Comments

• Jose_X

  2009-08-13 01:54:37

  First mistake is that they brush over reverse engineering of binaries as if it was a similar thing (ie, as complete and efficient) to having human-readable source code.
  
  Yeah, Bob. That is why FOSS stands for Free and Reversed-Engineered Software. That is why IBM will from this day forward distribute any source code at low cost to everyone that asks (since reverse engineering is so easy, cheap, and effective -- why anger your clients for no real reason). Sure.
  
  The second mistake is that contributing to FOSS has many advantages if you are a hardware company, service provider, or a user .. and that includes the vast majority of the world (including IBM on all three counts). It's these groups (and others) that are contributing to FOSS. They benefit immediately and directly. Since patents are easier to come up with than a solid piece of software, would so many people be wasting their time writing software at such low gains (if we believe IBM) and not going after patents instead? Or is it that the people contributing to and using/leveraging FOSS are really gaining?
  
  IBM wants the government to keep handing out unethical, stifling, and unconstitutional monopolies to prop up profit margins and unjust weapons against competitors despite the costs to the rest of society and to innovation. It's not that patents are needed. It's that they continue to be profitable assets to those that take the time (and have the money, experience, and lack of ethics) to exploit that broken system that survives on the backs of the many that are writing software instead of writing patents.
  
  Microsoft and IBM want to continue to keep their levers so as to buy out for cheap the companies doing the real work and keep companies growing fast from FOSS unable to escape heavy Industry-Giants Taxes.
  
  http://boycottnovell.com/2009/08/12/mckool-smith-i4i-vs-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-72064

• Charles Oliver

  2009-08-13 04:33:16

  As pointed out, IBM are a member of the Open Invention Network.
  
  It's not terribly surprising that a company that is so heavily invested in patents is riding to defend them. IBM's patents give them a competitive advantage.
  
  If anything the number of large companies represented in these friends of the court briefs shows what a big advantage patents are to incumbents in the market.

• BrownieBoy

  2009-08-13 10:03:53

  Scarey stuff, maybe. But on the positive side, it's also a restraint on Microsoft's patent lawsuits.
  
  Microsoft has been poking around the edges so far - i.e. the TomTom thing. But it knows that it can't risk open patent warfare with IBM. That would be MAD (as in Mutually Assured Destruction).
  
  And IBM has been Linux-friendly so far. So some good as well as bad here, IMHO.