EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.19.11

GNU/Linux Desktop Market Share

Posted in GNU/Linux, Site News at 6:22 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

20 years old kernel finds itself everywhere

Tux in money

Summary: The usage of GNU/Linux on the desktop is not as tepid as the corporate press has some people believe

WHEN this site was a lot younger and well before it required a cache server to offload pressure, monthly “market share” statistics were occasionally posted to show that about 40% of the visitors of the site use GNU/Linux. We have a wiki page about this subject, still. Many actually used SUSE, perhaps because we covered SUSE quite routinely.

After the DDOS attacks of 2009 we needed to move to a server which was not shared. Whenever people attacked the site this impacted some other sites. It was then that we lost cPanel and AWStats. Later in the year we also added server-level cache for handling the load and for protection against attacks (common around December of that year). This was not CMS-level cache, which continued to be used. Varnish basically divided, based on some criteria, requests that could be served from a local file (static) and those that needed to be passed for processing the usual way by Apache and the underlying CMS (with or without the database, depending on cache). The outcome of this was that statistics ceased to be meaningful. The logs contained requests from Varnish rather than from the users who accessed pages. Having said that, it is reasonable to speculate that about 40% of the visitors are still GNU/Linux users, putting Android aside.

What might be worth noting here is that there is a population bias that affects how people perceive the “market share” (usage) of GNU/Linux. Users of this operating system are drawn into niche sites that have a strong privacy policy and would not give away logs for the sake of someone’s business model. Moreover, there are uneven distributions of OS use, typically based on geographical and lingual factors. Those factors are rarely or never accounted for by quick ‘facts’ vendors that just use brute force to output some ‘magic’ numbers, never bothering to study the population in question.

The bottom line is, as far as a site like Techrights is concerned, GNU/Linux as a desktop operating system is massive. It keeps growing, too.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. Nate said,

    August 19, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    Gravatar

    I administer a server for a small business based in MA, USA. I occasionally check the server-wide logs to formulate statistics, but unfortunately they haven’t really impressed me. I just did a quick check now, and only 0.34% of 48,496 form submissions to approximately 200 websites from 2011-01-01 to 2011-08-19 have been from a system identified as a Linux (excluding Android). Most of our clients are small businesses located in the northeatern United States. The submissions I am referring to are from such as general contact forms, reservation request forms, payment forms, and shopping cart order forms.

    Of course, I know that statistics will be different for different audiences, but it’s disappointing to me not to be able to see better numbers from the only source I can personally trust.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, this validates exactly the point that I was making. The users of GNU/Linux tend to located in other geographies (Brazil for example) and visit particular types of sites. My other site, schestowitz.com, has 10%-20% of the visitors running some form of “Linux”. Those sites are never included in statistics from the firms the corporate press loves to quote (US-based firms).

    See

    http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/08/21/linux-popularity-across-the-globe/
    http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/

    The US is not even listed in the top 20.

  2. NotZed said,

    August 20, 2011 at 12:55 am

    Gravatar

    My blog is but a piddle of a puddle but I see a fair bit of Linux. Not entirely surprisingly given my past and blog posts, but I don’t have too many regular readers from previous connections and most hits are just from web search results unrelated to gnu/linux (e.g. #1 hit every month for the last year has been: “java fft”).

    So most of those are for quite technical programming stuff – OpenCL, scientific programming with Java, beagleboard related, or obtuse performance stuff even I can’t remember writing much about. That probably means the demographic is largely students and other engineers who are probably more likely to be using a decent engineering platform like gnu/linux. Last month I had about 20% gnu, 65% microsoft and 5% apple.

    What I find more interesting is where the people are from. USA is by far the biggest on it’s own, and then usually a bit over 1/3 as many hits from Germany, with Australia and India a bit behind, and then UK trailing somewhat. But the USA is only about 1/3 of the total too, so it isn’t even a majority.

    The Germany and Australian figures surprise me a bit, particularly Australia with it’s much smaller population than every other source. Perhaps googlesearch.au adds some bias to the results based on location/the language I use (unfortunately, you never can tell …).

    A few of the others are surprising too (although the numbers are so low it’s hard to be definitive), for example in the last month Malaysia has more more hits than Russia or France, and Thailand (just) more than China (maybe malaysia/thai are hitting the cooking/gardening posts!).

    But back OT … personally I think the ‘year of the linux desktop’ was about 8 years go. That people chose not to use it is their own problem – one that often costs them dearly – I definitely wouldn’t even consider using anything else right now .

