Bonum Certa Men Certa

Guest Article: A Tale of Possible Surveillance



Article by figosdev

Nuclear power plant



Mark Kennedy spy



Summary: "If people subconsciously hire private investigators the same way they hire lawyers, that would explain a lot."

Usually, "A PI" stands for something else.



I've heavily considered not writing this, but I thought it would make a nice follow-up to this post and yes, I have considered the slight possibility that by doing so, I am contributing to my own surveillance.

Having considered that, I'll now tell you what happened.

As I said in that article, I am aware that activists sometimes end up under surveillance. It's far less of a leap these days -- though while you would (having read history) expect it for someone like Malcolm X or Martin Luther King, I wouldn't normally assume Roy or I were "important" enough. But I don't claim to be an expert on the subject anyway.

"And it's known that no less than 2/3 of people (probably far more) in the country are under surveillance, it's just a matter how much."Still, it's known that people involved with Occupy (I was) were under surveillance, it's just a matter of how much. It's known that people involved with more recent protests are under surveillance -- it's just a matter of how much.

And it's known that no less than 2/3 of people (probably far more) in the country are under surveillance, it's just a matter how much. Though you never know exactly what will trigger that bracket of importance -- like that kid who rode past an area on his bicycle where a crime was taking place -- because of his GPS.

I still don't know if this person was actually following or interviewing me, or if they were just weird. But having done a lot of volunteering and activism over the years, I've met loads of weird people. I've even dated some -- to be certain, at one point I married one (but she was very nice, and I honestly wish her the very best.)

Having met lots of weird people, I can also say what stood out to me about this particular individual -- it's all relative, really.

I will leave out many details here, though she was (or appeared and claimed to be) older, I've dated just one person with grey hair (before I was married) and I used to know someone who went grey early. Her face was younger-looking, but I've known plenty of people who aged well enough that this was plausible. I still think it's worth mentioning.

Despite what my intuition tells me (correctly or otherwise), I can honestly say I found her charming. When we started talking, I did not assume her intentions were romantic. Though most of the people I've had lunch with who acted similarly revealed romantic intentions eventually.

"When I say that she established rapport, I would almost compare it to the day I met my first wife."Many efforts were made to establish rapport -- that's not necessarily significant by itself, that's what people do as they become friends. When you meet a person who is narcissistic and/or a compulsive liar and/or they're trying to take advantage of you, there are certain signs to watch out for although covert narcissists are different. I've dealt with both, I've certainly dated a narcissist before. They make up enough of the population that it's possible many of us have.

I'm not by any means claiming to be the horse-whisperer of narcissists -- they're tricky, experience doesn't make you completely immune to their tricks. I had chicken pox when I was a kid, someday that will likely show up again as shingles. But despite my experience, this person seemed to be going out of their way to establish rapport (more than an average person does) and I started wondering if they were going to reveal their intentions. [Editor's note: I've seen similar things before (somebody else) and have solid reasons to believe I too was targeted; the presumed spy admitted to know Mark Kennedy, shown at the top of this article, and later admitted to me that he had been infiltrating groups]

As to why I continued to meet this person, I already said they were charming enough as company (my intentions were not romantic either, although she was attractive and pleasant to talk to) and I was not immediately suspicious anyway. We would keep bumping into each other, though there are reasons this was not (by itself) suspicious either. I'm leaving the reasons out, because I don't wish to say more than needs to be said.

All in all, I would not find it shocking if a year from now, I discover that this person was really just a slightly awkward person who thought it would be nice to have lunch with some company. We only scheduled a single meeting -- in the interim, we met a handful of times.

We went for a walk in a very public and very populated (well lit is an understatement, it was a sunny day during a heat wave -- I had a LOT of water, with and without electrolytes) area. We wore masks and social-distanced as well; this is the most exposure I've had to other people in months.

When I say that she established rapport, I would almost compare it to the day I met my first wife. The difference is that by the end of the day (when I met my first wife) I was in love, while with this person I simply thought she was interesting. She was cute, but a lot of people are cute. I talk to people with nice smiles (when you can see them at least) and pleasant personalities almost every day -- and this in a place I consider to be very stuck up and snobby on average.

We did talk about politics, but (being a big nerd) I mostly limited my talk of politics to the articles of the Constitution, which she either found interesting or feigned interest in. I'm heavily inspired by Lawrence Lessig, and I can speak about certain aspects of the topic as passionately as I can write about them -- and I did exactly that.

"Although a few people who do are in fact lying, and don’t really care what you look like at all because that’s not why you interest them."We talked about loads of personal subjects, but mostly mundane things (this would still happen during surveillance of course) and while I don't deny being a bit of an open book, I don't think I revealed all that much you couldn't get from tapping my communications anyway. Which of course, people most likely already do.

After our second or third meeting, when it started to remind me a little too much of when I met my first wife (the first time we met, I wasn't even sure I would bump into her again, and we had never had lunch or anything) I pointed out that this would have to be a "friends" thing, that I was not trying to date her.

She acknowledged the same, citing her own previous but partly unresolved relationship issues. We both acknowledged that the other was attractive, which I honestly found flattering enough -- IMO it's always nice when an attractive person admits they find you attractive. Although a few people who do are in fact lying, and don't really care what you look like at all because that's not why you interest them. I had no trouble taking the compliment however. I'm a dork, and even if I was as attractive as Roy for example, I would still be flattered by people who thought so.

Why do I find this person suspicious then, to the point where I make it into an article about surveillance? I've met literally hundreds of odd people, and nobody else I've met (including people who do surveillance for a living!) have ever inspired me to do so.

So here's what stood out for me, among all of those people -- this one person:

* Seemed to work as hard as any compulsive liar I've met, just to establish rapport.

* Most people who do that are more casual/informal, or more obvious about their intentions, even if they are hidden. There were broad and notable efforts to be "informal" and friendly, but I couldn't shake the feeling of a professional tinge to the whole thing -- despite there being zero cause for one.

I've met people from New York, DC, Numerous people who have met the POTUS (Including one I lived with) and I've met Buzz Aldrin at an event where I could have met both Hillary and Obama -- but I didn't care about them (only Buzz, he's awesome!) And all of these people have a more casual vibe than I got from this person, who was very clearly being casual and saying casual things.

"Why do I find this person suspicious then, to the point where I make it into an article about surveillance? I've met literally hundreds of odd people, and nobody else I've met (including people who do surveillance for a living!) have ever inspired me to do so."I just couldn't shake the feeling that it was professional, even though it was clearly not intended to feel that way.

* They did say a couple of things that I just swear are NOT TRUE. This is what made me think "compulsive liar?" for a day or so.

* I've met a lot of compulsive liars, including ones who are very slow to reveal their intentions. But with this person, the rapport (which was heavily pronounced) simply WENT NO-WHERE.

By "went nowhere" I mean no matter how slowly someone lets you know what they really want from you, it still MOVES. They work their way up, however slowly, to what they want.

This didn't move. It moved when I met my first wife. It moved with narcissists I dated. It moved with another friend or two who were narcissists or just selfish people. This person didn't WANT anything -- ANYTHING.

But they worked overly hard to get it -- like someone does if they want something from you. But they didn't want anything.

"The complete lack of interest in ANYTHING specific, paired with the sheer lack of professionalism and the STRONG sense of being professional, made me think this was just a fishing expedition."So I didn't seriously think this was a government agent (Really? Moi?) but I did toy with the idea. They did SO LITTLE probing though. And while they seemed too professional to be a friend, they seemed too much like a genuinely odd person to be an agent. I'm NO expert, and if it wasn't for HBO dramas I would know even less. But whatever.

The complete lack of interest in ANYTHING specific, paired with the sheer lack of professionalism and the STRONG sense of being professional, made me think this was just a fishing expedition. Okay. But even for a fishing expedition, it seemed a bit contrived and even pointless.

So if they're not a run of the mill compulsive / eccentric / dork / person like me, and they're not federal (I suppose it's possible but this is about my own impressions, and that's not what I'm sensing) what else could it be?

Are they corporate? I know that some cults have hired private investigators to get information on people before, but I'm not going after any cults at the moment -- maybe I pissed one off but I don't think so.

"All to establish rapport, all to get absolutely nothing but lunch with me, with no interest in either romance or friendship?"One of the things that tipped me off in the first place was that they had a few things in common with me that I just don't believe are truly part of who they are -- right down to a country I've lived in that they are supposedly from originally.

Yeah, I don't believe that at all, actually. I've lived with people from those countries, we met simply by chance that we had both lived there -- but when this person said it (repeatedly) it was the most suspicious thing they said. But not the only thing like it.

So, maybe a P.I., but someone who knows a handful of things about me (some of which are trivial to get for a fee, others are slightly more personal and less likely to be on file -- could be cold-reading or a lucky guess though?)

All to establish rapport, all to get absolutely nothing but lunch with me, with no interest in either romance or friendship?

Hmm...

Oh, did I mention they showed up out of nowhere very recently, and took IMMEDIATE interest in me? I'm not saying this to flatter myself -- I mean I'd never seen them ever before, then one day they were chatting with me, then a couple days later I bumped into them again, then we were having lunch -- going for walks, having lunch again--

"She claims to be from around here, though I really don't think she is."And then after our (only) scheduled meeting, which honestly seemed to go just as nicely as the others, they promptly disappeared?

She claims to be from around here, though I really don't think she is. I would probably know people that know her -- at the very least, she's newer than she claims. (Perhaps just a recluse -- but not for little old me.)

And IMO she acts in every way like a P.I., but doesn't seem to be interested in ANYTHING in particular about me (I realise that's an ideal impression for a P.I. or other investigator to give off.)

I do have one theory, that I consider pretty reasonable.

I come from a VERY controlling family. We have minimal contact now, and I'm glad they're not in my life. They have always showed some level of interest, even when we aren't speaking. When I've had relationships -- any level -- marriage, girlfriend, friends -- they've meddled. I've all but cut them off.

I looked into what this sort of venture would cost them. Sadly, it's well within their means (even if they were simply bored or curious.) Would they stoop that low? I don't know, it's the most reasonable (least nutty) explanation, IF this person is a professional. The other guesses are still possible, but I'm trying to put together the most reasonable explanation. That's what sane people do (I don't know, I read it on a matchbook.)

When you're going through a divorce or similar issues, your ex will often hire someone they subconsciously feel is the most like they are, personality-wise. This is particularly unpleasant if your ex was aggressive and manipulative, and they want to subject you to more of the same in the divorce proceedings. My divorce was unpleasant, but it wasn't as bad as that. I've seen a lot worse.

If people subconsciously hire private investigators the same way they hire lawyers, that would explain a lot. It would also explain why this person is so familiar with me. Sure, they could also get a lot of that from observing me from afar for long enough -- or perhaps tapping my communications. But this feels a little more like family. That would really explain basically every odd thing about this, including the "why bother?" part.

If that's what it turns out to be, I will be certain to distance myself https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3637 even further from them. On the other hand, if it somehow turns out to be something far more sinister... CHEERS! It's been fun.

Family is overrated sometimes. Also sort of priceless in general... but not this one!

Long live rms (and me, if possible) and happy hacking.

Licence: Creative Commons CC0 1.0 (public domain)

Recent Techrights' Posts

Fight Til the End
This comes to show that persistence pays off
SLAPP Censorship - Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100 KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of Legal Papers Sent to Us)
It's about the quality, not quantity (unless your sole aim is to drown out or "flood the zone")
Links 16/05/2026: Climate Issues, Free Speech, and Monopolies/Monopsonies
Links for the day
 
Finland Needs to Dump Microsoft (Microslop) for National Security Reasons and the Same is True for Hundreds of Countries
"I don't see why Ryssäs would want Finns to use microslop products..."
Cyber Show UK is Already Available Over Gemini Protocol
This past week the total number of active Gemini capsules hit all-time records several times
The Corrupt Lecture the Non-Corrupt - Part XXV - Not Bringing Intelligence to the EPO, Not 'Artificial Intelligence' Either (But Intelligence-Eroding Drugs)
The EPO was meant to be about science and law. In practice, however, it's about breaking the law and being stoned.
The Cyber Show on Why Coding is Important and Slop Cannot Change or Replace That
Hand-crafting one's site has plenty of advantages
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 16, 2026
IRC logs for Saturday, May 16, 2026
Gemini Links 17/05/2026: Music Theory, Reticulum Git Repos, and Releasing Kiln
Links for the day
Links 16/05/2026: Cuba Plunges Into Darkness (Energy Wasted by Nonsense), Googlebooks as Slop Nonsense (Energy Waste and Time Wasted)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 16/05/2026: Retreat and Devuan Manuals
Links for the day
SLAPP Censorship - Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the Truth About Graveley and Garrett's Abuse of Processes, Stacking Dockets
These are the sorts of things British taxpayers ought to talk about
"AI" Became a New Name or Placeholder for Debt
Because they will only ever lose money for this thing with "tokens" or "potential"
"Microsoft Goodwill and Intangible Assets" Down Two Years in a Row, According to Microsoft
Microsoft cannot sell these, so what is their real relevance?
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 15, 2026
IRC logs for Friday, May 15, 2026
IBM: Shares Down 30%, Mass Layoffs, IBM Says "Goodwill" Grew by 10% to Over a Third of the Company's Total "Worth"
According to IBM
Microsoft LinkedIn Layoffs "Very Likely Higher" Than 1,000 People
Microsoft is bleeding
The Corrupt Lecture the Non-Corrupt - Part XXIV - Luis Berenguer Giménez at the EPO (European Patent Office) Became the Punchline of EPO Staff
"the fact that Luis was caught with cocaine causes laughter. The use of cocaine in itself is not the real shocking bit."
IBM Keeps Culling Essential Linux, Fedora, GNOME, and GTK Staff
Over a month ago IBM laid off over 400 Red Hat engineers
Cisco Cuts Nearly 4,000 Jobs Because of Debt, Nothing to Do With Slop
The media keeps talking about revenue, not profits
Gemini Links 15/05/2026: UDP Game Forwarding Over SSH, Avoiding LLMs, and Alhena 5.5.9
Links for the day
Links 15/05/2026: Electric Company Shuns Entire Town to Prioritise Only Data Centres, Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. Carried Out Secret Attacks in Iran
Links for the day
LLM Slop is Not Reliable, Constitutes No Process of 'Thinking'; There's No Thought Process at All, No Grasp or Understanding, Let Alone Context
Lies have become the "business model" [...] More people ought to talk about it and explain to other people what LLMs really are
Not a Security Expert If You Cannot Manage to Keep Online a Simple Two-User Mastodon Instance Somebody Else Built
From uptime of ~99% to maybe 80%
Microsoft Has All the Symptoms of a Dying Company (Mass Layoffs of the People Who Built the Company)
the company's debt is going through the ceiling
Focus is Important, Focus is Everything
We are still running 6 multi-part series in tandem
For Effective 'Finlandisation' (Not Digital Sovereignty) to Be Replaced by Autonomy Finland Needs to Think Like GNU (Software Freedom), Not Linux (Openwashing Source, Plus LLM Slop and Killswitches)
What is 'Finlandisation'?
Guest Post on False Marketing and PR Blitzes by Anthropic
A lot of people my age are just tired of the nonsense
Links 15/05/2026: UK antitrust regulator is officially investigating Microsoft Office, Anthropic’s Fraudulent Lies About Mythoslop Don't Withstand Scrutiny
Links for the day
IBM's Kyndryl in Trouble: Mass Layoffs, Payroll Problems, Buybacks (in Company Whose Debt is Almost Twice Its Total Value), and Soon $9 Per Share (Down Over 80%)
Kyndryl is done. Stick a fork in it.
ICYMI: GNU/Linux Did Not Start in Finland
If we're honest/true to ourselves, we need to recognise history for what it is, not what some corporations (like GAFAM) want it to be
IBM is Googlebombing the Media With Fake Numbers to Promote Fake Technology
a classic example of why much of today's media cannot be trusted (anymore)
Up to 10,000 Microsoft Layoffs in a Couple of Months
Many ways to skin a cat
Truth Hurts. People Hurt by Truth Aren't Entitled to Compensation.
Family members aren't exempt
SLAPP Censorship - Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to Handle Women (Except to Attack Them)
The case against us was really quite simple
Update on Sirius Open Source in 2026 (When Your Former Employer Commits Crimes and Nobody is Held Accountable)
I did not envision myself spending several years (even 4 years after leaving that company) challenging the system for tolerating and even covering up corruption
Codecs and Software Patents - Part VII - Entering Phase II, the Battle Against Companies That Normalise Taxed (by Patents on Mathematics) Codecs
In the next few part we'll deal with the impact on Free software, including the GNU Project
The Corrupt Lecture the Non-Corrupt - Part XXIII - Cocaine Use at the EPO's Top-Level Management "Adds Up" and Worsens Things "Over Time"
"cocaine use knocks the IQ down permanently a tiny bit with each use. Over time that adds up."
Gemini Links 15/05/2026: Slop Fatigue and Banning LLM Use
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 14, 2026
IRC logs for Thursday, May 14, 2026