The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Delusion - Part IV - Machos in Charge of the House (and System), Even If the Faces Are Female (Optics)
Published 6 hours ago by The Law Society of Ireland:
Before we proceed to dealing with the communications that we've had since 12 months ago with the UK's Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) - basically a Windows/Microsoft (US) shop - we'd like to remind readers that there's no real oversight at the SRA (see Part I and Part II), it's just like an extension the litigation "industry" - the lawsuits' biggest profiteers - and it is staffed accordingly. It's a front group for the litigation interests, not of ordinary Brits or of law (justice) itself. SRA's site authorises and almost endorses "hired guns" for litigants. That's a serious problem and habitual conflict of interest, the revolving doors aside*. In Part III we showed that the SRA had failed women and trying to appear female (this is all optics) won't change the fact that it's a male- or macho- dominated institution, just like the people who spent years attacking us on behalf of very aggressive men. It was a predominantly male team targeting my wife and misnaming her intentionally (she confronted them about this in person, they tried to deflect blame to "third party") - exhibiting likely sexist and racist behaviour all in one fell swoop. They'd casually project their racism and sexist - trying to frame the victim of the real culprit. There's an old joke about graveyards with a tombstone that says "honest lawyer", which presumably means two people are buried there. Brett Wilson LLP is the ugliest, most vicious, most dishonest law firm I've ever had to deal with. Not too shockingly, law firms in Manchester thought and told us the same about Brett Wilson LLP, which seems like it's closing shop and trying to rename.
My wife knows this better than anybody. All the women who attacked her (attacked Rianne Schestowitz, which is a name they avoided) on behalf of Brat Wilson LLP [sic] appear to have quit the firm after the lawsuit (or got sacked). It seems plausible that at least one of them is now unemployed (based on publicly available material and Web research).
This is hardly surprising.
These women worked for a serial strangler of women and another man whose own spouse wrote the following to almost 2,000 people a few weeks ago:
Regardless of whether that's true or not (not for us to judge), it's clear that his core reputation issues are not in the UK but in America, where he has lived since 2009.
Anyway, in the next part we'll show how the SRA communicated with us, stalled, technically failed for many months, and then ignored slam-dunk evidence that only weeks later was confirmed in the courtroom under sworn oath (they had even shouldered the fees for the 'self-incriminating' transcripts).
That the SRA hides behind women's faces while failing abused women (abused by men in male-run firms) is something that merits extra attention and condemnation. █
____
* Similarly, thesocietyofmedialawyers.org, which is often cited by self-interested "media", is not an organisation that deserves a ".org" suffix, as it's a front group of the hired gun of the Serial Strangler from Microsoft (US) and few others. 7 or about 10% of all members are from the same firm (the above-mentioned hired gun). It's a lying lobby disguised as a non-profit. It also includes Mishcon de Reya LLP, which corrupt EPO officials hired to stalk, harass and threaten Techrights (they're part of Team UPC, which repeatedly threatened us for no good reason over the years).
The lobbyists are out of control and the regulators try to appease these lobbyists instead of aiming to protect the public from injustice.