in. An Amazon empire of virtual machines and containers is certainly helpful to Mr. Bezos. But is that what we want for ourselves? We don’t even mention Microsoft’s offering that starts with an “A” because it's an overhyped miserable failure (the media writes about it because Microsoft is paying). In my daily life, at work, I hardly come across anyone who uses the “A” thing of Microsoft; they’re grossly exaggerating their relevance — typical Microsoft marketing stunt.

IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 09, 2020

Posted in IRC Logs at 2:05 am by Needs Sunlight



#techrights log

#boycottnovell log



#boycottnovell-social log

#techbytes log

Enter the IRC channels now

« Previous Page « Previous Page Next entries »

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources




Samba logo

We support

End software patents


GNU project


EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com

Recent Posts