●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Saturday, April 23, 2022 ●● ● Apr 23 [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:14] yeah this is exactly why i've never gone public [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:14] it's my word against his [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:14] and, being on his good side was profitable for a few years [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:14] ever since the fsf abandoned me back in xxxx, i've had no reason to cosy up to them [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:14] I've seen worse things from other people [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:14] you know [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] my defense against him last year was actually an attack [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] do you know why i say that? [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] well, being facetious is not good [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] if he had either not publicly re-joined the board, or if he had lost and been kicked out again: [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] and you wanted to be ED [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] now you tell me this [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:15] if that had happened, he would have been a martyr [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:16] and he'd have a stronger position in the community than he does now [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:16] him "winning" was the worst thing for him. because it puts him in the spotlight again [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:16] well, not a smoking gun but: [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:16] have you ever considered why he has never had a girlfriend? [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:16] he has said he had one in his youth, but none since [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:17] and as you said, he was close to epstein [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:18] this is also another reason why i attacked stallman in xxxxx, while stating another reason - but i was constantly drunk back then and ended up going overboard and i became the topic of debate instead of him [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:18] 2021 was my revenge for xxxxxx [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:18] my defense served two purposes: [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:18] * prevent rms being a martyr. he would have been better off stepping down again [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:18] (i targeted the sycophants who enabled him, emboldening them to be more rigorous in their defenses) [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:19] * distract people from my takeover of xxxx [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:19] i've told xxxxxxx all of this [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:19] i decided to tell it all to you, on a whim [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:19] i hate stallman's guts [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:19] thing is, i bet if i came forward, others would too. but i won't [00:10] schestowitz-TR [15:19] i've seen how that ends. and i don't want to be harassed [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:19] i will never go public with any of this. but i've told a few people [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:20] [15:16] have you ever considered why he has never had a girlfriend? [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:20] he did have relationship [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:20] so the statement is not true [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:21] and his exes spoke out in his defence [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:21] [15:17] and as you said, he was close to epstein [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:21] no! [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:21] that's bill gates [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:21] rms never met the creep and rms called epstein very bad things [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:22] oh ok [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] the only think you say you can go public with is more trivial than you put it [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] sans name-calling [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] i don't have strong enough evidence against him [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] but i know he's a pedo [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] but I don't know the exact words he used [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] he does stare at many people, even men [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] and he wrote about it, some tried to train him to not do that [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:23] i do have the power to cause doubt in the minds of his inner circle though [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:24] that's why i've approached several members of the gnu advisory committee privately [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:24] anyway, the chat is over for now [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:24] we go in circles [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:24] oh? [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:24] ok [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:24] i actually just woke up and have work to do anyway [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] don't be offended [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] I just got back home [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] thanks for shasring the story from xxxxxx [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] I want to catch up with news links [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] i understand [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] what he wrote publicly is more incriminating [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:25] you have a very practical and utilitarian mindset. it's one thing i've noticed about you [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] and even though it's "old news" I still object strongly to what he wrote [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] and i respect it [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] but let's leave it at that [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] btw [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] my new cashcow is bsd [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] rather than fsf/gnu [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] been promoting myself to the bsd crowd lately. they love me [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] openbsd seems robust [00:11] schestowitz-TR [15:26] been doing openbsd installs on laptops recently [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:27] but openbsd lacks a lot of things for "mass" adoption [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:27] so I appreciate openbsd [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:27] for my customers, it's perfect [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:27] but not for my workflow [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:27] what things does it lack for mass adoption? [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] we talked about it in irc last night [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] oh ok [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] summarize it for me while i read it [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] around midnight, search scrollbuffer [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] I really want to post news links now [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] I appreciate what you told me about xxxxx [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:28] it helps me form an opinion [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] the rest is rehash and some name-calling, like "creep" [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] he's on the spectrum [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] I try to treat differently people who lack tact [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] that's tolerance [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] ok [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] like helping an old lady cross the road [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] "do you think I'm too weak !!" [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] i understand [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:29] "no, I could see you could use seome help" [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:30] this reminds me of a louis rossman video [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:30] he was talkingabout what to say to a new employer if your old one was an asshole [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:30] and he said: don't say your old boss was an asshole or this and that, just say what he did and why you left [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:30] etc [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:31] good tip [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:31] and to borrow an analogy [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:31] don't say LF "sucks" or RMS "creep" [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] explain what happened [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] and let people form their opinion [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] i'll let you get on with your work [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] thanks for the chat [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] my pleasure! [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] btw [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] quick tip: [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:32] always be consistent [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:33] if you attack RMS, then defend, then attack [00:12] schestowitz-TR [15:33] it'll catch up with you [00:12] schestowitz-TR [16:22] i know [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:22] i'm not going to mention his name publicly or do anything for/against him from now on [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:22] 2021 was a "reset" year [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:22] it served 3 purposes: [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:22] * restore reputation [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:23] * xxxxx takeover. revive the project (it was dead) [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:23] * actually distance myself from the fsf [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:23] trying to join fsf as ed wasn't really a serious effort [00:13] schestowitz-TR [16:23] i knew i wouldn't be accepted. i was just trolling them basically ● Apr 23 [01:33] *orgy has quit (Quit: Connection closed) ● Apr 23 [03:59] *Despatche has quit (connection closed) ● Apr 23 [04:00] *Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Apr 23 [05:37] *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [05:37] *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Apr 23 [06:20] *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed) [06:21] *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@bkb7tdc7zpz6c.irc) has joined #techbytes [06:30] *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed) [06:46] *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@9bsrk9cwiznhk.irc) has joined #techbytes [06:54] *rianne (~rianne@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytes [06:54] *asusbox (~rianne@s44cwn8sugddy.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Apr 23 [07:13] schestowitz https://www.reddit.com/r/Meovely/comments/u8ra6d/microsofts_human_resources_hr_policy_we_offer/ [07:13] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.reddit.com | Microsofts Human Resources (HR) Policy: We Offer Assistance to Perpetrators of Domestic Violence : Meovely [07:13] schestowitz " [07:13] schestowitz WE WANT MICROSOFT, THEIR CLOWNS AND OTHER PERVERTED STAFFERS, CONTRACTORS OR WHATEVER TO NEVER USE THE NAME MELINA TO POST PR0N EVER AGAIN ! [07:13] schestowitz WE WANT THEM TO F OFF AND STAY AWAY FROM MELINA. [07:13] schestowitz WHERE IS THEIR INVESTOR SUPER WOMAN ? [07:13] schestowitz WE WANT THEM TO STAY AWAY FROM OUR SUBREDDITS ALSO !!! WE'RE FED UP OF BEING OBLIGED TO GO RESTRICTED "OR ELSE" !!! [07:13] schestowitz We are scared for Melina's safety, as those people have been found guilty of s3x trafficking, assault, r@pe, harassment and the likes !!!!!! [07:13] schestowitz We will keep on screaming in terror until they stop !!! [07:13] schestowitz " [07:38] *Despatche_ (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes [07:39] *Despatche has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [07:41] schestowitz > Hi Roy, [07:41] schestowitz > [07:41] schestowitz > Hope you're very well. [07:41] schestowitz Yes, thanks. I was just going through your articles a couple of days ago. [07:41] schestowitz > If I wanted to give readers a single link that was a powerful and [07:41] schestowitz > authoritative account of all the official legal cases against [07:41] schestowitz > Microsoft (and/or Google) in respect of anti-trust, bribery etc, what [07:41] schestowitz > would you recommend? [07:41] schestowitz http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653 [07:41] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.groklaw.net | Groklaw - Microsoft Litigation [07:41] schestowitz > Do you know of any initiatives in support of the European Digital [07:41] schestowitz > Markets Act (and BTW - what do you personally think of it) [07:41] schestowitz > [07:41] schestowitz > all good wishes, [07:41] schestowitz I am not familiar with it, never read it myself, but I know someone who might know better. I can ask if you want. [07:49] schestowitz Jack from E.ON Next wrote on 21/04/2022 15:21: [07:49] schestowitz > Hi Roy, [07:49] schestowitz > [07:49] schestowitz > Thank you for your reply, [07:49] schestowitz > [07:49] schestowitz > Please can you provide more information on why you believe you pay extra [07:49] schestowitz > to get more frequent data collection readings? This is not a service [07:49] schestowitz > E-on Next provide. [07:49] schestowitz > [07:49] schestowitz > Jack [07:49] schestowitz > [07:49] schestowitz > E-on Next ● Apr 23 [08:50] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:56] *u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed) [08:57] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Apr 23 [10:08] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [10:23] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes [10:47] *Despatche_ has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer) ● Apr 23 [14:56] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) ● Apr 23 [17:24] *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [17:26] *psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [17:26] *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes [17:46] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Apr 23 [18:00] *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [18:00] *psydroid2 (~psydroid@memzbmehf99re.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Apr 23 [22:01] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes [22:04] schestowitz >> Yes, thanks. I was just going through your articles a couple of days ago. [22:04] schestowitz > Sorry I've not had time to write anything lately for Techrights. [22:04] schestowitz > But techrights always in my mind when considering an idea as [22:04] schestowitz > a possible destination. [22:04] schestowitz We've been around for many years and will stay afloat for many years. [22:04] schestowitz >>> If I wanted to give readers a single link that was a powerful and [22:04] schestowitz >>> authoritative account of all the official legal cases against [22:04] schestowitz >>> Microsoft (and/or Google) in respect of anti-trust, bribery etc, what [22:04] schestowitz >>> would you recommend? [22:04] schestowitz >> http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653 [22:04] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.groklaw.net | Groklaw - Microsoft Litigation [22:04] schestowitz > Thanks very much. [22:04] schestowitz Tell me if you need more. [22:04] schestowitz >>> Markets Act (and BTW - what do you personally think of it) [22:04] schestowitz >> I am not familiar with it, never read it myself, but I know someone who [22:04] schestowitz >> might know better. I can ask if you want. [22:04] schestowitz > If you know anyone who has written intelligently on it I'd be [22:04] schestowitz > curious. There's always a downside to these things (and I know you're [22:04] schestowitz > rightly critical of European corruption), but this one seemed to have [22:04] schestowitz > some merits for fighting monopoly infrastructure such as MS/Google in [22:04] schestowitz > schools etc. [22:04] schestowitz Not so much "European corruption" as much as EPO corruption or patent abuse. Today we start a 14-part series about EPO-Belarus-Russia. [22:04] schestowitz I don't know who promotes the above law (if Breton, be suspicious; we wrote tons about him), but I know someone who might know a lot more about it. [22:04] schestowitz When I try to speak to politicians it goes almost nowhere at the end, e.g.: http://techrights.org/2021/10/02/merkel-epo-legacy/ [22:04] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Angela Merkels Coalition Has Not Helped EPO Staff and Not Even Bloggers Blackmailed by EPO Management | Techrights [22:17] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [22:18] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@v6xmmrhxmbafc.irc) has joined #techbytes [22:38] *u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed) ● Apr 23 [23:20] *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [23:25] *Despatche (~desp@u3xy9z2ifjzci.irc) has joined #techbytes