●● IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: Saturday, January 30, 2021 ●● ● Jan 30 [01:17] schestowitz > Thanks, Im basically trying to drive home the fact that most people in corporate America are insane. However I woke up this morning and realized that I didnt point out many delusions among executives and obviously have to fix that. [01:17] schestowitz > [01:17] schestowitz > As always, free free to re-publish anything that I publish. Ill link you when its published and thanks again for the feedback. [01:17] schestowitz In two videos I made and published today in Techrights I mentioned you, albeit not by name. [01:18] schestowitz > Published/Attached. Have your way with it. Feel free to add more if you [01:18] schestowitz > noticed a prominent delusion that I overlooked. [01:39] schestowitz > goddamned medium. [01:39] schestowitz Microsoft and Google: Corporate Ethics and Profitable Delusions s http://techrights.org/2021/01/29/profitable-delusions/ [01:40] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-techrights.org | Microsoft and Google: Corporate Ethics and Profitable Delusions | Techrights [01:40] schestowitz Oddly enough, the original page lacks the twitter screenshot of the deluded man. I've grabbed it from the PDF. [01:40] schestowitz Attached. ● Jan 30 [02:37] schestowitz http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/01/25/upc-to-be-or-not-to-be/ [02:37] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | UPC: to be or not to be? - Kluwer Patent Blog [02:37] schestowitz " [02:38] schestowitz Bad, bad authorities [02:38] schestowitz January 25, 2021 at 5:20 pm [02:38] schestowitz the German authorities are jeopardizing the UPC [02:38] schestowitz Woha, are they? By checking its constitutionality? Really? [02:38] schestowitz Reply [02:38] schestowitz NordicObserver [02:38] schestowitz January 25, 2021 at 6:11 pm [02:38] schestowitz Without, in any way, prentending to be an expert on the UPC, I cannot understand the statement the German authorities are jeopardizing the UPC. Are the democratic processes not running their due course in Germany at the moment? Reform, perhaps, yes. But isnt evaluation of the project by the BVerfG also a test, that, if passed may lend credibility to the project? And if not, may occasion reform. [02:38] schestowitz Also I cannot see how pleading for Paris as epicenter turns the UPC in a true European Project? From the French perspective perhaps, from the perspective of the rest of Europe perhaps less so? [02:38] schestowitz Reply [02:38] schestowitz Anonymous [02:38] schestowitz January 25, 2021 at 7:04 pm [02:38] schestowitz We also must plead for Paris to be the epicenter of this jurisdiction. [02:38] schestowitz Sorry, but because of what exactly? So far Paris is not exactly known as an important venue for patent litigation. France does not even have a real patent office (in the sense of actually examining applications and having a large number of examiners). And why should the UPC be created in the second largest market in the Europe? Why not the largest? [02:38] schestowitz Yes, the UPCA should be completely reworked. No, the UPC should not be based in Paris. Rather it should be in Munich or The Hague, where there is already a critical mass of professionals (forget about market size, the market would after all be the participating countries). [02:38] schestowitz To me, choosing court sites because of political reasons and according to practical reasons is emblematic for some of the failures in setting up the UPC. A clean and streamlined procedure and organization seem to have been goals with low priority. [02:38] schestowitz But I fear nobody will work on a clean solution. After all, it would mean creating an EU patent office (without the non-EU members of the EPC). And then setting up a court responsible for appeals against decisions of this EU patent office plus dealing with validity and infringement (possibly even with an administrative law section covering labour law for this office?). I dont expect to see this happening during my [02:38] schestowitz professional life. [02:38] schestowitz In summary, it is not the German authorities [] jeopardizing the UPC. It was jeopardized by the authorities devising a bad agreement without caring for basic legal rules [02:38] schestowitz Reply [02:38] schestowitz MaxDrei [02:38] schestowitz January 25, 2021 at 7:42 pm [02:38] schestowitz Every lawyer considers his home jurisdiction to be the best. How could he not? The EPC has 38 Member States and presumably every patent lawyer in every one of them yields to no man in their contentions that their home jurisdiction is the best. [02:38] schestowitz Hence it is no surprise to read now from a French correspondent that: [02:38] schestowitz France must take its place as European leader in the field of innovation by having the seat of the UPC in Paris. [02:38] schestowitz The piece could have been drafted by the EPOs immediate past President, Monsieur Battistelli, also a Frenchman, who, disgracefully, went as far as to cripple the EPO Appeals Directorate in order to give Paris a free run to establish itself as the maker of pan-European patent law. [02:38] schestowitz This all illustrates both the beauty and the ugliness of life within the EU. We have the beauty and elegance of the patentability provisions of the EPC and the economy and rigour of the EPC case law written at the EPO. And then we have the demeaning scrabbling for opportunities under the UPC to make pocketfuls of lovely money. [02:38] schestowitz Until BREXIT, the UK used to be the Tie-breaker, between Germany and France. it is a tragedy, at least in patent law in Europe, that the UK has left the room. Frankly, for me, the Munich/London/Paris split of the UPC Seat was a plus point. Germany does engineering litigation well. English law fact-finding is good for chem/bio where each side might need to inspect the other sides experimental evidence, and Paris would handle the [02:38] schestowitz more intellectual (and hand-waving) do it on the internet sort of patent case. [02:38] schestowitz Reply [02:38] schestowitz Franco-belge [02:38] schestowitz January 25, 2021 at 10:21 pm [02:38] schestowitz Full support for the previous comments: constitutional review of laws is part of a democratic state. One can wonder why the BVerfG did not explicitly raise all its concerns in reaction to the first complaint. [02:38] schestowitz Incidentally, the Hungarian Constitutional Court has also raised concerns: it seems convenient to forget it. [02:38] schestowitz The Benelux countries have a common court that applies national law (identical law passed in the three countries). Maybe this should have served as example. [02:38] schestowitz Reply [02:38] schestowitz Attentive Observer [02:38] schestowitz January 25, 2021 at 11:45 pm [02:38] schestowitz Dear Matre Dhenne, [02:38] schestowitz Sorry but your claim for the UPC to be located in Paris is an old one, and previous commenter have clearly shown that this is vain and will certainly not help to insure the future of the UPC. [02:39] schestowitz It was the haggling between France, the UK and Germany which ended with a typical EU compromise, a bit for everyone. Nobody is pleased, but nobody can be completely displeased. And so we ended with Art 7(2) UPCA, and one of the actual stumbling blocks. [02:39] schestowitz Do you really think that Paris alone will solve the problem? We are exactly at the same point we were when the decision to split it not in two but in three parts was taken. [02:39] schestowitz It is not the German authorities who are jeopardizing the UPC. The UPC was jeopardised from day 1 as it started with the wrong premises. In view of the low average number of validations in EU member states and of the low number of true multinational litigations, the UPC is as useless as a plaster on a wooden leg. A proper study of the pros and cons and of the economic viability was never undertaken. That is also why we ended [02:39] schestowitz up with an extraordinary level of procedural fees. [02:39] schestowitz The UPC has also been jeopardised by the bunch of internationally acting lawyer firms having pushed for the UPC which were sitting in the Drafting committee for the rules of procedure of the UPC. They, and the big industry, used SMEs as a fig leaf behind which they could act in all impunity and lured politicians, be it at national or at European level, into false hopes. At the moment they also have the support of an EU Commissioner [02:39] schestowitz who is no more than a lobbyist. [02:39] schestowitz The large internationally active lawyer firms have soon realised that the UPC could even better fill their already deep pockets. The big industry helped them as they also realised pretty soon that with this system they could crush smaller entities. Why do you think that Poland or the Czech Republic do not want to join the UPC? [02:39] schestowitz The decision of the founding fathers of the EPC to separate the grant from the use of the title has made impossible to bring the whole EP patent granting and litigation system under the EU. [02:39] schestowitz It is in my humble opinion impossible to combine an open convention, the EPC, with mechanisms of a closed convention, the UPCA. Reconciling those two entities is doomed to fail. That some academics want to have a purely EU grant and litigation system is certainly nice, but it would mean turning the wheel back to the mid-sixties of the last century. Forget it! [02:39] schestowitz The few member states of the EU at the time have failed to reach an agreement. Do you think they would be more capable of doing so nowadays? It was the pressure of the PCT which forced Europeans to act. That the only input of the Commission and of the EU parliament in matters of European patents was to come up with the notion of enhanced cooperation says a lot. [02:39] schestowitz Relaunching the UPC or something similar that must be turned into a true European project is illusory! And that Paris wants to lead the whole thing is at best preposterous, not to say ludicrous! [02:39] schestowitz When you come up with an alleged historical role of France in patent matters you remind me of all the Brexiters who are hoping that the UK goes back to its past glory and power. At this rate Italy could go back to the Venetian patent act, and also claim the lead. [02:39] schestowitz The future of IP litigation in Europe lies with an enhanced cooperation of all judges dealing with patent validity and litigation in Europe, and not just limited to EU member states. Regularly bringing judges together can achieve more and at a much lower cost than any UPC of whatever kind. [02:39] schestowitz Rather than fighting for something like the UPC it would be much better to fight in order to give the Boards of Appeal of the EPO their true independence and to be merely satisfied with an increased perception of their independence. [02:39] schestowitz If you fight for this I will be with you, but not for what you want at the moment, which is no more than a playground for lawyers wanting to increase their revenues. That some German judges (I have not hear about others, but cannot exclude it) complain about the money they lose due to a belated opening of the UPC is adding insult to injury. [02:39] schestowitz Reply [02:39] schestowitz IPfrog [02:39] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 7:39 am [02:39] schestowitz Cocorico ! [02:39] schestowitz @anonymous : Think about the after work situation in The Hague and the food in Munich and give it a second thought [02:39] schestowitz Reply [02:39] schestowitz LightBlue [02:39] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 9:05 am [02:39] schestowitz As was commented previously, the hold up of the German ratification as a result of the complaint to the FCC is effectively impeding the will of the people. As such, there is every reason for the complaints to be made public as opposed to the current behind closed doors procedure. [02:39] schestowitz Establishing a central court in a EU country which is not high on the list of favored states for litigating IP would make sense (maybe one of the eastern states?). Otherwise there will always be the impression that the court has only been establsihed to favor ones friends in the system. [02:39] schestowitz Reply [02:39] schestowitz Patent robot [02:39] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 11:23 am [02:39] schestowitz Adopting a EU patent enforcement directive to harmonize patent infringement cases in all EU member states and creating an IP section at the CJEU would solve all issues and make the UPC completely useless. [02:39] schestowitz Reply [02:39] schestowitz Bergamo [02:39] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 11:39 am [02:39] schestowitz Noteworthy seems the authors repeated reference to we in this piece. Would the author mind telling the readers who we is? The group of people with vested interests conspiring in the truest sense of the word to ram down the publics throat an unlawful project for the profit of a selected few and to the detriment of many? [02:39] schestowitz Reply [02:39] schestowitz Concerned observer [02:39] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 1:58 pm [02:39] schestowitz If the UPC is to be reformed, which I believe is absolutely necessary, then amendment of the UPC Agreement would be the first (essential) step. However, that Agreement cannot be amended unless and until it enters into force. Therefore, reforming the UPC project necessarily means building an entirely new project, including new EU Regulations to replace those that are inextricably tied to the current UPC Agreement. [02:39] schestowitz This means that, with regard to reform of the UPC project, the decision is between wholesale reform or nothing at all. There is no guarantee that a new UPC project would clear all of the same hurdles that have been cleared by the current project. Therefore, unsurprisingly, the pro-UPC lobbyists have put their entire weight behind the option of no reform at all. However, by rights (ie under any sensible interpretation of the [02:39] schestowitz provisions of the Vienna Convention), that option ought to be pushing up the daisies alongside the fabled Norwegian Blue. [02:39] schestowitz Conclusion: do not expect the UPCs strongest supporters to give up flogging the current horse unless and until the FCC delivers a second opinion upon its evident demise. [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz French citizen [02:40] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 2:15 pm [02:40] schestowitz It is always interesting to see that centralization appears to be the best solution when the claimed central point is at the home of the one advocating for it, while it is the worse practice when the central point is located abroad, in the UPC case even only decentralized I am a French citizen and prefer decentralized courts where every member can contribute its own views and perspectives. Diversity of views is always better than [02:40] schestowitz silo thinking [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz Jan Verbist [02:40] schestowitz January 26, 2021 at 6:53 pm [02:40] schestowitz A proper study of the pros and cons and of the economic viability was never undertaken. That is also why we ended up with an extraordinary level of procedural fees. [02:40] schestowitz The only economic justification on the UPC dates from 2009, for a treaty signed in 2012, and when the court fees of 2016 were not even known! [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz Extraneous Attorney [02:40] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 7:10 am [02:40] schestowitz Taking a broader perspective, one may even wonder why any court ought to be financed only by the fees paid by the parties. Equitable, reasoned, and timely judicial adjudication of disputes, after all, benefits even non-parties to any given case, and the public in general. [02:40] schestowitz Accordingly, it is not outrageous that the states contribute to the operating costs of the courts exercising the