Netscape

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (11:45, 27 July 2009) (view source)
 
(20 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:Comes v Microsoft]]
 +
[[Category:Antitrust]]
 +
[[Category:Microsoft]]
 +
[[Category:Netscape]]
 +
[[Category:Sabotage]]
 +
This index deals with [[Comes vs Microsoft]] court exhibits which offer a glance at the history of Microsoft abuse. For a concise summary of some of the exhibits, see "[[Petition text - overview]]".
 +
 +
=== Fear ===
 +
* [[Bill Gates: The "inetarnet" will destroy our power]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5704)
* [[Bill Gates: The "inetarnet" will destroy our power]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5704)
* [[Netscape challenges Microsoft lead on the Internet]] (Exhibit PX07829)
* [[Netscape challenges Microsoft lead on the Internet]] (Exhibit PX07829)
 +
* [[Bill Gates: don't underestimate an OPEN Internet]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2273)
 +
* [[Microsoft on the dangers of a web-centric desktop]] (Exhibit PX02966)
 +
 +
=== IE Integration ===
 +
* [[Using IE5 to drive win32 adoption]] (Exhibit PX09121)
* [[Using IE5 to drive win32 adoption]] (Exhibit PX09121)
 +
* [[Sinofsky: write to Winsock]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2118)
* [[Bill Gates on making IE and ISS work better together]] (Exhibit PX09645)
* [[Bill Gates on making IE and ISS work better together]] (Exhibit PX09645)
* [[Bill Gates on Microsoft collaboration - Extend IE]] (Exhibit PX02991)
* [[Bill Gates on Microsoft collaboration - Extend IE]] (Exhibit PX02991)
-
* [[How to get a grab of Netscape's revenues]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5825)
+
* [[Win95 was Internet ready]] (Exhibit PLEX0_4524)
-
* [[How to keep Netscape from sabotaging our protocol extensions]] (Exhibit plex0_5716)
+
* [[Microsoft: don't mention putting the browser in the OS]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2846)
-
* [[Microsoft and the quasi-partner]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5705)
+
* [[Integrated Web capabilities]] (Exhibit PX03077)
 +
=== Scheming ===
 +
* [[Microsoft: let's clone Netscape]] (Exhibit plex0_5071)
 +
* [[Mosiac: you guys are going to f*ck us eventually]] (Exhibit PX02132)
 +
* [[Microsoft: the Office club]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2844)
 +
* [[Brad Silverberg: winning the Internet platform battle]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2700)
 +
* [[Paul Maritz: problems of open APIs]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2278)
-
== MS: the Office club .. ==
+
=== Attack on Netscape ===
 +
* [[How to get a grab of Netscape's revenues]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5825)
 +
* [[How to keep Netscape from sabotaging our protocol extensions]] (Exhibit plex0_5716)
 +
* [[Microsoft and the quasi-partner]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5705)
 +
* [[Yet more undocumented API calls]] (Exhibit PX02667)
 +
===Others===
-
From: Don Bradford
+
* [[Netscape on the SDK]] (Exhibit PX02284_A)
-
Sent: Friday, February 13, 1998 7:35 AM
+
* [[Microsoft to Netscape: try our 800 number]] (Exhibit PX02400_A)
-
To: Ben Waldman
+
-
 
+
-
Cc: Bill Gates; Paul MAritz; David Cole; Dave Reed; Charles Fitzgearld; Jon DeVaan
+
-
 
+
-
Subject: RE: Java on Macintosh/IE Control
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
ISL is something Apple seems to really want to jumpstart their protocol work and act as an integrated point for their new key chain stuff. It could really help Netscape, so I've only been willing to talk about in the context of IE as the exclusive browser. [They could ship Netscape on secondary media]
+
-
 
+
-
..
+
-
 
+
-
From: Ben Waldman
+
-
Sent: Friday, February 13, 1998 1:02 AM
+
-
To: Don Bradford
+
-
 
+
-
Cc: Bill Gates; Paul Maritz; David Cole; Dave Reed; Charles Fitzgearld; Jon DeVaan
+
-
 
+
-
Subject: RE: Java on Macintosh/IE Control
+
-
 
+
-
RE IE -
+
-
 
+
-
Sounds like we will give them the HTML control for nothing except making IE the "standard browser for Apple". I think they should be doing this anyway. Though the language of the agreement uses the word "encourage" I think the spirit is that Apple should be using it everywhere, and if they don't do it, then we can use Office as a club. So I guess I'm saying that I don't think we should give them the HTML control unless they make IE the exclusive browser (and not need to bargain with ISL).
+
-
 
+
-
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/122106/PLEX0_2844.pdf
+

Current revision

This index deals with Comes vs Microsoft court exhibits which offer a glance at the history of Microsoft abuse. For a concise summary of some of the exhibits, see "Petition text - overview".

Contents

Fear

IE Integration

Scheming

Attack on Netscape

Others

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories