The Linux Foundation, OSI and the Neglected Values of Freedom

Dr. Roy Schestowitz

2008-04-12 15:17:45 UTC
Modified: 2008-04-13 12:49:09 UTC

Difference of opinion is no excuse for fighting though

The Novell-LF special relationship was demonstrated in the past in order to explain their attitudes. If following of the moneyflow is the path to better understanding of action, then caution will be required when the Foundation delivers a message on behalf of its f[o]unding members, collectively.

The business-oriented approach of the Linux Foundation was noted on several occasions before and it's pretty well expressed in the following new article.

I came away from the second annual Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit with mixed feelings. I mean, it's hard not to support the group that pays Linus Torvalds to spend his time continuing to lead the poster-boy project for free and open source software. But at the same time, those golden chains are my biggest concern about the Linux Foundation.

IBM sponsored the event, and they are the biggest supporter of Linux in the corporate world. The foundation membership is made up of almost all the large and and many of wanna-be-large IT firms around the globe -- including Adobe, which is one of the foundation's newest members.

“...Perens will be better off defending and promoting the GPLv3.”There are other similar issues that apply to the OSI. In order to prevent greater influence by Microsoft inside the OSI, Bruce Perens recently stepped up to be elected, yet it does not appear as though he was successful, despite the overwhelming support in his online petition. In any event, the OSI had already lost some credibility with dilution of key values, so Perens will be better off defending and promoting the GPLv3. In fact, the software that runs his news site, Technocrat, has just been released under the AGPLv3, which on a separate note Google continues to snub (whereas Palamida had it welcomed). Where is Chris DiBona and when will there be an open explanation for this?

There are other noteworthy frictions in the Free software world. Theo de Raadt goes on the offensive against Richard Stallman again, although he would be wiser to bury the hatchets and let all this hostility slide. We showed before, using Microsoft's internal documents, how the company encourages civil wars, friction and hostility among allies which jointly become great threat to it. These are ugly, unethical and maybe even illegal measures to take.

Anyway, those wondering what Theo is up to at a moment will find information here.

The song for the upcoming 4.3 release is titled, "Home to Hypocrisy", with scathing references to some recent postings on the OpenBSD -misc mailing list by Free Software Foundation creator Richard Stallman.

He now uses some humour against Richard Stallman, but it's unnecessary and hardly amusing. Criticism is fine, but being polite and gentle is a virtue. ⬆

"Real men don't attack straw men"

--Richard Stallman, December 2007

Richard Stallman and the GPLv3

Comments

Logan

2008-04-12 21:16:57

So Google, like Microsoft, wants to dictate what license a developer chooses for his code. I'm shocked! No, really. Shocked!

This is the same guy who was against Microsoft licenses being officially recognized as "Open Source Licenses" because they weren't "free enough". God bless hypocrisy, because he always done so.
Victor Soliz

2008-04-13 05:13:44

MS' licenses remain a terrible choice though, specially the one that was specifically designed to work against the GPL.

AGPL sounds interesting, I'd like to see a vBulletin equivalent on it. Perhaps if I had the time...
Victor Soliz

2008-04-13 05:19:49

Anyways, google is just dictating what licenses to use if you want their hosting:

It is also not okay to host an AGPL covered program on code.google.com by saying it is GPL, as you are telling the users of the site one thing, while meaning something else altogether. So sadly, the answer is to remove your project and host somewhere else like sf or savannah.

So he was basically saying, "you can use AGPL, but not here". I actually see not much of an issue here.
Roy Schestowitz

2008-04-13 06:00:30

So he was basically saying, “you can use AGPL, but not here”.

Is the AGPL some form of cigarette (to Google)? Sure sounds like it.
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra

2008-04-13 12:32:33

The link and quote at the end is, in fact, Real men DON'T attack straw men. Please correct! :)
Roy Schestowitz

2008-04-13 12:48:37

Whoopsie. I did this quickly. I googled "Real men attack straw" to just quickly find the thread and then copied the text thinking that I had already included the word "don't" (abbreviated for faster search).
J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2008-05-04 15:36:48

Google isn't "dictating" any licensing for the works hosted on Google Hosting. Copyright holders get the power to choose their license (this is a power, not a freedom, because the act of licensing means determining terms for others, not for oneself). Google is offering hosting with restrictions aimed at benefiting themselves, Google isn't able to change the terms of the license unless the license for a work unless the work's license already allows relicensing. If Google were dictating licensing Google would be the sole copyright holder to the works hosted on Google Hosting and they'd use that control over the licensing of the works hosted there.

So it's interesting to note why Google restricts the set of allowable licenses (and Brad Kuhn of the Software Freedom Law Center did an excellent job of this in his post to Fabrizio Capobianco's blog -- http://www.funambol.com/blog/capo/2008/03/google-blocking-agpl-in-google-code.html#c4629641731974008715).

@Logan: With regards to your claim: "This is the same guy who was against Microsoft licenses being officially recognized as “Open Source Licenses” because they weren’t “free enough”. God bless hypocrisy, because he always done so."

What's your source for RMS saying this?

At first blush, your comment reads like someone who doesn't understand that RMS isn't in the open source movement, someone who might be attributing something to him and then arguing against that point (hence the quote at the end about not attacking straw men). So I'd like to know where I can find RMS advocating against Microsoft's licenses being considered "open source" for any reason, particularly because "they weren't 'free enough'".

RMS has spent plenty of time in talks and essays explaining how he doesn't want his work or the free software community he founded (over a decade before the Open Source Initiative began the open source movement, by the way) "lumped in with them [the open source movement]" (see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html and the updated essay which is linked from that same location). RMS wrote: "We are not against the Open Source movement, but we don't want to be lumped in with them. We acknowledge that they have contributed to our community, but we created this community, and we want people to know this. We want people to associate our achievements with our values and our philosophy, not with theirs. We want to be heard, not obscured behind a group with different views."

So I'd find it surprising if he were advocating one way or another on which licenses the Open Source Initiative approved of. To my knowledge RMS doesn't even advocate as such regarding the licenses he wrote.
Roy Schestowitz

2008-05-05 07:41:39

J.B. Nicholson-Owens,

I think he was referring to Chris DiBona, not to RMS. See http://www.linux.com/feature/118677

Microsoft's Demise in the Global News Cycle is Rather Telling: It should be noted that Microsoft is, in general, no longer prominent or dominant in news headlines
Gemini Migration and Backup Capsule (Archive): At the end we'll end up with something a lot better than before and latency should be massively reduced
Links 01/10/2023: Science, Education, and pro-Russia Slovakia Leadership: Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 01, 2023: IRC logs for Sunday, October 01, 2023
Links 01/10/2023: Climate, Patents, Programming, and More: Links for the day
Apple and Microsoft Problems: half a dozen links
Malware in the Ubuntu Snap Store, Thanks to Canonical Bloatware Mindset: Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Gemini Rising: There are 3523 capsules
Richard Stallman Gave a Talk Yesterday, Will Give Another Talk Today, and Will Give Two More Talks in Germany Later This Week: Those cover at least 2 different topics
Beware the Microsoft Sharks: We won't forgive and forget
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 30, 2023: IRC logs for Saturday, September 30, 2023
Don't be Afraid of the Command Line, It Might Even be a Friend: There's a tendency to think that only graphical interfaces were made to simplify usage, and any declarative interface is by design raw, inherently unfit for usage
One Positive Note About GNU/Linux Coverage in 2023 (Less Microsoft): GNU/Linux users do not want this, with very rare exceptions
Snaps Were Never Good at Security, But the Media Coverage is Just Appalling: The media should focus on culling Windows, not making a huge fuss over minor things wrongly attributed to "Linux"
Better Footage of Richard Stallman's Talk Last Week: “Freedom in computing, forty years after starting to really protect it”: Richard Stallman speaks about the cancer situation early in his speech
Links 30/09/2023: A Government Shutdown and More Blizzard Layoffs: Links for the day
Links 30/09/2023: Bing Almost Offloaded Due to Failure/Losses, Nvidia Raided: Links for the day
A Lot of Technological 'Progress' Has Been Nothing But Buzzwords: Free software does not try to excite people people over nothing
Community is the Lifeblood of Freedom in the GNU/Linux World: Removing or undoing the "cancerd" (systemd) is feasible but increasingly difficult
Proprietary Software: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Proprietary software has an entirely different mindset, revolving around business models rather than science
Web Hostnames Down to Lowest Number in More Than 7 Years!: the number of hostnames is falling rapidly (they hide this by choosing logarithmic scale)
Over at Tux Machines...: 2 days' worth
Richard Stallman Says He Will Probably Live Many More Years: "Richard Stallman has cancer. Fortunately it is slow-growing and manageable follicular lymphona, so he will probably live many more years nonetheless. But he now has to be even more careful not to catch Covid-19."
Quitting 'Clown Computing' and GAFAM is Only the Start: The Web and the Net at large became far too centralised
Stop Begging Companies That Don't Value Your Freedom to Stop Pushing You Around: That's not freedom
They Say Free Software is Like Communism When They, the Proprietary Software Giants, Constantly Pursue Government Bailouts (Subsidies From Taxpayers): At the moment Ukraine is at most risk due to its dependence on Microsoft (inside its infrastructure)
Social Control Media Has No Future, It Was Always Doomed to Fail (Also Promoted Based on Lies): Recent events, including developments at Twitter, meant that they lost a lot of their audience and then, in turn, sponsors/advertisers
The forbidden topics: There are forbidden topics in the hacker community
They're Been Trying to 'Kill' Richard Stallman for Years (by Mentally Tormenting Him): Malicious tongue wanted to do him what had been done to Julian Assange
We Temporarily Have Two Gemini Capsules: They're both authentic and secure, but they're not the same
Consumerism is Lying and Revisionism: We need to reject these liars and charlatans
Links 30/09/2023: Open VFS Framework, CrossOver 23.5, Dianne Feinstein Dies: Links for the day
Security Leftovers: GNU/Linux, Microsoft, and more
Microsoft Down on the World Wide Web, Shows Survey: down by a lot in this category
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 29, 2023: IRC logs for Friday, September 29, 2023
A Society That Fails Journalists Does Not Deserve Journalism: It's probably too later to save Julian Assange as a working publisher (he might never recover from the mental torture), but as a person and a father we can wish and work towards his release
Almost Nothing To Go With Your Morning's Cup Of Coffee: Newspaper? What newspaper?

The Linux Foundation, OSI and the Neglected Values of Freedom

Comments

Recent Techrights' Posts