    As far as I can tell it did everything back then that all the ‘desktop’ systems do now, which for the most part means automatically mounting a usb drive when you insert it, or configuring a pcmcia card (or whatever the current iteration is called) automatically. Oh except sound actually worked out of the box …

    I think all the work since then has been purely cosmetic (or big steps backwards, e.g. trying to put a touch interface to a keyboard+mouse system, or packagekit, or pulse-audio). On the other hand the quality and breadth of software beyond the core so-called ‘desktop’ just continues to improve in bounds and leaps.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Last night my connection was down (had been down for 14 hours), so I went through my file system looking at old screenshots of my older Linux boxes (I love to document these). I saw Ubuntu 4.10, Mandrake 9, SUSE 8, and a few more. It was then that I reminded myself they had to compete with XP. Nowadays XP is still “the one to beat” and GNU/Linux is considerably better. I installed Queeze last week (with KDE4) and I am still finding new features that astound me. Carla put it well last week.

    Based on capability, GNU/Linux has had its “desktop” year a long time ago.

    Michael Glasser Reply:

    Shuttleworth speaks of Apple’s OS X as the one to beat. As you and I discussed, at least in the areas we covered, desktop Linux, as represented by PCLOS, has not yet hit that mark.

    From the audiocast when you kindly let me on your show:

    Snit: 24:45
    —–
    When you have “Save” on the left and “Save” on the right -
    people click on the wrong button. And it’s user error -
    that’s what it’s called – but it’s not; it’s an error of
    the system. [About older PCLOS] looking at its default
    programs … and there is a mish mash [quit/exit, save
    dialog with "Save" on left or right]
    —–
    Roy: 25:32
    —–
    I’ve used it before and I don’t think it’s true what you
    are saying now.
    —–

    And:

    Snit: 32:28:
    —–
    [Of the newest PCLOS] I will post – I will make screenshots
    or maybe even a quick video and we can look at it. Now I
    haven’t used the newest one … but let me look at PC Linux
    and I can pretty much guarantee you there will be a mix of
    quit and exit, there will be a mix of hot keys, there will
    be a mix of save dialogs, there will be a mix of print
    dialogs, … some programs will lose the clipboard when you
    quit some programs won’t…
    —–
    Roy: 33:15
    —–
    [talks about how development happens... ] Interesting that
    you raise this point … when you are using something like
    a file dialog you might say that will be inconsistent but
    that is just not true … the way it works in KDE I would
    be quite surprised if it is very inconsistent. I would be
    very happy if you found some cases where it’s not
    consistent – maybe even help developers.
    —–

    In both cases, though, you were shown to be wrong.

    http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PCLOS-OSX-comparison.pdf

  3. Michael Glasser said,

    August 30, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    Gravatar

    I responded to this post here: http://trw.gallopinginsanity.com/2011/08/27/gnulinux-desktop-market-share

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Please refrain from spamming this site. You have just posted 7 non-content self-promotion links in a matter of 5 minutes, Your trolling and stalking elsewhere have verged the pathological too.

What Else is New


  1. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  2. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  3. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  4. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  5. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  6. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  7. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  8. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  9. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  10. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  11. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  12. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  13. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  14. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  15. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  16. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  17. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  18. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  19. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  20. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  21. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  22. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.



  23. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day



  24. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)



  25. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)



  26. Links 9/6/2019: Arrest of Microsoft Peter, Linux 5.2 RC4, Ubuntu Touch Update

    Links for the day



  27. Chapter 8: A Foot in the Door -- How to Train Sympathetic Developers and Infiltrate Other Projects

    How to train sympathetic developers and infiltrate other projects



  28. Chapter 7: Patent War -- Use Low-Quality Patents to Prove That All Software Rips Off Your Company

    Patents in the United States last for 20 years from the time of filing. Prior to 1994, the patent term was 17 years from when the patent was issued.



  29. The Linux Foundation in 2019: Over 100 Million Dollars in Income, But Cannot Maintain Linux.com?

    Today’s Linux Foundation gets about 0.1 billion dollars per year (as explained in our previous post), so why can’t it spend about 0.1% of that money on people who write for and maintain a site that actually promotes GNU/Linux?



  30. Microsoft and Proprietary Software Vendors a Financial Boon for the Linux Foundation, But at What Cost?

    The Linux Foundation is thriving financially, but the sources of income are diversified to the point where the Linux Foundation is actually funded by foes of Linux, defeating the very purpose or direction of such a nonprofit foundation (led by self-serving millionaires who don't use GNU/Linux)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts