Sun

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (11:13, 7 September 2009) (view source)
 
(21 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:Sun]]
 +
[[Category:Comes v Microsoft]]
 +
[[Category:Antitrust]]
 +
[[Category:Microsoft]]
 +
[[Category:Hardware]]
 +
[[Category:Java]]
 +
This index deals with [[Comes vs Microsoft]] court exhibits which offer a glance at the history of Microsoft abuse. For a concise summary of some of the exhibits, see "[[Petition text - overview]]".
 +
== NetPC ==
 +
See [[NetPC]] page.
 +
== Java ==
-
== billg: I am hardcore on not supporting Suns Java .. ==
+
=== Exploring ===
 +
* [[Bill Gates on the JAVA crisis]] (Exhibit PLEX0_6109)
 +
* [[Surf the Java wave]] (Exhibit PX07871)
 +
* [[Key platform challenges from Java and NC]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5852)
 +
* [[IBM Confidential Java Strategy Update]] (Exhibit PX02712)
 +
* [[Java Redacted]] (Exhibit PX04264)
-
From: Ben Slivka
+
=== Harming ===
-
Sent: Wednesday, May 14 1997 11:35 AM
+
-
To: Bill Gates; John Ludwig; Charles Fitzgearld
+
-
Cc: Arron Contorer; Paul Maritz; Brad Silverberg
+
-
Subject: RE: DirectX and Talisman Update (Java JDK 1.2 support)
+
-
To quote charles on JDK 1.2 support: "No fucking way!"
+
* [[We have to avoid pure JAVA applications]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5879)
 +
* [[Ben Slivka: how do we wrest control of Java away from Sun]] (Exhibit plex0_4482)
 +
* [[A good tactic to tie java developers to windows]] (Exhibit PX09104)
 +
* [[Jim Allchin: piss on Java]] (Exhibit PX02412)
 +
* [[Microsoft terminates Sun's Java license]] (Exhibit PX02782)
 +
* [[Microsoft on fighting the Java infestation]] (Exhibit PX02916)
 +
* [http://boycottnovell.com/2009/07/19/microsoft-about-killing-sun-java/ Microsoft Product Manager: “Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let’s move on and steal the Java language.”]
 +
* [[The Microsoft Java Language Council]] (Exhibit PX04258)
 +
=== Bill Gates' Personal Role ===
-
The Java community is having a hard time digesting JDK 1.1, and while it has important new features (like Beans), it still has that crapy AWT stuff, shitty printing, the list goes on and on. JDK 1.2 had JFC, which we're going to be pissing on at every opportunity.
+
* [[Bill Gates: I am hardcore on not supporting Suns Java]] (Exhibits plex0_2727 and plex0_2710)
 +
* [[Bill Gates on how to cause a Java schism]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2727)
 +
* [[Bill Gates: An ISV that writes to COR is just f*cked]] (Exhibit PLEX0_2759)
-
This summer we're going to totally divorce Sun ..
+
=== Articles ===
 +
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/06/business/technology-judge-likens-microsoft-s-effect-on-java-to-a-bang-on-the-knee.html Judge Likens Microsoft's Effect on Java to a Bang on the Knee]
 +
* [http://news.cnet.com/Jinxed-by-Java/2009-1001_3-218429.html Jinxed by Java]
-
We'll come out swinging with AFC, with our new Multi-Class File format (for packaging both native code as well as byte codes, saves lots of space), with Java language extensions (peteku/andersh are driving), with very easy-to-use support for calling Win32 DLLs (we demo'd a Petzold app written in Java, complete with message pump, windprocs etc. - you had to look very close to see that it was Java), with clesses for DirectX and DHTML, with Enterprise AFC classes (that's all I can remember off the top of my head). We're really jucing up our JIT compiler - peteku just checked in function inlining last night, and we've got a P5 instruction scheduler, too. Our latest VM beats all comers (Sun, Netscape, Symantic) in almost every singe benchmark.
+
=== Posts of Interest ===
-
From: Bill Gates:
+
* [http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/21/nathan-myhrvold-antitrust-memo/ Microsoft’s Nathan Myhrvold on How “to Freeze the Market at the OEM and ISV Level”]
-
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 1997 11:21 AM
+
* [http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/25/ms-definition-of-embrace-and-extend/ Microsoft on “Embrace and Extend”, the “Windows API Franchise”]
-
To: John Ludwig
+
* [http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/26/eee-versus-cross-platform/ Nathan Myhrvold/Bill Gates Use “Embrace and Extend” Against “Making it Easy for People to Do Competitive Operating Systems”]
-
Cc: Arron Contorer; Ben Slivka
+
* [http://boycottnovell.com/2009/08/26/joachim-kempin-lunix-full-text/ Bill Gates Called “LUNIX” a Threat Back in 1997] (also covers Java)
-
Subject: RE: DirectX and Talisman Update
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
I would be very glad to talk about this. Christine - see if we can get a time in the next 2 - 3 week setting aside an hour.
+
-
 
+
-
I did stick a few "barb" comments about cross platform which I should have avoided but it's a key topic that has me worried.
+
-
 
+
-
The email exchange this morning with Charles Fitzgerald was very helpfull to my thinking on this. I think supporting JDK 1.1 is fine and I am hard core about NOT supporting JDK 1.2. I really needed to understand where we are going to draw the line because I am so afraid of the slippery slope.
+
-
 
+
-
If you think we should support JDK 1.2 its ok but you will really have to explain why and where it stops.
+
-
 
+
-
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/122106/PLEX0_2710.pdf
+
-
 
+
-
-
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
Can a 'Java' applet written to make calls to a Win32 DLL still be called a JAVA applet.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
billg on how to cause a Java schism ..From: Bill Gates
+
-
Sent: Monday, June 16, 1997 3:38 AM
+
-
To: Paul Maritz
+
-
Cc: Arron Contorer; Natham Myhrvold; John Lufwig; Paul Gross; Ben Slivka
+
-
Subject: Java schism
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
A point that is important to me is to have PURE JAVA applications that do a lot HAVE to ship a full runtime instead of being able to count on the run time being shipped with the operating system. This will make more complex in some ways that a Windows application that uses our native APIs. It will make the installation and version management harder.
+
-
 
+
-
Since we do want to run JAVA applets in the browser we have to provide some JAVA support there. It may be that some of the JAVA runtime should ONLY be available through the browser - like AWT versus our equivalent. I think restricting things to the browser is an important idea that should be explored.
+
-
 
+
-
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/122106/PLEX0_2727.pdf
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
== Java ==
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
* [[Bill Gates on the JAVA crisis]] (Exhibit PLEX0_6109)
+
-
* [[Surf the Java wave]] (Exhibit PX07871)
+
-
* [[We have to avoid pure JAVA applications]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5879)
+
-
* [[Key platform challenges from Java and NC]] (Exhibit PLEX0_5852)
+
-
* [[Ben Slivka: how do we wrest control of Java away from Sun]] (Exhibit plex0_4482)
+
-
* [[A good tactic to tie java developers to windows]] (Exhibit PX09104)
+

Current revision

This index deals with Comes vs Microsoft court exhibits which offer a glance at the history of Microsoft abuse. For a concise summary of some of the exhibits, see "Petition text - overview".

Contents

NetPC

See NetPC page.

Java

Exploring

Harming

Bill Gates' Personal Role

Articles

Posts of Interest

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories