"A stacked panel, on the other hand, is like a stacked deck: it is packed with people who, on the face of things, should be neutral, but who are in fact strong supporters of our technology. The key to stacking a panel is being able to choose the moderator. Most conference organizers allow the moderator to select die panel, so if you can pick the moderator, you win. Since you can't expect representatives of our competitors to speak on your behalf, you have to get the moderator to agree to having only "independent ISVs" on the panel. "

--Internal Microsoft document

What have we here? A little damning update. Yesterday we wrote about some of the latest abuses and irregularities at the BRM in Geneva . There are other examples also, e.g. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. But what happens when you combine the notorious panel-stacking which Microsoft raves about with a form of legalised bribery (codename for lobbyists)? That is apparently what might happen.

A quick update on the concurrent OFE conference. I just heard that Microsoft employees have now started registering for the conference, around 8 so far.

Interesting. So why exactly are all of these Microsoft guys in Geneva that week? None of them appear to be BRM delegates. To quote Doug Mahugh, "Wow. If this isn't an attempt to exert undue influence on the standards process, it's hard to imagine what is. Who are these people?"

Methinks that the OFE conference has forced Microsoft's lobbying team to decloak.

You can find some older examples of Microsoft lobbying in Europe here. These include blackmail. ⬆