Comments

• shane

  2007-04-07 21:58:55

  Here was Stafford Masie relating the tale of Novell's entry into Linux and Open Source

• David Mohring (NZheretic)

  2007-04-08 23:37:33

  The Novell Linux Desktop was also code-named Expose.
  
  From my entry on Bruce Perens' open letter to Novell's CEO Ron Hovsepian
  
  In early 1993, AT&T sold it's UNIX System Laboratories to Novell. Back in April 25, 1994, PC Magazine had an article announcing that Novell Inc was developing a Linux based desktop system for Windows, DOS, NetWare, and Unix applications ( http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=1994Apr25.151605.293@umr.edu ). After long negotiations with Microsoft, Novell abandoned the "Expose" Linux desktop project. A month later, a group of Novell alumni from the Expose project formed Caldera Systems International with the backing of Novell's founder, Ray Noorda. The Canopy Group, which purchased major holding in Caldera, was also founded by Ray Noorda. In 1995 Novell sub-licensed the remainder of it's Unix technology to the Santa Cruz Operation Inc ( No relation to the SCO Group ). In November 2001, the Santa Cruz Operation sold it's Unix rights under Novell's license agreement to Caldera. In 2003 Caldera Systems International changed it's name to "The SCO GROUP Inc" and entered into a series of essentially inherently flawed lawsuits and fraudulent license claims against users of the Linux operating system based upon rights to the original Unix that have turned out to be still owned by Novell itself. Both IBM and Novell lawyers have repeatedly pointed out to the SCO GROUP that it loses the right to continue to distribute GPL licensed code if it violates the terms of the GPL. Also SCO Group long legal travesty would not have been possible without the direct and indirect financial support from Microsoft. In November 2003, nine years after it had abandoned Linux, Novell purchased one of the leading Linux distributions SUSE. Now three years later in 2006, after a long period of Negoitation Novell has entered into another agreement with Microsoft. This agreement results in Microsoft sales people effectively acting as agents on behalf of Novell by selling "coupons" for SUSE Linux and hyping a limited "promise" from Microsoft not to sue the customer for the so called Microsoft IP included in Linux, Samba, Mono and OpenOffice.org. Any agent acting on behalf of Novell offering a limited coverage "not to sue" represents a clear violation of section seven of the GPL by Novell. As Novell's laywers have repeated pointed out to The SCO Group, you lose right to continue to distribute GPL licensed code if you violate the terms of the GPL. History shows us that the combination of Microsoft and Novell has never been in the long term interests of either Linux or Novell. So to Ron Hovsepian, I say : Please, do not take almost another decade to realise your companies long term interests remain with Linux, open source and continued compliance with its licensing terms. Now is no time for appeasement http://itheresies.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_itheresies_archive.html

• Roy Schestowitz

  2007-04-09 03:23:26

  Thank you, David, for some invaluable information.