judicial power in their name. In fact, considering that high court fees may deter some parties from asserting all their rights, it is a very reasonable position. [02:40] schestowitz In this context, the fees resulting from the requirement that the UPC be self-financed are not simply high. They are outrageously high. Requiring that a party pay more than ten thousand euros just to file a counterclaim for nullity will deter many alleged infringers from even trying to defend their case! [02:40] schestowitz And as an exercise, I would suggest that one try to tell, for instance, a US federal judge that the fee for filing a civil action in their jurisdiction ought to be set above ten thousand dollars [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz Wouter Ohrenstein [02:40] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 8:38 am [02:40] schestowitz Before I forget, can I please emphasize the following: [02:40] schestowitz The suspension of the ratification proceedings impedes the clear will of the people as clearly expressed in several votes by the German Parliament, in which the legislation was approved by a large majority. This suspension clearly violates the very core of democracy. This cannot be, for, as a wise man has recently stated: Ultimately, at a constitutional level, the will of the people still comes first. [02:40] schestowitz Also, the fact that this suspension has been concocted in a private phone call between the Federal President and the FCC is an outrageous violation of transparency and the publics god-given right to know whatever it wishes (with the exception, of course, when my interests are affected which self-evidently excludes any transparency from the outset). [02:40] schestowitz Moreover, the FCC is not even allowed to grant an interim order against the Federal President as this is only possible against existing laws (and dont look into sec. 32 BVerfGG, theres nothing to see there). [02:40] schestowitz Further, please note that the first constitutional complaint was only upheld partially and on formal grounds and with the closest possible vote of 5:3 judges and expect the new complaints to be thrown out imminently as obviously inadmissible and/or obviously unfounded, since the arguments asserted are exactly the same that were rejected in the first complaint already. [02:40] schestowitz So those of you also deeply invested in making the unlawful UPC scam a reality and contribute to our financial common good, please dont worry. The phoenix will once again rise from the ashes and we will get there eventually, whatever it takes and regardless of the consequences for society at large. Our common good will prevail. It always has. [02:40] schestowitz /irony off [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz Concerned observer [02:40] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 12:40 pm [02:40] schestowitz Please do not waste your irony on the pro-UPC lobbyists. It will have no effect upon them. All they need is to find an argument that they can PRETEND is plausible, and to then use that as an excuse for asserting that everything in UPC world is perfectly in order. [02:40] schestowitz If you need an example of how implausible legal arguments can be wheeled out as part of a strategy of avoiding engaging with substantive issues, then look no further than the assertions of unconstitutionality now being made across the pond. It comes from the same playbook: just simply find some legal expert who is prepared to stand behind whatever ludicrous and nonsensical interpretation of the law suits your purposes and [02:40] schestowitz then argue long and hard that you are merely upholding important legal principles by taking a stand against common sense. [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz Kevin Nasenstein [02:40] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 12:40 pm [02:40] schestowitz Very well said, Wouter. The phoenix will once again rise from the ashes and all our efforts will pay off in the end! Ultimately, this is for our common good, what could be wrong with that?! Transparency and democracy will win. [02:40] schestowitz Reply [02:40] schestowitz Winfried Zahnstein [02:40] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 1:08 pm [02:41] schestowitz Thank you for this, brother. Hail phoenix! Btw, dont you have further shills bots at hand who could populate the patent blogs and leave nonsense comments under UPC posts to divert the attention of the readers away from the questions that really matter? Most of the more versed UPC critics appear to slowly wake up to our brilliantly thought-out plan, even daring to increasingly doubt our non-existent honesty. Just send more [02:41] schestowitz shills over to post more nonsense and bury the mindful and well-formulated comments by UPC critics in BS, making it more difficult for the uninformed to find out about the true issues. After all, what are we paying all these associates for?! Im totally with you, our common good will prevail! [02:41] schestowitz Reply [02:41] schestowitz Attentive Observer [02:41] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 9:02 am [02:41] schestowitz If the members of the Bundestag and the Bundesrat would have been properly informed and the real problems facing the UPC taken into account -supremacy of Union Law-status of the London Section- then I would accept that the will of the people has been effectively impeded by the attitude of the GFCC. [02:41] schestowitz The first topic was ignored and the second belittled as the interpretation given in the explanatory note to the new ratification bill is in manifest contradiction with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. I do not expect that all members of the legislative are aware of all details, but the information given to them has to be neutral and factual. This was not the case. [02:41] schestowitz When you look at said explanatory note, which was actually written by heavy pro-UPC lobbyists, the manifest conclusion is that will of the people has been willingly misled, so that the intervention of the GFCC has to be welcomed. [02:41] schestowitz From the beginning the pro-UPC lobbyists wanted the UPC to come into force as quickly as possible in order to obtain a kind of fait accompli. By pushing it through at any cost and at any rate they hoped that no jurisdiction would dare putting the carefully set up money machine into jeopardy. [02:41] schestowitz Brexit was a first blow to this hope, and the first complaint before the GFCC a second one. How often have we heard that the complaint will be dismissed at once as the complaint had no merit? The same record is playing again with the second one. Dear lobbyists, it is getting tiring to hear again the same tune. [02:41] schestowitz By keeping flogging the dead UPC horse pro-UPC lobbyists still show that they have not given up their hope of the big buck. Hope dies last, but in the present situation, pro-UPC lobbyists are becoming a pain. [02:41] schestowitz Trying to locate the UPC in one of the eastern states is a nice idea, but rather naive. The problem is that the present text of the UPCA says something quite different. And on top of it the Czech Republic and Poland have declined to ratify the UPC. In Hungary there are constitutional problems, and the UPC cannot be ratified without an amendment to the constitution. Where else should it then be located in Easter Europe? [02:41] schestowitz When on top one sees how those countries want to get the money from the EU, but try as much as possible not to abide with fundamental values like free speech and independence of justice, it can only lead to hair raising. [02:41] schestowitz Reply [02:41] schestowitz MaxDrei [02:41] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 9:25 am [02:41] schestowitz Good comments from Extraneous, but could somebody tell me what is the fee set by the USPTO to entertain a Request for review of the validity of a patent duly issued by that Office. It also is of the order of EUR 10,000, is it not? If so, is that not even more scandalous? [02:41] schestowitz Reply [02:41] schestowitz Extraneous Attorney [02:41] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 11:55 am [02:41] schestowitz Per the USPTO fee schedule, the Inter partes review request fee is 19,000 USD for up to 20 claims, and an additional 375 USD for each claim in excess to 20. And there are no reductions for small and micro entities! [02:41] schestowitz It is worth noting that the USPTO describes itself as a fully fee-funded agency. See, e.g.: https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/performance-and-planning/budget-and-financial-information [02:41] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-www.uspto.gov | Budget and Financial Information | USPTO [02:41] schestowitz Reply [02:41] schestowitz Patent robot [02:41] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 10:42 am [02:41] schestowitz Not only art. 7(2) UPCA is an issue but also art. 19(1) and art. 35(1), for the same reasons. [02:41] schestowitz It was not smart (euphemism) to locate divisions of the UPC in specific states and not to require the ratification of these states for the entry into force of the UPCA. [02:41] schestowitz Reply [02:41] schestowitz Attentive Observer [02:41] schestowitz January 27, 2021 at 3:41 pm [02:41] schestowitz The discussion about the height of the fees is distracting from the real issues. [02:41] schestowitz I do not care what the fees are in the US, what matters is the fee level here in Europe. And at the UPC it is extortionate to say the least. SMEs have repeatedly said that the fees are much too high for them. They hardly have the funds to file European applications, and even less when it comes to defend themselves. The ceiling on the recoverable costs are not a safety net they can rely on. [02:41] schestowitz It is not uncommon, and I have seen it many times, that big industry either buys applications from SMEs just to put them in a cupboard, or inundate them with a series of legal challenges so that in the end they cannot afford them and go bankrupt. For any patents left, they cannot any longer afford annual fees so that they even have the patents for free. [02:41] schestowitz In spite of the fiercest proponent of the UPC say, the UPC is not for SMEs, and even the present blogger agrees with it. The UPC is a machinery set up in order to crush SMEs by big industry helped by wilful lawyers which can at the same time make the big buck. [02:41] schestowitz When it comes to Art 19(1), i.e. to Hungary, the ratification of the UPC is far from being at the door as there are constitutional problems. When it comes to Art 35(1), Portugal has ratified, against the clear message from the local representatives considering that it was damageable to local industries. Guess who was the head of the PPTO for quite a while? I have not heard for a long time that that Slovenia was making any attempt to [02:41] schestowitz ratify. [02:41] schestowitz May be Mr Tilmann and his friends will explain to us that, should those countries not have ratified the UPCA before the UPC could come into action, the duties foreseen to be located in Budapest and Ljubljana could be temporarily transferred to other locations, for instance Paris and Munich. This would then allow to decide on a proper location later, for instance at the first amendment of the UPC. Seeing how far their intellectual [02:41] schestowitz flexibility can go when it comes to defend their private interests, I would not put it past them! [02:41] schestowitz " ● Jan 30 [09:05] schestowitz https://gatesofvienna.net/2021/01/the-facebook-spring-in-egypt/ [09:05] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-gatesofvienna.net | The Facebook Spring in Egypt | Gates of Vienna ● Jan 30 [13:49] *liberty_box_ (~liberty@host81-154-168-60.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [13:58] *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [13:58] *liberty_box_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [13:58] *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) ● Jan 30 [14:03] *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-168-60.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [14:04] *liberty_box_ (~liberty@host81-154-168-60.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [14:04] *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-168-60.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [14:06] *liberty_box has quit (Client Quit) [14:06] *liberty_box_ has quit (Client Quit) [14:07] *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-168-60.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [14:08] *acer-box__ has quit (Quit: Konversation term) [14:09] *acer-box__ (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #boycottnovell [14:09] *ChanServ gives channel operator status to acer-box__ [14:19] *acer-box__ has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [14:19] *libertybox has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [14:19] *Techrights-sec has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) [14:27] *acer-box__ (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #boycottnovell [14:27] *ChanServ gives channel operator status to acer-box__ [14:27] *Techrights-sec (~quassel@host81-154-168-60.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell [14:28] *libertybox (~schestowi@2a00:23c4:c3aa:7d01:9ed2:1eff:feb6:a8e1) has joined #boycottnovell ● Jan 30 [16:15] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354943902688677902 [16:15] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: .@sallyKP Philanthropic Racism (Clinical Trials/Experimentation on Live Subjects and Ethnic Cleaning as 'Public https://t.co/GFJobeGU1D [16:15] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354942853806481417 [16:15] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Even the Mainstream/Corporate Media is Trying to Study Why (or If) Bill Gates and Epstein's Sex Abuse Ring Were Clo https://t.co/rfWsekaCiT [16:15] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Even the Mainstream/Corporate Media is Trying to Study Why (or If) Bill Gates and Epstein's Sex Abuse Ring Were Clo https://t.co/rfWsekaCiT [16:15] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354942622750691337 [16:15] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Whistleblower Aid Already Showed Cover-up of Bill Gates 'Contributions' to MIT https://t.co/G5A89YZUBB [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | Whistleblower Aid Already Showed Cover-up of Bill Gates Contributions to MIT | Techrights [16:16] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354942459172823049 [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Always Look for Stories the Media is Suppressing and Hiding https://t.co/zyEOvdOkVp [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | Always Look for Stories the Media is Suppressing and Hiding | Techrights [16:16] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354942289307643907 [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) Identified Some of the Children in the Pornographic https://t.co/1HJ7gOwgwI [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) Identified Some of the Children in the Pornographic https://t.co/1HJ7gOwgwI [16:16] schestowitz "The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) Identified Some of the Children in the Pornographic 'Stash' of Bill Gates' Engineer" [16:16] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354942107513982978 [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: No Prison for Pre-Teen Child Rape Collections When You Work for Bill Gates? https://t.co/s63eb7ER6f [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | No Prison for Pre-Teen Child Rape Collections When You Work for Bill Gates? | Techrights [16:16] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354941777929793538 [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Former Microsoft Employee Explains the Deception, Lies, and 'Philanthropy' of Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein https://t.co/M5N9YEtd4g [16:16] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | Former Microsoft Employee Explains the Deception, Lies, and Philanthropy of Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein | Techrights [16:16] schestowitz ""Former Microsoft Employee Explains the Deception, Lies, and 'Philanthropy' of Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein" [16:17] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354941583360192514 [16:17] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: The Deeds and Misdeeds of Bill Gates Have International Impact https://t.co/Vc2CF7gH1l [16:17] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | The Deeds and Misdeeds of Bill Gates Have International Impact | Techrights [16:18] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354941161866194954 [16:18] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: A New Tim Schwab Investigative Report on Bill Gates' Bribery of the Media and Beyond (for Hagiographies and Salesma https://t.co/lbFnR6PJj8 [16:18] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: A New Tim Schwab Investigative Report on Bill Gates' Bribery of the Media and Beyond (for Hagiographies and Salesma https://t.co/lbFnR6PJj8 [16:18] *acer-box__ has quit (Quit: Konversation term) [16:18] *acer-box__ (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #boycottnovell [16:18] *ChanServ gives channel operator status to acer-box__ [16:19] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354941010984505349 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Techrights Needs Help From American Readers (in Order to Retrieve the Court Documents Regarding Bill Gates' Enginee https://t.co/A3XBjE700y [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Techrights Needs Help From American Readers (in Order to Retrieve the Court Documents Regarding Bill Gates' Enginee https://t.co/A3XBjE700y [16:19] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354940783040868369 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Detectives Found That Bill Gates' Engineer Took Photos of Latino Boys at the Beach. His Child Pornography Files Inc https://t.co/ojAbZMl5e1 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Detectives Found That Bill Gates' Engineer Took Photos of Latino Boys at the Beach. His Child Pornography Files Inc https://t.co/ojAbZMl5e1 [16:19] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354940469663379458 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Melinda and Zoophilia Found in Tandem in the Illegal Pornographic 'Stash' of Bill Gates' Engineer https://t.co/w37ONtiQ8c [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | Melinda and Zoophilia Found in Tandem in the Illegal Pornographic Stash of Bill Gates Engineer | Techrights [16:19] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354940241417789442 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Bill Gates Lied to Mainstream Media About His Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein https://t.co/62Q2ST1AM8 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | Bill Gates Lied to Mainstream Media About His Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein | Techrights [16:19] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354940040527417349 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: The Pandemic Has Been Hugely Profitable for Bill Gates and It Helps Distract From His Epstein Mystery https://t.co/46sQdedTP2 [16:19] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell--> techrights.org | The Pandemic Has Been Hugely Profitable for Bill Gates and It Helps Distract From His Epstein Mystery | Techrights [16:20] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354939216808079365 [16:20] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never De https://t.co/Jn5ErdsoV6 [16:20] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never De https://t.co/Jn5ErdsoV6 [16:20] schestowitz "Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)" [16:20] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354938825345277965 [16:20] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Conspiracy Theories Have Successfully Distracted From Perfectly Legitimate and Real Scandals of Bill Gates in India https://t.co/tC5n8QZorc [16:20] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Conspiracy Theories Have Successfully Distracted From Perfectly Legitimate and Real Scandals of Bill Gates in India https://t.co/tC5n8QZorc [16:20] schestowitz "Conspiracy Theories Have Successfully Distracted From Perfectly Legitimate and Real Scandals of Bill Gates in India, the Fertile Ground for Unethical Mass Experimentation on Humans" [16:20] schestowitz https://twitter.com/UCheckItOut/status/1354938018658967558 [16:20] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Latest Tim Schwab Investigative Report on Bill Gates Explores His Latest Vaccine Profiteering Drive Bill Gates has https://t.co/2YfELmlhtR [16:20] -TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@UCheckItOut: Latest Tim Schwab Investigative Report on Bill Gates Explores His Latest Vaccine Profiteering Drive Bill Gates has https://t.co/2YfELmlhtR [16:20] schestowitz " [16:20] schestowitz Latest Tim Schwab Investigative Report on Bill Gates Explores His Latest Vaccine Profiteering Drive [16:20] schestowitz Bill Gates has apparently not bribed Schwabs publisher yet [16:20] schestowitz "