The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Times report on Linux: should we respond?

I cannot believe the Times publishes such a lousy part of journalism.

Michael

--
Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager        | topystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux!      | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Andy Mortimer [SMTP:andy.mortimer@poboxes.com]
>Sent:	Monday, April 21, 1997 2:08 PM
>To:	Debian Private List
>Cc:	Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject:	Times report on Linux: should we respond?
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>First of all, a bit of background. For those of you who don't know, The
>Times is a fairly well-respected British newspaper, and its technology
>magazine, Innovations, recently published a very damning article about
>Linux, based on last month's PCW cover CD, which I believe contained some
>version of Red Hat. The text of the article can be found at
>
>http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/Sunday-Times/stiinnsnd01001.html?112977
>4
>
>but whether this is the full text, I don't know. If I can find somebody
>with a copy of the Times, I'll compare them and let you know.
>
>My question is, is it worth responding to this as a project? I personally
>found it highly offensive, but I don't really know whether it is worth
>responding to, or whether this would just be counter-productive. Your
>opinions would be welcomed.
>
>I haven't posted this to the devel or user lists, in case it caused a
>storm of flames etc, which we don't want. For all I know, of course, it
>could be already on the comp.os.linux.* newsgroups anyway, since I don't
>read them, but I didn't think it was worth the risk.
>
>Somewhat miffed,
>
>&E
>
>- -- 
>Andy Mortimer, andy.mortimer@poboxes.com
>http://www.netforward.com/poboxes/?andy.mortimer
>Finger asm21@asm21.emma.cam.ac.uk for PGP public key
>- --
>The people are fading away, as I slip into colours then ten shades of grey;
>If I don't last this one tell them when I've gone,
>That playing with you was incredible fun.
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.3i
>Charset: noconv
>
>iQDVAwUBM1tYzAupwOfdl1GZAQFNFQX9Gq9geMIJzpn9IMzVhufjZb925F2Qzhhf
>qmQSChqfyMBMagW5bpRSJ+JZMWhfJjiMr6x1HgNsefPDptDzFFRPGTfHIJc8lhC3
>pWa1RZZALn4BxiNVCjVKEhdQM9/eHpFUde5yqNXhetrVKwzuyScSYZfMaiOtg0aT
>3E2EPm9RiJNWDwvdjZSf+1Okr1gS5v5OMeYHUSkRf1bn3qznTDlKwir+H/J882/b
>Cw+7nIFvjukVPQS/07cl2drR5vkVRtr4
>=D8lZ
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>--
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
>Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .