Slopfarms We Forget About Because They Silently Die
Slopfarm of the Serial Slopper still having a go at plagiarising other people's work today:

Yes, France is allegedly moving to GNU/Linux even faster, but pay no attention to slopfarms with slop images and plagiarised (by LLMs) text. See, there are still some slopfarms out there, but Google News seems to be linking to none today, at least not in the context of "linux". We did see a couple of slop pieces ("Linux Kernel Developers Adopt New Fuzzing Tools" and "GNOME 50 Reaches Arch Linux: A Leaner, Wayland-Only Future Arrives") in linuxjournal.com, "Microsoft Blocks Open Source Dev Accounts, Disrupting Security Pipelines" in linuxsecurity.com, then "Why Red Hat’s 14-Year Support Is a Big Deal" and "Unix File System Guide: What Every New Developer Must Know" in linuxteck.com. Those are all slopfarms with "linux" in their domain name, but they hardly have visibility. Many other slopfarms we used to call out became dormant or went offline (the former is typically followed by the latter).
The hard reality (for slobs and sloppers) is, slopfarms have no future. They're based on this fantasy that reporting can be automated and actual people will tolerate slop even when (or after) they know it's slop. █
