EPO "Cocaine Communication Manager" - Part XIII - At the EPO, Cocaine Addicts and Their Friends Are "Protected Class"
In the previous part we said that "In the Second-Largest Institution in Europe [the EPO] One Can Take Paid 'Sick Leave' for Doing Cocaine, Then Come Back" and the person responsible can still buy support from member states because apparently doing cocaine on the job isn't such a big deal, not even in "In the Second-Largest Institution in Europe".
What does this tell us about the state of European politics?
At one point we learned that people who oppose this are being mobbed. At the EPO, doing cocaine isn't that bad (we contacted many people connected to the cocaine user; they would refuse to provide their comment, it's a "taboo" to them). What's bad is questioning authority.
Animosity isn't the result of doing cocaine but of questioning (mis)treatment of staff. "I presume it was clearly because I have said at the beginning of March to Luis" (the cocaine addict), "that I am being terribly mobbed and I won't accept the discrimination between me to another Spanish 'Mafia' colleague."
So said an insider, who identified a clear pattern; the cocaine addict was bringing his friends to the Office, apparently because the "best" way to plunder the Office at a pace of millions of euros is to get friends to participate. Who would stand in the way? The President? No, he was romancing with the sister of the cocaine addict.
"That probably pissed Mr. Mafia Junior," we got told, "the Cocaine guy Luis," as he is called, "and since then, I was only mobbed terribly and unfairly treated."
At the end, the cocaine addict stayed, anyone seen as disloyal to him got removed.
What does that tell us about the EPO? █