Comments on: Vista 8 is Not Selling, But Microsoft’s UEFI Scheme Blocks Linux Installations/Booting http://techrights.org/2012/11/18/blocking-gnu-linux-in-oems/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Thu, 05 Jan 2017 01:24:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Michael http://techrights.org/2012/11/18/blocking-gnu-linux-in-oems/comment-page-1/#comment-133798 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:50:13 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=64464#comment-133798 Both Win XP and Win 7 were well received… unlike Vista and, it seems, Win 8. Not sure what made you think otherwise. And all of those did better than *free* alternatives… which have not earned their place on the desktop in any significant way.

]]>
By: mcinsand http://techrights.org/2012/11/18/blocking-gnu-linux-in-oems/comment-page-1/#comment-133797 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:33:27 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=64464#comment-133797 One thing that MS is doing well over in the US is a serious, constant, and aggressive advertising campaign. The last publicly-welcomed OS that MS released was over a decade ago. Windows 7 is really only tolerated, and only then because it isn’t the trainwreck of the Alpha version (Vista). Then again, Windows 7 did pick up my time consumed in helping friends jump to FOSS.

Although the new ad campaign is done well, the desperation is still definitely there. MS desperately needs a release that is not a flop. This isn’t it, and it could help to further usher-in a world that expects performance and a degree of freedom/choice. In other worlds, a post MS, post Apple world. The duopoly needs MS to continue with the majority share in order to defend the status quo. Otherwise, users will look for (and find) better options. When most people simply used Windows because most people used Windows, there was a bit of safety… as long as FOSS was only a thin slice of the market share. The perception was of only two real options: economy with poor reilibility or reliability with poor economy. With both, performance was sadly compromised. As MS’ market share drops, more and more will realize that they can fork over more cash for an overpriced, underperforming Macintoy, but that won’t be the majority. Most don’t like licenses that amount to technological straightjackets, and most don’t want to overpay for what they get. Furthermore, most people actually like choices (although I have had cultmembers assert that the advantage of the Apple is that they don’t have to worry with having choices for what they might like best). As options build, and especially as MS deflates, Apple has three monstrous disadvantages from the starting gate. If Windows 8 doesn’t save Windows, then it will definitely also be a massive hit to Apple.

]]>
By: Michael http://techrights.org/2012/11/18/blocking-gnu-linux-in-oems/comment-page-1/#comment-133792 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:39:05 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=64464#comment-133792 You are still whining about Vista. LOL! Vista came out in 2009. Move on already.

Windows 8 is a bit of a UI nightmare… it gives the competition an opening (yes, as Vista did). Apple capitalized on the opening before… now we shall see if the open source community can get their act together and get desktop Linux into a good enough state to compete with a bad release of Windows. If they can you will no doubt see HP and Dell making a lot more sales of desktop Linux systems.

I hope this happens. I think it would be great. But I am not holding my breath.

]]>