(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *jacobk (~quassel@rj6egqhg7yiky.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 02:31 | |
| schestowitz | " First of all, let us give a big thank you to all those who voted in the Staff Rep elections in June. We appreciate your support and were impressed by the high turnout in the election of 69% of staff in The Hague! We would like to thank all the candidates that stood in the elections and extend a special thank you to the election committee who took on the task of organising the whole process." | Mar 03 02:51 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz | " We will now continue with our priority as staff representatives: supporting our colleagues and protecting the rights of staff. We will do our best to channel all our efforts into this goal." | Mar 03 02:51 |
| schestowitz | "Dear colleagues, | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | Home leave is regulated by the CODEX in Art 60 ServRegs, with the reimbursement of costs done according to Art 77(3) and Art 80(1)(c) ServRegs. In principle, this means that the actual costs for the journey should be reimbursed: | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | “Travel expenses, actually incurred for the outward and return journey between the place of employment and his home, for such leave shall be reimbursed to the employee concerned” | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | The implementation of these reimbursements are regulated by Circ. 22, Rule 10: | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | For pragmatic reasons, the administration proposes a lump-sum approach in Rule 10(c)(i). | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | However, it is also possible to request reimbursement of the actual expenses incurred, in line with Rule 10(c)(ii). Such a request should be made before the home leave (except in cases of force majeure). | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | It makes sense to request reimbursement of the actual expenses one incurs to travel to & from their place of home leave (with their family), if these exceed the lump-sum calculation. | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | When requesting home leave, the administration will provide you with a calculation for your expenses. If the calculation comprises a total sum of travel expenses that is lower than the actual expenses you incurred for the travel, we encourage you to request the reimbursement of your actual costs – and to do so before the actual journey. (Bear in mind you’ll of course need the invoices/tickets/proof of payment to establish your actua | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | l travel costs towards the administration) | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | Feel free to contact your staff representation if you are in doubt. | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | Your Local Staff Committee The Hague - LSCTH" | Mar 03 02:52 |
| schestowitz | (Home leave: reimbursement of actual travel expenses) | Mar 03 02:52 |
| *SaphirJD has quit (connection closed) | Mar 03 03:07 | |
| schestowitz | > Yes, I did, but the issue is that when I submit the post, it comes under | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | > the trendoceans account. | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | > I want a separate account so that I can easily manage and work on it | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | > with my team. | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | > | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | > For your further consideration, I attached the public key to the email | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | > and assigned the username "arctic". | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | The precious account was barely used, and given we implement the whole system on our own, it takes a lot of time to make yet another account, so I hope it can be reused, instead. | Mar 03 03:11 |
| schestowitz | <DaemonFC> The Lobster? | Mar 03 03:32 |
| schestowitz | could be | Mar 03 03:32 |
| schestowitz | better not to assume _too_ much | Mar 03 03:32 |
| *Enviosity has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Mar 03 06:35 | |
| *versatile (~versatile@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 06:53 | |
| *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Mar 03 07:23 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Mar 03 07:29 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 07:29 | |
| *jacobk (~quassel@rj6egqhg7yiky.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 07:53 | |
| *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Mar 03 07:56 | |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 09:00 | |
| *parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Mar 03 13:44 | |
| schestowitz | DaemonFC: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=zLFKjqzWGr4 | Mar 03 15:10 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-yewtu.be | CCTV shows boys at Asda moments before brave man murdered for standing up to them - Invidious | Mar 03 15:10 | |
| *Despatche (~desp@dycvpzw6dvcrw.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 17:53 | |
| *psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/) | Mar 03 17:54 | |
| *jacobk (~quassel@32hz32it3ih2k.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 19:41 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Mar 03 20:03 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 20:06 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Mar 03 20:43 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 20:43 | |
| *parsifal (~parsifal@uuar9r28yasyu.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 21:59 | |
| schestowitz | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/03/ukipos-second-report-on-social-medial.html?showComment=1709309788517#c6750855199388248958 | Mar 03 22:34 |
| schestowitz | ">The authors say that "definitional confusion" feeds rationalisations of deviant behaviour. I don't think they have evidence for any such thing. They asked participants to define what they think "counterfeit" means and, not surprisingly, the people who gave it the broadest definition ("products which are designer inspired but are clearly different") were more likely to confess to purchasing counterfeits. N | Mar 03 22:34 |
| schestowitz | obody is rationalising their deviant behaviour - the respondents who believe in different definitions are just admitting (or not) to completely different things.<br /><br />Sure, in between the question about defining "counterfeit" and the question about how many counterfeits you buy came the authors' definition to "guide the respondents". That definition said:<br /><br />Counterfeits are items that look identical to | Mar 03 22:34 |
| schestowitz | a genuine product with or without the official branding/logo, but are not made by the brand and may be of lower quality, for example, sneakers of an identical design to Nike Sneakers with or without the Nike logo.<br /><br />Crystal clear then. It might seek to mislead the consumer by use of the official logo, but then again it might not. It might be of lower quality, it might not. It might infringe some IP, but it might not. Hard to s | Mar 03 22:34 |
| schestowitz | ee why any respondent would just give up and revert to their intuitive understanding of what a counterfeit is, regardless of the definition that is there to "guide" them.<br /><br />What a load of rubbish.<br /><br />Patent attorney and deviant who sometimes shops in Aldi.<br /><br />" | Mar 03 22:34 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | UKIPO’s second report on social medial influencers and counterfeiting - The IPKat | Mar 03 22:34 | |
| *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Mar 03 22:55 | |
| *jacobk (~quassel@838aynky6btpe.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 23:17 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.