07.18.20

Thierry Breton and the European Commission Must Answer Perfectly Legitimate Questions About European Patent Office Corruption

Posted in Europe, Law, Patents at 2:06 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

As we’ve been arguing for years, EPO scandals were assured to doom the credibility of the Commission (for failing to intervene and hold people accountable, all this despite the UPC being a clear bridge between the EPO and the EU)

Patrick Breyer, Germany
Patrick Breyer, Germany. Licence: Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Summary: MEPs are growingly aware and increasingly upset about the corruption in Munich; they want answers from the European Commission; having cronies like Thierry Breton in charge will only make things worse because that encourages the perception of collusion and cover-up

THE endless scandals of EPOnia are perhaps belatedly becoming a stain on the EU, which failed to act for over half a decade (as did the German injustice ministry, which looked the other way after illegal things had been done).

Looking at Kluwer comments (not the hogwash from Team UPC), the sentiment seems consistent; all 6 comments there basically blast the response from Commissioner Thierry Breton; it was just as bad if not worse than that of the German injustice minister, whose absurd words were quoted as fact by António Campinos, President of the ‘European’ Patent Office. “Nonchalant Biped” wrote:

The last thing the EU Commission wants is to re-open the can of worms that it created by not providing robust entry and exit of membership of the system, and by not really providing a flexible mechanism relating to the seat of the courts, instead relying, as usual, on a political compromise (one might be so unkind to say, “as usual”). The statement from a French commissioner is therefore totally unsurprising, given that France was the first country/major user of the UPC system to ratify. I do find that the comms unit adding on a Covid-crisis hanger as some sort of justification crass in the extreme, as it clearly indicates that the Commission will use anything it can to try and justify its position.

It would be nice, for once, if the legal issues surrounding the UPC (and there are several) could actually be sorted out before the whole things gets ratified and dragged screaming into existence, but of course, that would take another umpteen years of negotiating and horsetrading…

Notice how the last comment there mentions Mr. Breyer, an MEP who opposes software patents in Europe (owing to 35 U.S.C. § 101 the USPTO can no longer grant these patents too easily; not anymore… and courts almost always reject those).

Clare Daly (GUE/NGL); CC BY-SA 2.0And regarding our latest article about this, “Thierry Breton has two further questions on his desk awaiting response,” a source told us. This source cites “European Patent Organisation – disbandment of Audit Committee” (Question for written answer E-003299/2020) and “Establishment of a European Patent Organisation Treasury Investment Fund” (Question for written answer E-003298/2020). “Will be fun to watch him wriggling off the hook on those ones as he covers up for his old buddy [Benoît Battistelli] at the EPO,” our source noted.

“The Commission, and possibly Breton himself, will be under heavy burden/pressure to provide an answer with actual substance…”Both questions come from Clare Daly (GUE/NGL) (photo to the left; CC BY-SA 2.0), “an Irish politician who has been a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from Ireland for the Dublin constituency since July 2019,” according to Wikipedia. “She is a member of Independents 4 Change, part of the European United Left–Nordic Green Left. She served as a Teachta Dála (TD) from 2011 to 2019.”

She has asked two very important questions very politely.

On 2 June 2020 she posted this question to the Commission, as per Rule 138:

The European Patent Organisation (EPOrg) is an intergovernmental organisation established under the terms of the European Patent Convention (EPC). Under the terms of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012, increased co-operation between the EU and the EPOrg has been in progress since 2012 in the context of the EU’s Unitary Patent project. Furthermore, although the EU is not a contracting party to the European Patent Convention, it has observer status on the Administrative Council of the EPOrg under the terms of Article 30 of the EPC.

1. Does the Commission agree that the EU has a legitimate interest in ensuring that governance mechanisms at the EPO are fit for purpose?

2. Is the Commission aware of and concerned by the circumstances relating to the disbandment of the EPO Audit Committee in June 2011, a Committee which had only been established two years previously?

3. Does the Commission agree that the establishment of the Audit Committee was meant to empower the Board of the Administrative Council to better control the EPO, and that the consequence of its disbandment was to return this key oversight function to a single person – the President of the Office, and is the Commission of the opinion that current governance mechanisms at the EPO, particularly those on financial and budgetary oversight, are fit for purpose, and correspond to international best practice?

