Does a grand evil conspiracy lie behind specific Desktop Environments?

[lefty]

Which ivy league school did you get a degree in spin doctoring from? Quite impressive..

Says the person who has 121 posts at this time of posting, mostly in this thread.

It would be interesting to see you actually respond at some point, rather than indulging in this infantile shodow-boxing, Mr. [Name redacted].

And my postings are completely in this thread, and nowhere else. And I've done virtually nothing here but to respond to the various lies and defamations from your accomplice, MICHAEL RUDRA NATH/JASON CHRISTOPHER HUGHES and you, [Name redacted] [Name redacted].

I think you need to add "Schlesianer"'s postings to your own score, in any case.

Given that you've stolen, defaced and illegally republished my photographs, as well as the photographs of James Duncan Davidson, on not one, but multiple occasions, and had to be forced to take them down via a valid DMCA complaint?unlike your own bogus one, and that you've maintained multiple IDs and web-sites dedicated to nothing other than harassing me, you're on pretty shaky ground here. I've got a slam-dunk showing a pattern of ongoing public harassment on your part, Mr. [Name redacted].

Just like your friend there.

[ender2070]

It would be interesting to see you actually respond at some point, rather than indulging in this infantile shodow-boxing, Mr. [Name redacted].

And my postings are completely in this thread, and nowhere else. And I've done virtually nothing here but to respond to the various lies and defamations from your accomplice, MICHAEL RUDRA NATH/JASON CHRISTOPHER HUGHES and you, [Name redacted] [Name redacted].

I think you need to add "Schlesianer"'s postings to your own score, in any case.

Given that you've stolen, defaced and illegally republished my photographs, as well as the photographs of James Duncan Davidson, on not one, but multiple occasions, and had to be forced to take them down via a valid DMCA complaint?unlike your own bogus one, and that you've maintained multiple IDs and web-sites dedicated to nothing other than harassing me, you're on pretty shaky ground here. I've got a slam-dunk showing a pattern of ongoing public harassment on your part, Mr. [Name redacted].

Just like your friend there.

Why don't you come to Brampton then? Speaking of your ongoing copyright infringement You know Canada has moral rights clauses in its copyright act?

[lefty]

Why don't you come to Brampton then? Speaking of your ongoing copyright infringement You know Canada has moral rights clauses in its copyright act?

I may well be coming to Brampton, if that's what's necessary to press criminal charges against you. It's a $500 round-trip plane ticket, and a half-hour ride from the airport.

Given that I have in my possession your written permission to publish your correspondence, which was sent to me without any solicitation on my part, you're going to have an interesting time, "moral rights" or not.

You've got the "moral right", if you care to assert it, to be identified as the author. You' however, asked that I not give out your identity, so I didn't. So which "moral right" are you talking about, precisely?

So what exactly is this copyright case you fantasize that you have? You think you're the first person ever to attempt to rescind a publication after having previously given permission?

Given your subsequent harassment of me and my ISP, and now my family and my employer, and your increasingly defamatory postings, on the web and on identi.ca, it might even occur to the court that you were looking for a pretext to harass me, albeit an especially moronic one.

(And by the way: copyright infringement, even were it to have?completely hypothetically speaking?actually occurred is a civil matter. The cops don't do that, the courts do, so you'd better have a case going and your paperwork ready to serve the day I arrive...)

What did I tell you about trying to practice law when you have no idea what you're talking about?

[ender2070]

I may well be coming to Brampton, if that's what's necessary to press criminal charges against you. It's a $500 round-trip plane ticket, and a half-hour ride from the airport.

Given that I have in my possession your written permission to publish your correspondence, which was sent to me without any solicitation on my part, you're going to have an interesting time, "moral rights" or not.

You've got the "moral right", if you care to assert it, to be identified as the author. You' however, asked that I not give out your identity, so I didn't. So which "moral right" are you talking about, precisely?

So what exactly is this copyright case you fantasize that you have? You think you're the first person ever to attempt to rescind a publication after having previously given permission?

Given your subsequent harassment of me and my ISP, and now my family and my employer, and your increasingly defamatory postings, on the web and on identi.ca, it might even occur to the court that you were looking for a pretext to harass me, albeit an especially moronic one.

(And by the way: copyright infringement, even were it to have?completely hypothetically speaking?actually occurred is a civil matter. The cops don't do that, the courts do, so you'd better have a case going and your paperwork ready to serve the day I arrive...)

What did I tell you about trying to practice law when you have no idea what you're talking about?

The judge will have a hard time finding the word "irrevocable" in any of the permission you were given.

[ender2070]

It is also my moral right to remain anonymous. Which you failed to do as you approved comments to be posted exposing my identity.

[lefty]

Speaking of your ongoing copyright infringement

Actually?since I've been, correctly, chided in the past here for not giving the backstory with the previous nitwit harasser in a coherent fashion?let me do that here. Mr. [Name redacted] (aka "Ender2070", aka "Schlesianer") can present his version if he cares to.

Several months ago, I received an email from Mr. [Name redacted] in connection with a site I run. I requested, and received, his permission to republish his email, which I did.

Mr. [Name redacted] subsequently decided that he didn't want me to publish his email after all. Since "the horse was out of the gate" at that point, and since I had taken his permission to be sincere and freely given, I refused.

Mr. [Name redacted] then sent my ISP what he imagined was a DMCA complaint. I responded to it (while in Tokyo on business, at 3 in the morning), and no further action was taken.

Mr. [Name redacted] then somehow came into possession of a photograph of me which I had only published on Facebook, through circumstances which remain unclear. He defaced it and republished it, and I was obliged to serve a DMCA complaint on him, and the photograph was taken down. No counter-notification was provided. During this period, Mr. [Name redacted] expressed his intention to use the photograph in a "comic strip" he had in mind.

Mr. [Name redacted] then provided my ISP with a second, this time closer-to-correct, DMCA infringement notice regarding his email. I complied with the terms of the act and filed a counter-notification, stating in detail my reasoning in believing that Mr. [Name redacted]'s claim was erroneous, and took the material down for 14 business days, during which time Mr. [Name redacted] was obligated to either institute actual legal action, or forfeit his claim. He took no action, and the material went back up.

Since that time, Mr. [Name redacted] has used the IDs "ender2070" (now deleted) and "boycottlefty" to harass and defame me, sending messages claiming that I'm a drug addict and a pedophile.

Further, he carried through with his previous intention and put up a blog at boycottlefty.wordpress.com with a defamatory "comic strip" titled "Mono Rangers", in which he not only infringed the copyright of the same photograph which had been at issue earlier, but a second photograph (taken by professional James Duncan Davidson, and?as with my photos, with a clear "All rights reserved" copyright notice attached) of me, both defaced, and again suggesting that I was a drug addict.

I was again obliged to provide him with a DMCA infringement notice, this time via Wordpress.com, and again, the photos were taken down. No counter-notification was filed. Mr. [Name redacted] however, maintains a public copy of this defamatory and infringing "comic strip" on a server which he describes as being "in Soviet Russia".

Now, Mr. [Name redacted] is an ongoing participant in direct harassment of myself here, and via his web site and via defamatory emails to various third-parties whose email addresses he's collected from various press releases related to my employment, as well being as a participant in the criminal harassment of my family.

That's my side of the story. What's yours, Mr. [Name redacted]?

[lefty]

It is also my moral right to remain anonymous. Which you failed to do as you approved comments to be posted exposing my identity.

I have no control over what goes into the comments of registered users of the site, and I don't see them until they're posted. That doesn't constitute a copyright complaint, and it certainly doesn't justify your subsequent?and ongoing?acts of direct and indirect criminal harassment and defamation.

If you have a legal gripe with me, sue me. You're a halfwit if you imagine that someone's pointing at your web site in a comment justifies your actions to date, as you're going to be discovering.

[lefty]

It is also my moral right to remain anonymous. Which you failed to do as you approved comments to be posted exposing my identity.

Also, please note that I neither confirmed nor denied any association between the site in question and the email itself. I think you asked me once whether I thought you were the only guy in Canada named "[Name redacted]", didn't you...?

Of course, once your harassment began, any agreements about anonymity went right out the window. That was your doing.

[lefty]

The judge will have a hard time finding the word "irrevocable" in any of the permission you were given.

He won't need to, Trust Me On This.

I guess if your legal counsel is guiding you this closely, then you must have also been acting under advice of your attorney when you made public claims that I was a drug addict, a pedophile, a pornographer, a cannibal, etc., right?

[L33F3R]

Why don't you come to Brampton then? Speaking of your ongoing copyright infringement You know Canada has moral rights clauses in its copyright act?

Why would you ever recommend that. NO. NO. NO. OMG. Never again. Not because of the rights federally, but Brampton?!? Indians and Newfies do not make a very solid combination for a community. No one, and i repeat NO ONE deserves to live in Brampton .