Comments

• Needs Sunlight

  2010-03-30 11:05:00

  The top two are good starts. The checkbox is nice,

• Dr. Roy Schestowitz

  2010-03-30 11:16:12

  Since two were contributed by readers, we might use of all them in different places.

• mtjm

  2010-03-30 09:11:16

  The font of the third one suggests times where laws were made more to help people, it's also not used by nearly all websites. Does the unusual design of "ig" have some special meanings?

• Robotron 2084

  2010-03-30 15:58:08

  The first graphic is fine but the other two are crap. The green check-box looks good but the font kerneling is all jacked up. The last one is just plain ugly.
  
  And for God's sake, change your avatar picture to one that uses a correct aspect ratio. Why do you think I used to call you "squarehead" back in the day?

• NotZed

  2010-03-31 02:03:22

  Well at least you've got something better than that *god*awful* bottom one! Whomever came up with that should be banned from using The Gimp for life!
  
  The name itself is a bit wet lettuce-y weak and a bit geeky sounding, but it could be worse. Because technology is only getting more pervasive these issues are taking over and affecting everything from human rights to food production to democracy.

• Robotron 2084

  2010-03-31 03:05:09

  Ha ha ha. Careful... it's possible one of those designs is Roy's own creation.
  
  While I agree that "Technology Rights" may be a good issue, should Roy be the once deciding those rights? Is he objective enough to look at all sides of the issues without watering things down to good vs evil? Would he support the right of people to create, sell, and purchase commercial software? I doubt it. A house with a crooked foundation can't be built up too high, so I don't think anything will change around here except for the name.