SLAPP Censorship - Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to Attribute)

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jun 07, 2026

In the news right now: I wrote about George Santos. Then he made a violent threat and lied about it

He then proceeded to name-call and attack the reputation of NPR, the kind of invective that's common when reporting on people who try to discredit reporters and news organizations for stories they don't like.

What Santos said next took me aback, even by his outlandish and brazen standards.

"This story is going to get you a gun in your face," Santos said.

I asked him what he meant by that.

"You know what I mean."

4 weeks ago:

Yesterday I spoke to several cops because the "hired guns" (hired by Americans) are definitely connected to threatening letters sent from burner accounts and since they're working for violent thugs arrested for strangling women (and who tell women to kill themselves) they cannot be ignored; they're accustomed to working with criminals, this is how they sell themselves.

Today, as promised (for Part 100), we'll give an outline of this series (what was covered so far).

The series began on 03/03/26 with an explanation of Claim No. KB-2024-001270, which began 2 years earlier. Part 2 gave a "Timeline From 2012 to 2024" - something that ought to have helped the uninitiated reader. Part 3 offered a "More In-Depth Breakdown" and Part 4 gave my wife's "Version of Events and Narrative" (the truth of the matter is, there's no doubt she was abused online and the chief media judge for the country acknowledged this in her judgement). In Part 5 we peeled off Garrett's mask; he's hardly what he claims to be, he's just an effective imposter and he tries to silence people who challenge him. Part 6 focused on abuses against women - a motif we'd see a lot of - almost at every level. Part 7 covered the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (strangled women, then misused the UK-GDPR to try to cover it up; he's not even from the UK!). Part 8 went on and discussed how the UK-GDPR was misused. They basically tried to cover up or suppress important topics by alleging that reporting was some kind of UK-GDPR (privacy) violation. Part 9 showed that their sloppy complaint was so sloppy that they even got very basic facts wrong and Part 10 said the main aim (all along) was censorship (this is why they offered to settle in exchange for censorship about 7 times!). Part 11 even showed that Garrett's own spouse was calling him a "rapist". He could not silence his own spouse for very long (he did try).

Part 12 explained that the Serial Strangler From Microsoft was working with Garrett all along. They clearly had some similar or overlapping problems. Part 13 revisited misuse of UK-GDPR and Part 14 reminded readers of "Serious Harm" done by Garrett and by the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (harm to women) - it became so ludicrous that they want the victims and reporters to apologise to them!

Part 15 explained what Techrights and Tux Machines are, followed by an explanation of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) and other key concepts. In Part 17 we looked at censorship precedents and Part 18 reminded readers that third parties funded litigation against Techrights and Tux Machines. It's not illegal, but it is very shady, more so as they're Americans forum-shopping in the UK, where libel laws are notoriously plaintiff-friendly.

Part 19 talked about cross-examination (false statements exposed therein) and Part 20 mentioned that some of the money used for litigation had come from Microsoft. There was more on that in Part 21. Part 22 showed that Garrett had a history of impersonating people in IRC (he admitted this during cross-examination) and Part 23 reminded readers that he could not afford to pay his lawyers (third parties helped him repeatedly).

Part 24 said Garrett had failed to stop our lawsuits against him (in January 2025) and we then revisited his removal from Twitter (he had probably crossed some lines; it's not clear which). It's just a matter of public record and he kept asking us for information that he already had.

Part 27 dealt with Garrett's affinity for Tor, followed by more details on how he impersonated another person in our IRC network - a fact he did not deny (he even confessed that he had done this; it was under sworn oath, a court testimony). His rude, aggressive, foul and combative language was then explained, followed by an explanation of why we escalated to Greater Manchester Police (GMP), knowing he had already annoyed many high-profile people (some told us he had defamed them in America).

Part 32 showed Garrett made many attempts to take down our Web site (attempts made by targetting at least 3 companies) and Part 33 talked about the person who did the same in tandem (they corresponded over E-mail about takedowns; it was somewhat coordinated, just like Garrett and the violent man from Microsoft).

Part 34 focused on why transparency does not favour Garrett et al and then we spent a lot of time showing that Garrett's lawsuit was basically 'copypasta' compared to that of his Microsoft/GNOME litigation buddy (Graveley). It was utterly embarrassing and it vindicated us. A lot of these lawsuits were fantasies or self-promotional drivel. We showed many examples of flaws and lazy copy-pasting bordering on the ludicrous and asserting or sounding like Garrett and Graveley were the same person.

Part 46 showed that Graveley's own attorney already admit that he had been charged for strangulation and Part 47 protested that British courts should not become instruments for Americans to hide their past - even Americans "Who Tell Women to Kill Themselves" and cooperate with Americans whose spouses say they're "rapists".

Part 50 brought up Burgess Mee (another law firm) and Part 51 reminded readers who was funding it. We said we would escalate to the Bar Standards Board (BSB) in Part 52 and then noticed that Graveley's solicitor at Brett Wilson LLP had quietly quit the job (or got sacked).

We then examined the Garrett-Graveley connection and similar complaints that they could hardly find a job (they failed to consider the problem could be their behaviour). Garrett and Graveley ended up sloppily doing a tag-team with almost identical texts - something that Brett Wilson LLP was more happy to do for them, knowing it might backfire much later.

Part 58 looked at silencing attempts, alleging that it's not OK to oppose violence against women (at Brett Wilson LLP, all the people in charge are men, who think punching trans women is humour).

Part 60 showed what else they thought was verboten/forbidden to say (as if to speak against crime is a crime) and Part 61 showed the same regarding women's issues. Since when is protecting women a crime?

Part 62 wrapped some of the copy-paste job, as did Part 63.

At that stage, as I was already getting death threats that I was reporting to the police, I decided to write about it in public (those threats mentioned my wife as well). Part 65 said "Graveley and Garrett Claims Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All Along)" and Garrett did not deny this, instead he seemed to be getting rather erratic online, in social control media. Pointing out facts is not "privacy violation" and their "distress" about negative response from colleagues is their own fault. Their close association with one another only contributes to the negative publicity. They cannot expect apologies from their victims. They should be the ones issuing apologies. Instead they try to nuke history - to vanish the past. The law firm makes money out of this attack on reporting in the UK (the money always comes from the US) and the law firm has repeatedly lied to courts. Last month it made it crystal clear that it is still being paid from America to "Stack the Docket in Another Continent" (lawfare, gaming the system, abuse of process, false statements).

Part 76 discussed the "United Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy" and Part 77 spoke of the effect on women. It's a recurring theme for Graveley and Garrett. They have severe "women problems" - a problem that alcohol and lawfare won't wish away. In Part 79 I said they had sent nearly 100 KG of legal papers to us (we're getting close to that!) and Part 80 spoke of Graveley's lawsuit taking almost two years without any real progress. He cannot even afford the lawsuit! It's about "revenge", not justice. Seeing how scandalous it had become, the British Government became more involved in the SLAPPs - as the SRA (regulator) is a toothless tiger that Brett Wilson LLP can treat as non-existent, not really a regulator but part of the "litigation industry" which appeals to greedy people and monopolists. We got told that SLAPP reform is now - at long last! - on its way (it's true, good news at last!), which can improve "The United Kingdom's Rating for Press Freedom" (even the US has better SLAPP protections, despite the US being ranked utterly low for press freedom).

We revisited how courts deal with LLM slop as legal filings in Part 86 and then dealt with "Access to Justice" (which does not discriminate in favour or rich Americans or Americans funded by American companies like Microsoft).

Shockingly enough, it turned out that Garrett instructed Brett Wilson LLP to say bad things about his own spouse - a misstep that should beget transparency (sooner or later everything comes out, one way or another, no matter the death threats).

Part 91 said that our government gave us two barristers, guided by a Director of a law firm. That changed a lot. We then commented on how widespread this problem is (we're just more vocal then others who are affected by it). They're jamming the British docket - people who are not even from this continent! They think this is some "funny" stunt - a way to cancel people who live thousands of miles away. Part 95 said this was really bad for women, including my wife. When people dox and target family members it's anything but virtuous - it's outright bullying. The death threats were revisited some days ago, then the American who "Tells Women to Kill Themselves". Apparently Garrett thinks this is a fine person to collaborate with. Three days ago we showed how Microsoft was "Threatening [a] Real Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About Microsoft's Bug Doors/Back Doors" (the above-named person worked for Microsoft) and yesterday we began showing that they're taking a heavy toll on Brett Wilson LLP, a firm that increasingly looks like "criminals working for criminals" (not literally, but it does give a rather negative impression).

This week we plan to have a good time celebrating an anniversary:

Trying to disrupt our lives, Brett Wilson LLP sends to our doorstep bizarre men who are neither postmen nor bailiffs. Not too long after "threats to kill" (the police's interpretation). When Garrett's litigation and LARPing buddy from Canada did that he was arrested by Canadian police. █

Previously:

2026-03-03	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No. KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell
2026-03-04	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another Continent)
2026-03-05	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth Breakdown
2026-03-06	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s Version of Events and Narrative
2026-03-07	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be One
2026-03-08	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had Been Subjected to Similar Abuse
2026-03-09	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide Embarrassing Facts
2026-03-10	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass Surveillance)
2026-03-11	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid Well Over $200,000 to 'Speak' or 'Cover' for)
2026-03-12	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn't About Justice, It's About Censorship
2026-03-13	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today
2026-03-14	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits (Funded by Third Parties) as 'Revenge' for Exposing Crimes
2026-03-15	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations
2026-03-16	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation Buddy Garrett Did Cause "Serious Harm"
2026-03-17	Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public Apologies to These Men
2026-03-18	SLAPP Censorship - Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines
2026-03-19	SLAPP Censorship - Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and Explaining Techrights' Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Network
2026-03-20	SLAPP Censorship - Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade
2026-03-21	SLAPP Censorship - Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices That Uphold Real National Security
2026-03-22	SLAPP Censorship - Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for Tough Questions in Cross-Examination
2026-03-23	SLAPP Censorship - Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and to GAFAM Funding
2026-03-24	SLAPP Censorship - Part 21 Out of 200: It's About Behaviour Online, Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers and Two Barristers
2026-03-24	SLAPP Censorship - Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles)
2026-03-25	SLAPP Censorship - Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for 2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to 'Break the Bank' in Pursuit of "Revenge"
2026-03-26	SLAPP Censorship - Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife's Lawsuit Against Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed)
2026-03-27	SLAPP Censorship - Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter
2026-03-28	SLAPP Censorship - Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You Yourself Sent!
2026-03-29	SLAPP Censorship - Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to Hide From Consequences
2026-03-30	SLAPP Censorship - Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for Impersonation and Worse
2026-03-31	SLAPP Censorship - Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won't Go Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control Media
2026-04-01	SLAPP Censorship - Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its Cybercrime Unit
2026-04-02	SLAPP Censorship - Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile 'Targets' of Garrett
2026-04-03	SLAPP Censorship - Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost
2026-04-03	SLAPP Censorship - Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too
2026-04-04	SLAPP Censorship - Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of Transparency, Illuminating Garrett's and Graveley's 'Tag-Team' Act, Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts to Hide Bad Behaviour
2026-04-05	SLAPP Censorship - Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and Editing 10 Pages
2026-04-06	SLAPP Censorship - Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the Reporter in Another Continent)
2026-04-07	SLAPP Censorship - Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation Against Critics
2026-04-08	SLAPP Censorship - Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+ Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another Continent
2026-04-08	SLAPP Censorship - Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?)
2026-04-09	SLAPP Censorship - Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12 Months)
2026-04-10	SLAPP Censorship - Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging That Publishing Unflattering Information is a 'Privacy' Issue
2026-04-10	SLAPP Censorship - Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets "Plausible Deniability"
2026-04-11	SLAPP Censorship - Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake)
2026-04-12	SLAPP Censorship - Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley 'Copypasta' Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change 'T' to 't')
2026-04-13	SLAPP Censorship - Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish (Full Timeline)
2026-04-14	SLAPP Censorship - Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley's Attorney Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did, However, Pay Local Officials
2026-04-14	SLAPP Censorship - Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third Parties
2026-04-16	SLAPP Censorship - Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who Tell Women to Kill Themselves
2026-04-17	SLAPP Censorship - Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case, Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Barristers
2026-04-18	SLAPP Censorship - Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler From Microsoft
2026-04-19	SLAPP Censorship - Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in Another Continent)
2026-04-20	SLAPP Censorship - Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End
2026-04-21	SLAPP Censorship - Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire Office/Team)
2026-04-22	SLAPP Censorship - Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
2026-04-23	SLAPP Censorship - Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft)
2026-04-24	SLAPP Censorship - Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP's Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley
2026-04-25	SLAPP Censorship - Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like Photocopies!
2026-04-26	SLAPP Censorship - Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs Superficially 'Enforceable' in the UK, Using Threats
2026-04-27	SLAPP Censorship - Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is "Reckless" and "Malicious", According to His 'Hired Guns' in London
2026-04-28	SLAPP Censorship - Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is "Malice"
2026-04-29	SLAPP Censorship - Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must Understand That Reporting Women's Issues in the United States of America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible
2026-04-30	SLAPP Censorship - Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden
2026-05-01	SLAPP Censorship - Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could Do This in One Minute)
2026-05-02	SLAPP Censorship - Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated Threats (to "Shut Down" My "Existence" While Mentioning My Wife Too)
2026-05-03	SLAPP Censorship - Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All Along)
2026-05-04	SLAPP Censorship - Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy Violation
2026-05-05	SLAPP Censorship - Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Against My Wife and I Assert 'Distress', But It Was Just a Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears)
2026-05-06	SLAPP Censorship - Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars of Claims, Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled)
2026-05-07	SLAPP Censorship - Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett's Plea for Apology
2026-05-08	SLAPP Censorship - Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett's (Pure 'Copy-paste', Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!)
2026-05-09	SLAPP Censorship - Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett
2026-05-10	SLAPP Censorship - Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and Liable for Lies
2026-05-11	SLAPP Censorship - Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 ("Tag-Teaming" Against Bloggers in Another Continent)
2026-05-12	SLAPP Censorship - Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in Another Continent
2026-05-12	SLAPP Censorship - Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable, Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court Judges About What They Did
2026-05-14	SLAPP Censorship - Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by "Hired Guns")
2026-05-15	SLAPP Censorship - Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to Handle Women (Except to Attack Them)
2026-05-16	SLAPP Censorship - Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the Truth About Graveley and Garrett's Abuse of Processes, Stacking Dockets
2026-05-17	SLAPP Censorship - Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100 KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of Legal Papers Sent to Us)
2026-05-18	SLAPP Censorship - Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to Meet a Judge's Deadline, Microsoft's Graveley Had Garrett's Lawyers Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear About My Position
2026-05-19	SLAPP Censorship - Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the Family)
2026-05-20	SLAPP Censorship - Part 82 Out of 200: British Government Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP
2026-05-20	SLAPP Censorship - Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate Power)
2026-05-22	SLAPP Censorship - Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers)
2026-05-23	SLAPP Censorship - Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom's Rating for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better
2026-05-24	SLAPP Censorship - Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent (Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies)
2026-05-25	SLAPP Censorship - Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice
2026-05-26	SLAPP Censorship - Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence Them
2026-05-27	SLAPP Censorship - Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction, That's Why Transparency is Paramount
2026-05-28	SLAPP Censorship - Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information
2026-05-29	SLAPP Censorship - Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by Americans)
2026-05-30	SLAPP Censorship - Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned "On" and "Off" Like a Faucet
2026-05-31	SLAPP Censorship - Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another Continent)
2026-06-01	SLAPP Censorship - Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett's Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His Defence Yet!
2026-06-02	SLAPP Censorship - Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women
2026-06-03	SLAPP Censorship - Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill Themselves
2026-06-04	SLAPP Censorship - Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the Simple Observable Fact He's Closely Connected to the Microsofter Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and Worse)
2026-06-04	SLAPP Censorship - Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About Microsoft's Bug Doors/Back Doors
2026-06-06	SLAPP Censorship - Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs as SLAPP Clients)