Development

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
* [[Microsoft developers used undocumented APIs]] (Exhibit PX01614)
* [[Microsoft developers used undocumented APIs]] (Exhibit PX01614)
* [[Microsoft "undocumentation"]] (Exhibit supp_rpt_andrew_schulman, Iowa)
* [[Microsoft "undocumentation"]] (Exhibit supp_rpt_andrew_schulman, Iowa)
 +
 +
== style guide biased towards MS apps .. ==
 +
 +
To: Don Casey
 +
cc: Alex Morror, Frank King, AI-ESC, AI-PSC, AI-TSC, Richard Wolf
 +
From: Richard Wolf
 +
Date 09/11/91 07:03:09 Pm
 +
Subject:
 +
 +
 +
This memo lists and briefly describes items in the draft Microsoft Style Guide for Windows that are biased towards Microsoft applications. Individually, none of the items are major changes. They are a collection of small arbitrary decisions without clear user benefit that taken together give Microsoft an advantage because most of their applications already conform ..
 +
 +
..
 +
 +
 +
Second, the style guide provides little or no indication of future object oriented user interface directions that Microsoft is developing, including property sheets, direct manipulation, pop-up menus, and notebook techniques. Essentially, current and somewhat arbitrary GUI practices of Microsoft applications are being set up as detailed standards while Microsoft works on new approaches that obsolete these standards. Microsoft has privately disclosed to Lotus some elements of their intended direction.
 +
 +
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/0000/PX00956.pdf
 +
 +
--
 +
court documents in the case of Comes v. Microsoft.

Revision as of 19:17, 22 January 2009

style guide biased towards MS apps ..

To: Don Casey cc: Alex Morror, Frank King, AI-ESC, AI-PSC, AI-TSC, Richard Wolf From: Richard Wolf Date 09/11/91 07:03:09 Pm Subject:


This memo lists and briefly describes items in the draft Microsoft Style Guide for Windows that are biased towards Microsoft applications. Individually, none of the items are major changes. They are a collection of small arbitrary decisions without clear user benefit that taken together give Microsoft an advantage because most of their applications already conform ..

..


Second, the style guide provides little or no indication of future object oriented user interface directions that Microsoft is developing, including property sheets, direct manipulation, pop-up menus, and notebook techniques. Essentially, current and somewhat arbitrary GUI practices of Microsoft applications are being set up as detailed standards while Microsoft works on new approaches that obsolete these standards. Microsoft has privately disclosed to Lotus some elements of their intended direction.

http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/0000/PX00956.pdf

-- court documents in the case of Comes v. Microsoft.

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories