People Who Enforce the GPL Banned From Linux Foundation Board (After Bribes From Prolific GPL Violators), Now They're Banned From Giving Talks at Events
The Linux Foundation (LF), funded by GPL violators, has become a radical pro-GAFAM mouthpiece.
This was minutes ago: (there's more there regarding "LF")
The above man seems to be recognising that raising money (like he did from Google, IBM, and Microsoft) is evil but "necessary" in "capitalism". He is also stepping down as treasurer. What we find interesting is what he says about the "LF" ('Linux' Foundation).
In textual form:
"It was at the conference hotel for an event. It's someone I vaguely knew and I was like: "Oh, do you wanna sit together?" Others from LF saw the person eating with me and they were chastised. I've literally had LF employees ask me to come far away from an event so that no one sees them talk to me because LF has (apparently?) a standing order that talking to me is not permitted. [...] I guess I should be "proud" of that I'm seen as such a subversive that LF fears its employees even talking to me! I am banned from speaking at LF events. My employer (SFC) is banned from being an LF member even though the org clearly is in their "industry". (I think that's a legally actionable grievance FWiW.) LF, IMO, knows that their power depends on convincing FOSS fans to believe LF is the radical org that stops companies from controlling everything. But it's a lie."
"Re: NGO corruption: LF creates jobs, and folks think that because they're working for a "non profit" that it must be good. Ultimately LF is a classic trade association, working toward the common interest of its for-profit members, so one who works there is just working for indoctrination. LF employees have literally got in trouble for having breakfast with me at LF events. Like, seriously. The situation is toxic."
It wasn't always like that. LF changed. It now panders to elite perverts. Also, SFC wasn't always like that. It platforms perverts who pander to elites. █