EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.19.11

GNU/Linux Desktop Market Share

Posted in GNU/Linux, Site News at 6:22 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

20 years old kernel finds itself everywhere

Tux in money

Summary: The usage of GNU/Linux on the desktop is not as tepid as the corporate press has some people believe

WHEN this site was a lot younger and well before it required a cache server to offload pressure, monthly “market share” statistics were occasionally posted to show that about 40% of the visitors of the site use GNU/Linux. We have a wiki page about this subject, still. Many actually used SUSE, perhaps because we covered SUSE quite routinely.

After the DDOS attacks of 2009 we needed to move to a server which was not shared. Whenever people attacked the site this impacted some other sites. It was then that we lost cPanel and AWStats. Later in the year we also added server-level cache for handling the load and for protection against attacks (common around December of that year). This was not CMS-level cache, which continued to be used. Varnish basically divided, based on some criteria, requests that could be served from a local file (static) and those that needed to be passed for processing the usual way by Apache and the underlying CMS (with or without the database, depending on cache). The outcome of this was that statistics ceased to be meaningful. The logs contained requests from Varnish rather than from the users who accessed pages. Having said that, it is reasonable to speculate that about 40% of the visitors are still GNU/Linux users, putting Android aside.

What might be worth noting here is that there is a population bias that affects how people perceive the “market share” (usage) of GNU/Linux. Users of this operating system are drawn into niche sites that have a strong privacy policy and would not give away logs for the sake of someone’s business model. Moreover, there are uneven distributions of OS use, typically based on geographical and lingual factors. Those factors are rarely or never accounted for by quick ‘facts’ vendors that just use brute force to output some ‘magic’ numbers, never bothering to study the population in question.

The bottom line is, as far as a site like Techrights is concerned, GNU/Linux as a desktop operating system is massive. It keeps growing, too.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. Nate said,

    August 19, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    Gravatar

    I administer a server for a small business based in MA, USA. I occasionally check the server-wide logs to formulate statistics, but unfortunately they haven’t really impressed me. I just did a quick check now, and only 0.34% of 48,496 form submissions to approximately 200 websites from 2011-01-01 to 2011-08-19 have been from a system identified as a Linux (excluding Android). Most of our clients are small businesses located in the northeatern United States. The submissions I am referring to are from such as general contact forms, reservation request forms, payment forms, and shopping cart order forms.

    Of course, I know that statistics will be different for different audiences, but it’s disappointing to me not to be able to see better numbers from the only source I can personally trust.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, this validates exactly the point that I was making. The users of GNU/Linux tend to located in other geographies (Brazil for example) and visit particular types of sites. My other site, schestowitz.com, has 10%-20% of the visitors running some form of “Linux”. Those sites are never included in statistics from the firms the corporate press loves to quote (US-based firms).

    See

    http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/08/21/linux-popularity-across-the-globe/
    http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/

    The US is not even listed in the top 20.

  2. NotZed said,

    August 20, 2011 at 12:55 am

    Gravatar

    My blog is but a piddle of a puddle but I see a fair bit of Linux. Not entirely surprisingly given my past and blog posts, but I don’t have too many regular readers from previous connections and most hits are just from web search results unrelated to gnu/linux (e.g. #1 hit every month for the last year has been: “java fft”).

    So most of those are for quite technical programming stuff – OpenCL, scientific programming with Java, beagleboard related, or obtuse performance stuff even I can’t remember writing much about. That probably means the demographic is largely students and other engineers who are probably more likely to be using a decent engineering platform like gnu/linux. Last month I had about 20% gnu, 65% microsoft and 5% apple.

    What I find more interesting is where the people are from. USA is by far the biggest on it’s own, and then usually a bit over 1/3 as many hits from Germany, with Australia and India a bit behind, and then UK trailing somewhat. But the USA is only about 1/3 of the total too, so it isn’t even a majority.

    The Germany and Australian figures surprise me a bit, particularly Australia with it’s much smaller population than every other source. Perhaps googlesearch.au adds some bias to the results based on location/the language I use (unfortunately, you never can tell …).

    A few of the others are surprising too (although the numbers are so low it’s hard to be definitive), for example in the last month Malaysia has more more hits than Russia or France, and Thailand (just) more than China (maybe malaysia/thai are hitting the cooking/gardening posts!).

    But back OT … personally I think the ‘year of the linux desktop’ was about 8 years go. That people chose not to use it is their own problem – one that often costs them dearly – I definitely wouldn’t even consider using anything else right now .

    As far as I can tell it did everything back then that all the ‘desktop’ systems do now, which for the most part means automatically mounting a usb drive when you insert it, or configuring a pcmcia card (or whatever the current iteration is called) automatically. Oh except sound actually worked out of the box …

    I think all the work since then has been purely cosmetic (or big steps backwards, e.g. trying to put a touch interface to a keyboard+mouse system, or packagekit, or pulse-audio). On the other hand the quality and breadth of software beyond the core so-called ‘desktop’ just continues to improve in bounds and leaps.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Last night my connection was down (had been down for 14 hours), so I went through my file system looking at old screenshots of my older Linux boxes (I love to document these). I saw Ubuntu 4.10, Mandrake 9, SUSE 8, and a few more. It was then that I reminded myself they had to compete with XP. Nowadays XP is still “the one to beat” and GNU/Linux is considerably better. I installed Queeze last week (with KDE4) and I am still finding new features that astound me. Carla put it well last week.

    Based on capability, GNU/Linux has had its “desktop” year a long time ago.

    Michael Glasser Reply:

    Shuttleworth speaks of Apple’s OS X as the one to beat. As you and I discussed, at least in the areas we covered, desktop Linux, as represented by PCLOS, has not yet hit that mark.

    From the audiocast when you kindly let me on your show:

    Snit: 24:45
    —–
    When you have “Save” on the left and “Save” on the right -
    people click on the wrong button. And it’s user error -
    that’s what it’s called – but it’s not; it’s an error of
    the system. [About older PCLOS] looking at its default
    programs … and there is a mish mash [quit/exit, save
    dialog with "Save" on left or right]
    —–
    Roy: 25:32
    —–
    I’ve used it before and I don’t think it’s true what you
    are saying now.
    —–

    And:

    Snit: 32:28:
    —–
    [Of the newest PCLOS] I will post – I will make screenshots
    or maybe even a quick video and we can look at it. Now I
    haven’t used the newest one … but let me look at PC Linux
    and I can pretty much guarantee you there will be a mix of
    quit and exit, there will be a mix of hot keys, there will
    be a mix of save dialogs, there will be a mix of print
    dialogs, … some programs will lose the clipboard when you
    quit some programs won’t…
    —–
    Roy: 33:15
    —–
    [talks about how development happens... ] Interesting that
    you raise this point … when you are using something like
    a file dialog you might say that will be inconsistent but
    that is just not true … the way it works in KDE I would
    be quite surprised if it is very inconsistent. I would be
    very happy if you found some cases where it’s not
    consistent – maybe even help developers.
    —–

    In both cases, though, you were shown to be wrong.

    http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PCLOS-OSX-comparison.pdf

  3. Michael Glasser said,

    August 30, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    Gravatar

    I responded to this post here: http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/2011/08/27/gnulinux-desktop-market-share

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Please refrain from spamming this site. You have just posted 7 non-content self-promotion links in a matter of 5 minutes, Your trolling and stalking elsewhere have verged the pathological too.

What Else is New


  1. Links 17/8/2018: GNU/Linux From ASUS, Debian at 25, Lubuntu Plans

    Links for the day



  2. Links 16/8/2018: MAAS 2.4.1, Mesa 18.2 RC3

    Links for the day



  3. USPTO Craziness: Changing Rules to Punish PTAB Petitioners and Reward Microsoft for Corruption at ISO

    The US patent office proposes charging/imposing on applicants that are not customers of Microsoft a penalty; there’s also an overtly and blatantly malicious move whose purpose is to discourage petitions against wrongly-granted (by the USPTO) patents



  4. The Demise of US Software Patents Continues at the Federal Circuit

    Software patents are rotting away in the United States; it remains to be seen when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will truly/fully honour 35 U.S.C. § 101 and stop granting such patents



  5. Almost Two Months After the ILO Ruling Staff Representative Brumme is Finally Back on the Job at EPO

    Ion Brumme gets his position at the EPO back, owing to the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization (ILO-AT) ruling back in July; things, however, aren't rosy for the Office as a whole



  6. Links 15/8/2018: Akademy 2018 Wrapups and More Intel Defects

    Links for the day



  7. Antiquated Patenting Trick: Adding Words Like 'Apparatus' to Make Abstract Ideas Look/Sound Like They Pertain to or Contain a 'Device'

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101) still maintains that abstract ideas are not patent-eligible; so applicants and law firms go out of their way to make their ideas seem as though they're physical



  8. Open Invention Network (OIN) Member Companies Need to Become Unanimous in Opposition to Software Patents

    Opposition to abstract software patents, which even the SCOTUS and the Federal Circuit nowadays reject, would be strategically smart for OIN; but instead it issues a statement in support of a GPL compliance initiative



  9. President Battistelli 'Killed' the EPO; António Campinos Will 'Finish the Job'

    The EPO is shrinking, but this is being shrewdly disguised using terms like "efficiency" and a low-profile President who keeps himself in the dark



  10. Links 14/8/2018: Virtlyst 1.2.0, Blender 2.8 Planning Update, Zorin OS 12.4, FreeBSD 12.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  11. Berkheimer Changed Nothing and Invalidation Rates of Abstract Software Patents Remain Very High

    Contrary to repetitive misinformation from firms that 'sell' services around patents, there is no turnaround or comeback for software patents; the latest numbers suggest a marginal difference at best — one that may be negligible considering the correlation between expected outcomes and actions (the nature of risk analysis)



