Join us now at the IRC channel.
| -->swagg_boi (~swaggboi@2601:151:c301:20f1:225:90ff:fe57:2da4) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 19 00:39 | |
| <--swaggboi has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | Jan 19 00:40 | |
| -->swaggboi (~swaggboi@2601:151:c301:20f1:225:90ff:fe57:2da4) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 19 02:38 | |
| <--swagg_boi has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | Jan 19 02:39 | |
| schestowitz | MINDS is trying to silence me and is lying about the reasons: | Jan 19 05:50 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz | ==== | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Sorry about that | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Minds | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Unbanned | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Jan 10, 2020, 1:25 AM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Thank you for rectifying this so quickly. I was a little shocked and felt insulted at first. Have a great day. | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Jan 10, 2020, 1:31 AM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | the account was banned again | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | why?? | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 4:09 AM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | I cannot even log in to appeal | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | "due to the following reason: | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 8.0 | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | " | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | That does not even make any sense | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Banned without proper English reason twice in a week | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | what is going on? | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | you did it again ... why? | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 5:09 AM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Minds | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Screenshot? | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 2:49 PM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | When I log in it says accounts "banned". The emails say the same, so I don't think it's a bug, my gut feeling is saying that some moderator does not like my political views and looks for ways to deploatform me. Please, can you investigate? Thanks in advance. | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 5:11 PM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Screenshot | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | No it isnt that | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Minds | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | It is a bug | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 5:11 PM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | wow | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | this bug really insults me, it's a critical one to fix, I poured so much effort into the site | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | I will screenshot it | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 5:12 PM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | Minds | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | unabnned | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | 5:15 PM | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | oh | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | now I am in | Jan 19 05:50 |
| schestowitz | I only managed to get a screenshot of logic screen | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | Image | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | otherwise, it seems like I'm in, then for two seconds it says banned, then back to login page | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | Seems like a bug in MINDS is the reason some people get banned for no reason. A bug. Maybe security-related? Remote de-platforming? | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | you cannot post as much as you are posting | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | are you using an automated tool | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | Minds | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | you are getting flagged | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | 5:57 PM | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | no, nothing automated | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | I post the same in mastodon though, I paste it in | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | Now I get totally inconsistent stories about why #MINDS keeps banning me (then unbanning). The inconsistency necessarily implies lying. | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | How many times a day do you post | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | Minds | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | And why doesnt anything have a thunbnail | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | 7:37 PM | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | I post on average 250 a day, I think, recently I didn't add a spacebar to let it load up a thumbnail. I will add that. | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | ====== | Jan 19 05:51 |
| schestowitz | > Was checking out staff at Medina PD where Gates lives. | Jan 19 06:30 |
| schestowitz | > Look how many people from Homeland Security work there. | Jan 19 06:30 |
| schestowitz | > https://web.archive.org/web/20200117204358/https://www.medina-wa.gov/index.asp?SEC=DF8ED795-58DB-47CE-87D4-F9DD600B0ECC | Jan 19 06:30 |
| schestowitz | > Started digging into who was working there during the arrest date but got interrupted and have to go now. | Jan 19 06:30 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-web.archive.org | Command & Staff - Medina, Washington | Jan 19 06:30 | |
| schestowitz | > Just thought I’d pass it along. | Jan 19 06:30 |
| schestowitz | > Tweet made on date of arrest/search. | Jan 19 06:30 |
| schestowitz | This one seems rather innocuous (the overlap in dates) and I'd barely count that as noteworthy, IMHO :-) | Jan 19 06:30 |
| schestowitz | > "Fusion Center” | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | > https://www.linkedin.com/in/steve-burns-ab711379/ | Jan 19 06:32 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell- ( status 999 @ https://www.linkedin.com/in/steve-burns-ab711379/ ) | Jan 19 06:32 | |
| schestowitz | > | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | > Doesn’t look like he worked in Medina at the time but interesting that | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | > this small little town of elites has this level of local law enforcement. | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | If we think from the point of view or super rich needing their private army, mercenaries etc. ('pitchforks' scenario), I guess this one counts as... well, tasteless but not too shocking. :-) | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | It's good that you dig into these things regardless. | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | I've just come back home from a short holiday, will catch up today. | Jan 19 06:32 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxx sent you a Direct Message. | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:01 | |
| schestowitz | The latest comment was marked as off topic, but you can choose to see it. I posted to a xxxxxxx team member at the github site and got this response: | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | xxxxx 3 hours ago Member | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxxxx was that conflict of interest label for me? No problem, if so. I used to work with xxxxxx, but resigned xxxxxx. 1. I have always made that very clear in my bios and if anyone asks me. No, we have a team member whom I cannot name and whom I hope will come up who has been offered a job by xxxx and we are having a bit of disagreement within the team on how to handle that. In my opinion the person should tell about it by themselves | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | as I fear it could sway people close to them in the team into accepting xxxx getting relisted in fear of making them lose the opportunity thus making this a conflict of interest and I see a potential conflict of interest even if the team swore to not care about their employment. | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | : https://github.com/xxxxxx | Jan 19 07:01 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-github.com | xxxxxx (aaaaa) · GitHub | Jan 19 07:01 | |
| schestowitz | Must see: xxxxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:01 | |
| schestowitz | "Anyway, i say we do not re add xxx, but we should keep an eye on them, they broke trust, causing them to be removed, quickly coming up with answers after that trust was broken doesn't make on immediately trusted again, the damage has already been done. However, being delisted does not mean that the trust cannot be restored, see matrix/riot as example, which got relisted after a significant amount of time by hard work. | Jan 19 07:01 |
| schestowitz | "We should keep an eye on xxxxxxx, for when it becomes better, or in another case, worse. If xxxxxxxx can keep its independence for a long period without any actual changes, then i would be more willing to give in my vote, but for now, i vote to not re list them, and keep a close eye on the for any changes in the situation." | Jan 19 07:03 |
| schestowitz | is it ok to say xxxxxx may be trying to pay its way into re-acceptance, without disclosing pertinent details? | Jan 19 07:03 |
| schestowitz | We've got a rather big story about xxxxxxxxx coming... | Jan 19 07:03 |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:03 | |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:03 | |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:04 | |
| schestowitz | Hi. I think you should find out what the truth is first IMHO. You could ask, but indicate that you are investigating. | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | relist xxxxxxx in Search Engines by danarel · Pull Request #1592 · xxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | github.com | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | I've posted a follow-up question that I hope get a forthright response. See: | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | 4:02 PM | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Some people are concerned the post might be removed it seems so it has been archived here: xxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | There is more posted since that archive btw | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | I'm going to archive the thing myself now, too. | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | 4:06 PM | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Here's the archive I made that includes my new response: | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Off the record, of course. I suspect xxxxxxx is already working with xxxxxx or courting them. Check out his xxxxxxx Twitter feed and hisxxxxxxx website where he makes SP his top pick -- without any warning label. | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Quote Tweet | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | · Nov 25, 2019 | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Replying toxxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | I'd like to know, too, xxxxx -- especially since you recently de-listed xxxxxxx. Maybe you are re-listing both? Did you see that xxxxxx *does* share "fuzzed" data with pay-per-click ad company xxxxxx? It's like pulling teeth, but more info is surfacing. | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Here's a twitter thread with his announcement: | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | xxxxxxxxx | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | He responded behind my back claiming I was harassing him by asking why. I was puzzled as to why he suddenly turned on me. He has also attacked other privacy advocates who have questioned the new xxxxxxxxx ownership. | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Maybe there's another PTIO person, too? I hope they are forthcoming. | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:04 | |
| schestowitz | no response at all | Jan 19 07:04 |
| schestowitz | Jan 19 07:04 | |
| social_log | https://twitter.com/StarchyArchie/status/1218782837870157825 | Jan 19 19:06 |
| -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@StarchyArchie: @schestowitz #Oops #Iran #Ukraine 🇮🇷✈️💥🇺🇦 | Jan 19 19:06 | |
| -->X-Scale` (~ARM@131.61.158.5.rev.vodafone.pt) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 19 21:29 | |
| <--X-Scale has quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | Jan 19 21:31 | |
| ---X-Scale` is now known as X-Scale | Jan 19 21:31 | |
| -->X-Scale` (~ARM@31.22.146.189) has joined #boycottnovell | Jan 19 22:07 | |
| <--X-Scale has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | Jan 19 22:08 | |
| ---X-Scale` is now known as X-Scale | Jan 19 22:09 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!