●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Thursday, March 17, 2022 ●● ● Mar 17 [02:00] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) ● Mar 17 [04:51] *Techrights-sec has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [04:52] *Techrights-sec (~quassel@joseon-tcvbp5.am6e.nqgd.t29qgt.IP) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 17 [05:42] *DaemonFC has quit (Quit: Leaving) [05:55] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@hngiv8sdpiaf2.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 17 [06:59] *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Mar 17 [07:41] *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@cdi55u9b7mjf4.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 17 [08:15] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:21] schestowitz https://munich.suepo.org/suepo_action_plan_strike_on_tuesday_22_march/d-48041 [08:21] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-munich.suepo.org | [08:21] schestowitz ""https://munich.suepo.org/suepo_action_plan_strike_on_tuesday_22_march/d-4804 [08:21] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 404 @ https://munich.suepo.org/suepo_action_plan_strike_on_tuesday_22_march/d-4804 ) [08:21] schestowitz The SUEPO action plan approved on 22 February started with Work-to-Rule actions and now culminates with 1 full day of strike on Tuesday 22 March 2022 during the meeting of the Administrative Council (see calendar). [08:21] schestowitz Inflation is historically high and salaries frozen, but thanks to the Tribunal, there is at least one thing that has become cheaper for EPO staff this year: strike deductions! (down from 1/20th to 1/30th). Show Mr Campinos your discontent. Participate in the strike! [08:21] schestowitz This paper gives you the latest updates. [08:21] schestowitz Participate in the strike! Make Tuesday 22 March count! [08:22] schestowitz SUEPO Munich [08:22] schestowitz |" ● Mar 17 [09:17] schestowitz
[09:17] schestowitz"There are no advertisements on the respondent's website," the decision states. "There is no evidence that respondent is a competitor of complainant, nor is there any evidence that respondent has operated the website for any commercial purpose. The panel rejects complainant's submission, unsupported by evidence, that respondent's conduct is likely to have been undertaken for commercial gain."
[09:17] schestowitzThe decision goes on to state that Red Hat failed to establish that the website was created in bad faith, and to affirm its legitimacy. It further finds that Red Hat's complaint constituted harassment.