●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Sunday, July 03, 2022 ●● ● Jul 03 [00:47] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [00:48] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [00:59] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [00:59] *SaphirJD has quit (connection closed) [00:59] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [01:05] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [01:06] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [01:12] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [01:14] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [01:19] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [01:20] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [03:08] *schestowitz[TR] has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [03:08] *schestowitz[TR] (~schestowitz[TR]@hcdms2vr9hu9e.irc) has joined #techbytes [03:12] *Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [03:12] *Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@freenode-i33.jp8.7132oi.IP) has joined #techbytes [03:13] *Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [03:13] *Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@hcdms2vr9hu9e.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [05:02] *techrights_guest|1 (~490bc725@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes [05:20] *techrights_guest|1 has quit (Quit: Connection closed) ● Jul 03 [07:47] schestowitz
  • [07:47] schestowitz
    And Now A Real RISC-V Laptop ... Maybe
    [07:47] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.talospace.com | And now a real RISC-V laptop ... maybe [07:47] schestowitz
    [07:47] schestowitz

    Phoronix is reporting the first production RISC-V laptop, (code?) named ROMA, with "a quad-core RISC-V CPU (although clock frequencies are not noted), a GPU/NPU accelerator [and reportedly other features], up to 16GB of LPDDR4/LPDDR4X RAM [and] up to 256GB of storage." This sounds great, except that I was seriously underwhelmed by the Allwinner D1 in the DevTerm R-01, so the lack of CPU specs is not [07:47] schestowitz encouraging. There are also two distinct process nodes for the System-on-Module, 12nm for Pro and 28nm for Normal, so there may be a wide gulf between configurations. On the other hand, it does prominently claim to be upgradable, possibly by swapping out the modules. Strangely, it advertises itself with an ARM SC300 secure enclave, which seems a bit odd as well.

    [07:47] schestowitz
    [07:47] schestowitz
  • [07:50] schestowitz
  • [07:50] schestowitz
    i.MX8M Mini powers Pico-ITX board and supports Yocto-based Linux distributions
    [07:50] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 520 @ https://linuxgizmos.com/i-mx8m-mini-powers-pico-itx-board-and-supports-yocto-based-linux-distributions/ ) [07:50] schestowitz
    [07:50] schestowitz

    The eDM-SBC-iMX8Mm is a Single Board Computer (SBC) which comes in a small Pico-ITX form factor and its powered by NXPs i.MX8M Mini System on Chip (SoC). This compact device was designed to run 24/7 to suit applications such as kiosks , digital signage displays, smart home appliances etc.

    [07:50] schestowitz

    DATA MODUL has designed this SBC to be coupled with NXPs i.MX8M Mini Dual Cortex-A53 (up to 1800 MHz) or its Quad-core version. Both CPU models integrate a GCNanoUltra GPU with a 2D/3D accelerator and they include up to 512KB L2 in Cache memory.

