As Jim Zemlin, the executive director of The Linux Foundation, points out, “I am not joking or trying to be trite, but the answer to this question is: every single person in the modern world every day. Everyone who searches Google, picks up a phone and uses telecommunication infrastructure, watches a new televisions, use a new camera, makes a call on many modern cell phones, trades a stock on a major exchange, watches a weather forecast generated on a supercomputer, logs into Facebook, navigates via air traffic control systems, buys a netbook computer, checks out at a cash register, withdraws cash at an ATM machine, fires up a quick-boot desktop (even those with Windows), or uses one of many medical devices; the list goes on and on.”
“It is hard to think of someone in the developed world who doesn’t touch Linux every single day. The better question here is who isn’t a Linux user,” Zemlin concluded.
He’s got a point there. If you buy something from Craigslist or keep up with friends on Facebook, you’re using Linux. To be exact, you’re using Big-IP 9.4.6, which is an embedded high-speed networking system that incorporates Linux. Do you watch videos on YouTube? Linux again. Google? Yes, they run Linux too.
The question that isn’t often asked though is: “Can you trust Net Applications’ numbers?” According to Roy S. Schestowitz, editor of Boycott Novell, the answer is: “No.” According to a recent Boycott Novell blog, “Microsoft and Apple put money on Net Applications’ table, so rather unsurprisingly, the results satisfy both companies. GNU/Linux, on the other hand, is not able to pay Net Applications for favourable bias.”
And, in addition, to other points Schestowitz writes, “Net Applications admits its statistics are flawed (skewed)” and “Net Applications keeps its methods secret and the dataset likewise.”
Linux 101 Hacks doesn’t contain information that couldn’t be found elsewhere — but it nicely presents common administrative tasks in a way that makes grasping the power (and subtle nuances) of a command easier to process in a practical sense than reading a man page would.
The companies behind a 356,800 seat deployment in Brazil claim world records for the largest desktop virtualisation rollout, the largest desktop Linux rollout, and the lowest cost per seat.
Thanks to this press release that appeared on Linux Today a few weeks ago, V.i. Labs Announces CodeArmor Intelligence Support for Linux Platforms, I had a “Oh no, the MAFIAA is coming to Linux” moment…
First, for the record, there are no such things as “software piracy” or “intellectual property.” There are copyrights, trademarks, and patents. (Richard Stallman wrote an excellent article on this.) Piracy is an inflammatory propaganda word; the correct term is copyright infringement. (The Free Software Foundation has a handy list of loaded words and phrases.)
Veeam Software has released Backup 3.0, an update to its backup and replication software for VMware-based virtual machines.
Server virtualization juggernaut – well, at least on x64 iron – VMware is beside itself with glee that a virtualized Linux server running atop ESX Server hypervisor narrowly beat out real Linux boxes on a popular Web serving benchmark test.
Denying the plethora of possibilities with the Linux platform is myopic, considering that the largest and most influential names in virtualization; VMware, Citrix, Red Hat and Canonical are 100 percent Linux-based.
BOSaNOVA kicked off its VDI initiative less than a year ago after rolling out its first round of virtualized thin clients. By preloading Citrix Systems’ XenDesktop virtualization software on its Windows and Linux thin clients, BOSaNOVA hoped to help streamline the provisioning and management of thin client infrastructures, as well as preventing the computer’s performance from eroding over time.
These days, most people have at least one computer and a large collection of media files. The conventional practice for most people has always been to have redundant copies of their media collection on their various computers. While this system technically works, it is highly inefficient and creates the unnecessary task of keeping the media collection on each computer synchronized and up-to-date with the others. A far better solution is to keep all the media on one computer and stream it as needed to the other machines over the network.
I’m still packaging Elisa for Mandriva, because my HTPC is still running Mandriva (don’t really see any need to go through unnecessary work to convert my servers and HTPC to Fedora, Linux is Linux…). Fedora has good Elisa packages already, maintained expertly by Matthias Saou, so my services are not required there. He doesn’t update quite as fast as me, though.
In this episode of the Software Freedom Law Show, Bradley and Karen interview Van Lindberg of the law firm, Haynes and Boone. The discussion centers around explaining the difference between copyrights, patents and trademarks to Free Software developers.
MP3 – 1 hour 31 minutes 34 seconds, 41.9 MB — you can also download all our episodes in both MP3 and Ogg Vorbis format from the Outlaw Archives.
Presenters: Andrew Gregory, Paul Hudson, Graham Morrison, Mike Saunders
We are in the process of applying for a few large grants that will allow us to operate autonomously and when that happens, you can bet that everything you have given will be given back to Linux/FOSS in spades.
We’ve set up our “Operation Wired” donation point at our Helios Project site and you can do what you feel is right there. There is no set dollar amount, no “goal”. We simply need to amass some funding so those P4 computers we give to our kids are more than really bulky typewriters.
When the Linux Hater’s blog rails about meta community quirks and legitimate software issues, it seems almost like a (perhaps obsessed) fellow traveler, but when detractors criticize open source generally, as if it’s some sort of homogenous group, I take pause. That sort of talk makes me wonder if they’re even offering earnest tirades.
Nearly a year ago we shared that two new PC action games were being ported to Linux. The games were Shadowgrounds and, its sequel, Shadowgrounds: Survivor. Both games were supposed to ship in the first half of 2008 for Linux, but that never ended up materializing. A Finnish game studio known as Frozenbyte originally developed these games and the Linux port was contracted to a company known as IGIOS. In August we were told that the delay was due to publisher negotiations and that they would hopefully have something in a week or two. That never ended up amounting to anything, but a month ago, we finally learned that Linux Game Publishing was working on Shadowgrounds: Survivor. Well, last night we finally got our hands on a beta copy of Shadowgrounds: Suvivor for Linux.
In its first two days of availability, 2D Boy saw the Linux version of World of Goo grow to claim 4.6 per cent of its sales, and the day the release went live saw 2D Boy’s previous best sales day bettered by 40 per cent. As the firm points out, the numbers certainly suggest that “there is a market for Linux games after all :)”.
The Linux version of World of Goo is finally ready for download! It’s available exclusively from our site, in three different packages depending on what your computer likes. (tar.gz, deb, rpm)
Last week S3 Graphics had released the Chrome 540 GTX, which is their newest and fastest PCI Express graphics card. Similar to when announcing the S3 Chrome 540 GT, in the Chrome 540 GTX press release they once again mention Linux support along with OpenGL 3.0 capabilities. However, they talk up Linux support, but fail to provide the support. We have just heard back though from S3 Graphics’ Benson Tao, which is the one that previously told us there would be Chrome 500 Linux support in December along with a beta OpenGL 3.0 driver. What though did he have to say this time? His email is below.
The fourth extended file system, or ext4, is the next generation of journaling file systems, retaining backward compatibility with the previous file system, ext3. Although ext4 is not currently the standard, it will be the next default file system for most Linux® distributions. Get to know ext4, and discover why it will be your new favorite file system.
We (padoca team) are long time Amarok users. We have seen amarok grow and become the best audio player along the 1.x series. We’ve seen the writing on the wall when 2.0 was out, the same promise and potential that embodied Kde 4.0 release.
A rewrite, a new beginning, not perfect at first but full of potential and vision. Sure, some features where sorely missed (like Kde 4.0) but it was needed. In order to be able to make the future envisioned by the amarok dev team, they had to go back… they had to send amarok back in time, and it showed.
I HAVE written several articles about Pardus GNU/Linux since it first appeared on the Linux/Open Source scene in 2005, but in one report to coincide with the release of version 2007.3, I wrote the following introduction. “Do you know what I love so much about Linux? It’s the feeling you get when you stumble upon a distribution that’s pure computing gold.”
Ever since we launched the new website and implemented UGC (User Generated Content) in entropy it looks like it never came clear what this is all about. Let me try to put some light in the dark here and explain about the purpose about it.
I just released 126.96.36.199. This is a rollup release we a bunch of bug fixes and the latest version of all our packages. All trixbox users are recommended to upgrade to this release. Especially 2.6.x.x users.
This release resolved the problems with the package manager not working and some PSTN cards causing kernel panics when the system is rebooted. There are also a number of small GUI fixes and enhancements. I also added support for some of the new Realtek netwrok chipsets that are not supported by CentOS 5.2
We are pleased to announce the release of paldo 1.17 with many bug fixes and updates.
Enhancements to point out:
* GNOME 2.24.3
* OpenOffice.org 3.0.1
* Firefox 3.0.6
* Linux 188.8.131.52
* X.org server 1.5.3
The original archlinux-2009.02-ftp-i686.img USB image was broken, a new image (archlinux-2009.02-2-ftp-i686.img) has been uploaded. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you.
With one image broken, we also had to create new torrents: We now use a single torrent per file again and added more mirrors to the webseeds. All seeders should stop seeding the old torrent and get the new ones.
Here’s another Linux distribution that adopts the EXT4 filesystem, Arch Linux 2009-02, announced last night (February 16th) by Aaron Griffin. Arch Linux is a bleeding-edge independently developed Linux distribution. This is the first release of Arch Linux for 2009 and it brings some of the latest and greatest Linux technologies available today, such as Linux kernel 2.6.28 and support for the evolutionary EXT4 filesystem. The latter was also added in the installer, which means that every Arch Linux user will be able to easily create EXT4 partitions.
A little earlier than originally planned, we now have the pleasure to announce the availability of sidux 2009-01 “Ουρανός”, shipping with kernel 184.108.40.206-rc1 and available in the following flavours:
* KDE-lite, amd64, en/ de, ≈465 MB.
* KDE-lite, i686, en/ de, ≈450 MB.
* KDE-full, amd64+i686, en/ de (da, el, es, fr, hr, it, ja, nl, pt, pt_BR, ro, ru through liveapt) ≈2 GB.
* XFCE, amd64, en/ de, ≈400 MB.
* XFCE, i686, en/ de, ≈395 MB.
The DragonFly 2.2 release is here! The HAMMER filesystem is considered production-ready in this release; It was first released in July 2008. The 2.2 release represents major stability improvements across the board, new drivers, much better pkgsrc support and integration, and a brand new release infrastructure with multiple target options.
Three release options are now available: Our bare-bones CD ISO, a DVD ISO which includes a fully operational X environment, and a bare-bones bootable USB disk-key image (less than 512M).
Red Hat announces that the Bank of New Zealand, a subsidiary of the National Australia Bank Group, has deployed Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 on IBM System z mainframes to solve environment, space and cost issues related to its data center.
With Red Hat and IBM, the Bank of New Zealand has significantly reduced its hardware footprint, power consumption, heat and carbon emissions and costs, including an expected 20 percent cost reduction over the life of the platform.
Today we are celebrating a momentous occasion. Ten years ago today, Red Hat and IBM began our global collaborative partnership to expand the use of enterprise solutions on Linux. It was a small but important start to announce that IBM would run Red Hat Linux on its industry-standard systems. Back in 1999, Red Hat was on the eve of its IPO, and IBM was testing the waters of Linux. Only 10 million users ran the Linux operating system at the time, according to IDC Research quoted in our original partnership announcement.
As long as the issues with the graphics drivers are ironed out, I believe Jaunty Jackalope will become another must-have upgrade and if you are smart and install using EXT4, you will see some very real performance increases for very little effort.
The Debian development community has officially released version 5.0 of the venerable open source Linux distribution. The new version, which is codenamed Lenny, includes updated software, security enhancements, and improved hardware support.
Debian is known for its broad architecture support, lengthy development cycles, and strong ideological commitment to software freedom. Debian provides the foundation for many popular derivatives, including Ubuntu and Knoppix. The Debian project has attracted an enormous community of free software enthusiasts and has become one of the largest community-driven distributions in existence. Despite its declining relevance on the desktop, it is an essential part of the Linux software ecosystem and continues to serve an important function for its downstream partners.
All things considered, this is a pretty good Debian release. It seems to live up to the distro’s long-standing tradition of delivering solid reliability, and it introduces some nice improvements that will be appreciated by Debian aficionados.
The telco’s Mobility CEO Ralph De La Vega, sitting on a panel at MWC yesterday said, “Dell announced they’re entering the smart phone market.”
Open-Plug, the French mobile platform developer, selects solution from Enea for its ELIPS platform targeting Linux devices and mass market mobile phones.
Access is demonstrating its Access Linux Platform (ALP) 3.0 at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. The new LiMo-compatible “advanced UI” mobile ALP stack leverages Open GL-ES 2.0 to offer 3D special effects, and introduces a standardized API that splits logic from presentation layers, says Access.
Vodafone and HTC announced the latter’s second-generation, all-touchscreen Android phone. Scheduled to ship to Vodafone customers in Europe this spring, the Android Magic offers HDSPA 3G connectivity, and a slimer profile than the G1, lacking the earlier HTC Android phone’s slide-out keyboard.
HTC has announced the second Android-based phone, the HTC Magic. It’s thinner than the G1 and lacks a physical keyboard.
Palm CTO Mitch Allen is writing a book about the company’s new webOS. The first chapter, which includes a technical overview of the platform, has been published on the Palm Developer Network web site.
With deteriorating global economic conditions making their impact felt in the wireless industry, handset OEMs and mobile network operators are looking towards Linux-based operating systems to cut costs and diversify handset portfolios.
While Linux-based operating systems making their presence felt in the mobile handset market for years, growth has been slow and steady until recently. However, recent announcements from Motorola, Vodafone, HTC, and Huawei, among others, all stating that Linux-based operating systems will figure in their upcoming handset releases, clearly demonstrate that OEMs and operators are ready to embrace Linux on a larger scale.
These are all continued validation that the latest mobile efforts around Linux and open source software are truly contributing to consolidation, something the hardware, software and carrier players now pushing it have wanted for a long time.
The big news from the GSMA Mobile World Congress this year: New phones using the Android, LiMo and Symbian open-source operating systems are rolling out in 2009.
What’s unusual is that it is not the handsets themselves that are creating the buzz so much as what is under the hood and invisible to the user, the basic software. Lines are being drawn in the battle for dominance among the three main systems.
The Linux OS also reminded me of the HP Mini 1000 Mi series. It has a tabbed interface that separates Internet (a browser, chat client, and e-mail program), multimedia (painting, photos, and music, among others), and productivity (word processing and the like). The UI is easy enough for a small child to use, but the software stack covers older kids’ needs, too.
Adoption of non-Windows operating systems, Linux mainly, is stronger there than the United States.
Yes, the vet’s Acer runs Windows. While the vast majority of new netbooks will be sold with either Windows XP or Windows 7, a substantial minority will continue to be preloaded with Linux. Millions of people have been introduced to Linux through netbooks and are satisfied with it. Educated consumers who learn that Linux, which requires fewer system resources, will run faster and comes with a wide variety of software preinstalled will choose Linux.
Despite the posts by various so-called tech journalists who always cheerlead for Microsoft claiming that Windows has “kicked Linux to the curb” or “crushed” Linux on netbooks, Microsoft’s own estimate places Linux at 30% of current market share. Asustek’s Samson Hu, quoted in the same Bloomberg article, places Linux on 30-40% of all EeePCs currently sold and expects Linux to maintain a 30% market share. Acer spokesman Henry Wang expects 20% of his Aspire One models to ship with Linux this year.
During the GSMA Mobile World Conference in Barcelona this week, Canonical is working behind the scenes — evangelizing Ubuntu-based Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs) to new and existing customers. The big question: Will Canonical line up more Ubuntu MID partners, or will MIDs (highly mobile WiFi devices) remain overshadowed by the netbook craze?
In addition, LG’s Moblin 2.0 Linux-based Moorestown MID announcement, which does not currently support WiMAX and is limited to 3G connectivity, has sparked great interest in Moorestown as a viable device.
Intel also has a software challenge. Where a huge array of programs were written for x86 chips in PCs, most of the popular programs in smartphones–which do about the same things MIDs are expected to do–were designed for ARM. The list includes Apple’s iPhone software and Google’s Android, which is based on the Linux operating system. So Intel has led the development of a Linux variant for MIDs, dubbed Moblin; LG is also announcing it will support the software in its MID based on Moorestown.
On a recently released White Paper, the Puerto Rico based Open Source company, Altamente, provides a well thought out introduction to Open Source for businesses.
The Linux operation system, for example, is preferred by many technology savvy individuals and is growing in popularity because of its benefits. The operation system is available for anyone to change and distribute.
With the goal of speeding service creation for telecom service providers in a converged IP network, CIMI Corporation has completed the Alpha-One prototype of its ExperiaSphere open source next-generation network (NGN) services architecture and is demonstrating it to telecom service providers and equipment vendors. Extreme Networks,the project’s first open partner, is providing technical support and testing for connecting ExperiaSphere to its EPICenter management interface using industry-standard XML.
Samba very quickly became a valuable piece of merchandise to the Linux and Unix companies, who have sponsored its development and employed the Samba Team’s key developers, although notably in the case of Allison, the developers have quickly left their jobs rather than accept any compromise to the integrity of the project. Like the developers of other key free and open source projects, the Samba Team are mostly employed by third parties to do what they would be doing anyway, working on Samba and programming for fun, while getting paid for it. The attraction for the employing companies is that they get an invaluable piece of software for the price of one or two developers and an ear to their requirements, but as Allison points out “free software is not incompatible with commercial activity”.
The manner in which open source tools are developed lends a level of security assurance to the applications that are built on this model, said Sun Microsystems executives.
Roman Tuma, Asia South software practice managing director at Sun, noted that due to the inherent nature of open source, anyone can review the source codes to look for irregularities that could potentially harm users.
He keynoted an open source conference in Singapore on Tuesday and gave special praise to Google’s Android and Nokia’s Symbian, whose open source efforts are opening the market for Singapore.
Those are two of many key new features of Amanda Enterprise 3.0, the Sunnyvale, Calif. company announced today.
Enter a new player in small and medium business backup, Zmanda. They mashed together two money-saving tools to drop the costs of online backup lower than most of their competitors. By adding open source backup software with the storage infrastructure of Amazon’s S3, they multiply savings. You can use some Zmanda products to backup locally, but I strongly (repeat, strongly) recommend you also save a copy of all data offsite as well.
Open source Exchange rival Zarafa has added native support for Blackberry Enterprise Server to a roster of collaboration features that already includes Outlook interoperability, and integration with open source tools such as SugarCRM, OpenERP and Alfresco.
Four years after it was launched, SugarCRM now counts 4,000 customers of its commercial open source software. The Cupertino, Calif.-based company recently held its annual SugarCon conference for customers and developers. We caught up with CEO John Roberts, who discussed how SugarCRM is approaching cloud computing and open source applications in the cloud, mobile CRM, and the use of open source software in a recession.
Jitterbit, the leading provider of open source integration software, today announced a successful Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) integration for Balfour Beatty Construction.
I was recently at a conference on virtualization, but one comment by one of the presenters attracted my interest. He noted that one of the big drivers towards open source use in business took place after the dot com bust nine years ago. When the dot com balloon burst, companies needed less expensive ways to run their IT infrastructure and many turned to open source and Linux for the first time. Here are five reasons why the current economic malaise is good for open source. Here’s the caveat, my next blog will be on five reasons why the economic downturn will be good for proprietary software vendors.
Obama wants stimulus to transform schools. Linux, anyone?
Without squabbling over the politics of what the new US president wants for our educational system, the fact of the matter is he now has access to enormous spending power to potentially improve what schools’ financial resources.
Medsphere Systems Corporation, the leading provider of Open Source healthcare IT solutions, today announced full support for the health IT funding incorporated into the stimulus package legislation that was passed by Congress. The approved measure, which awaits President Obama’s signature, opens the door for a national electronic health records (EHR) network built on standards for interoperability and affordability.
Andrey N. Filippov, developer of the Elphel camera, has published a very interesting paper detailing the history of his efforts and explaining why he chose free software for the project.
There are lots of reasons to love MySQL, the leading open-source database that Sun bought in 2008: it’s inexpensive, perfect for Web applications (among other things), and boasts high performance.
Sun has thrown its open source key management ideas into the key management standards giant brandy glass, offering license-free management that it hopes will become an industry standard.
Today, nearly every corner of the world faces the challenge of a stagnant or shrinking economy. Bleak economic forecasts, shrinking budgets and increasing pressure on businesses and governments to meet the needs of their customers and constituents—often with less resources to do so—are becoming commonplace. While I’m not naïve enough to suggest a “one-size-fits-all” cure for these problems or that the solutions will be driven by only one industry or region, I do believe that, because technology and innovation drive global economic progress, the remedy for many of these challenges is in our hands.
Businesses also benefit from the opportunities and efficiency enabled by open source innovations. Brazil, another of the so-called “emerging markets”, provides a strong example. In 2003, its president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, spearheaded a countrywide movement towards open standards. It’s now estimated that at least 70% of Brazilian enterprises use open source software, many of which are experiencing cost savings attributable to open source solutions.
The software is freely distributed under GNU General Public License (GPL) and can be downloaded from http://sourceforge.net/projects/biosunms/.
It is not the end of the end, nor the end of the beginning, but more like the beginning of the end for the development of ODF 1.2. The Committee Draft 01 of ODF 1.2, Part 1 was approved by the OASIS ODF TC yesterday in a 10-2-2 vote. You can download it here.
Two new working drafts of the next specification for HTML have been published by HTML Working Group of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). One draft document deals with HTML 5 itself, while the second draft document looks at the difference between HTML 5 and HTML 4.
This theme actually has two related topics.
1. Government shouldn’t get involved with technology.
There’s no disagreement that technology is best developed by technologists and entrepreneurs rather than government.
In this issue…
* Mozilla Foundation February report
* Q&A on Mozilla and the European Commission
* Introducing Bespin
* Air Mozilla returns with open video
* Mozilla and Education
The Securities and Exchange Commission is charging four executives at Research In Motion – the firm behind the BlackBerry – with offences related to the backdating of share options.
The SEC alleges RIM’s CFO Dennis Kavelman, former VP of Finance Angelo Loberto, and Co-Chief Executive Officers James Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis illegally backdated share options between 1998 and 2006.
BLACKBERRY MAKER RIM has been ordered to cough up $1.4 million after the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) had a look through its books and found some dodgy dealings relating to stock issuws.
Two corrupt judges have admitted getting paid for sending young offenders to private jails, often against the advice of probation officers and other court officials.
Bent judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan, both of Pennsylvania, admitted receiving $2.6m in kickbacks as part of a plea-bargaining agreement that will see each jailed for a minimum of seven years. The deal sparked protests from friends and relatives of youngsters affected by the case, some of who have already launched lawsuits.
First it was Blackwater USA. Then it was Blackwater Worldwide. Now, it’s “Xe” (pronounced “Zee”). The private military company has repeatedly tried to re-brand, after numerous controversies from the killing of civilians in Nisoor Square in Baghdad; to its no-bid contracts in Iraq, Afghanistan and New Orleans, post-Katrina; to its hiring troops with ties to repressive regimes, like that of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. The company says its latest name change is meant to reflect a new focus.
James Love has published some details about the current ACTA negotiations. Copyright ideologues have been (successfully) pushing for extreme legislation for several years. Each time new legislation is passed, it is only a stepping stone towards even more extreme legislation. Any reasonable person picked up from the 70s and dropped in the 00s would be stunned by how completely copyright ideology has infected the legislative process. Indeed, by germinating in international fora, it subverts the process. Copyright ideologues use international treaties to enforce or extend domestic legislation, bypassing local legislatures and then requiring them to enact the provisions. Any time anyone objects about the disparity between the ideology and reality, they are slapped down with “International Obligations”.
Tarabaz: Hello Richard. What do you personally think about idea of censoring internet?
RMS: I am against all censorship, because censorship is the tool of tyrants. However, blocking certain network protocols is not exactly censorship — it is a different kind of injustice. Whereas censorship attacks the freedom of expression, the blocking of these protocols attacks the freedom to share and the freedom to communicate.
Tarabaz: You know – many years ago in my country there was bunch of really powerful persons on high seats in government, who wish to control what could be done, and what can everyone think. Do you think, that steps performed by our ISP companies is something in sort of? Control on citizens by corporations – not by political world?
RMS: The tendency these days is for governments to bow down to the megacorporations, and let the dictate the laws. People often take for granted that business has more political power than citizens — but if that is true, what does it mean? It means we have corporatocracy instead of democracy.
This is the fear raised by, amongst others, the Comic Book Alliance, who point out that at the consultation stage for this law, no significant producers of legitimate comic book material were consulted: the government appear to have proceeded on the basis that adult cartoons were at best pornographic, at worst abusive, and to have ignored any input from those involved with the subject.
Can a magic sprinkling of Web 2.0 buzzwords revive the fortunes of a deeply unpopular government?
That’s what the Cabinet Office hopes with the appointment of a civil service post with the title of “Director of Digital Engagement”. The lucky bureaucrat will play the part of cybernetic overlord – “to embed digital engagement in the day to day working of Government”. However, he/she won’t have executive powers over existing departments.
Every year, the entertainment industry comes out with some ridiculous report about how Canada is a hotbed of piracy, on par with places like China and Russia. Every year the report asks the US Trade Representative to classify Canada as being on the “Priority Watch List.”
Last week, we wrote about how the Writers Guild of Canada was pushing government regulators to force ISPs to fund content creation, with a specific focus on promoting Canadian content and trying to tone down or keep out non-Canadian content from online sources.
As mentioned, the Fair Use Project at Stanford’s CIS is representing Shepard Fairey in his suit against the AP. To that end, we’d be grateful for some net-based knowledge. How many photos are there “like” the beautiful photograph that Mannie Garcia took (the one on the left; the one on the right is a CC licensed photo taken by Steve Jurvetson)?
The anger and activism at a rule in New Zealand requiring Internet service be terminated upon a mere accusation of copyright infringement is growing.
IT WAS only a few days ago that we remarked on the IDG-Microsoft relationship, which is based on IDC right there in middle. We don’t trust IDG, despite that fact that its reporters occasionally reference Boycott Novell (twice this week). There is no black-and-white, but there are tendencies to cover certain stories (or aspects of them) more frequently than others. That’s just the known formula for biased journalism, and it’s by no means a problem that affects only technology reporting.
To be fair to all the Web sites that are listed in the headline, their advertisers have little effect on the content, with the exception of the advertising space. That’s what Michael Larabel told me when he thought hard about whatever to cede some control of his excellent Web site, Phoronix.
“There is no black-and-white, but there are tendencies to cover certain stories (or aspects of them) more frequently than others.”A few hours ago we found out that OStatic too had become part of the IDG network. This triggered some red lights because the site advertises a lot of Novell technologies in the form of promotional articles advocating its technologies, e.g. Mono, Go-OOXML, OpenSUSE. OStatic is owned by GigaOM, which was founded and run by Om Malik. When Om Malik took money from Microsoft to recite its slogan in his writings (without disclosure), it truly gave away some clues, not to mention consequent interviews that he had with chief Microsoft staff.
Another news site (and paper publication) that sports the IDG TechNetwork logo is SD Times. For a change which is refreshing, GNU has just made the front page of the SD Times, but a lot of Microsoft adverts are in there, along with praises for Microsoft’s pseudo-open source (imposed confusion to dilute vocabulary, baffle, and obfuscate).
Before anyone claims hypocrisy, Shane and I have already blocked domains like
novell.com and since Shane pays the hosting bills, the Google ads stay. It’s hard to control their content because Novell and Microsoft, for example, have loads of partners who sell their products, so the adverts come from to a large number of different domain names that we can’t determine. It’s like playing whack-a-mole with domains names which try to sell Novell and/or Microsoft products. It’s impossible.
As one last note, a reader wrote to us to say:
DRM problems and weak support of open standards aside, here is a fun quote:
You also won’t have to worry about Vista if you buy one of Apple Computer’s Macintosh computers, which don’t run Windows. Every mainstream consumer doing typical tasks should consider the Mac.
…[T]he WSJ actually mentioning a non-Microsoft product.
I’m going through articles now and finding that they tend to put the really damning material at the back after padding the front with crap, opinions. For example, this one.
I’m compiling a Vista Failure Log, but it’s taking too long. Most articles on Microsoft Vista slam the pile of [***] “product”.
Hardcore tattoos not the cause
ONE of the regulars from LinuxToday has just published a talkback saying that “Novell is bleeding to death.” This was pretty much said there before and the layoffs which are coming confirm that there are issues. Anyway, here is the body of the message:
Novell Is Bleeding to Death
Novell was never going to die in one big go (these companies never do) but it is gradually bleeding to death and is not in a great position to ride out the current climate. I know everyone has been laying people off, but Novell have been having large rounds of layoffs for several years now and the situation hasn’t improved.
From their deal with Microsoft that puts Microsoft in the driving seat, their complete inability to make anything out of the open source software that has dropped into their lap to the bleeding of their Netware, eDirectory and Groupwise businesses in favour of Windows Server, AD and Exchange – that other posters have pointed out here for years – the prognosis is looking terminal.
Over here in the United Kingdom, Novell is obviously suffering quite badly. The country's affairs with Microsoft (statistically much higher than the rest of the world) might have something to do with it.
Siruis, a UK-based company, had previously defeated Novell and it did this again thanks to Debian GNU/Linux, the poster child which was conceived by
a Brit, Ian Murdock. Here is a new report about it.
“We had one client who moved from a Novell/Microsoft-based environment to a Debian-based one and they saved something like 80 percent of the cost in the first year – they couldn’t have done that moving to Red Hat – not when their licences cost £1000,” Callway said. He added that Sirius was set to announce a major educational project that would show the extent to which open source software was becoming more accepted.
Novell UK is in ruins, based on our sources. Jacqueline de Rojas still works around Novell in the vicinity of Europe (in the Operation side) and she was responsible for this role until recently (she has run the UK/Ireland operations since 2007). Novell’s business in UK/Ireland is now considered a total failure, however, as Microsoft has taken a lot of municipal projects, deployments, and contracts from Novell (GroupWise, Netware, etc). This could easily be seen across various UK news outlets and Groklaw pointed this out at least once in 2008. We gave many examples over the past couple of years, so there is extensive solid evidence.
This week’s news serves as a reminder of Ray Noorda’s newly-coined term, “co-opetition”. It’s truly a shame that Novell's new management is doing such co-opetition with a company that Noorda could not stand.
The late Ray Noorda, founder of Novell, coined the word “co-opetition” to describe these sorts of deals, where competitors sometimes find it sensible to actually work closely together for the common good. Sometimes, as in this case, customers seem to win as well.
“I’ve heard from Novell sales representatives that Microsoft sales executives have started calling the Suse Linux Enterprise Server coupons “royalty payments”…”
–Matt Asay, April 21st, 2008
“My background is finance and accounting. As a socially conscious venture capitalist and philanthropist, I have a very good understanding of wealth management and philanthropy. I started my career in 1967 with the IRS as a specialist in taxation covering many areas of the tax law including the so-called legal loopholes to charitable giving. […] However, the Gates Buffet foundation grant is nothing more than a shell game in which control of assets for both Gates and Buffet remain the same. […] The only difference is that the accumulation of wealth by these two will be much more massive because they will no longer have to pay any taxes.”
THIS mystery lingers on. The Gates Foundation invests in oil companies, in governments, and even in pharmaceutical companies that gain from the suffering people in developing nations. With financial questions hovering over Microsoft and the economy in general (another massive fraud has just been unearthed), one must understand and accept a reasonable degree of skepticism. What does a supposedly-charitable foundation think that it’s doing with an investment in a patent-slinging monopolist?
Bill Gates has acquired a 5.2 percent stake in Eastman Kodak, according to a regulatory filing today. The Microsoft chairman owns the shares through his Cascade Investment LLC investment arm and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Kodak is in antitrust waters while it harasses companies using its patents, so in many ways it has things in common with Microsoft. Why is the Gates Foundation becoming a shareholder? Gates already invests in the world's largest patent troll.
As a side note, the Foundation has been tossing some money around for publicity in recent days (relatively minuscule amounts by the way). Some of this appears to be promotion for Windows Mobile, which is dying. █
“Do some good deeds for publicity if the cameras are on”
Assimilation strategy revisited
Ms-PL and G-PL — which is the black sheep?
INTERNAL PRESENTATIONS which are delivered at Microsoft clearly suggest that the company not only understands that attending competitors’ events/committees upsets the audience; Microsoft actively encourages its employee to exploit this and to ‘crash’ events by merely turning attention to itself and changing the agenda to include more of Microsoft. Recent examples include VMWare, but it's a complicated one. Better examples include the crashing of PlayStation3 launch parties and Microsoft’s flirt with the OSI. This was deliberate and it was nothing to be fond of [1, 2, 3].
Over at LinuxToday, GreyGeek composed a good new post which goes under the headline “The OSI was hijacked.” To highlight a couple of portions:
Linux is where it is today, despite the constant attacks from Microsoft and its sycophants, and other proprietary businesses, entirely because it is impossible for them to hijack GPL code.
So, if they can’t hijack the GPL they tried the next best thing: surround the GPL with licenses which CLAIM to be similar to the GPL but were not. The uninformed, walking into the forest of OSI “approved” licenses, stands a strong chance of being deceived into believing that a license they might choose is “identical” because they heard that the GPL is Open Source and the OSI is the “Open Source” Initiative. What their guides through the forest lead them away from is the TRUE open source license, the GPL.
When you acquire an application that is GPL you are guaranteed that:
1) You have the same rights over that application as the person or company from which you got the application.
2) You have the right to obtain the source code of the binary of that application which, when compiled, produces an EXACT copy of the binary of the application you were given.
3) You can modify the source code any way you wish and
3a) If you don’t share your modified application then you don’t have to share your changes,
3b) If you do share your modified application you MUST give the people receiving it the same rights you were given, which includes access to the original source and the source code you added.
4) If they violate the GPL then they lose ALL rights to distribute the GPL portion of the code, but you do not.
5) You cannot sign away your GPL rights as part of an agreement to recive a GPL application. See #4.
Why do these PHONY FOSS companies want to lure you away from the GPL with PHONY FOSS LICENSES? Simple. If it is not “Bait and Switch” then it’s called LOCK-IN.
SUMMARY: There is only ONE TRUE FOSS License, the GPL. Any other license gives the user less freedom and/or less security in knowing that the code can’t be hijacked they way Microsoft and Apple HIJACKED the BSD and the FreeBSD.
Jose X argues that “GreyGeek’s reply is missing something. I don’t disagree, but besides the license, it’s the licensor as well as the group that owns the copyrights to the license, e.g. an Ms-* license like the GPL will be interpreted differently by Microsoft and they would likely try to play the version x or higher trick so that later versions of the license are different in spirit, i.e. bait and switch.”
“The OSI may not be the only entity to have been ‘hijacked’.”“Bruce Perens couldn't get elected,” writes Balzac. “He was the most reasonable guy involved, and the most visionary. The OSI is irrelevant to those whose concern is computer users’ freedom.”
Balzac also writes that Bruce Perens was tossed for saying [paraphrasing] “It’s time to start saying free software again. Notice I didn’t say open source.”
The OSI may not be the only entity to have been ‘hijacked’. Some months ago we mentioned Redmonk because they have Microsoft’s money on their table, too. To their credit, they at least admit this upfront, as pointed out in this new post.
Their clients are posted clearly on their site. Every time they mention a client (in a blog or otherwise) they include the disclaimer. I see them as being more of a pulse on what’s going on than a mouthpiece for clients (e.g. Gartner). I never feel like I have to look at their research with a microscope and wonder if any string manipulation is going on. I know that many are curious how many companies have ever been in the Gartner Magic Quadrant without paying fees but if Redmonk had their own, this too would be transparent.
An opposite example used in this case is the Gartner Group, which we already have substantial proof to show as “corrupted by Microsoft.” For details:
Whether output from Gartner should be embargoed or not, well… that’s just left for others to decide. █
Can GNU/Linux beat ghosts?
“In the face of strong competition, Evangelism’s focus may shift immediately to the next version of the same technology, however. Indeed, Phase 1 (Evangelism Starts) for version x+1 may start as soon as this Final Release of version X.”
–Microsoft, internal document
Information Week, a publication which is typically hostile towards freedom, has just published this comparison between today’s GNU/Linux and Microsoft's vapourware. It’s not exactly a fair comparison when inexistent products are treated as though they are available, but here they go.
There’s fierce debate in the air about what 7 means for both Windows and Linux. Microsoft’s last gasp? Linux’s formidable new enemy? Closer inspection shows us it’s not really either of those things. Linux has made strides of its own on the desktop and made it possible to build netbooks at low cost–and while Windows 7 will almost certainly take a bite out of that market and impress existing Windows users all the more, Linux has also become its own animal.
There are some more remarks on that in BMighty.
Although Serdar doesn’t spell it out here, I think his comparison of Linux and Windows 7 offers an important subtext. While it is clear that a lot of Microsoft’s work on WIndows 7 was a direct response to its difficulties with Windows Vista, it’s not a stretch to see that some improvements would not have happened if Linux didn’t represent a legitimate competitive threat. (One word: netbooks.)
As we showed a few days ago, this unfinished project called Vista 7 is already dropping features, so there are good reasons to maintain healthy doses of skepticism. Moreover, according to a Slashdot post that garnered over 1000 comments in a matter of hours, Vista 7 turns out to have become another huge DRM mess.
A few days’ testing of Windows 7 has already disclosed some draconian DRM, some unrelated to media files. A legitimate copy of Photoshop CS4 stopped functioning after we clobberred a nagging registration screen by replacing a .dll with a hacked version. That’s not so much a surprise, but what WAS a surprise: Noting that Win7 allows programs like Photoshop to stealthily insert themselves in your firewall exception list.
Something *really nasty* is lurking under the surface of Win7. Being in bed with the RIAA is bad enough, but locking your own files away from you is a device so outrageous it may kill the OS for many persons.
Additionally, it’s only vaporware at this stage. So what do Microsoft and their partners have today?
What can be purchased at the shops right now?
Several days ago we showed that Microsoft had been sued for its malpractice that generates money out of people who are highly dissatisfied, having been forced to pay for Windows Vista when they acquire new hardware (bundling), only to be charged again to remove this unwanted sofwtare. Microsoft is already going on the defence with the help of IDG, as usual.
“Customers have been forced to purchase the most expensive version of [Windows XP] in order to ‘downgrade’ from the Windows Vista operating system,” the complaint read.
That was the cause of some confusion last year, when Dell Inc. was accused of gouging customers by charging $150 to downgrade a new computer to XP. Dell, however, countered that although it did charge $20 to install XP on the machine, as well as to cover the cost of the additional media, the bulk — $120 of the $150 — was the price of upgrading the PC from the standard Home Premium to the more expensive Business edition.
Free Software Magazine has a nice cartoon about it. If people want to upgrade from Vista, they ought to consider migrating to GNU/Linux, not running back to XP. The editor of ComputerWorld (IDG) had something to say on this matter as well.
Money, money, money; that’s us.
Microsoft should understand that — just as we understand why Microsoft has started to push Vista with arguments ranging from the sincere to the screwy. (No, Steve Ballmer, most users won’t ask their boss why they can’t get Vista at work this year; they just want to keep getting a paycheck this year.)
In other related news about Windows Mobile, the latest feeble attempt from Microsoft to shore up the product is met with disdain from Microsoft Watch, a pro-Microsoft Web site.
News Analysis. My reaction to today’s Microsoft announcements coming out of the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona: Too little. Too late. Too bad.
Windows is having a very rough ride these days. But Microsoft doesn’t want anyone to notice. All the answers are out there, readily available to the public if it knows just where to look (beyond spin and marketing that’s endemic by design). █
RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates
Site Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content
Site Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page
IRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time