Summary: Steve Ballmer is ranting against net neutrality and Juniper's business is in trouble after a lot of executives from Microsoft took over most top positions there
Microsoft is once again shown publicly for what it really is; it can be easily seen as anti-net neutrality, thanks for the most part to its longtime CEO (who is now replaced for PR purposes). Microsoft's record of hostility towards net neutrality must not to be forgotten as we covered it several times before and provided examples.
Well, speaking of networking, a reader tells us that
the person who replaced the Microsoft veteran who had run Juniper for years has just resigned. "He joined from Barclays Plc," told us this reader, "but I have yet to find out what kind of 'technology' he was involved with there.
"How much ongoing damage has been caused by the influx of softers like now-gone Kevin Johnson and how many people and their legacy are still there that he brought in? Softers would not be a good match for the core technologies the company brings in its money with" because it
contributed to
BSD.
"The incoming CEO, Rami Rahim," adds the reader, "has been with Juniper 17 years, so that is promising since they use FOSS (OSS) in-house at least in the devices they sell. However, that is just an uniformed guess, who knows the internal politics. The CRN article (not linked to) blathers about being on-message and sales teams rather than technology and function.
"Then there's
this:
Juniper's decline has been linked by some industry-watchers to the management changes that have taken place in recent years, including the influx of staff who previously worked at Microsoft, but Brooks -- himself a former employee with the software {sic} giant
"
This one has a lot of links. One thing to remember is that these boxes are going to be tap points for surveillance."
The same has been revealed to be the case last week when it comes to Cisco routers (used against anonymity). We shared links about that yesterday.
In addition, what would be the impact of having Juniper filled with executives from a net neutrality-hostile company?
⬆