    [07:50] schestowitz
    [07:50] schestowitz
  • ● Jul 03 [08:04] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [08:07] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:31] schestowitz are there any access codes or not yet? sorry to hear about the AC... ● Jul 03 [09:46] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [09:51] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@5tcc2vuaj9aks.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [10:16] *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [11:00] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [11:00] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [13:42] *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [13:47] *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@vayqsuzqttqha.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [15:57] *techrights_guest|20 (~d52d6a5b@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 03 [16:06] *techrights_guest|20 has quit (Quit: Connection closed) ● Jul 03 [20:45] schestowitz http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/27/survey-epo-staff-dont-trust-top-management-concerns-about-quality/ [20:45] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | Survey: EPO staff dont trust top management, concerns about quality - Kluwer Patent Blog [20:45] schestowitz " [20:45] schestowitz Staff members of the EPO have little confidence in the top management. They dont think there is a clear and coherent strategy, there are big concerns about quality and also about the increasing work load. This is shown by the fifth Technologia Survey, the results of which have been shared with staff last week. [20:45] schestowitz The survey, which was commissioned by trade union SUEPO, reveals deep divisions between management and staff. It was published just ahead of the meeting of the Administrative Council, 29 and 30 June 2022, in which a decision about the re-appointment of Antnio Campines as EPO president for a second term until 2028 is on the agenda. [20:45] schestowitz One sign of the lack of trust between staff and management is the fact that the Technologia survey could be held among SUEPO members only and those among EPO staff who actively opted in, since president Campinos refused SUEPO to use EPO emails*. [20:45] schestowitz Some results in more detail: [20:45] schestowitz I think top management has set out a clear and coherent strategy for the EPO: 31% of respondents said they totally disagree, 33% tend to disagree, 21% are neutral, 14% tend to agree and 2% totally agree. [20:45] schestowitz I support the strategy of the EPO set out by top management: 39% totally disagree, 32% tend to disagree, 21% neutral, 7% tend to agree, 1% totally agree. [20:45] schestowitz In my view, the actions of top management and the strategy adopted have departed considerably from the role that the EPO should be playing in the European patent system: 6% totally disagree, 12% tend to disagree, 20% neutral, 31% tend to agree, 32% totally agree. [20:45] schestowitz I identify with top managements view: 46% totally disagree, 35% tend to disagree, 15% neutral, 4% tend to agree, 1% totally agree. [20:45] schestowitz I identify with the views of Staff Representation: 1% totally disagree, 5% tend to disagree, 17% neutral, 51% tend to agree, 27% totally agree. [20:45] schestowitz Questions about the level of trust in superiors show a staggering 3% confidence in president Campinos and 1% in the Management Advisory Committee, whereas the confidence in immediate superiors is relatively good. [20:45] schestowitz Trust in my immediate superior : 7% very little, 12% little, 24% neutral, 35% much, 22% very much [20:45] schestowitz My director : 20% very little, 19% little, 37% neutral, 18% much, 6% very much [20:45] schestowitz My Principal Director/COO : 50% very little, 26% little, 20% neutral, 4% much, 1% very much [20:45] schestowitz My Vice President : 47% very little, 24% little, 23% neutral, 6% much, 1% very much [20:45] schestowitz The Management Advisory Committee: 60% very little, 24% little, 16% neutral, 1% much, 0% very much [20:45] schestowitz The President : 61% very little, 23% little, 13% neutral, 3% much, 0% very much [20:45] schestowitz Quality [20:45] schestowitz The survey also clarifies there are concerns about the quality of the work the EPO produces and about recent reorganizations. [20:45] schestowitz In reaction to the statement: Do you consider that the introduction of a performance-related bonus at the level of the individual employee is a good thing for the QUALITY OF THE WORK produced by the European Patent Office?: 61% answered they totally disagree, 28% tend to disagree, 10% tend to agree, 1% totally agree. [20:45] schestowitz With the following statement: the current president and top management have taken useful measures to maintain and improve the quality of the EPOs products and services, 38% totally disagrees, 32% tends to disagree, 19% is neutral, 11% tends to agree, 1% totally agrees. [20:45] schestowitz Staff members were asked as well how many times the operational organigram around your post within the EPO had been restructured in the last three years. 19% answered never, but more than 80% of respondents had experienced such restructuring (once 30%, twice 34%, three times or more 18%). [20:45] schestowitz These reorganizations concerning their post were pointless, according to 86% of respondents. 72% said that the constant reorganizations and restructuring over recent years are pointless and have a negative effect on my situation. [20:45] schestowitz In the meantime, the economic situation of the EPO is favorable, according to most respondents: 2% say: disagree and it bothers me, 6% disagree, 66% agree, 26% say agree and I appreciate [20:45] schestowitz Equality [20:45] schestowitz The Technologia survey was also about the personal situation of staff members. A remarkable result is the reaction to the statement: Employees are treated equally at the EPO: 32% totally disagrees, 30% tends to disagree, up sharp since the 2020 survey, in which these numbers were 8% and 22% respectively. [20:45] schestowitz Some other findings: [20:45] schestowitz I can expand my professional competences: 14% answer: disagree and it bothers me, 38% disagree, 40% agree, 9% says: agree and I appreciate [20:45] schestowitz The amount of work I am tasked with is acceptable: 29% disagree and it bothers me, 36% disagree, 30% agree, 5% agree and I appreciate [20:45] schestowitz My work pace is acceptable: 24% disagree and it bothers me, 34% disagree, 37% agree, 5% agree and I appreciate [20:45] schestowitz My professional activity allows me to balance work life and private life: 20% disagree and it bothers me, 30% disagree, 41% agree, 10% agree and I appreciate [20:45] schestowitz My work is interesting: 7% disagree and it bothers me, 17% disagree, 55% agree, 21% agree and I appreciate [20:45] schestowitz Remarkable also is the reaction to the statement: Do you work outside the hours provided for by the regulations governing your working hours? 58% work in the evening or at night, 26% during weekends or public holidays, 16% during holidays. 36% dont work outside working hours. [20:46] schestowitz This a huge change compared to earlier Technologia surveys, in which many more respondents said they did not work outside working hours: 76% in 2010, 69% in 2013, 61% in 2016, 58% in 2020. [20:46] schestowitz Proud [20:46] schestowitz Asked to describe the work atmosphere at the level of the EPO, respondents mentioned the words: tense (56%), confrontational (35%), cold (31%), warm (2%), cheerful (1%). [20:46] schestowitz 69% of staff feel very tired (sometimes, often or always), 42% feel depressed and 37% feel desperate. 67% think their current work life affects their health. [20:46] schestowitz 93% of respondents said they were fairly (44%) of very (49%) proud to work for the European Patent Office before. But asked whether they are proud to work for the European Patent Office now, only 34% said they are fairly proud, and a mere 8% is very proud. [20:46] schestowitz *Over 6545 staff, the questionnaire was sent to 2915 and 1766 participated. [20:46] schestowitz _____________________________ [20:46] schestowitz Kluwer IP Law [20:46] schestowitz This page as PDF [20:46] schestowitz LIKE? SHARE WITH YOUR FRIENDS. [20:46] schestowitz Post navigation [20:46] schestowitz NEXT ARTICLE [20:46] schestowitz A preliminary injunction can be based on a patent application [20:46] schestowitz MATTHIEU DHENNE (IPSILON)/JUNE 28, 2022 [20:46] schestowitz PREVIOUS ARTICLE [20:46] schestowitz The metamorphosis of the trainee into an employee inventor [20:46] schestowitz MATTHIEU DHENNE (IPSILON)/JUNE 24, 2022 [20:46] schestowitz 18 comments [20:46] schestowitz Kluwer Patent Blog [20:46] schestowitz JUNE 27, 2022 AT 11:18 AM [20:46] schestowitz Dear Reader, [20:46] schestowitz The publisher and editor of the blog may at their discretion remove submitted comments and/or other material from the blog if they have reason to believe that the materials are in violation of the editorial policy. [20:46] schestowitz We ask our readers and commenters to follow these guidelines: [20:46] schestowitz Be polite. Avoid derogatory comments and respond to the argument, not its messenger. Any ad hominem attacks will not be tolerated. If a comment includes such an attack, the whole comment will not be published. There will be no discussion on this. [20:46] schestowitz Avoid repetitiveness. If you havent convinced the other person after commenting twice, you will probably not succeed the third time. [20:46] schestowitz Be specific and concise. A reaction of 200 well-chosen words is often better than a lengthy expos. [20:46] schestowitz Extraneous Attorney [20:46] schestowitz JUNE 27, 2022 AT 11:43 AM [20:46] schestowitz These results are appalling. In any sane public sector organization, the only conclusion would be that a major shake-up in management is urgently needed. [20:46] schestowitz Now, of course, this being the EPO, I am not holding my breath. [20:46] schestowitz Mismanagement [20:46] schestowitz JUNE 27, 2022 AT 12:33 PM [20:46] schestowitz One may say that there is some consistency in EPOs top management goals/actions for the past 10 years since the same questionnaire over 5 iterations shows a solid coherence in negative results. [20:46] schestowitz The dogmatic beliefs of pseudo top managers who have no clues nor competencies with regard to those they are in charge of, prevail over the interests of the applicants or the public at large. [20:46] schestowitz Their sole interest is to please the administrative council delegations so that their contract be extended and they get bonuses and functional allowances in return for deteriorations of the working conditions for the examiners and support staff. [20:46] schestowitz This mismanagement within a european public organisation is scandalous. [20:46] schestowitz Concerned observer [20:46] schestowitz JUNE 27, 2022 AT 5:29 PM [20:46] schestowitz The results of the survey clearly point to a demotivated, stressed and depressed workforce that has little to no trust in management and serious concerns regarding quality of the EPOs output. There is simply no way of dressing this up: the results demonstrate that the current President has failed miserably to resolve social tensions at the EPO. [20:46] schestowitz When the AC appointed the current President, their public pronouncements gave the impression that resolving social tensions would be a key priority for him. But will an epic failure with respect to this key performance indicator prevent his reappointment? More specifically, being in mind the potential gifts to the AC delegations that CA 32/22 might place at the disposal of the President, how seriously will the AC view the Presidents abject [20:47] schestowitz failure to restore social peace? [20:47] schestowitz Caballero [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 27, 2022 AT 7:02 PM [20:47] schestowitz Considering that 92% of those asked agree with the economic situation and that 76% find their work interesting is a pretty good starting point. The communications problem between management and staff has been evident for quite some time and escalated to levels where change appears to be inevitable. Can EPO find a 21st century manager? [20:47] schestowitz Martin [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 28, 2022 AT 12:05 PM [20:47] schestowitz The EPO needs a 1960s or 70s manager. [20:47] schestowitz Someone who grew through the organisation and knows the work being done. [20:47] schestowitz An engineer/chemist/scientist, not an MBA, nor a politician. [20:47] schestowitz But that is true for most companies and organisations [20:47] schestowitz Caballero [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:55 AM [20:47] schestowitz That person would be about 100 years old by now. I like the idea of a wise old man/woman, but I am not sure if he/she would want to put up with this. [20:47] schestowitz Concerned observer [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 28, 2022 AT 12:16 PM [20:47] schestowitz In response to your question, ask yourself whether the AC even bothered with interviewing any alternative candidates. My suspicion is that the wait for a manager of the EPO who has any respect for the rule of law let alone 21st century management practices will become much like the wait for Godot. [20:47] schestowitz Caballero [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 29, 2022 AT 12:02 PM [20:47] schestowitz It was meant more as rhetorical question, with a challenge to a constructive approach. Sort of like Open your mind [20:47] schestowitz Concerned observer [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 29, 2022 AT 3:45 PM [20:47] schestowitz Yet again it seems that my suspicions we well founded: [20:47] schestowitz https://www.epo.org/news-events/news/2022/20220629a.html [20:47] schestowitz Attentive Observer [20:47] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.epo.org | EPO - Antnio Campinos reappointed President of the European Patent Office [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 27, 2022 AT 9:34 PM [20:47] schestowitz The result of the survey is clearly not in favor of the top management. [20:47] schestowitz This is nothing new, but the speed at which the present tenant of the 10th floor has alienated his own staff is flabbergasting. [20:47] schestowitz In any well run organisation it would bring about a change in the upper management by the controlling body. But at the EPO the tail is wagging the dog. [20:47] schestowitz As long as the AC accepts to rubber stamp any decision proposed by the management the situation will continue to deteriorate. [20:47] schestowitz The quality might deteriorate, but until the effects are felt, there is a great latency time. This in favor of management as it allows to show figures of production/productivity which guarantees a steady flow of renewal fees. That all what matters for the AC. [20:47] schestowitz That lots of patents come out of the opposition procedure maimed or even revoked is not a problem for bulk filers. They still have enough patents in their portfolio. When it hits a SME with a few patents, the story is different. [20:47] schestowitz This is one of the white elephants in the room! [20:47] schestowitz The problem is that the present head of the office and its predecessor confuse immunity with impunity! [20:47] schestowitz Disgusted [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 28, 2022 AT 1:36 PM [20:47] schestowitz The results of the other survey, the official one with >5000 respondents, organised by the office itself, will be out at the end of July. They will be even more impressive: zero trust from employees towards all managers. [20:47] schestowitz Still, despite all empty promises. nobody at the EPO expects anything to actually happen. [20:47] schestowitz Ill be gone at the end of this year. You are stuck with the Portuguese until 2028. [20:47] schestowitz Working in paradise [20:47] schestowitz JUNE 28, 2022 AT 2:53 PM [20:48] schestowitz To all those who think that the EPO is heaven on earth, according to my info in 2021 more than 50% FIFTY of the job applicants to an examiner position at EPO who were offered a job did not take it, many of them not even bothering to inform the EPO that they would not come. [20:48] schestowitz So to those who think that the working conditions at EPO are over the top, that the working atmosphere is cool or the kind of work one performs there is so exciting, well sorry but Gen Z and millennials may beg to differ [20:48] schestowitz law sniffer [20:48] schestowitz JUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:19 AM [20:48] schestowitz I am glad to see some figures now, just as a reference: where I work (and is one of the most renowned employers, at least in chemistry) only one out of four positively interviewed candidates accepts the offer at the end and we make use of a consulting company which does for us an intensive and professional hunting and pre-selecting job ahead of our interviews. This could depend from the fact that we are very selective and demanding when [20:48] schestowitz choosing our potential new colleagues, if we were to choose with a lower professional expectation and less rigorous selection the acceptance rate would be for sure higher [20:48] schestowitz Troll sniffer [20:48] schestowitz JUNE 29, 2022 AT 7:29 PM [20:48] schestowitz On average, a job offer is declined in less than 30% of the cases. Google is your friend. [20:48] schestowitz So, either you misunderstood your statistics or you work in a really terrible place. [20:48] schestowitz Working in paradise [20:48] schestowitz JUNE 29, 2022 AT 11:43 PM [20:48] schestowitz Dear law sniffer [20:48] schestowitz all depends from where you start from. I do not dispute that you may find worse conditions elsewhere but this is irrelevant and not the point. [20:48] schestowitz All reforms forced on the workforce for past two decades were not contributing in any way to make of the EPO a stronger office from a qualitative point of view. It squeezed the lemon dry, with now tired, depressed and more precarious workers rubber-stamping patents to meet their stupid targets and avoid being removed at the end of their contract. [20:48] schestowitz This is not a sustainable management, this does not serve the public. [20:48] schestowitz EPO is lost [20:48] schestowitz JUNE 28, 2022 AT 5:19 PM [20:48] schestowitz its an open secret for those who know the backstage of the EPO but the only time the EPO hired HR consultancy to run a selection procedure for VPs years ago, the one candidate who was not selected as he was clearly identified as unfit for the position due to his profile, is the very same man who was hired as president of the EPO a few years later and who will lead this beautiful organisation into social chaos as well as the IP community into [20:48] schestowitz despair. [20:48] schestowitz Nothing could stop him to act erratically as he and his minions did, not even the courts, the dozens of EU MPs questioning the EU Commission or the Council of Europe which passed a motion signed by dozens of MPs, and not even the bad press throughout Europe which recurrently reminded the society of the deleterious things that occurred at EPO. [20:48] schestowitz So hoping to find competency at the highest level of the EPO is illusory since contrary to the EU institutions in Brussels, the EPO does not dispose upon check and balances and can exercise without any true public scrutiny and transparency, into what is now very much looking like unethical governance. [20:48] schestowitz I remember a striking parallel done between the EPO and the FIFA in an article which years ago tried to alert the public on the situation to no avail. Not even Germany, Switzerland, the NL or the Scandinavian countries which are always prone to give the world lessons in Ethics and the Rule of Law did act to restore the situation http://www.fosspatents.com/2015/06/striking-structural-parallels-between.html [20:48] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.fosspatents.com | FOSS Patents: Striking structural parallels between the European Patent Office and soccer body FIFA [20:48] schestowitz Roy Schestowitz [20:48] schestowitz JULY 1, 2022 AT 4:08 AM [20:48] schestowitz I dont typically post comments here, but I just wanted to say to whoever posts these articles on EPO issues, well done and carry on. Dont let EPO management bully you (or the blogs publisher) into changing topics or sanitising comments. Theyve done this to many sites before. Theyre NOT AN ORDINARY PATENT OFFICE! [20:48] schestowitz Comments are closed. [20:48] schestowitz GET BLOG POSTS IN YOUR INBOX! [20:48] schestowitz Email [20:48] schestowitz wolters Kluwer [20:48] schestowitz wolters Kluwer [20:48] schestowitz GO TO POSTS ON [20:48] schestowitz (Compulsory) license (Cross-border) jurisdiction (Indirect) infringement Amendments Biologics Brexit Case Law Chemical Engineering Damages Denmark Enforcement EPC EPO EPO Decision Equivalents European Union Exceptions to patentability Extent of Protection France Germany Infringement Injunction Inventive step Italy Litigation Netherlands Novelty Opposition Patents Pharma Pharmaceutical patent Procedure Revocation Scope of protection Second Medical [20:48] schestowitz Use SEP Spain SPC Sufficiency of disclosure Switzerland Unitary Patent United Kingdom United States of America UPC Validity [20:48] schestowitz NUMBER 3 IN TOP 10 PHARMA PATENT BLOGS TO FOLLOW IN 2022! [20:48] schestowitz Pharma Patent Blogs [20:48] schestowitz BLOG CONTRIBUTORS [20:48] schestowitz Brian Cordery [20:48] schestowitz Bristows [20:48] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Rik Lambers [20:49] schestowitz Brinkhof [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Daniela Ampollini [20:49] schestowitz Trevisan & Cuonzo [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Thorsten Bausch [20:49] schestowitz Hoffmann Eitle [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz John Collins [20:49] schestowitz Clayton Utz [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Matthieu Dhenne [20:49] schestowitz Ipsilon [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Simon Holzer [20:49] schestowitz MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd. (MLL) [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Binxin Li [20:49] schestowitz Baker & McKenzie FenXun (FTZ) [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Vaishali Mittal [20:49] schestowitz Anand and Anand [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Miquel Monta [20:49] schestowitz Clifford Chance [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Thomas Musmann [20:49] schestowitz Rospatt Osten Pross [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Alexa von Uexkll [20:49] schestowitz Vossius & Partner [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz Anders Valentin [20:49] schestowitz Bugge Valentin [20:49] schestowitz [20:49] schestowitz VAEPC-2021 [20:49] schestowitz Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition [20:49] schestowitz Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge [20:49] schestowitz 105 [20:50] schestowitz Practical-Guide-to-Succesful-IP-Valuation [20:50] schestowitz Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions [20:50] schestowitz Alexander Puutio [20:50] schestowitz 135 [20:50] schestowitz Internet-Law [20:50] schestowitz Internet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation Around the World [20:50] schestowitz Edward J. Swan [20:50] schestowitz 112 [20:50] schestowitz Chinese-patent-law [20:50] schestowitz Chinese Patent Law: A Practical Guide [20:50] schestowitz Sun Changlong, Zhang Junjie, Fanwen Kong, Dang Li, Yongbo Li, Zhang Liang (William), Wang Meng, Zhang Qiulin, Wang Rong, Gu Runfeng, Chen Shasha, Lu Weiting, Ge Xiaomei, Yang Yang, He Yibo [20:50] schestowitz 148 [20:50] schestowitz KLUWER IP LAW NEWS ALERT [20:50] schestowitz Stay informed on Intellectual Property law & developments [20:50] schestowitz SEARCH POSTS [20:50] schestowitz RSS FEEDS [20:50] schestowitz Summary Feed [20:50] schestowitz Article Feed [20:50] schestowitz RELATED SITES [20:50] schestowitz Kluwer IP Law [20:50] schestowitz Kluwer Copyright Blog [20:50] schestowitz Kluwer Trademark Blog [20:50] schestowitz Regulating for Globalization Blog [20:50] schestowitz Author Portal [20:50] schestowitz " ● Jul 03 [22:48] *techrights_guest|7 (~92463172@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes [22:54] *techrights_guest|7 has quit (Quit: Connection closed) ● Jul 03 [23:16] *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [23:34] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [23:35] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [23:54] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [23:54] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [23:57] *Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer)