02.11.22
Gemini version available ♊︎Where Sir Paul Mahoney Has Failed to Protect EPO Staff From Injustice and Sheer Abuse
Video download link | md5sum 58c7510d8e889a214c47342e56046646
Shallow Legal Theatre vs Juridical Sciences
Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0
Summary: EPO President Benoît Battistelli and EPO President António Campinos have got themselves a ‘British van der Eijk‘; The documents from within the EPO have made it clear that Sir Paul Mahoney was unwilling or simply incapable of matching staff’s expectations; instead of protecting staff’s basic, most fundamental rights he doubled down on abolition of such rights
THIS morning’s installment and tomorrow’s follow-up, which is a lot longer, will show readers the true track record of Sir Paul Mahoney, who is either too afraid or too complicit to do what’s right for the EPO. As of two weeks ago, Sir Paul Mahoney got two — not just one — very major and profound errors, leaving staff to suffer and ‘vindicating’ law-breaking managers. As we put it this morning, “the EPO’s internal appeals committee under Mahoney’s stewardship also saw fit to give a clean bill of legal health to Battistelli’s Orwellian “Social Democracy” project, another sinister liberticidal measure which was struck down by a seven-judge panel of the ILOAT on 27 January 2022.”
The video above discusses some of the status quo, but it’s a lot shorter than usual because we’re bracing for some server maintenance, as the next post will explain. █
Judges learn the job (or some implicit rules) quickly at the EPO
ᶃ Gemini Space
This post is also available in 
Content is available under CC-BY-SA