●● IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: Tuesday, December 01, 2020 ●● ● Dec 01 [00:03] *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [00:03] *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) [00:04] *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-173-112.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [00:05] *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-173-112.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [00:24] schestowitz Re: bit more time needed re art [00:24] schestowitz > Cheers, Roy, and have a fun week too! :-) ● Dec 01 [01:37] gry [TechrightsBN] www.minds.com | Hoorays for the Biden/Harris Victory, But the Battle's Fa... | Minds ● Dec 01 [09:44] schestowitz > If it is intended as HTML5, there are a few errors: [09:44] schestowitz > [09:44] schestowitz > https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Ftechrights.org%2Firc-archives%2Firc-log-techrights-301120.html [09:44] schestowitz More than a few, but I blame the software we use. On the WordPress side we have an error I could never get past... IF we want "tweets" to show up with the feature image. And I think it's worth the tradeoff. Stupid social control media 'extending' the standards... [09:44] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-validator.w3.org | Showing results for http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-techrights-301120.html - Nu Html Checker ● Dec 01 [14:30] schestowitz "Burning money to create a burning deck," the Committee of EPO staff called the building projects. "Management is currently censoring a CSC paper about Mr Campinos' building investment program," it noted. "Following a request from the CSC, we hereby provide you with the CSC paper." ● Dec 01 [21:05] schestowitz >>> If it is intended as HTML5, there are a few errors: [21:05] schestowitz >>> [21:05] schestowitz >>> https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Ftechrights.org%2Firc-archives%2Firc-log-techrights-301120.html [21:05] schestowitz >> More than a few, but I blame the software we use. On the WordPress side [21:05] schestowitz >> we have an error I could never get past... IF we want "tweets" to show [21:05] schestowitz >> up with the feature image. And I think it's worth the tradeoff. Stupid [21:05] schestowitz >> social control media 'extending' the standards... [21:05] schestowitz > Would it be feasible to archive the old Wordpress material as static [21:05] schestowitz > HTML and then do all the new articles using a static site generator? [21:05] schestowitz > Discussion could be referred to an SN journal or on the IRC channels. [21:05] schestowitz It would make editing and linking too hard. It should not be static; we'd lose a lot.