SLAPP Censorship - Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like Photocopies!
It's a weekend again (nice and sunny across England - great for getting a tan while watching Wembley), so we'll try to keep the upcoming parts a little shorter than the rest - same as last weekend.
The "money-printing" machines of 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP must be running low on toner (they did, after all, send us over 85 kilograms of legal papers!). They seem very much irritated that I speak about this - to the point where I get what cops determined to be "threats to kill" (direct quote from a higher level officer).
If what was sent to me from burner accounts (and mentioned my wife, mentioned Garrett several times, including in the subject line) came from them, then at this point they don't practice law, they are practising crime and can be held accountable for it anywhere in the British jurisdiction.
Their sloppy work cannot be worked around by sending abusive communications, as they've done for over 2 years already (based on some information online, they had done this to others and even doxed people and their families).
They are data protection specialists, according to themselves.
Well, to be fair, at least the number is not the same:
There will be lots more of these (regarding "data protection", which is how they try to cover up strangulation in the US - Graveley's attorney admitted to me he had been charged for it - after secretive threats and begging didn't work). Heaps and heaps and heaps of 'copypasta' will be shown for "data protection" claims. And in Graveley's case, they keep interchangeably using different names; in Garrett's case, they got his first name wrong. Copy-pasting can be done fast, so why spend extra time checking basic things like the client's name?
Maybe Graveley can change his name again (to a third given/first name) in order to evade the past, as those "data protection" claims got him nowhere.
In the Garrett trial, they pretty much abandoned "data protection" claims; they knew these were spurious and invalid. They're accustomed to using "data protection" to abuse processes (omitted or grasped upon as "safety nets"); Brett Wilson LLM was blasted by the High Court for doing so less than a year ago.
Happy weekend for now in Manchester. We shall carry on tomorrow.
In the meantime, please don't bother sending me more threats. They will be rerouted to British Police. █