Techrights logo

IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Join us now at the IRC channel.

schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/kaddourkardio/status/1321208225237270528Oct 28 03:05
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@kaddourkardio: @schestowitz viva #Mahrez 🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿Oct 28 03:05
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/maubaq/status/1321081545323589641\Oct 28 03:05
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@maubaq: @schestowitz what does based on thunderbolt means?Oct 28 03:05
schestowitzhttps://pleroma.site/notice/A0aTRiBwcJ2WsDaOJMOct 28 03:07
schestowitz"Oct 28 03:07
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-social.librem.one | Placeholder Name: "How do you best enforce your copyright as a small…" - Librem SocialOct 28 03:07
schestowitzHow do you best enforce your copyright as a small developer against #GPLviolations from a large company?Oct 28 03:07
schestowitzIf you knew of a #GPL violation which the copyright owner felt unable to enforce, when would it be appropriate to try to stir up public fury to shame the company into doing the right thing?Oct 28 03:07
schestowitz@schestowitzOct 28 03:07
schestowitz"Oct 28 03:07
schestowitzIt's never too early to shame themOct 28 03:07
schestowitzhttps://pleroma.site/notice/A0ajPDpW82CFOavkrwOct 28 03:07
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-qoto.org | Phaedrus: "@schestowitz@pleroma.site You have to smile at …" - Qoto MastodonOct 28 03:07
schestowitz"You have to smile at the queens BBC talking about it"Oct 28 03:07
schestowitzhttps://pleroma.site/notice/A0b0Me6pfHcFFeO3DkOct 28 03:07
schestowitz"my newpipe refuses to play this."Oct 28 03:08
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-linuxrocks.online | NixiИ: "@schestowitz@pleroma.site my newpipe refuses to p…" - LinuxRocks.OnlineOct 28 03:08
*rianne (~rianne@host81-154-169-118.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovellOct 28 08:27
*rianne__ has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 28 08:27
schestowitzx https://www.computerworld.com/article/3276276/microsoft-teams-its-features-how-it-compares-to-slack-and-other-rivals.htmlOct 28 08:53
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-www.computerworld.com | Microsoft Teams: How to use it, and how it stacks up to Slack and Zoom | ComputerworldOct 28 08:53
schestowitzx https://qz.com/1918570/how-businesses-are-leveraging-tiktoks-growth-to-drive-engagement/Oct 28 08:53
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-qz.com | How businesses are leveraging Tiktok’s growth to drive engagement — QuartzOct 28 08:53
*asusbox has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 28 16:26
*asusbox (~rianne@host81-154-169-118.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovellOct 28 16:27
*rianne has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 28 19:08
*rianne (~rianne@host81-154-169-118.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovellOct 28 19:08
*rianne has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Oct 28 19:29
*rianne (~rianne@host81-154-169-118.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovellOct 28 19:29
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/PCribbett/status/1321591444344197121\Oct 28 23:29
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@PCribbett: @schestowitz Yes! #WarOnCash! 🤔😱👉https://t.co/8TdqSCVZJHOct 28 23:29
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@PCribbett: Negative Interest Rates Policy! #NIRP! #WarOnCash! #CashBan! The New Relationship Between You, the Bank and what y… https://t.co/Tjolc9x7cBOct 28 23:29
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/iridesce57/status/1321570485986041859Oct 28 23:30
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@iridesce57: @schestowitz #BehindPaywallOct 28 23:30
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/NagasRetro/status/1321568404063571973Oct 28 23:30
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@NagasRetro: I dunno, it sounds like those two womyn are just bigoted against men and thy boys are trying to make the best of it. https://t.co/sip3CZPBiaOct 28 23:30
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@schestowitz: #LinuxFoundation (Men for #Monopolies ) Once Again Hijacking Women's (and Minorities') Voices for #PublicRelations… https://t.co/mce3hAIVR0Oct 28 23:30
schestowitz"Oct 28 23:30
schestowitzI dunno, it sounds like those two womyn are just bigoted against men and thy boys are trying to make the best of it.Oct 28 23:30
schestowitzQuote TweetOct 28 23:30
schestowitz"Oct 28 23:30
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/jimmyroybloom/status/1321489516587343874Oct 28 23:30
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@jimmyroybloom: .... https://t.co/9suPeth77AOct 28 23:30
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/Rick4312/status/1321396703719731200Oct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Rick4312: Surprise, surprise..... https://t.co/1wHjf7DlAkOct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@schestowitz: ● NEWS ● #Counterpunch #Finance ☞ The Trump Tax Reform Helped the Billionaire Class, Not the Working Class… https://t.co/Df13KhpVrkOct 28 23:31
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/glynmoody/status/1321388946446819330Oct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@glynmoody: amazing https://t.co/AFpUCNE41EOct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@schestowitz: ● NEWS ● #ClimateNewsNetwork ☞ #Africa desert is home to abundant forest growth https://t.co/Mkgl4VGvFgOct 28 23:31
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/Rick4312/status/1321379955012489216Oct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Rick4312: @schestowitz Severest political crisis in US since tricky Dicky Nixon. Combined with ultra conservatieve #SCOTUS Tr… https://t.co/v4PmBN5ahtOct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Rick4312: @schestowitz Severest political crisis in US since tricky Dicky Nixon. Combined with ultra conservatieve #SCOTUS Tr… https://t.co/v4PmBN5ahtOct 28 23:31
schestowitz"Severest political crisis in US since tricky Dicky Nixon. Combined with ultra conservatieve #SCOTUS Trump might reject the outcome of the upcoming elections."Oct 28 23:31
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/kaddourkardio/status/1321208225237270528Oct 28 23:31
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@kaddourkardio: @schestowitz viva #Mahrez 🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿Oct 28 23:31
schestowitzhttp://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/10/23/ffii-preparing-constitutional-complaint-against-unified-patent-court-agreement/#commentsOct 28 23:43
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | FFII preparing constitutional complaint against Unified Patent Court Agreement - Kluwer Patent BlogOct 28 23:43
schestowitz"Oct 28 23:43
schestowitzThe argument is quite obvious: The ratification of the UPC is an amendment of the constitution such that EU law has primacy in view of the other provisions of the constitution in respect of all matters relating to the UPC. This has been confirmed in the interview of the judge rapporteur in his interview regarding the ECB judgment as already discussed on this blog:Oct 28 23:43
schestowitzhttp://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/05/18/primacy-of-eu-law-over-national-law-german-federal-constitutional-court-judge-comments-on-unified-patent-court-decision/Oct 28 23:43
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | Primacy of EU Law over National Law – German Federal Constitutional Court Judge Comments On Unified Patent Court Decision - Kluwer Patent BlogOct 28 23:43
schestowitzThat is clearly against the core of the constitution since it needs to have primacy in view of any EU law. There are only some situations in which the constitutional court does not apply the provisions of the constitution but e.g. the charter of fundamental rights of the EU. But that does not mean that they have primacy in view of the respective provisions of the constitution then.Oct 28 23:43
schestowitzConcerned observerOct 28 23:43
schestowitzOCTOBER 27, 2020 AT 11:02 AMOct 28 23:44
schestowitzPeter, a legislator securing a 2/3 majority may be able to achieve all sorts of things. However, any purported amendment of the Basic Law should surely be presented (and debated) as such, instead of being hidden as some sort of unexplained consequence of other legislation. Otherwise, and purported overwriting of the Basic Law would lack democratic legitimacy.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzAttentive ObserverOct 28 23:44
schestowitzOCTOBER 27, 2020 AT 8:59 AMOct 28 23:44
schestowitzDear Peter Parker,Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzIn principle one cannot but agree with you when you claim that with a 2/3 majority the German Bundestag and Bundesrat can decide very important changes in the structure of the country. You have however forgotten one very important aspect: any such vote should be preceded by a proper debate with the pro and cons of the measure to be voted be put clearly on the table.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzAnd here lies the problem. When you look at the explanatory note prepared by the ministry of justice, you will have to see that the Pro-UPC lobbyists have held the hand of the civil servants having drafted this explanatory note.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzJust compare the article written by Mr Tilmann in GRUR 2020, 441, Zur Nichtigerklärung des EPGÜ-Ratifizierungsgesetzes, and especially § VI.2 dealing with the departure of the UK, with the Keynote of the Ministry of Justice prepared for the MPs.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzhttps://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/Dokumente/RefE_EPG%C3%9C_Vertragsgesetz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzI do not see here a presentation in which all the problems are actually put on the table so that MPs can decide in all knowledge. Dodging the problem of Art 7(2) UPCA and all the other problems linked with the departure of the UK is in my opinion criminal. Promoting an interpretation of the UPCA which goes against any common sense, not to say going blatantly against reasonable international interpretation of treaties.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzThe explanatory note also dodges the problems raised by the GFCC in point 106 of its decision. Do you think it is normal? I do not.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzLook also at some the links proposed by Jan Verbist on this blog. They are revealing and should bring you to have a more balanced look in the present situation.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzIt is also ironical that Mr Tilmann himself has shown in an Article published in GRUR 2020, 847 “The UPC without the UK: Consequences and Alternatives” that there are alternatives to the UPC within the EU legal system, see § III.2, in order to reject them immediately in favour of the UPC, see §III.1.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzThe proposal was rejected for very flimsy reasons: “The proposal was unanimously rejected by industry, lawyers and judges, not only but mainly because of the rigorous centralisation excluding local and regional divisions in EU Member States. Europe’s big competitors, the US and China, have decentralised first instance courts for patent cases”. Talking about being ridiculous, I would say that it is difficult to find something Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzmore ridiculous for a reason.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitzTo sum it up, and contrary to what you think I consider “that the UPC is violating the spirit of the core of the German constitution”. The UPC is an instrument devised by a small group of global industry leaders, lawyers and judges having only their financial interests in mind and certainly not the interests of Europe industry in general and European SMEs in particular.Oct 28 23:44
schestowitz"Oct 28 23:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!