IBM Red Hat's Goal Is Not Real Security (It Probably Never Was)
From Red Hat's official account:
Red Hat's hegemony-ware is a subject we covered a lot in light of the NSA leaks. Among the articles, from 2013:
- Trusting Trust and Trusting Red Hat et al.
- Linux in Government and Why There is Still NSA Agenda to Keep Wary Eye on
- NSA Confirms Remote Computer Bricking by BIOS (or UEFI) as a Real Strategy
- FreeBSD Lost Trust in Hardware Makers, Alleging NSA Tampering
- Despite US Roots, Red Hat Appears to Have Benefited From NSA Scandals
Back then I was attacked a lot by a Red Hat employee who helped Microsoft plant de facto "kill switches" in GNU/Linux systems.
From 2014:
- For Real Security, Use CentOS -- Never RHEL -- and Run Neither on Amazon's Servers
- IBM Shows That Collaborations With the NSA Are a Company's Death Knell
- Poll: Only 39% Trust Red Hat Over Back Doors
- Red Hat Joins the Joke Which is Amazon's 'Secure' Federal 'Cloud'
- Red Hat Should Keep Its Distance From NSA Facilitator Microsoft
At the end, IBM Red Hat became a Microsoft reseller. Worse yet, the above-mentioned person took advantage of attacks on my wife (who wrote about these attacks; British Police said it would be OK) to do a SLAPP, after which his own spouse called him a "rapist" and now he acts like he wants to kill my wife's elderly parents by denying them medical assistance.
Spies and trolls are very malicious people and sometimes they're the same thing. █