Join us now at the IRC channel.
| -->hook54321 (sid149355@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sklonmmshrrbilhq) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 00:25 | |
| -->pedro4 (sid145515@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-untcepcgktibamnq) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 00:29 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/MistyHa01259914/status/1217598332505292802\ | Jan 16 00:31 |
|---|---|---|
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@MistyHa01259914: @schestowitz @trolltrip Maybe we should all just get a Mac. | Jan 16 00:31 | |
| schestowitz | many of the same issues, but a different brand | Jan 16 00:31 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/Charbrevolution/status/1217602092812115969 | Jan 16 00:32 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Charbrevolution: @schestowitz They knew but didn't care | Jan 16 00:32 | |
| schestowitz | until this became a >public< issue | Jan 16 00:32 |
| <--pedro4 has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | Jan 16 00:43 | |
| <--hook54321 has quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | Jan 16 00:45 | |
| <--libertybox has quit (Remote host closed the connection) | Jan 16 02:09 | |
| -->libertybox (~schestowi@host81-154-169-2.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 02:37 | |
| -->acer-box__ (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 02:37 | |
| ---ChanServ gives channel operator status to acer-box__ | Jan 16 02:37 | |
| <--acer-box__ has quit (Client Quit) | Jan 16 02:37 | |
| <--libertybox has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) | Jan 16 02:38 | |
| -->libertybox (~schestowi@host81-154-169-2.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 02:39 | |
| -->acer-box__ (~acer-box@host81-154-169-2.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 02:39 | |
| <--acer-box__ has quit (Changing host) | Jan 16 02:39 | |
| -->acer-box__ (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 02:39 | |
| ---ChanServ gives channel operator status to acer-box__ | Jan 16 02:39 | |
| <--acer-box has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | Jan 16 02:39 | |
| schestowitz | Re: More Devuan censorship | Jan 16 02:54 |
| schestowitz | > Quote: (Me) | Jan 16 02:54 |
| schestowitz | > It is funny. Whatever error you encountered (Again, I think I found that one a year or so ago) it should be gone now. Proxies and other addresses are loading. | Jan 16 02:54 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > I can access via a proxy, but directly. I see the "dubious" message if I access via HTTP and the connection reset if I try HTTPS. This is from work, from home I can access it with no problems. I don't think I've ever actually posted the site from home however... in fact I'm 99% sure I haven't. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > I easily found a thread at dev1 which confirms that the SSL problem is really a spam blacklist, as suspected... https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=xxxx | Jan 16 02:55 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell- ( status 404 @ https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=xxxx ) | Jan 16 02:55 | |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > In the case of that OP, I'd suspect that it was probably a case of 'someone' adding an IP to that supposedly "fully automated" "barrier"... | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > Also a thread at the "palemoon" forum from a locked out user. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > In both cases, I think they were apparently unfortunate victims of the spam countermeasures. They talked about various browsers, but they also talked about tor and it's likely that tor usage would be a big flashing alarm for whatever you use - so it's possible they were simply unfortunate false positives. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > However in my case, it's not a shared, dynamic address which is being blocked - it's a static address, which is allocated to a company and which would never be used by anyone else and which is not located in any "suspicious" part of the world and which would never be sending spam or anything "dubious" and which doesn't in fact feature on any public blacklists visible on the web... hence I think it's deliberate and I can see the humour | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | in that. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > My last post at dev1 was in April last year. I left around that time and about a month before that had clashed with golinux at DUF: | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > http://www.debianuserforums.org/view...p=xxxxx | Jan 16 02:55 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell- ( status 404 @ http://www.debianuserforums.org/view...p=xxxxx ) | Jan 16 02:55 | |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > I noticed the "error" very soon after that time. At the time I just dismissed it, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense and comes across as the kind of thing she would do... | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > It doesn't bother me at all - it intrigues me somewhat and of course further confirms my beliefs that she is a rather resentful and spiteful control freak. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > Quote: | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > So few people over there understand these things. I admit, if I were in charge of it some things would throw me as well. But they've got someone who isn't technical in charge, which makes absolutely no sense-- except that's just how they roll. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > They've got someone, who is both not technical and not really ethical at all and is very much "do as I say, not as I do", who preaches and removes, censors and harasses perceived threats. | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | > I see my "censorship" as just part of that expected behaviour... | Jan 16 02:55 |
| schestowitz | Re: Fwd: Software patents in China | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > My Chinese friend Feynman Liang | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > <https://bastianbest.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=faf780d7e9e9d15d30e763ed6&id=9c3eb1fed7&e=4906b2581c> told | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > me that the Chinese Patent Office has updated its Guidelines for Patent | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > Examination, including some changes for inventions involving algorithm | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > features and business rules. | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 03:03 |
| schestowitz | > As far as I understand these guidelines, *subject-matter eligibility* is | Jan 16 03:03 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-www.innotrack.cn | Feynman LIANG | Jan 16 03:03 | |
| schestowitz | > tested in two steps: | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > 1. Does the claim include technical features? | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > 2. Does the claim recite technical means adopted to solve a technical | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > problem? | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > Concerning *inventive step*, if the algorithmic features of the claim | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > contribute to the technical solution, they have to be considered in the | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > inventive step assessment. | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > To me, this sounds very similar to the German framework for assessing | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > computer-implemented inventions. In Germany, we also have a *two-step | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > eligibility test* (in contrast to the EPO’s more pragmatic “any | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > hardware” approach), and inventive step can be based only on the | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > technical part of the claim. | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > The amendments will enter into force on 1 Feb 2020. | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > Cheers, | Jan 16 03:04 |
| schestowitz | > xxxx | Jan 16 03:04 |
| -->hook54321 (sid149355@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rqjgycckbmemnhcj) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 07:00 | |
| -->pedro4 (sid145515@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kobmynghjjtanmzy) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 07:01 | |
| schestowitz | I got alerted about TM b y email. | Jan 16 08:08 |
| schestowitz | I could ssh to get prompted for a password, but then it would not accept anything I put it. It'd just freeze. The site was not accessible and HV showed very high CPU usage on then VM.... very odd. | Jan 16 08:08 |
| schestowitz | Anyway, I had to reboot it. | Jan 16 08:08 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/hm_belcher/status/1217655084605030400 | Jan 16 08:49 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@hm_belcher: BILL GATES DEEPLY CORRUPT... MY EXPERT WITNESSES WILL BE FILING OUR COMPLAINTS IN A COURT DOCK ET https://t.co/JfTYr0T6Ok | Jan 16 08:49 | |
| schestowitz | " | Jan 16 08:49 |
| schestowitz | BILL GATES DEEPLY CORRUPT... | Jan 16 08:49 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | Bill Gates Deeply Corrupt Not Just in Education Sector | Techrights | Jan 16 08:49 | |
| schestowitz | MY EXPERT WITNESSES WILL BE FILING OUR COMPLAINTS IN A COURT DOCK ET | Jan 16 08:49 |
| schestowitz | " | Jan 16 08:49 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/samvittighed/status/1217722029308182529 | Jan 16 08:51 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@samvittighed: @zoobab @schestowitz Did the video from https://t.co/NO6SYXvwSw come online? | Jan 16 08:51 | |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> events.ccc.de | Session:NO Unitary Software Patents - 36C3 Wiki | Jan 16 08:51 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/MistyHa01259914/status/1217630188638355456 | Jan 16 08:52 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@MistyHa01259914: @schestowitz @trolltrip I'm not too surprised. Thank you. | Jan 16 08:52 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/zoobab/status/1217733260232609792 | Jan 16 09:52 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@zoobab: @samvittighed @schestowitz It was not recorded, but we mostly talked about the points of the petition… https://t.co/SBVQuG0irS | Jan 16 09:52 | |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@zoobab: @samvittighed @schestowitz It was not recorded, but we mostly talked about the points of the petition… https://t.co/SBVQuG0irS | Jan 16 09:52 | |
| schestowitz | "It was not recorded, but we mostly talked about the points of the petition http://blog.ffii.org/manifestation-contre-le-brevet-logiciel-unitaire-jeudi-12-decembre-a-bruxelles/ … Still need a proper english translation, I am working on it." | Jan 16 09:52 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-blog.ffii.org | Manifestation contre le Brevet Logiciel Unitaire, jeudi 12 décembre à Bruxelles | Blog.FFII.org | Jan 16 09:52 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/StarchyArchie/status/1217745582850301952 | Jan 16 09:53 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@StarchyArchie: @schestowitz #IllGates! 😄 🖥️🤒😜🤪 | Jan 16 09:53 | |
| schestowitz | oops :-) | Jan 16 09:53 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/django_stiglitz/status/1217748410582753281 | Jan 16 10:22 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@django_stiglitz: @schestowitz I grew up with 1.44 MB diskettes. You shook be able to fit one wepage on a disk | Jan 16 10:22 | |
| schestowitz | to read this article, which is 4 paragraphs long, please enter disk #2 (out of 10). Estimated time to load: 3 hours. | Jan 16 10:23 |
| schestowitz | " | Jan 16 10:46 |
| schestowitz | old: #evangelicals #antichrist | Jan 16 10:46 |
| schestowitz | https://benjaminlcorey.com/could-american-evangelicals-spot-the-antichrist-heres-the-biblical-predictions/ | Jan 16 10:46 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-www.benjaminlcorey.com | Could American Evangelicals Spot the Antichrist? Here Are the Biblical Predictions: - Benjamin L. Corey | Jan 16 10:46 | |
| schestowitz | #benjaminlcorey ... long read | Jan 16 10:46 |
| schestowitz | i have read it - interesting | Jan 16 10:46 |
| schestowitz | " | Jan 16 10:46 |
| schestowitz | response | Jan 16 10:46 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/2Fflandro/status/1217763162725998593 | Jan 16 11:50 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@2Fflandro: @schestowitz BREAKING: Bernie Sanders field operative exposed as radical eco-fascist, demands mass killings of cons… https://t.co/Vd7nDD6d3w | Jan 16 11:50 | |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@2Fflandro: @schestowitz BREAKING: Bernie Sanders field operative exposed as radical eco-fascist, demands mass killings of cons… https://t.co/Vd7nDD6d3w | Jan 16 11:50 | |
| schestowitz | "BREAKING: Bernie Sanders field operative exposed as radical eco-fascist, demands mass killings of conservatives to save “the entire human race” and “planet Earth” – video" | Jan 16 11:50 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/SleepyPenguin1/status/1217763570273918977 | Jan 16 11:50 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@SleepyPenguin1: @schestowitz Can be a struggle. See also for extensions... https://t.co/LfekmJLRsc | Jan 16 11:50 | |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> www.privacytools.io | PrivacyTools - Encryption Against Global Mass Surveillance | Jan 16 11:50 | |
| schestowitz | " | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | A referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is misplaced to say the least. There are a plurality of reasons for this. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | There is a large body of case law according to which the transfer of the priority right has been assessed by the Board and the way the Opposition Division has used it is clearly following this case law. There is no divergent case law, hence no need to address the Enlarged Board. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | The interpretation by the proprietors of “any” person is biased to say the least. When looking at the raison d’être of the priority right, is to avoid self-collision, not to avoid prior art made public in the priority interval by the applicant himself, should its priority not be valid. This is exactly what happened here. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | “A” person having filed a first application in a member state of the Paris Convention, can file a further application claiming priority of the original application. If “a plurality of persons” have filed a first application, the priority right can only be exercised by the same plurality of persons in a subsequent filing. At least the rights of all the original applicants should have been transferred to the subsequent applicant. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | If it would be accepted that only part of the persons having filed a ´first application would be allowed to file a subsequent application, this would amount to a perversion of the priority right. One of the original applicants could simply decide to file a subsequent application with the other applicants being left to claim property of the subsequent application once filed. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | There is also a danger that the subsequent patent could be revoked at national level. Art 138 (1,e) provides that a patent can revoked if the proprietor of the European patent is not entitled. By not mentioning all the applicants in the original applicant in the priority application, the subsequent patent could thus be endangered. It is however correct that only an applicant having been squeezed out could request such a revocation. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | The problem at stake is only occurring due to some idiosyncrasies of US legislation with respect to provisional applications. If an exception would be made for US applicants as far priority is concerned, it would also derogate to the second pillar of the Paris Convention, i.e. that all applicants have to be treated on a par. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | If the ecxeption would be valid for US applicants, I see in it a further manifestation of extra-territoriality of US law. The rest of the world, especially Europe is suffering enough from the extensive application of US law abroad, which is actually merely used to get read of competition and nothing else. Enough is enough. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | It is to the USA to make their legislation in accordance with the general principles of priority which are existing long enough, and not to other patent offices to follow US legislation. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | The question at stake is certainly not a question of fundamental importance, as it boils down to act in favour of certain applicants stemming from the US. The case is important as a lot of money at stake, but this is not a criterion on which a referral should be based. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | If the Board would be referring a question to the Enlarged Board, one could also consider that the referring Board is chickening out from taking its responsibilities in view of existing case law. It would simply take into account the important financial impact of an adverse decision for the applicant’s money, but this is not an argument which should bother the Board. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | Should nevertheless a referral to the Enlarged Board occur, I hope that the latter would dismiss the referral as not admissible. Enough reasons have been given above here. | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | ' | Jan 16 13:22 |
| schestowitz | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2020/01/crispr-hearing-days-2-3-board-of-appeal.html?showComment=1579158662348#c638343834580622722 | Jan 16 13:22 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-ipkitten.blogspot.com | CRISPR hearing days 2-3: Board of Appeal poised to refer to the EBA? - The IPKat | Jan 16 13:22 | |
| <--social_log has quit (Quit: Leaving.) | Jan 16 16:32 | |
| -->social_log (~roy@host81-154-169-2.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 16:33 | |
| <--rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) | Jan 16 18:31 | |
| -->MinceR_ (~mincer@unaffiliated/mincer) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 18:36 | |
| <--MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | Jan 16 18:39 | |
| ---MinceR_ is now known as MinceR | Jan 16 19:00 | |
| -->X-Scale (~ARM@31.22.202.34) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 22:12 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/invictusjuvat/status/1217890783342272513 | Jan 16 22:23 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@invictusjuvat: @simonkidwell @shaunattwood @bbc5live @tonylivesey @chriswarburton_ Mansion of Pedophilia – Part I: Bill Gates Has… https://t.co/mPi0aObvH5 | Jan 16 22:23 | |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@invictusjuvat: @simonkidwell @shaunattwood @bbc5live @tonylivesey @chriswarburton_ Mansion of Pedophilia – Part I: Bill Gates Has… https://t.co/mPi0aObvH5 | Jan 16 22:23 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/TallElfin/status/1217912545857691649 | Jan 16 22:23 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@TallElfin: @schestowitz What's a "Chromebook"? :D | Jan 16 22:23 | |
| schestowitz | Like a "Mac" Book, just some laptop with branding | Jan 16 22:24 |
| MinceR | not all of them are as low quality as "mac" books though :> | Jan 16 22:28 |
| <--oiaohm has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) | Jan 16 23:38 | |
| -->oiaohm (~oiaohm@unaffiliated/oiaohm) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 16 23:39 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!