EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.16.09

Microsoft’s Brad Silverberg: “Please Make Sure This Request Doesn’t Get Filled.”

Posted in Antitrust, Microsoft at 8:02 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Antitrust exhibit from DRI is dissected

WE HAVE BEGUN working on some older Comes vs Microsoft exhibits and today we properly document Exhibit PX00891 (1991) [PDF]. It starts with Brad Silverberg, one of Microsoft’s crudest people. At Microsoft, they were speaking about Digital Research, which they committed abuses against (see our DRI reference page). Here is part of the correspondence (the full text is at the bottom of this post):

Customer: Digital Research, Inc.
UK Address: 70 Garden Court
Monteray, CA

Contact: John Constant
Telephone: 44(0) 488 684587
FAX: 44 (0) 488 683135

Digital Research would like to become a beta site. They would like to enable their operating system to support Windows 3.10. Specifically they need to modify the LoadHi VxD (now part of VMM) allowing their memory manager to function correctly.

NOTE: John Constant would like to be contacted by telephone as soon as possible.

What was Microsoft’s response?

> From johnen Fri Aug 2 15:14:52 1991
To: bradsi stevetho winbeta
Subject: RE: BETA REQ: Digital Research, Inc.
Date: Fri Aug 02 15:11:40 PDT 1991

Um, I don’t think so.

Watch the response from Brad Silverberg:

From bradsi Fri Aug 02 15:20:58 1991
To: johnen kalak stevetho winbeta
Subject: RE: BETA REQ: Digital Research, Inc.
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 15:20:25 PDT

ha ha ha ha ha…

kala, please make sure this request doesn’t get filled.

What a cooperative company. So little has changes since then, but Microsoft now has superior policies for shredding E-mail. Now, that’s a change, that’s the “New Microsoft” — malicious and secretive rather than malicious, blunt, and sloppy.


Appendix: Comes vs. Microsoft – exhibit PX00891, as text


PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT
891
Comes v. Microsoft

X 207533
CONFIDENTIAL

###############################
98
From bradsi Fri Aug 02 15:08:47 1991
To: davidcol davidw dennisad karlst philba richab richt
Subject: Re: Press tour
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 15:08:41 PDT

it sure makes sense to do both the technical and “marketing” parts together. the “marketing” parts are product oriented, not hype. people will want to know the api’s in 3.1, issues like doc and printer portability, postscript printer interaction, etc. I like the idea of doing it after beta 2.

###############################
99
From bradsi Fri Aug 02 15:12:16 1991
To: davidcol
Subject: print assoc
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 15:12:15 PDT

which, if any, print associations will be in beta 2???

###############################
100
From bradsi Fri Aug 02 15:20:58 1991
To: johnen kalak stevetho winbeta
Subject: RE: BETA REQ: Digital Research, Inc.
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 15:20:25 PDT

ha ha ha ha ha…

kala, please make sure this request doesn’t get filled.

> From johnen Fri Aug 2 15:14:52 1991
To: bradsi stevetho winbeta
Subject: RE: BETA REQ: Digital Research, Inc.
Date: Fri Aug 02 15:11:40 PDT 1991

Um, I don’t think so.

> From stevetho Fri Aug 2 14:49:56 1991
To: winbeta
Subject: BETA REQ: Digital Research, Inc.


Date: Fri Aug 02 14:48:26 PDT

Customer: Digital Research, Inc.
UK Address: 70 Garden Court
Monteray, CA

Contact: John Constant
Telephone: 44(0) 488 684587
FAX: 44 (0) 488 683135

Digital Research would like to become a beta site. They would like to enable their operating system to support Windows 3.10. Specifically they need to modify the LoadHi VxD (now part of VMM) allowing their memory manager to function correctly.

NOTE: John Constant would like to be contacted by telephone as soon as possible.

###############################
101
From: bradsi Fri Aug 02 15:53:17 1991
To: karkst philba
Subject: win32 code review
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 15:53:14 PDT

thomasf has been going through the win386 code and has noticed some places where he doesn’t think they’ve set up critical sections right or worked through some of the cases; and suggests that someone like zibbo do a good code review. sounds like a good idea to me.

###############################
102
From: bradsi Fri Aug 02 16:14:12 1991
To: tomle
Subject: next week
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 16:14:07 PDT

I want to close on a dos dev lead. My first choice is paulc. Honestly, I’m a bit uneasy about nigelt.

X 207534
CONFIDENTIAL

Credit: wallclimber

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

2 Comments

  1. twitter said,

    July 16, 2009 at 9:23 am

    Gravatar

    Quick context. DR had a superior version of DOS, which worried M$ because M$ saw DOS as their “power base”. M$ made sure that Windows 3.1 would detect DRDOS and error out. They planned this as well as a campaign of lies on the bulletin boards of the day, such as Compuserve. M$ lost in court over this, but it was far to late for DR at that point and M$ continues to use these tactics today. M$’s success with these tactics is not as great now because everyone knows what they do and few are dumb enough to risk their time and money on anything to do with them.

  2. Yggdrasil said,

    July 16, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    Gravatar

    There is no legal requirement, moral obligation (Roy is big on this), or public expectation for one company to help another company, especially if they are a competitor. Roy’s suggestion that Microsoft’s rejection was somehow evil, selfish, or malicious is completely without merit. The very idea that companies must be forced to work with a competitor goes against the basic principles of a free market economy. The request made of Microsoft for the sake of another companies operating system was ludicrous. The response given was a lot more tame than I would have delivered.

    In my opinion, this irrational thinking is an unwanted byproduct of the FOSS community itself. Because they give away their work for free, so should you. So should all of us. You are allowed to make a profit, but ONLY if you are willing to share your business methods, tactics, and designs with anyone who asks for them. You can complete, but you MUST cooperate. You can create, but you MUST share!

    After I came to this understanding is when I realized why FOSS is not the future of software. Many who devote themselves to FOSS soon believe that all others must share in their beliefs and act according to the principles they believe in. These principles go against a system, that while not perfect, simply works where others have failed. Rather than work against Capitalism, those in the FOSS community should learn to do their own thing. They should focus on being self sufficient and not interfere with those who prefer to use commercial software for whatever reason they choose.

    I work. I get paid. I spend my money. I like paying for software that I find useful and I enjoy using free software that I also find useful. Sometimes the free alternative is best, and sometimes it isn’t. Sometimes you get what you pay for, sometimes you don’t. I can enjoy the best of both worlds, but not Roy. It’s not enough that Roy only uses free software, but he wants you to use it too. Not only that, but he has to attack the companies that provide “me” with software that “I” enjoy. Now you can start to understand why Roy’s enemies aren’t really defending Microsoft, in so much as they are trying to protect their own freedom of choice.

What Else is New


  1. Teaser: “Enriching Exchanges”

    Ahead of the fourteenth part in the Breton series this old tweet seems increasingly relevant



  2. Web Site Which Exposed Microsoft Crimes is Gone From the Web, But Copies Still Exist

    Reputation laundering operations of Microsoft tell us that Microsoft is a 'new' and 'reformed' company; but Comes v Microsoft documents serve to show that little has changed



  3. Understanding Thierry Breton: Socialising With the Elite

    "Bernadette Chirac is not the only Presidential widow with whom Valerie has close connections."



  4. Justice Peter Huber Speaking to a Front Group of Team UPC May Compromise the Integrity of the FCC and Its Outcomes

    The public reaction, even from some legal professionals, isn't too positive, seeing how judges from BVerfG (FCC) speak to the mouthpieces of Team UPC (biased and in the pockets of the litigation 'industry')



  5. Injustice at Every Level Would Simply Doom the Entire Patent System

    Repeated failure to restore the Rule of Law and enforce accountability/oversight in Europe's patent system renders the entire system moot; it is a case of adherence to basic constitutional pillars



  6. Understanding Thierry Breton: Thierry and the $100 Billion Man

    Thierry Breton's connections to the tax avoidance ploy of his friend Bernard Arnault



  7. Links 21/11/2019: Mesa 19.3.0 RC4, Canonical SPS

    Links for the day



  8. Links 21/11/2019: Charmed OSM, Mesa 19.2.5, DXVK 1.4.5, Zorin OS 15 Lite

    Links for the day



  9. Understanding Thierry Breton: Atos Healthcare - “The Ugly Face of Business”

    "...2,380 people died after their claim for employment and support allowance (ESA) ended because a work capability assessment (WCA) found that they were found fit for work."



  10. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, November 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, November 20, 2019



  11. Microsoft Tim: Microsoft is Now Defending Linux

    The difference between fiction and reality



  12. Justice Peter Huber of the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) Calls 'Bullshit' a Rumour Nobody Really Spreads

    A sort of 'trial by media' (by Team UPC) compromises the integrity of the case (constitutional complaint) and can be interpreted as judges succumbing to lobbying/pressure from those who conspire to violate many constitutions across Europe for personal/financial gain



  13. Understanding Thierry Breton: What Thierry Did Next...

    "Whether by coincidence or not, when Atos announced in 2010 that it would acquire Siemens’ IT unit, it was the 32-year-old Macron at Rothschild who advised Breton on the deal."



  14. Links 20/11/2019: HONOR MagicBook With GNU/Linux, Coreboot 4.11, GNU Health Patchset 3.6.1

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, November 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, November 19, 2019



  16. EPO Geared Towards Financial Exploitation of Europe Instead of Serving Europe

    For the financial benefit of law firms and patent offices (they profit from processing loads of patents and lawsuits) Europe is being reverted back to Medieval Times when exercising invention and free thought (or free coding) was a luxury of the rich alone



  17. Microsoft and IBM Are the Patent Trolls, They Won't Protect Us From Trolls

    "Microsoft has no taste" and IBM has no taste, either; they're lying to our collective face together with OIN and the 'Linux' Foundation



  18. How Ralph Nader Put It

    Ralph Nader on money in politics



  19. ZDNet (CBS) Associates GNU/Linux Users With ISIS

    Response to "US student was allegedly building a custom Gentoo Linux distro for ISIS," just published by ZDNet and composed by their biggest troll, Catalin Cimpanu



  20. Understanding Thierry Breton: Noël Forgeard and His “Golden Parachute”

    The end of the first half of the Breton series; in this particular part we continue to cover the EADS scandal and the second half of this series will include the EPO connections (the vote in a plenary for Breton's nomination is due 27/11)



  21. Links 19/11/2019: Zswap's B-Tree Search Implementation, WordPress 5.2.4

    Links for the day



  22. We've Already Entered the Era When Patents Should be Presumed Invalid

    The abundance of low-quality patents may mean short-term profits for patent offices and law firms; but we know at whose expense they are profiting and the legitimacy of patent systems suffers as a result



  23. Jean-Luc Breton

    Breton a champion of obstruction and obfuscation



  24. Understanding Thierry Breton: Insider-Trading Scandal at EADS

    Although Breton was not directly implicated in the insider trading scandal itself he did come under fire in 2007 for the role he played in a side-show to the main story, namely the payment of a generous € 8.5m severance package to Noël Forgeard when the EADS co-CEO was compelled to resign in June 2006.



  25. Startpage is Not Denying Its Betrayal of Privacy, It is Just Being Evasive

    They can't call you a liar if you issue a non-denying 'denial'; the "Roll Safe Think About It" meme seems applicable here



  26. Guest Post: Open Source is Not Free Software

    "If you look at human history, you can see lots of similar ideas, movements, intellectuals who are affected by the power of the ruling class like this."



  27. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, November 18, 2019



  28. Links 19/11/2019: HPC Focus and LibreOffice 6.4 Beta

    Links for the day



  29. Understanding Thierry Breton: “Rhodiagate” and the Vivendi Universal Affair

    When the "Rhodia affair" became the "Breton affair"



  30. Links 18/11/2019: Last Linux RC, OSMC Updated

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts