●● IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: Sunday, May 16, 2021 ●● ● May 16 [02:04] schestowitz__ http://suepo.org/may_2021_press_articles/d-47418 [02:04] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-suepo.org | [02:04] schestowitz__ " [02:04] schestowitz__ (Kluwer Patent Blog published on 11/05/2021) A Few More Thoughts on Normality. [02:04] schestowitz__ The Kluwer article links to the following blog publication (original French version): ""Vers une nouvelle normalit": contribution de MM. Jacques Michel et Willy Minnoye". [02:04] schestowitz__ Click here for the English translation. [02:04] schestowitz__ " [02:09] schestowitz__ http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/05/board-of-appeal-upholds-principle-of.html?showComment=1620755643036#c3856115494082489908 [02:10] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Board of Appeal upholds the principle of "any person" opposition in view of the broader public good (T 1839/18) - The IPKat [02:10] schestowitz__ " [02:10] schestowitz__ Filing an anonymous opposition by a patent agent is also risky, the uninterested party might be discovered by social engineering. Using public resources like registers or social networks you might find a link between the patent agent and the uninterested person. Even if you use an unknown patent agent, usually suggested by you usual patent agent, there is a risk of discovering a link between both patent agents... [02:10] schestowitz__ If anonymity is the real concern you should consider to use a commercial service provider like e.g. www.ghost-ip.com This could also solve the problem of anonymous experimental data or? It might not solve the problem of a technical experts attending the oral proceedings. [02:10] schestowitz__ " [02:10] schestowitz__ http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/05/board-of-appeal-upholds-principle-of.html?showComment=1620811905967#c6468941842585004746 [02:10] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Board of Appeal upholds the principle of "any person" opposition in view of the broader public good (T 1839/18) - The IPKat [02:10] schestowitz__ " [02:10] schestowitz__ Wow, there sure seem to be a lot of patent agents around filing oppositions! [02:10] schestowitz__ I used to see individual attorneys taking on the role of the strawperson, but I think this has fallen out of favour. I forget exactly why naming an individual was ever seen as preferable to filing in the name of a firm or a made-for-the-purpose shell company. It's a bit morbid, but I always wondered what would happen if that individual died while the opposition was ongoing. [02:10] schestowitz__ " [02:45] schestowitz__ > Bastian Best [02:45] schestowitz__ > In case you havent heard it through the grapevine already: Im leaving [02:45] schestowitz__ > Bardehle Pagenberg after 13 years (!) to start my own solo patent practice. [02:45] schestowitz__ > Unlike many solo practitioners, Im not going to offer the whole [02:45] schestowitz__ > vendors tray of intellectual property. Quite the contrary, my strategy [02:45] schestowitz__ > is to hyper-focus: *only patent prosecution, only for digital and [02:45] schestowitz__ > software-related inventions*. [02:45] schestowitz__ > Im extremely excited about this new phase! And there will be plenty of [02:45] schestowitz__ > learnings to share on this email list for sure. [02:45] schestowitz__ > My new firm will officially launch on 16 May. In the meantime, dont be [02:45] schestowitz__ > shy and let me have any tips you want to share. [02:45] schestowitz__ > ● May 16 [08:38] schestowitz__ Today I offload 60gb of video (raw stuff) to the 3 external drives for storage, as they clog up the main drive (SSD). I've listed all video in http://techrights.org/videos.html and I hope I did not accidentally list something I ought NOT ;-) if you can double-check by gazing/clicking... lots of stuff there [08:38] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-techrights.org | Techrights Full Videos Listing [08:57] schestowitz__ NEWS #Phoronix # Fedora 35 Might Drop Installer Option To "Allow SSH Root Login With Password" https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-35-Install-Root-SSH-PW [08:57] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-www.phoronix.com | Linux Hardware Reviews, Open-Source Benchmarks & Linux Performance - Phoronix [08:57] schestowitz__
[08:58] schestowitz__A Fedora 35 change proposal submitted this week that is ruffling some feathers is over removing the "allow SSH root login with password" option from Fedora's Anaconda installer.
[08:58] schestowitz__The past several years there has been a Fedora installer option to "allow SSH root login with password" to enable password-based logins over SSH. This hasn't been enabled by default but simply offered as an option for those wanting a password based login.
[08:58] schestowitz__With Fedora 35 this autumn the change proposal wants to eliminate this option from the installer. The basis is that the option was planned to only be temporary and security benefits in just dropping the option to encourage users to rely on SSH keys, etc.
[08:58] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nxos.org | Nitrux #YourNextOS A Linux for Everyone [08:58] schestowitz__For the better part of three years, we have remained silent about your ongoing efforts to affect peoples perception of our Linux distribution continuously. We have tried our best not to engage with your evident hostility and disregard to inform your viewers and visitors about correct facts of the Linux distributions you display on your website, especially ours.
[08:58] schestowitz__However, we have decided to take a stance. It is today, the 6th of May, that we gallantly demand you to stop.
[08:58] schestowitz__We do not accept for one more minute that the information displayed on your website about our product remains erroneous in what is no longer a mistake or oversight on your part. In addition, we do not accept the way you have chosen to describe our product, including making an absolute wild claim that we did not offer our product to the public before an arbitrary date, even if that is easily [08:58] schestowitz__ refuted.
[08:58] schestowitz__It looks like Nitrux's page on DistroWatch provides incorrect information, which the maintainer isn't willing to update yet.