  12. Lockton Insurance Brokers Exploiting Patent Trolls to Sell Insurance to the Gullible

    Demonstrating what some people have dubbed (and popularised) "disaster capitalism", Lockton now looks for opportunities to profit from patent trolls, in the form of "insurance" (the same thing Microsoft does)



  13. Patent Lawyers Writing Patent Law for Their Own Enrichment Rather Than for Innovation

    We have become detached from the original goals and come to the point where patent offices aren't necessarily run by people qualified for the job of advancing science and technology; they, unlike judges, only seem to care about how many patents get granted, irrespective of their quality/merit



  14. Links 13/8/2018: Linux 4.18 and GNU Linux-libre 4.18 Arrive

    Links for the day



  15. PTAB is Loathed by Patent Maximalists Because It Can Potentially Invalidate Thousands of Software Patents (More Than Courts Can Handle)

    The US patent system has become more resistant to software patents; courts, however, are still needed to invalidate such patents (a potentially expensive process) because the USPTO continues to grant these provided some fashionable buzzwords/hype waves are utilised (e.g. "facial recognition", "blockchain", "autonomous vehicles")



  16. Gene Quinn and 'Dallas Innovates' as Couriers of Agenda for Patent Trolls Like iPEL

    Failing to hide their real purpose and malicious agenda, sites whose real purpose is to promote a lot of patent litigation produce puff pieces, even for patently unethical trolls such as iPEL



  17. Software Patents, Secured by 'Smart' and 'Intelligent' Tricks, Help Microsoft and Others Bypass Alice/Section 101

    A look at the use of fashionable trends and buzzwords to acquire and pass around dubious software patents, then attempting to guard these from much-needed post-Alice scrutiny



  18. Keep Boston (and Massachusetts in General) From Becoming an Infestation Zone for Patent Litigation

    Boston, renowned for research and innovation, has become somewhat of a litigation hotbed; this jeopardises the state's attractiveness (except perhaps to lawyers)



  19. Links 12/8/2018: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, Mesa 18.1.6 Release Notice, New Linux Imminent

    Links for the day



  20. Thomas Massie's “Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2018” (RALIA) Would Put the US Patent System in the Lions' (or Trolls') Mouth Again

    An anti-§ 101 and anti-PTAB bill from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) strives to remove quality control; but by handing the system back to patent trolls he and his proponents simply strive to create more business of litigation, at the expense of innovation



  21. EPO-Style Problem-Solution: Tackling Backlog by Granting Lots of Low-Quality (Bogus) European Patents, Causing a Surge in Troll/Frivolous Litigation

    The EPO's lack of interest in genuine patent quality (measuring "quality" in terms of speed, not actual quality) may mean nothing but a litigation epidemic; many of these lawsuits would be abusive, baseless; those harmed the most would be small businesses that cannot afford a legal defense and would rather settle with those who exploit questionable patents, notably patent trolls



  22. Links 11/8/2018: PGP Clean Room 1.0, Ring-KDE 3.0.0, Julia 1.0

    Links for the day



  23. Propaganda Sites of Patent Trolls and Litigators Have Quit Trying to Appear Impartial or Having Integrity

    The lobbying groups of patent trolls (which receive money from such trolls) carry on meddling in policy and altering perception that drives policy; we present some new examples



  24. Months After Oil States the Patent Maximalists Still Try to Undermine Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”), Refusing to Accept Patent Quality

    The patent maximalists in the United States, seeing that the USPTO is moving away from patent maximalism, is desperate for a turnaround; prominent patent maximalists take it all out on PTAB



  25. The Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement is Paralysed, So Team UPC is Twisting Old News

    Paralysis of the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) means that people are completely forgetting about its very existence; those standing to benefit from it (patent litigation firms) are therefore recycling and distorting old news



  26. Patents as Profiteering Opportunities for Law Firms Rather Than Drivers of Innovation for Productive Companies

    A sample of news from yesterday; the patent microcosm is still arguing about who pays attorneys’ fees (not whether these fees are justified) and is constantly complaining about the decline in patent litigation, which means fewer and lower attorneys’ fees (less work for them)



  27. Links 9/8/2018: Mesa 18.2 RC2, Cockpit 175, WPA-2 Hash Cracking

    Links for the day



  28. Patent Maximalists -- Not Reformers -- Are the Biggest Threat to the Viability of the Patent System and Innovation

    Those who strive to infinitely expand patent scope are rendering the patent system obsolete and completely losing sight of the very purpose of the patent system, whose sanity US courts and lawmakers gradually restore (one ruling and one bill at a time)



  29. WeMove.EU Tackles Low Patent Quality at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The breadth of European Patents, which now cover even nature itself, worries public interest groups; Team UPC, however, wants patent scope to expand further and António Campinos has expressed his intention to further increase the number of grants



  30. Links 8/8/2018: KDE Neon for Testing, New LibreOffice Release, Dart 2.0

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts