Join us now at the IRC channel.
| schestowitz | >>> Dear Roy | Sep 10 02:50 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz | >>> | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >>> Apologies for the delayed response. I have been engaged on urgent Tribunal matters. | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >>> | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >>> I am interested but I am away on annual leave after tomorrow until 4 September 2019. Therefore, if you would rather speak to a solicitor before then I can recommend Latitude Law in Manchester that specialise in immigration law only. | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >> | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >> Thanks. | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >> | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >> Can you facilitate encryption in communications? That too can be a | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | >> consideration in our choice of representative/advisor. | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | > | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | > Will you be available to discuss next week? | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | You said you were interested in our case, so we waited. It's now 5 days after the date you said you'd be back from holidays and I still have my messages ignored. As such, we cannot recommend or rely on such a service... | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | We just lost a lot of time due to these false promises... | Sep 10 02:50 |
| schestowitz | > With M$ spamming about "Linux" maybe there is a matter of trademark | Sep 10 05:11 |
| schestowitz | > dilution or similar risks. You've pointed out something similar for | Sep 10 05:11 |
| schestowitz | > Open Source, even though it is not a trademark. IRRC Bruce Perens tried | Sep 10 05:11 |
| schestowitz | > but was denied, which can work to everyone's advantage when making bids | Sep 10 05:11 |
| schestowitz | > for government contracts. Back to Linux, could/would/should Linus drop | Sep 10 05:11 |
| schestowitz | > the LF and take his code and his trademarks elsewhere? He wouldn't do | Sep 10 05:11 |
| schestowitz | > it himself, but if someone at the top did the leg work, I expect he | Sep 10 05:12 |
| schestowitz | > might consider it. Don't quote ANY of that directly but feel free to | Sep 10 05:12 |
| schestowitz | > get ideas from it. | Sep 10 05:12 |
| schestowitz | I decided it's OK to quote as a random person not associated with us or our position. I see no harm in doing so TBH. No harm at all. | Sep 10 05:12 |
| schestowitz | >>>> I decided it's OK to quote as a random person not associated with us or | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>>> our position. I see no harm in doing so TBH. No harm at all. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> I'd rather not. It's poorly formed thoughts. TR gains from quality. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> Also, I'd like to be able to bounce ideas around without having to | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> self-censor so much. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >> I think what you said in this case was perfectly reasonable. I don't | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >> always quote, but this one is OK by most standards. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > Yes, but remember Christian xxx and several others felt compelled | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > to stop corresponding because there was no control over what got quoted | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > and when. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | I've edited that into a form I'm happy to go with, without naming anyone. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> As for ideas, since Lundgren is getting readjusted has he dropped any | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> hints about continuing the series? There are a lot of people pulling | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> for him and getting the full story out would probably increase the number. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >> His mates are always in our IRC channel. I'll ask. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > Ok. His case is important because publicity will help clear his name, | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > bring business to his new activities, and show that the "new" M$ is the | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > same as the old M$. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | I just got a reply on that... | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> Also, any further luck on sanitizing the material about M$ products | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >>> causing more hospital deaths? | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >> My source is afraid to go ahead with my draft (for now). | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >> | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | >> Same for one particular EPO story. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > Ok. I hope they can be worked into a publishable form someday. As for | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > the hospitals, like anywhere else, the microsofters are calling all the | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > shots. The MDs are below the administrators which are below the | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > microsofters. Ostensibly the vile administrators are on top and, while | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > they may feel that way, all the actual important decisions about ICT | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > policy and strategy are determined by little M$ resellers in the basement. | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | Known issue... widespread | Sep 10 06:05 |
| schestowitz | > Stadiums are not big and yet they are nonetheless too much of an area | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | > for 5G mobile service to cover easily. 5G in practice will probably | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | > mean a mast every few meters. That's too much cost overhead to cover | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | > with subscriptions, how will they get the money to recover their initial | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | > and ongoing costs? | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | And there's the health factor. | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | Apologist: but there are other sources of radiation! | Sep 10 06:59 |
| schestowitz | Me: yeah, we'll all get nuked anyway soon... with Trump and Putin.. | Sep 10 06:59 |
| <--MrGreenFriend has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | Sep 10 13:18 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!