Bonum Certa Men Certa

Workers of the European Patent Office Take the Office to Court Over Pension

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jun 22, 2024,
updated Jun 22, 2024

Appeals Committee favours staff and pensioners in salary adjustment litigation

European Patent Office (EPO) pensions still precarious

SEVERAL hours ago the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) published and circulated a new publication about the ongoing attack on pensioners and future pensioners by António Campinos and his predecessor Benoît Battistelli.

As a little bit of background consider the following:

The latest publication is dated Friday and it was accompanied/spread with the message in the abstract/overview: "SUEPO has been actively contesting the new salary adjustment procedure introduced in 2020, which has led to reduced or halted annual adjustments of salaries and pensions. A test-case procedure before the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee has now resulted in an opinion favouring staff and pensioners, which has been sent to the President. In a recent publication, the President has downplayed the opinion and indicated a preference for a judgment from ILOAT. SUEPO criticises the inflated financial provisions of EUR 2 billion cited by the President and emphasises the Office’s strong financial position. The President should follow the opinion of the Appeals Committee, as generally foreseen in the Service Regulations."

Here's the full thing as HTML, plain text, and GemText:

INTERNATIONALE GEWERKSCHAFT IM EUROPÄISCHEN PATENTAMT
STAFF UNION OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE
UNION SYNDICALE DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS

Zentraler Vorstand Central Executive Committee Bureau central
Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) www.suepo.org

21 June 2024
su24012cp 0.2.1 – 5.2

Appeals Committee favours staff and pensioners in salary adjustment litigation

SUEPO has been actively contesting the new salary adjustment procedure introduced in 2020, which has led to reduced or halted annual adjustments of salaries and pensions. A test-case procedure before the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee has now resulted in an opinion favouring staff and pensioners, which has been sent to the President. In a recent publication, the President has downplayed the opinion and indicated a preference for a judgment from ILOAT. SUEPO criticises the inflated financial provisions of EUR 2 billion cited by the President and emphasises the Office’s strong financial position. The President should follow the opinion of the Appeals Committee, as generally foreseen in the Service Regulations.

Dear SUEPO members,

Since the introduction of the new salary adjustment procedure in 2020, SUEPO has been supporting appeals and complaints against it. The Office has regularly reduced or even halted the annual adjustments of salaries and pensions, which should normally reflect the average development of the purchasing power of national civil servants, and has excluded pensioners from the redistribution pool.

Recent developments: Internal appeal procedure

An important positive development has now taken place in this dispute. On 13 April 2022, the presiding member of the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee announced the possibility of initiating a test-case procedure for appeals against the salary adjustment procedure and its implementation for 2021 (86,8% cut in adjustments). SUEPO considered this proposal adequate and informed its members accordingly. The initiation of the test- case procedure was then announced on 8 August 2022.

After several submissions of observations by the test appellants and the Office, a hearing before the Enlarged Chamber on 15 November 2023, and further exchanges of information, the Appeals Committee sent its reasoned opinion to the President on 7 June 2024. This opinion shall apply to every appeal in which a similar issue has been raised (see Article 9b of the Implementing Rules for Articles 106 to 113 ServRegs). Pursuant to Article 110(4) ServRegs, the President shall take a final decision on the appeal, of which the appellants shall receive a copy.

President’s response and implications

Although latter has not yet taken place, the President published on the Intranet on 13 June 2024 that the Enlarged Chamber had concluded that the application of the sustainability clause (cut in adjustments) had gone against the principle of purchasing power parity. In addition, the Enlarged Chamber considered it fair and advisable that the periodical settlement clause should not exclude pensioners.

The President shall in general follow the opinion of the Appeals Committee. If not, he shall set out in writing the reasons for deviating from the opinion. Interestingly, in this legal context (Article 110(4) ServRegs), the President minimised the opinion of the Enlarged Chamber in a test-case procedure as a “non-binding opinion” and declared, without further reasoning, that the Office did not share this opinion. Instead, he suggested that the lawfulness of the current salary adjustment procedure would ultimately be cleared by an ILOAT judgment.

Paradoxically, the President, who once favoured a shift from a litigation culture to a culture of social dialogue, now seeks resolution from the Tribunal in Geneva. In addition, on the same date, he also published an announcement stating that many measures taken by the Office in recent years have strengthened dialogue, but that the backlog before the Tribunal remains a concern.

Analysis and proposal

The jurisprudence of the Tribunal attributes considerable deference to rational and balanced findings of internal appeal bodies (see Judgments Nos. 2295, 3400, 4697). When rejecting an opinion of the Appeals Committee, the President thus must give clear and cogent reasons (see Judgments Nos. 2699, 4697). We believe that respect for this opinion must be all the greater since this is a test-case procedure in which the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee has carefully investigated and assessed the matter. SUEPO would therefore not shy away from supporting complaints by the test appellants in Geneva in the event of a negative decision by the President.

Unfortunately, we cannot comment in detail on the opinion because the President has not published it together with his Intranet statement. Neither has he sent a copy to the appellants yet. It seems wrong to publicly criticise a positive opinion in a test-case procedure before it is even published. This approach is lacking transparency and fairness. It appears that that the President wants to ensure the sovereignty of interpretation before allowing the appellants and all other concerned employees and pensioners to make their own assessment.

SUEPO encourages the President to fully implement the opinion of the Appeals Committee and to propose the removal of the sustainability clause (Article 9) from the Implementing Rule for Article 64 ServRegs. This would also render the periodical settlement redundant (Article 10), thus preventing the discrimination of pensioners (which contravenes Article 33(2)(c) EPC). The dispute over the salary adjustment procedure would then be settled with a subsequent payment of the arrears, interests, and costs.

Financial situation

Some colleagues approached us because the President referred in his publication to a provision of circa EUR 2 bn in the Office’s reserves, equivalent to the savings of the salary adjustment procedure. Indeed, the impact of the salary adjustment procedure on the alleged coverage gap was estimated in CA/19/20 at EUR 2 bn under the conditions of the so-called Base 2 scenario. This scenario, which assumed no recovery from a low interest rate environment and a global economic recession in 2020, did not materialise. The savings of EUR 2 bn forecasted in the financial study 2019 assumed the application of limiting the adjustments to the inflation in the Eurozone + 0,2% over a period of multiple cycles of the salary adjustment procedure, but the current opinion of the Appeals Committee should lead to a correction of the SAP already in this first cycle. It follows, that a more realistic figure is at least one order of magnitude lower. The financial situation of the Office is as follows (2023 year-end actuals): RFPSS: EUR 12,1 bn; EPOTIF: EUR 3,5 bn; cash reserve: EUR 0,5 bn; annual surplus: EUR 0,4 bn. This is much better than estimated. The reference to a EUR 2 bn provision is clearly inflated and not aligned with the current financial situation.

Furthermore, the fact that a provision is only mentioned now, despite a four-digit number of requests for review and appeals against the salary adjustment procedure having been filed since 2020, raises the question as to whether the Office has adequately assessed the legal risks and failed to recognise the need to make provisions at an earlier stage. The annual statements according to IFRS for the accounting periods of 2021 and 2022 make it clear that the EPOrg has contingencies arising from the ordinary course of business, mainly due to disputed invoices, pending legal disputes and arbitration procedures or appeals by staff members including those in front of the ILOAT. The Office does not anticipate that these will give rise to any material liabilities other than those for which provision has been made. The provisions for litigation risks amounted to EUR 6,1 million on 31 December 2022 (see CA/60/23, note 26), and to EUR 5,6 million on 31 December 2021 (see CA/60/22, note 25).

Together, we are strong!

We would like to emphasise that the only way we can finance the dispute about the salary adjustment procedure is through your contributions. SUEPO collaborates with reputable lawyers who draft appeals for SUEPO members and who support the appellants. As a union with strong membership, SUEPO is perfectly placed to defend the rights of staff and pensioners.

Your SUEPO Central Bureau

What happens at the EPO in that regard is part of a broader trend.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Red Hat's Bluewashing to be Further Completed This Year
Do not wait for some announcement from redhat.com - it's already covered by IBM
Dr. Andy Farnell on a Death to Efficiency and Cash
Cash is not the same as "digital cash", which isn't even remotely the same
A Gift That Keeps on Giving: Microsofters Reveal a Campaign of SLAPP, Seeking to Censor Critical Information About Lawsuits Against Microsoft
All they can get here or mockery and ridicule
LLM Slopfarms: LinuxSecurity.com and FUDZilla Doing 'Linux' (Fake Articles)
It's 2025. Everything on the Web is getting worse, except SPARTAN.
 
Zizian, transgender, Google & Debian open source extremist cult phenomena
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 19/02/2025: The Forgotten USB Competitor and Pope's Bilateral Pneumonia
Links for the day
Gemini Links 19/02/2025: AuraRepo and Offpunk
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Wayne Williams is Making Up for His Workers' Slop Party, LinuxSecurity.com Still Publishes Fake Articles
We must identify and call out the culprits
“Open Source” Really Does Miss the Point, We Can Do Better Than That
We need to reject groups of people who promote Microsoft GitHub (proprietary) and call that "Open Source"
Links 19/02/2025: Organisations Quitting Social Control Media, Windows TCO Illustrated Some More
Links for the day
The Free Software Foundation is More Financially Independent From Large Corporations Right Now
Money that comes with strings attached to it is always problematic
The Free Software Foundation's Position on IBM Taking Red Hat Enterprise Linux 'Private' is Articulated Almost 2 Years Late
The Free Software Foundation finally spoke out about this issue
Techrights Publication Topics
One thing we'd like to do more of is Software Freedom advocacy
Springtime Layoffs at IBM (2025) and Statement From IBM European Works Council
It's about cost-cutting, even if such cuts doom the company
Microsoft Paying People Who Harass and SLAPP Techrights, Demanding Censorship
At this point the money trail leads directly to Microsoft
It's Not Even Hidden Anymore: Microsoft is Passing Bribes for Media to Publish Puff Pieces About Itself
GeekWire is paid by Microsoft to publish many puff pieces (even outright lies) about Microsoft
Links 19/02/2025: Political Roundup and Halifax Wants to Dump Twitter ("X")
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/02/2025: Beginning Meditation, Poison as Praxis, and Blogging
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 18, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, February 18, 2025
Two Years After Issuing Ridiculous Threats and Choosing a Law Firm in Debt (Probably Desperate for Clients) Matthew J. Garrett Gets Help ('Bailout') From Microsofters
The karma won't be good
How Americans View 'Free Speech' in Practice
"No good deed goes unpunished"
Threats Against Techrights Always Come From Outside Britain
Over the coming days we shall write about an example of our own and we'll show how Americans have the audacity to bully people using a foreign (to them) court
Links 18/02/2025: More DeepSeek Bans and Supreme Court Patent Challenges
Links for the day
Links 18/02/2025: FAA Layoffs and EU Betrayed
Links for the day
On Technical Contracts of Employment and Why People Must Read Before Signing
The wave of layoffs under MElon will worsen prospects of finding alternate/better employment
Gemini Links 18/02/2025: Reading Books and Oneiric Monk
Links for the day
Swiss corruption, Greens, Liip & Debian human rights violations
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Swiss police TIGRIS unit, World Cat Day, Swiss-corruption.com & Debian
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 18/02/2025: “Hey Hi Video Surveillance” and YouTube at 20
Links for the day
LLM Slop is Now Filling the Web With Pure Fiction/Fabrication/Misinformation About Linux
The timing of this lie/fiction is curious because Torvalds is being brigaded for defending C
FUDZilla Has Turned Into LLM Slop and Machine-Generated FUD (New York Times Has Also Just Admitted Moving in That Direction)
Failing news sites, instead of calling it quits with some remaining dignity, are handing control over to LLM slop (pretending to still be active)
By Buying Twitter, MElon and Cheeto Now Control EU Politicians, Even at the Highest Levels
"the top level politicians make the egregious mistake of trying to treat Xitter as if it were a communications medium"
The Washington Post (Jeff Bezos) Dies in Darkness
spread it on
How to 'Sell' Software Freedom to People
In my experience, it helps when one speaks about control, not freedom, including confidentiality
Gemini Links 18/02/2025: Downloading Gemini Files with Emacs and Elpher, Gopher on Devuan
Links for the day
Richard Stallman Confirms His Next Talk, "Free/Libre Software and Freedom in the Digital Society" (Next Monday in Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
He could already advertise this more than a week ago
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 17, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, February 17, 2025
IBM's Chronic Neglect Won't Save Anything and It Might Even Get IBM Sued
The problem is likely a lack of manpower, not deliberate shoddiness
Gemini Links 17/02/2025: Ideal OS, AuraRepo Alpha, and Simple Code
Links for the day
The "Cool Kids" Are Already Using GNU/Linux, Microsoft is Just Cheating
The future and the present are Linux
Links 17/02/2025: War on Dissent and Bloggers, Nationalism a Growing Theme
Links for the day
IBM Going International (and India)
It's Monday and a national holiday
GeekWire: Microsoft Bribes Us While We Cover Microsoft Affairs (Spin Doctoring), Hence We Are "Independent"
What good is a "journalist" sponsored by the very same company he or she writes about?
The Attacks on LinuxQuestions.org
Going to Clownflare only worsens the problem
The GNU Manifesto Turns 40 Next Month
The guardian of Free software (definition, licences, philosophy, hosting and so on) has managed to endure and persevere for 40 years. Very few others can say the same.
Microsoft Lunduke Belongs in 4Chan
Assuming Microsoft Lunduke is aware of the full context, he is now trolling not one but two decent organisations
In Europe and in India Richard Stallman Need Not Duck Anymore, People Trying to Cancel His Talk Have No Sway
the last time a talk by Dr. Stallman got canceled was about a year ago
Back From a Short Break
We can now resume and try to stick to the usual pace
Links 17/02/2025: LLMs Failing and Patreon Support Becoming a Burden to Bloggers
Links for the day
Links 17/02/2025: Blogroll Conundrum; Research, Scientists Under Siege
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 16, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, February 16, 2025