Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ FreeNode: Saturday, September 19, 2020

Join us now at the IRC channel.

*oiaohm has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)Sep 19 00:38
*oiaohm (~oiaohm@unaffiliated/oiaohm) has joined #techbytesSep 19 00:38
schestowitz>> I will wait until we have credible info. Would rather say nothing thanSep 19 04:24
schestowitz>> repeat a bunch of crap.Sep 19 04:24
schestowitz> +1Sep 19 04:24
schestowitz>Sep 19 04:24
schestowitz> Accuracy is very important.Sep 19 04:24
schestowitz>Sep 19 04:24
schestowitz> So far nothing has turned up in patent blogs. If it was good for team upc, they'd say something by now.Sep 19 04:24
schestowitz> I have it queued up man. I haven’t had a chance to dig up old trauma between my garden and a few other passion projects.Sep 19 04:24
schestowitzNo worries, no hurry :-)Sep 19 04:24
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)Sep 19 10:23
*rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)Sep 19 10:23
*asusbox has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)Sep 19 11:06
*asusbox (~rianne@host81-154-169-82.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 11:06
*rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-169-82.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 11:35
*liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-82.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 11:35
*rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)Sep 19 12:43
*rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-169-82.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 12:44
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)Sep 19 12:52
*rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)Sep 19 12:52
*liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-82.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 13:15
*rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-169-82.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 13:15
Tcl interface unloadedSep 19 16:46
Python interface unloadedSep 19 16:46
*Now talking on #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*Topic for #techbytes is: Welcome to the official channel of the TechBytes AudiocastSep 19 16:51
*Topic for #techbytes set by ThistleWeb!~gordon@unaffiliated/thistleweb at Wed Jan 5 20:55:35 2011Sep 19 16:51
*schestowitz (~schestowi@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*schestowitz has quit (Changing host)Sep 19 16:51
*schestowitz (~schestowi@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*acer-box (~acer-box@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*asusbox (~rianne@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*acer-box has quit (Changing host)Sep 19 16:51
*acer-box (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 16:51
*liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 17:02
*libertybox (~schestowi@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 17:03
*rianne (~rianne@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 17:05
*rianne_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)Sep 19 19:53
*rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-174-55.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesSep 19 19:53
schestowitz>> covering UNIX as I'm far from familiar. It's a lot older than me.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> it really isnt though. i mean it wasnt even rewritten in c until lessSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> than a decade before you were born.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> -> bcplSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> -> b (came after bcpl)Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> -> c (came after b)Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> -> d (they named it upside down. as roger faulkner says, the ogicalSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> progression of b c is p, not d.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> 1973, unix was rewritten in c. and the progression from that into thisSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> thing that would take over the world happened even later.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> unix licensing targeted minicomputers, left pc users to have their ownSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> revolution WITHOUT at&t. they could have been smarter-- but licensesSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> were like $1000 (on the cheap end-- they would get much worse)Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> usl wanted to do intel and have sun focus on sparc-- sparc didnt careSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> about that, so they and usl stopped talking. sun, bsd and sgi innovatedSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> while usl focused on things that bolstered short term financialSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> stability (short term stability!) and in the long run just cost them theSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> business.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> then the innovators got just as cocky while bsd moved forward. then bsdSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> got caught up in the same kind of thing with usl that compaq did goingSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> up against ibm. usl didnt have much of a case and it would have gottenSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> thrown out except they shifted targets to ucb, who had deeper pockets.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz> the legal battles were as much of a dance as anything-- more like aSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> really nasty, long and drawn out divorce proceeding than a company goingSep 19 23:31
schestowitz> after somebody for something they did.Sep 19 23:31
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz> the heroism of torvalds is overstated-- a LOT of bsd (some of theSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> technologies people still rely on because theyre entrenched wereSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> INTENDED as weekend hacks. other entrenched things that were intended asSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> quick hacks: python, javascript, dos-- the "d" in dos orignally comesSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> from tim patters "qdos" and the qd stands for "quick and dirty".Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz> so they make out torvalds to be this scruffy university kid doing aSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> hobby project, not something big and important like gnu (his words, iveSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> read them many times and weve both quoted them) though the original unixSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> started out as a computer game, just for fun, after multics was dead. onSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> a 2-million dollar (in todays money) computer (pdp 7) that wasSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> practically someones garbage. when they UPGRADED it was to a "bargainSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> basement" $65,000 pdp-11, in the money of that time period.Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz> but what people miss when they deify torvalds is that every scruffySep 19 23:32
schestowitz> university kid that worked on something like bsd-- or javascript, orSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> python (perhaps not a scruffy university kid, but still a quick hack asSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> a christmas vacation effort) started the way the linux kernel did. unixSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> started the way the linux kernel did (taking into account differences inSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> hardware at the time).Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz> so theyre deifying torvalds for doing what everybody else did. he wasSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> lucky. if he was exceptional compared to the other guys, he was trulySep 19 23:32
schestowitz> exceptional as a manager. the thing hes supposedly terrible at but weSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> all know better than that. on a technical level hes done some incrediblySep 19 23:32
schestowitz> stupid things, but he was the boss at the time and OVERALL, the kernelSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> truly wasnt shit. it was usable, and usable counts for so much. heSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> allowed people to improve it, in more instances than not (some of theSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> exceptions are unfortunate, but theyre exceptions).Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz> the more you get into this stuff, the more you realise that the bigSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> corporations had all their plans, but on a technical level mostSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> advancements came from dorks, not bosses. tcp/ip came from both, but theSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> dorks won against the bosses in battle. dorks made a better tcp/ip thanSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> the bosses that hired them. and they had to fight to win. torvalds hasSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> stopped fighting, and the bosses have won. but they didnt make this stuff.Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:32
schestowitz> even in radio, there was one scruffy guy who inveted fm, rca had no useSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> for it and since it was created on company time, they owned the patentSep 19 23:32
schestowitz> on it-- which they didnt use and didnt let him work, so the inventer ofSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> fm radio killed himself, iirc.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> companies dont make this stuff. they buy and own and try to steer it.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> that goes badly as often as it goes well. theyre not magicians orSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> wizards. theyre kings. kings dont make things. they tell people to makeSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> things, and things are not always better for it. fm eventuallySep 19 23:33
schestowitz> revolutionised radio.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> watch the keith packard talk, he says a lot of the same things. evenSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> when a company like sun makes something better like the 360, they cantSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> make it work because their model depends on keeping other people fromSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> building for/on it. so people end up going with whats cheaper to build on.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> cars that run on petrol came about because it was byproduct of anSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> existing industry that was cheaper. after more than a century ofSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> innovation based on this, cars that run on petrol have more technologySep 19 23:33
schestowitz> that makes them efficient, though until people figured out that petrolSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> was plentiful and cheap, electric cars had just as much of a chance inSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> the early days.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> people think they want bach and beethoven, but those were rock stars inSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> their days-- they were rebels who made ladies swoon and their music wasSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> considered noise by earlier generations. the industry proves that moreSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> people want britney spears instead. they want cut corners, they wantSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> stuff optimised for performance over reliablity, they want to have theirSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> legs peed on and for the meteorologists to tell them its rain.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> industry is cheap, because thats where the profit is. once they have aSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> good scam going, its "expensive" because if you have a horse you knowSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> will win, you put LOTS of money on it. then you have to pay off theSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> politicians so they dont ban the races. so its expensive in that regard.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> its such a joke. but its ONE HUNDRED percent politics. engineering, likeSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> rock music, is blue collar work where some people get rich and mostSep 19 23:33
schestowitz> people go bankrupt. its like the music industry.Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> oh baby, babySep 19 23:33
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:33
schestowitz> how was i supposed to know?Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> of course 90% of what im saying here is in those talks. i mean itsSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> lifted DIRECTLY from youtube videos of conference presentations. theSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> industry is a bunch of hacks, glued together by managers who do just asSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> much (perhaps more) to shut down good ideas because theyre mostlySep 19 23:34
schestowitz> interested in money.Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> but its very tricky to build something better. gnu is being co-opted andSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> sort of gradually shut down, im not saying its dying but its in very badSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> shape in terms of who is caring for it long-term. that cant be rms longSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> term, though im in favour of him running the project as long as he feelsSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> able.Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> in many ways, gnu has the same problems the fsf did TWO years ago. thatsSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> not good, hackers-- thats not good. rms doesnt believe me, and id likeSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> to be wrong-- but im not as often as id like.Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> when i say its very tricky to build something better, i mean im aSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> software guy but you do need hardware. if you think of hardware costs inSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> terms of new stuff, not garbage and ewaste (unix was designed andSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> developed literally on ewaste) then you have open hardware projects likeSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> what bunny huang works on-- you get an idea of just how much fuckingSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> trouble hardware really is, if you watch his talks and his projects andSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> efforts to create open hardware as a work-in-progress and even academicSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> study. unlike most people, huang understands bulk commodity hardwareSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> from-the-actual-source.Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> this stuff will always be easier on surplus hardware, not bulk newSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> hardware, probably. maybe one day that will change, but not soon.Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> but the fsf (emacs) started because the university labs were emptyingSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> out into the corporations-- even before people left the labs, they wereSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> working more and more for companies who wanted to ultimately controlSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> what they did. and rms wanted no part of that.Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> with github and lf and all this other stuff, this is the next generationSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> of that happening. and rms obviously thinks of this shit as linear, notSep 19 23:34
schestowitz> generational or cyclical. he thinks theres only progress and setbacks,Sep 19 23:34
schestowitz> not cycles of revolution, co-opting and stagnation.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> but we are sort of now reliving the times he suffered at the lab. andSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> since he doesnt believe thats happening, hes not going to do anythingSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> about that.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> but on a small level, hes still fighting-- and thats good, because hesSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> one of the best fighters. its a shame though, after building up such aSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> movement that he refuses to warn it about you know-- the next cycle. heSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> just misses it completely, or he leaves it out.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> what im trying to do here isnt write an article. what im trying to doSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> here, is give you things to think about, things to consider, things toSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> watch for. but knowing you, youll turn it into an article. i dont careSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> about that, but im not writing it for the audience i write articles for.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> im writing this to you, and i hope it finds you.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> the main reason there isnt much of a next generation free softwareSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> movement yet, is MOST of the free software movement (except outliers) isSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> still acting like there isnt a next generation of threats. like theyreSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> all old threats-- which is true. but i honestly dont believe they haveSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> any idea just how true that really is. theres no evidence that they getSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> what has changed, or why its more urgent than it was 3 years ago. thatsSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> the sort of hubris that did in sgi, sun and at&t.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> you know the people who wanted the internet went to at&t first, right?Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> they wanted at&t to design the internet. and at&t balked at it. which isSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> probably why tcp/ip didnt come from at&t, and why at&t was behind onSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> tcp/ip (which isnt what the internet was built on at first, but itSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> certainly is what the internet is build on foremost)Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> why did at&t not want to build the internet? hubris. and that let bsdSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> move ahead. it was bb&n (the same people who designed the very FIRST twoSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> internet routerss, kleinrock and all those people) and the bsd people.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> and the bsd people outdid the bb&n design. that was another scruffy hack.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> everybody gets comfortable, and they start thinking "weve got this" noSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> matter what happens. and they get cocky, and think theyre too big to fail.Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:35
schestowitz> its a stupid and pointless attitude. its great to think that you wontSep 19 23:35
schestowitz> give up-- but this is more like "we dont have to try"-- they dont haveSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> to understand, worry, keep innovating, or adapt.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> THATS fucking hubris. and it will kill a movement as surely as it willSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> kill a corporation. in some ways it nearly has.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> most innovation IS crap though. just ask the open SHIT initiative. butSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> when corporations, scruffy hackers or humanitarian movements get cockySep 19 23:36
schestowitz> and overconfident, thats just as bad as most innovation. sometimes itsSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> worse, because things just drop off-- and become acquired, perhaps bySep 19 23:36
schestowitz> ibm-- who then throws it away, like multics.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> i mean its great that multics was powered off, it needed gobs ofSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> expensive hardware and allowed unix to come about, luckily. but we arentSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> talking about multics now, we are talking about the free software movement.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> id actually rather it not get powered down, really.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz---------------------Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> the "malicious instigators of treachery"Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> i mentioned in that article i met the inventor of the strobe light. thatSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> was in his lab at mit. i used to be a very big fan, and some amazingSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> things have come out of there, but in the 21st century i think its aSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> very dark and ugly thing. i know, right? like the stuff the inventor ofSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> the strobe light worked on wasnt! but back then, i really dont think mitSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> was corrupt, or did so much to sell out and exploit its own alumni andSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> staff... awful!Sep 19 23:36
MinceR20 003451 < schestowitz> > working more and more for companies who wanted to ultimately controlSep 19 23:36
schestowitz------------------------Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> One thing GNU Watch gets all wrong is there's no focus on the FSF'sSep 19 23:36
MinceR20 003452 < schestowitz> > what they did. and rms wanted no part of that.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> high-profile work.Sep 19 23:36
MinceRfunny, apparently he doesn't mind anymoreSep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> Take the video they made to promote free software alternatives to Zoom.Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> What's the FSF promoting?Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> https://www.fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-announces-freedom-respecting-videoconferencing-for-its-associate-membersSep 19 23:36
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.fsf.org | Free Software Foundation announces freedom-respecting videoconferencing for its associate members — Free Software Foundation — working together for free softwareSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> (nice url, guys)Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> "The platform the FSF will use to offer ethical videoconferencing accessSep 19 23:36
schestowitz> is Jitsi Meet."Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:36
schestowitz> So that links to: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Jitsi-MeetSep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-directory.fsf.org | Jitsi-Meet - Free Software DirectorySep 19 23:37
schestowitz> I mean, we have a really great opportunity here-- most Free Software hasSep 19 23:37
schestowitz> been co-opted by GitHub, we can use the FSF to promote GitHub and makeSep 19 23:37
schestowitz> it the Free Github Foundation, we can get (pay) the FSF to spend its ownSep 19 23:37
schestowitz> budget making adverts for software that requires a Microsoft account toSep 19 23:37
schestowitz> fully participate in.Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Jitsi-MeetSep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz> "Jitsi MeetSep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz> https://jitsi.org/jitsi-meet/"Sep 19 23:37
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-jitsi.org | Jitsi Meet - Instant Free VideoconferencingSep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz> "DocumentationSep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz> https://jitsi.github.io/handbook/docs/intro"Sep 19 23:37
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-jitsi.github.io | Introduction · Jitsi Meet HandbookSep 19 23:37
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:37
schestowitz> Free Github Foundation-- Fighting for *your* Github!Sep 19 23:37
MinceRmaybe they support Microsoft GitHub because it runs Git, which is [L]GPL and apparently they believe that in itself is enough to fix everythingSep 19 23:38
schestowitznaaa...Sep 19 23:38
schestowitzthey just don't careSep 19 23:38
MinceRit seemed to be the story about cancerd, thoughSep 19 23:40
schestowitz> Here's one you might like https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=-rPPqm44xLsSep 19 23:45
schestowitz>Sep 19 23:45
schestowitz> "Mainframes and the Unix Revolution" 15 minutesSep 19 23:45
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-invidious.snopyta.org | Mainframes and the Unix Revolution - Computerphile - InvidiousSep 19 23:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!