We covered this a long time ago. Daly also asked about EPOTIF, which we wrote a great deal about in the past (inspiring some press articles). To quote:

The European Patent Organisation (EPOrg) is an intergovernmental organisation established under the terms of the European Patent Convention (EPC). Under the terms of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012, there has been increased cooperation between the EU and the EPOrg since 2012 in the context of the EU’s Unitary Patent project. Moreover, although the EU is not a contracting party to the EPC, it has observer status on the Administrative Council of the EPOrg under the terms of Article 30.

1. With this in mind, is the Commission aware of the circumstances relating to the establishment of an EPO Treasury Investment Fund (EPOTIF) in 2018 using cash reserves of approximately EUR 2.3 billion from the surplus accumulated in the current account of the EPOrg, as reported in German periodical WirtschaftsWoche on 22 June 2018?

2. Is it aware of and concerned about the reservations expressed by the German Federal Court of Auditors concerning the establishment of the EPOTIF?

3. Is it aware of the criticism of the EPOTIF voiced by a former judge of the German Federal Constitutional Court, who described the EUR 2.3 billion fund as a ‘shadow budget’ whose establishment allegedly ‘violates the fundamental democratic constitutional principle according to which public budgetary arrangements must be subject to parliamentary supervision,’ and which lacks a legal basis in the EPO?

The public should be thankful to Daly for bringing up these issues. The Commission, and possibly Breton himself, will be under heavy burden/pressure to provide an answer with actual substance; it will inevitably become a very heavy burden or reputational liability and having Breton in that key position will be a scandal. All the stuff we published about him last year is going to become ever more relevant.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2020/07/18/collusion-and-coverup/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The Cancel Song

    People who work for (or receive funding from) Nazi-associated IBM are still trying to turn the work/legacy of Richard Stallman (RMS) into dust/ashes



  2. Pro-Software Freedom Advocates and Free/Libre Software Supporters Face Barriers Due to Domination of Communication Channels (Beyond the Media)

    A carefully-checked assessment of an overlooked aspect surrounding the 'cancel mob', which incites and brainwashes people based on lies; there's an attempt to control channels of communication (e.g. Open and Free Technology Community and Freenode) and to generally suppress people who support the founder of GNU/Linux



  3. Bashing Free Software and GNU/Linux is a Terrible Business Model for Publishers

    Contrary to unflattering portrayals by hostile media that's sponsored by foes of Free software, the usage of Free software grows, even if things such as DRM and surveillance stand in the way of software freedom (which was wrongly assumed to be ushered in by Free software, irrespective of malicious features like 'telemetry')



  4. Links 8/5/2021: GIMP 2.99.6, Wine 6.8 Released

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 07, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, May 07, 2021



  6. [Meme] Outsourcing Audacity Development to Microsoft Proprietary Software and Then Copying Microsoft Tactics (and 'Telemetry')

    They've had the audacity to call it "telemetry" and pretend that surveillance companies (spying giants) cannot figure out who you are based on IP addresses



  7. Links 7/5/2021: IPFire 2.25 Core Update 156 and Diffoscope 174 Released

    Links for the day



  8. The New Microsoft? No, the New IBM.

    Microsoft GitHub and IBM: a strategic alliance between a monopolistic duo



  9. The Audacity Takeover by Muse Group is No Cause for Celebration

    Audacity is now part of an entity called Muse Group and if it doesn’t take or suck freedom out of Audacity, it will certainly deny users rather basic concepts (or anticipation) of privacy



  10. King of Linux

    If the entire operating system is being called "Linux", then we fall for a publicity or misattribution stunt



  11. The Biggest Troll is the Linux Foundation, Still Looking to Provoke and Defame Free Software Communities in Order to Help a Monopolistic Takeover and to Shoehorn Tyrants Into Leadership Positions

    Contrary to what the so-called ‘Linux’ Foundation is trying to say, the most toxic element is itself; it’s maligning the real community while protecting abusive and racist corporations that profit from war and tribalism-motivated hatred



  12. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 06, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 06, 2021



  13. “The Lolita Express” and Prince Bill

    “The Lolita Express” scandals return to haunt pool old Bill, as it turns out his wife was upset and it's quite likely the reason for their divorce



  14. Links 7/5/2021: GNU/Linux Preinstalled, Plamo 7.3, LibreOffice 7.1.3

    Links for the day



  15. The Latest Reports About Bill Gates Serve to Confirm or at Least Reaffirm Many People's Suspicions

    So, just as many people suspected, Melinda Gates did not appreciate her husband sneaking behind her back to meet someone who had trafficked thousands of underage girls for sexual exploitation and there are high-profile calls right now for greater transparency, seeing the impact on the world’s biggest tax evasion vehicle



  16. Disregard Web Sites That Call Themselves 'News' and Instead Promote Proprietary Software for Companies Like Microsoft

    Publishers like IDG have long been paid-for marketing in ‘article’ clothing, sometimes with the veneer of ‘reporting’ (as if they have some inside knowledge or insight, e.g. speaking with or for the company they secretly coordinate with or market for); but sadly we’ve been seeing some so-called ‘Linux’ sites doing the same thing, in effect acting like de facto Microsoft marketers



  17. [Meme] Who Needs Examination Anyway When There's 'Hey Hi' (AI)?

    The patent production line could do away with 'pesky' and 'opinionated' examiners who actually wish to scrutinise alleged 'inventions'



  18. Europe's Second-Largest Institution Corrupting the Media and Buying Expensive Puff Pieces

    As annual reports reveal, the EPO wastes an extraordinary amount of money on reputation laundering campaigns and it pollutes the signal by paying publishers; we examine this issue using the new 'reports' shown in the video above



  19. Links 6/5/2021: Fedora’s Compiler Policy and Celemony Software GmbH Adopting Free Software

    Links for the day



  20. Free Software Proponents Don't Fall for Bullshit (Same is True for EPO Examiners)

    There are parallels between what happens in the Free Software Movement and the EPO, where well-meaning people — and usually hard-working scientists — are besieged by people who never really contributed anything to society



  21. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 05, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 05, 2021



  22. Lessons From Another Failed Coup Against the Free Software Movement

    The coup has very clearly failed and we should prepare for future attempts (they go in cycles); the monopolies really dislike software they cannot control fully (e.g. copyleft/GPL-licensed software)



  23. Links 5/5/2021: Mesa 21.1 Released and New Releases of Python

    Links for the day



  24. Links 5/5/2021: StarLabs, GNU Zile 2.6.2, Fedora i3 Spin

    Links for the day



  25. Phony 'Scandals' From Phony 'News' Site ZDNet

    Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols continues the coup against the FSF (trying to separate it from its founder, Richard Stallman), funded by IBM and Microsoft to engage in libel at a marketing company-owned ‘news’ site called ZDNet



  26. Links 5/5/2021: Windows Security Breaches and GNU Pokology Launched

    Links for the day



  27. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 04, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 04, 2021



  28. Links 4/5/2021: Taiwins 0.3, KDE Plasma 5.21.5 Released

    Links for the day



  29. EPO Already Wasting Money on Media Manipulation Campaigns for European Inventor Award

    An online-only European Inventor Award 'event' is being used as a pretext/excuse to flood European publishers with money they can rightly perceive as 'hush money'; everyone out there with no spine would likely buckle at the sight of EPO euros and just produce mindless puff pieces that serve to distract from EPO corruption



  30. The Timing of This Melinda Gates Tweet Was Always Curious...

    Remarking on her trip to Africa, where the Gates family lobbies for monopolies on seeds (for profit or course, notably through Monsanto/Bayer, which the Gates family heavily invests in), she posted pure fluff and old photos. And it’s hard to believe she had nothing better to do at the time (better than such nostalgia). As we noted last year: “The above tweet of a beach was posted [by Melinda Gates] on the date of the arrest/search of their employee, who was at their residence at the time.” He was arrested around the very same time this tweet was posted. As we wrote last year (based on detailed documents obtained from the police department): “This tweet was posted 2 hours and 40 minutes after the door was breached and incriminating evidence collected.” He was arrested later that morning at the mansion of Bill and Melinda Gates (the police records contain detailed timelines to confirm the chronology). Melinda’s first name was also in the CP 'stash'.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts