Bonum Certa Men Certa

Novell: Pushing Proprietary and Paying Microsoft for Free

BSoD for Novell



Summary: Novell is reducing people's freedom and helps Microsoft impose a patent tax on software which is free/libre

NOVELL has always been a proprietary software vendor. It still is, but some of its proprietary offerings depend on Free software which is developed from the outside, without Novell's investment. For instance, for those who want RHEL but also want to please Microsoft there is the 'knockoff' called SLES, which Microsoft takes/has commissions on. Novell is giving Microsoft's ally, SAP, a Microsoft-friendly RHEL that pays Microsoft for alleged patent violations which were never proven. That's Novell role and that's why Microsoft has been sponsoring Novell for over 4 years (there are more reasons like OOXML and Moonlight). To quote:



Novell is enhancing its partnership with SAP with an expanded Linux offering for SAP applications.

Josh Dorfman, director of alliance marketing at Novell, told InternetNews.com that the new version of SLES for SAP Applications is based on SLES 11.


SAP's portfolio is also RHEL-certified, but ever since Novell and Microsoft became allies, SAP has been enjoying a sort of relationships triangle.

If one looks at Novell news in general, it's mostly about more proprietary software. Even BrainShare 2011, which Ron Hovsepian says will take place, is mostly about proprietary software. Rather often we just find that Novell uses SLES as a platform on which to sell its own proprietary software, so what good is Novell? There is of course the OpenSUSE project which still has some articles about it [1, 2], but that too is being neglected by Novell and abandoned by volunteers (they don't want to carry water for AttachMSFT).

Over at YouTube, there are new videos of Novell promoting SUSE using Microsoft capabilities like Mono Extension (video with Windows Vista), proprietary software like ZENworks (it is also promoted for the Microsoft side of course) and the proprietary Novell PlateSpin (Forge) or even GroupWise. Here it is:



There are also videos about the proprietary IDM4, e.g. "IDM4: What is Novell Analyzer?" (Japanese). There are two more of these and also "The Lord of the Files" [1, 2, 3]. Here is part 1:



This basically promotes Novell Vibe, which also spreads proprietary problems. Why are some people still characterising Novell as an "open source" company? It's not.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Most of This Month Will Deal With EPO Scandals
A timeline of sorts
Links 01/11/2025: Microsoft Distributes Malware Again, Radio Free Asia Shut Down by Dictator
Links for the day
 
Still Catching Up, Daily Links a Top Priority
Readers who have additional information about the EPO can send it along to us
3 Days Ago Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news
Links 01/11/2025: "Americans Are Defaulting on Car Loans at an Alarming Rate" While Many Left to Starve (SNAP)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/11/2025: FIFO and Gemini Age Survey
Links for the day
Why Does German Media Protect the EPO From Accountability for Cocaine?
Can we trust such media to properly inform the public?
Links 01/11/2025: Microsoft Azure Goes Offline Again
Links for the day
November is Here, Anniversary Party This Coming Friday
Expect this site to return to its normal publication pace either by tomorrow or Monday
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 31, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, October 31, 2025
Gemini Links 01/11/2025: Synergetic Disinformation and Software Maintenance
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 30, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, October 30, 2025
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 29, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Slopwatch: Brian Fagioli, Google News, and Other LLM Slopfarms
Why does Google News keep promoting these fake articles?