08.06.20

Gemini version available ♊︎

The Psychology of Developers

Posted in Free/Libre Software at 11:39 pm by Guest Editorial Team

2020 figosdev

Index

Psychology's mental health series
Chapter 5: The Psychology of Developers

Summary: “It turns out, there are ways around a free license — you can make software “less free” or more imposing, without changing the license at all.”

Imagine a person shows up at your door. You offer them a seat, have some conversations with them, get to know a little bit about them. As it turns out, this person is looking for a place to stay. They’re willing to be your personal assistant, and all they ask in return is a desk to sit at, a small cot to sleep on and an Internet connection.

“You run upstairs and move the vase of flowers your assistant put in your bedroom, and find a small microphone.”Things go well initially. Your new assistant is constantly making various aspects of daily life easier. Want to buy something, see a film, go somewhere to eat? Your assistant takes care of everything, except driving. You notice they ask lots of personal questions, but you trust them — you can’t imagine anything would go wrong if you told them more about your life. Technically you have an assistant, but they seem more like a good friend. Besides, your friends don’t do all these things for you.

One day, your assistant is about to take a pile of envelopes to a post box. They drop them on the floor, and as you help to pick them up you notice they’re all addressed to the same corporation. Curious, you ask your assistant what they’re for.

“Oh, I tell them everything I learn about you in long, boring detail” your assistant says. “But that’s not what what I hired you for,” you say. “No,” your assistant replies — “that’s what THEY hired me for.”

“You move other objects your assistant put around the house, and find microphones and cameras. You ask your assistant what the hell is going on, but they tell you to relax.”You run upstairs and move the vase of flowers your assistant put in your bedroom, and find a small microphone. You move other objects your assistant put around the house, and find microphones and cameras. You ask your assistant what the hell is going on, but they tell you to relax.

“Look, they don’t do anything BAD with all this — it just helps me assist you! The more I know about you, the better I can help!”

You get some geeks from a nearby university to help you find and get rid of the rest of the corporate gadgetry in your home, and ask a lawyer how you can sue this person and their company. But when you go over the employment contract for your assistant, it turns out you agreed to all of this — it was simply put in vague terms that you didn’t stop to think about the implications of.

“Not all developers are evil, or narcissists — but with great power comes great responsibility.”Now imagine that the assistant is a robot. You buy it on sale and bring it home, and the rest of the story is more or less the same — they don’t even need the cot to sleep on. You’re told the microphones are voice activated, and work out for yourself that they only listen when you talk to them. Later on you find out this isn’t quite true, but you’re already used to thinking of it as something inert that only becomes active when you want it to.

Maybe you find that whole idea creepy, and wonder why people would actually shell out money for such intrusive technology. Meanwhile, actual companies are turning your phone and your PC into the same thing, and eventually you will have the same “features” in your home whether you go out and buy these robot assistants or not. As time moves forward, your thermostat, toaster oven, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner become just as creepy and presumptuous. Sadly, this sort of thing is no longer fiction.

“On their own, most developers are harmless.”There is a word for the sort of narcissist that cons you into giving them this much power in your life: “Developers”. Not all developers are evil, or narcissists — but with great power comes great responsibility.

If it’s privacy you’re trying to preserve, then the sure way to have it is for developers to not collect your data in the first place. If you want control over your own work on your computer, then you need to be able to put limits on what developers can do without you granting them specific access.

But how did we get to this dystopian reality? Aren’t “developers” the same people who make harmless toys like Pong, Mario and Final Fantasy games? Absolutely.

On their own, most developers are harmless. Its not like they’re a different species, you could even become one if you wanted. Developers sometimes form groups, groups sometimes create development frameworks and toolkits, and eventually if a framework or toolkit becomes powerful and popular enough, some developers get corrupted ethics and start to IMPOSE themselves on users.

“Developers sometimes form groups, groups sometimes create development frameworks and toolkits, and eventually if a framework or toolkit becomes powerful and popular enough, some developers get corrupted ethics and start to IMPOSE themselves on users.”Funnily enough, it’s often the most corrupt developers that expect the most gratitude. A humble developer is a wonderful thing, and if more people learned some coding skills and put a few more projects together, it might erode some of the power complex that has led developers to become spies and sell out users. However, there are reasons it’s not quite that simple.

You might have no interest in technology, and that is very understandable. But you are also surrounded by it — this technology exists in your pocket, your car, in the skies overhead and it is carried around by most people. Technology does have a good side — it can build the largest library that mankind has ever created. It can let you talk to your loved ones practically anywhere on the planet. Either way, technology is here. Much of it is programmable. Will you decide what it does, or will it decide what you do instead?

Knowledge is power, and being able to say “No” to the people that wire your home for eavesdropping and spy on everything you do is power as well. The strongest recommendation that can be given is — if you don’t wish to understand technology at all, avoid it as much as possible.

“As for developers, we can try to set a better example for them. And we can call them out when they stray from creating ethical software.”Henry David Thoreau was a minimalist for several reasons, among them not wanting to support unjust wars. If you do not wish to learn more about technology, or even if you do wish to learn more and want more control over the technology you own, being able to say “No” is one of the most important lessons you can learn. Say “No” to turning everyone’s home into part of a spy network. Say “Yes” to basic human rights.

As for developers, we can try to set a better example for them. And we can call them out when they stray from creating ethical software. But that will require better education for users.

The best place to start that education is with Free software, and coding.

Note if you will, this dichotomy between the idea of “user” and the idea of “developer”. While there are bad things that developers can do that users may not be able to do themselves, per se (a user can use software to do bad things, while a developer can design it to do them) the line between “user” and “developer” is artificial.

“It would still be useful to explore the politics and group behaviour that turn developers into unethical software authors.”A developer is someone who makes software — computers are designed for making and running software. A user is not only a potential developer by definition, but the line between the two used to be a lot smaller. As Chapter 2 explained, people used to buy magazines with programs to type in. If you could write an article for a magazine, you got to call yourself a writer. If you could write a program that other people would enjoy or find useful, you got to call yourself a developer.

It would still be useful to explore the politics and group behaviour that turn developers into unethical software authors. Understanding how that happens might give the rest of us a better idea of how the world can say “No” to software that takes advantage of the user.

“It turns out, there are ways around a free license — you can make software “less free” or more imposing, without changing the license at all.”For many years, Free software made incredible progress along just those lines. The politics have adapted, and now you have users of (allegedly) Free software doing oppressive things that users hate and resent. But don’t you worry, Free software says — the license means you can change it!

So why are things getting worse instead of improving? It turns out, there are ways around a free license — you can make software “less free” or more imposing, without changing the license at all. That too is part of this subject of ethical developers vs. corrupt development groups. And you will barely find the “Free Software Foundation” talking about this — they prefer to sidestep the topic and reframe it in old rhetoric!

If Free software won’t tackle this issue, and no one else will tackle this issue, so-called “free” software will become just as oppressive as “non-free” software. There are already real-life examples of this happening, though so far very few people have stepped forward to say “No” to any of it.

Licence: Creative Commons CC0 1.0 (public domain)

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Visual Proof That Twitter Very Likely Faked Its Magnitude the Moment Musk et al (KSA, Ellison and so on) Wanted to Buy

    There's a very compelling case for the allegation that Twitter is defrauding shareholders and participants in the platform; Twitter is a lot smaller than it used to be (fewer people are actively involved), it is losing money, and it is so desperate to be acquired that it's shamelessly faking traffic



  2. Links 27/05/2022: Wayland 1.21 Alpha, KDE Adds Flatpak and Snap Permissions to Discover

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 26, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 26, 2022



  4. Links 27/05/2022: Many More Microsoft Security Failures (and Spin/Lies)

    Links for the day



  5. Links 26/05/2022: KStars 3.5.9 and Chrome 103 Beta

    Links for the day



  6. Links 26/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 9.0, MooseX::Extended for Perl Introduced

    Links for the day



  7. Links 26/05/2022: Kernel Events and Systemd-Free GNU/Linux Distributions

    Links for the day



  8. Links 26/05/2022: DuckDuckGo Increasingly Exposed as Microsoft Proxy

    Links for the day



  9. EPO Celebrates Software Patents Again, Dubbing Them 'Hey Hi' (AI) and '4IR'

    The ludicrous state of the EPO is demonstrated by yesterday’s puff piece about “four million” (merely requests for monopoly in Europe; most come from outside Europe) and L’Oréal, which claims to have “invented” something that was already done in the 1990s if not the 1980s



  10. [Meme] EPO's Monkey Business: Lowering the Patent Examination Bar

    As we shall show in a moment, EPO President António Campinos has lowered the quality of patents and applications; sooner or later he might outsource the job to ‘livestock’



  11. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 25, 2022



  12. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves



  13. Links 26/05/2022: Plex Finally on GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  14. The General Consultative Committee of the EPO Exposes a Disaster and a Lack of Genuine Dialogue

    The General Consultative Committee (GCC) at the EPO deals with unlawful proposals from António Campinos (he’s happy to violate laws, constitutions, protocols, conventions, just like Benoît Battistelli did) and once again the abuses by managers is covered up; it’s as if the Office is run by unaccountable gangsters who arrogantly curse at everyone whilst insisting they’re the nicest people ever



  15. The Latest Letter to Josef Kratochvìl and the Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

    A week-old letter from the Central Staff Committee (CSC) to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation highlights the nature of a crisis; there's no genuine dialogue and staff of the EPO (i.e. the scientists who do all the actual work) is constantly under attack



  16. [Meme] The Recordings Must Have Accidentally Been Lost While Breaking the Rules

    The EPO‘s “nicest” chief, Monopoly Tony, won’t even mention the recordings…



  17. Links 25/05/2022: ‘V Rising’ on GNU/Linux and Pearl Linux OS 11

    Links for the day



  18. Links 25/05/2022: Librem Tries Another Approach

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 24, 2022



  20. Links 24/05/2022: nginx-1.22.0 and WordPress 6.0

    Links for the day



  21. [Meme] Divine Protection

    You won’t find Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) wearing a mask at the EPO because the rules of the Office do not apply to him



  22. António Campinos and the Alicante Clique (EPO Management, Appointed Based on Nepotism Despite Lack of Qualifications) Nowadays Exploiting Kids for PR Charades

    The sick old habit of exploiting kids for Public Relations (PR) and marketing purposes is all too common at the EPO (they’re constantly exploiting “the children” to associate criticism of the EPO with demeaning the young and innocent), but the management — which enjoys nepotism and immunity rather than relevant skills — carries on today and it’s being called “inaugural”



  23. [Meme] Snake on a Plane

    The EPO‘s President ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos), whom you never see wearing a mask (none of the photo ops; he does not even socially distance himself from peers, he wears sneakers instead of masks) during the height of a pandemic, is the "f***ing president"; don’t tell him to wear one…



  24. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XX — Entering Phase II

    We're about to resume the long-running series about the sick clique which ran GitHub until the assault on women became too much of a liability (among other wrongdoings and PR blunders)



  25. Links 24/05/2022: Fedora 37 Test Days and Tor Browser 11.0.13

    Links for the day



  26. Microsoft Vidal, as USPTO Director, Already Plays 'Political Cards' to Disguise and Deflect Away From the Corporate Agenda

    Microsoft Vidal, another corporate pawn in charge of the world’s most dangerous patent system, is using soft-spoken defle



  27. Links 24/05/2022: WAL-G 2.0

    Links for the day



  28. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 23, 2022



  29. Unethical Advertising, Published as So-called 'Articles', in CNX Software

    As we noted earlier this year, the CNX team is looking for money in the wrong places



  30. Links 23/05/2022: Broadcom to Buy VMware?

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts