There are many other things that the Gates Foundation does not want people to understand. Thanks to the Internet, activists like Vandana Shiva can tell us how those things really impact the population; the mainstream press (read: corporate-dominated media) typically echoes elite opinion, with occasional exceptions. ⬆
"Microsoft sees what's coming. Things like Word and Excel sort of like a drug now getting ready to go generic."
It certainly does seem like they receive money from taxpayers for nothing, or for IBM to do mass layoffs/closure at Albany under the guise of "making a new spinoff"...
If the election is run by platforms that have back doors "baked-in" and if the communications are overseen by GAFAM, you would not have to be a "nutty MAGAt" to dispute the outcome
"It means a situation in which somebody accuses someone else of a fault which the accuser shares, and therefore is an example of psychological projection, or hypocrisy. Use of the expression to discredit or deflect a claim of wrongdoing by attacking the originator of the claim for their own similar behaviour (rather than acknowledging the guilt of both) is the tu quoque logical fallacy."
