EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.17.07

Microsoft Leaves Linspire Robbed, Naked

Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, GPL, Linspire, Microsoft, Novell at 11:45 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Well, well, well…

That’s what ‘partners’ are for.

Just shortly after Microsoft had betrayed Novell, Microsoft decided to move on to Linspire. DinformationWeek, which has been Microsoft’s pet for delivering endless FUD recently, has the report.

Microsoft says software that’s licensed under a new version of a popular open source license isn’t covered by the patent protection deal it recently signed with desktop Linux distributor Linspire.

If we get this straight, and only if (that’s a big if) Microsoft’s claims are legally valid at all, Linspire faces two choices (or scenarios) now:

  • Linspire has no access to GPLv3-licensed software, of which there will be plenty.
  • Linspire achieved nothing with its deal. It is not supposedly ‘protected’. It spends money building a so-called ‘translator’ to serve a convicted monopoly abuser. It also propagates the myth that Linux requires protection and at the same time drives many of its existing customers away.

This might be the perfect punishment to the man who called certain Linux distributors “high-brow pirates” and, as a Linux distributor, spread FUD on behalf on Microsoft (for profit).

A question remains here. Are Novell and Xandros affected by association/inference?

Have a look at this discussion at Digg.com and the pointers it contains. It says it all.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

19 Comments

  1. elkosmas said,

    July 18, 2007 at 7:09 am

    Gravatar

    Here in greece the we had Microsoft-Goverment “agreement” one year later the Goverment doesn’t report to the public about the context of this “agreement”…. sometimes i don’t know what’s worst. “M$Agreements” with OS software companies or with Goverments

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 18, 2007 at 7:42 am

    Gravatar

    Here in Britain we have some similar problems with BECTA, which always procures Microsoft software for education. The Open Source Consortium is looking into it.

    Example articles:


    Becta’s schools software scheme reported to EC

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | An advisor to Becta, the education technology quango, has complained
    | to the European Commission about its procurement process for firms
    | to provide online learning platforms and content to British schools.
    `—-

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01…_ec_complaint/

    OSC joins criticism of UK education’s attitude to open source

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Open Source Consortium president, Mark Taylor, has been in contact to
    | voice its opinion on the controversy surrounding Becta’s purchasing
    | frameworks and the adoption of open source adoption in UK schools.
    |
    | In short, it doesn’t make happy reading for Becta. “The essence of
    | our concern is that they’re saying one thing and actually pursuing
    | policies that are exclusive,” he said. “Becta’s own research shows there
    | are major benefits [with open source], however the reality of the
    | framework is that it excludes both products and services.”
    `—-

    http://www.businessreviewonline.com/…ins_criti.html

    UK Government criticised for stifling open source in schools

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | MP Pugh reckons shcools should support independent or open source
    | software firms. He says, “In my experience a school is a key part
    | of the community and as such has a role to play in the economy of
    | that community. By supporting SMEs the local high-technology
    | industry will be encouraged which will benefit everyone.”
    `—-

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36464

    Becta under fire for procurement framework

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Nineteen MPs have accused a government agency of restricting the
    | procurement of software in schools.
    `—-

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11…nt_criticised/

    MPs criticise government roadblocks to Open Source adoption in schools

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | The UK Government’s own studies have shown savings of up to 60% can be
    | made by schools and colleges using Open Source software. Despite this
    | clear advantage, some MPs believe the software procurement frameworks
    | from Becta and official advice from DfES effectively locks out the us
    | of free, Open Source software.
    `—-

    http://opensourceblog.itproportal.com/?p=220

    Among many more…

  3. Gopal said,

    July 18, 2007 at 8:22 am

    Gravatar

    If OpenOffice moves to LGPLv3, would M$ pull out of the OOXML converter deals also ? If so where wiould it leave the likes of Linspire .

  4. Rickie Stallman said,

    July 18, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Hey, weren’t you reported to your ISP for crapflooding USENET groups with “advocacy” flamebait? How did that go?

  5. Larz said,

    July 18, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Who the hell are you, Rickie? M$ rabble-rouser?

  6. Steve said,

    July 18, 2007 at 1:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Are we really surprised?

    ______________
    http://www.FreeOpenMoko.com

  7. Balmbag Balmer said,

    July 18, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    Gravatar

    C’mon… How can Micro$oft protect distributors from threats that do not exist? These distributors signed deals with M$, when there was no need to, and now they will pay a price for it. I will not shed a single tear and, by the way, who gives a fly’n phuck about Linspire or Novell? There are better distributions out there.

  8. Jonathan said,

    July 18, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    Gravatar

    What’s with the vitriol in the articles and in the comments? You’re not helping your case.

    And for that matter, writing “M$” just screams “from the heart of my Mom’s basement, I stab at thee!” Try working for the EFF or groups actually defending Linux and open-source if you really want to burn Microsoft.

  9. Fred said,

    July 18, 2007 at 2:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Here in Missouri we don’t need Microsoft or Linux. We use “Jesus OS”, pronounced “jeez-os”, for short. The Lord is our chipset and our compiler. He writes the code that makes the whole world sing. He writes the code. He writes the code.

  10. David Ponce said,

    July 18, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    Gravatar

    M$. I like it, not a single tear for me too. Microsoft is continuously proving that we need to get out of the proprietary software, change the copyright institution that is working against progress and enroll the open source revolution.

    Yes M$, you will die slowly…very slowly.

  11. Shawn Q said,

    July 18, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    Gravatar

    I wish most companies got this kind of attention. If we even scraped a smidgen of how criminal most of the worlds corporations can be…we might have a straighter world.

    Roy, I believe Linspire’s efforts were partly due to the “strange new” attitude Microsoft had. Microsoft seemed to “give up” and start unifying with other companies like Novell – which, perhaps was a nice ploy to knife a couple enemies in the back (keep your friends close, enemies closer), but, I couldn’t blame a single head at either Novell or Linspire for at least trying.

  12. Karl L. Gechlik said,

    July 18, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Come on! I mean really, who didn’t think Microsoft was capable of doing this? We are going to continue to see these types of shananagins until the world goes open source! And Good Luck With That!

    Good story though from your friends @ http://www.askTheAdmin.com

  13. mike said,

    July 18, 2007 at 9:57 pm

    Gravatar

    Some people have to realize that you cannot make deals with the devil and continue keeping your soul. Everyone who dare making deals with M$ will be doomed forever.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 18, 2007 at 11:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Mass grave of Microsoft ‘partners’: Lotus, WordPerfect, Corel, DBase, Netscape, Novell (pre Linux)…

  15. Kennon Keoseyan said,

    July 20, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    Gravatar

    Heh…most of you are like old hens. I am still waiting for SOMETHING bad to happen from the Novell/M$ deal. 6+ months later nothing. Novell made a boatload of cash off M$ and other than the FUD mongering here and a few other places no real damage to Linux is reported. You guys need to go find another jihad cuz this one is just getting silly. So Linspire was stabbed in the back…big shocker there. Businesses make good and bad decisions every day. It is part of the market. It blows me away that the owner of this site has put so much effort into criticizing one that has had zero tangible effect on FOSS other than the FUD that itself helped spread. You want a cause? Try starting a blog called boycottchina.com or boycottimperialism.com. you really want to help the FOSS community? Contribute some code or convert a company from IIS to Apache or something useful. Losers.

  16. sailor said,

    July 20, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Gravatar

    “effect on FOSS other than the FUD that itself helped spread.”

    That was it’s purpose…because that is all the MS can do…make threats to steer business users away from linux.

  17. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 20, 2007 at 7:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Kennon,

    Novell has already been betrayed by Microsoft as well. See:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/10/novell-and-microsoft-meet-gpl/

    Linux distributors must begin to understand that sidling with Microsoft is never an option, no matter how much Microsoft pays (which is does, because it knows the death knell is worth that money).

  18. Chris said,

    March 17, 2008 at 4:26 am

    Gravatar

    I dunno what Linspire is, but I bet if you install it, there’s no mention of GPL. SUSE makes no mention, that’s for sure.

    I contribute to what these people are distributing – so they’re taking my code, removing the GPL references they’re required to show, then selling it on.

    What insane hipocracy – calling other people thieves and pirates, when they’re in fact the worse offenders…

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 17, 2008 at 4:42 am

    Gravatar

    Linspire you are only allowed to install on one single PC. It’s right there in the licence. Linspire is not free. Needless to say, many developers are rightly pissed off.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/6/2019: Linux Mint Vs Vista 10, Qt 5.13 Released

    Links for the day



  2. The Linux Foundation's Business Model

    The Linux Foundation's plan, illustrated



  3. Links 18/6/2019: i386 Abandoned by Canonical and a New osquery 'Community'

    Links for the day



  4. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries



  5. Links 18/6/2019: CentOS 8 Coming Soon, DragonFly BSD 5.6 Released

    Links for the day



  6. 'AI Taskforce' is Actually a Taskforce for Software Patents

    The mainstream media has been calling just about everything "HEY HI!" (AI), but what it typically refers to is a family of old algorithms being applied in possibly new areas; patent maximalists in eastern Asia and the West hope that this mainstream media's obsession can be leveraged to justify new kinds of patents on code



  7. Patent Maximalism is Dead in the United States

    Last-ditch efforts, or a desperate final attempt to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101, isn't succeeding; stacked panels are seen for what they really are and 35 U.S.C. § 101 isn't expected to change



  8. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  9. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  10. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  11. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  12. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  13. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  14. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  15. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  16. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  17. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  18. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  19. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  21. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  22. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  23. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  25. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  26. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  27. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  28. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  29. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  30. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts