EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.02.16

Microsoft, Quien Activamente Promueve y Ayuda Ataques Ordenados por el Estado incluso in Rusia (Rival en la Guerra Fria), dizque “Combatira Ataques iniciados por el Estado”

Posted in Microsoft at 6:33 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Original/English version

Publicado en Decepcion, Mercadeo, Microsoft at 10:01 pm por el Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Bueno, roguemos paras saber en que Microsoft estaba pensando cuando salio con su ultima propaganda de proteger la “privacidad” de us usuarions. Esto es para cagarse de risa!

La primera Mentira de Microsoft del Nuevo Año 2016, y la cuenta prosigue.

Woman laughing

Summario: Mas de la ridicula MENTIRA de que Microsoft combate ataques originados o promovidos por gobierns que siguen siendo diseminados a granel.

La nueva estrategia de Relaciones Públicas de algunas compañias que usan el modelo de diluir la privacidad, es algo alredor de “infomaremos an nuestros usuarios de ataques promovidos por sus gobiernos (a quienes corrompemos dandoles dinero para hacer negocios y someter a los pueblos). Twitter por ejemlo se hizo mucha propaganda para si mismo de esta manera. Inevitablemente (cargos de conciencia) hacen que Microsoft se suba en este carro, en un esfuerzo de limpiarse, tirarse flores y hacerse propagande. Aunque esto sea ridiculo y/o oportunista.

Los Angeles Times, basado en reciente revelaciones, ocasionalmente escribe sus articules con ayuda de la CIA (por ejemplo, para promover la agenda del Departamento de Estado, como aquellos usados por los ataques promovidos por el Gobierno estadounidense, asi como ataques de Brenan contra los ordenadores personales de miembros del Senado quienes habian indagado acerca de las torturas de la CIA). Esto ya a salido a luz pública, el lobbyismo de Microsoft blog (este es el que estan leyendo). Cúan ridículo es esto? Quién lo puede creer? Esto no es periodismo, es lobbyismo amplificado. Para citar Los Angeles Times: ” Microsoft se comprometion este miércoles notificar a personas dueñas de cuentas en Microsoft (que incluye Outlook.com y OneDrive), si es que sospecha que sus cuentas han sido saboteadas or hackeadas por gente actuando o instigados por sus gobiernos o estados”

“Esto no es periodismo, es lobbyismo amplificado.”

Citando a los lobbyistas de Microsoft: “Ya estamos notificando a los usuarios si creemos que sus cuentas han sido saboteadas o comprometidas por terceros, y tambien los guiamos a tomar medidas para asegurar sus cuentas. Estamos tomando esta paso adicional de especificamnte hacerles saber de que el agresor o atacande puede ser agentes de sus respectivos gobiernos, por la posibilidad de que sea mas sofisticado y/o mas a largo plazo que ataques de otros criminales de la red y otros. Estas notificaciones no significan que nuestros propios sytemas hayan sido comprometidos” Hey no conocemos ni sabemos de nuestros propios systemas. Más ridiculos no pueden ser.

Como l pregunta que XFaCE escribio en el #techrights IRC channel, “Por qué hay tantos exitosos ataques promovidos pro los gobiernos en primer lugar? Probablemente se referia a las puertas traseras que Microsoft deliveradamente crea para los llamadas “fuerzas del orden”, con luchas contra el “terror” como pretexto.

Como XFaCE lo puso sarcasticamente: “No te preocupes, confía en Microsoft”

“Lo mismo va para aquellos que cubren la publicidad de Microsoft en Irlanda (juicio espectáculo) y sus llamadas “seguras” installaciones en Alemania.” Microsoft ayuda y encubre ataques perpretados por el gobierno ruso bajo la direccion de Putin contra los disidentes. Incluse los ataques del gobierno estadounidense contra el mundo entero. No olvidemos el gobierno norteamericano es controlado por las grandes corporaciones en busca de dominio mundial. Tambien la NSA ataca sus propios ciudadanos, incluyendo miembros del congreso (quienes de acuerdo a las ultimas revelaciones terminando siendo vigilados por puras razones politicas. Revelará Microsoft ataques del gobierno a los que ellos mismo ayudan? O si seguro que si!

Los lobbyistas de Microsoft son para cagarse de risa. Aquellos que los ayudan a diseminar su mensaje no son periodistas, ni siquiera taquígrafos. Son lo que Stalin llamaba “tontos útiles”. Lo mismo va para aquellos que cubrieron la propaganda de Microsoft en Irlanda, y las “seguras” instalaciones en Alemania.

Hay una razon por que el Director del FBI ha estado callado acerca del “cifrado” de Microsoft, ellos tienen ya puertas traseras (no olviden CIPAV por ejemplo). Ellos han estado alli hace tiempo. Como lo puso Micah Lee algunos dias atras: “Compraste una Windows computer? Microsoft probablemente ya tiene tu llave cifrada”. (Ya cubrimos esto hace tiempo. Microsoft Peter respondio a esto con un ridiculo articulo (duramente criticado en la red y forums). Microsoft se preoucupa por la privacidad y seguridad de sus usuarios tanto como a British Petroleum le importa el medio ambiente o como que la tonteria de que a Microsoft le “gusta Linux”.
______
* Cuando compañias que son las PEORES en cuanto a privacidad tratan de disfrazarse a si mismas de “campeones de la privacida”, tanto como las petroleras, carboneras que tratan de someterse a un tratamiento de “enverdeciento” para ser vistos como amigos del planeta Tierra.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/5/2018: DragonFlyBSD 5.2.1 and Kata Containers 1.0 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Masking Abstract Patents in the Age of Alice/§ 101 in the United States

    There are new examples and ample evidence of § 101-dodging strategies; the highest US court, however, wishes to limit patent scope and revert back to an era of patent sanity (as opposed to patent maximalism)



  3. PTAB's Latest Applications of 35 U.S.C. § 101 and Obviousness Tests to Void U.S. Patents

    Validity checks at PTAB continue to strike out patents, much to the fear of people who have made a living from patenting and lawsuits alone



  4. France is Irrelevant to Whether or Not UPC Ever Becomes a Reality, Moving/Outsourcing de Facto Patent Examination to European Courts Managed in/Presided by France

    Team UPC is still focusing on France as if it's up for France to decide the fate of the UPC, which EPO insiders say Battistelli wants to be the chief of (the chief, it has already been decided, would have to be a Frenchman)



  5. Saint-Germain's Poisonous Legacy of "Toxic Loans": The Emperor’s New Investment Guidelines

    Details about a secret vote to 'gamble' the EPO's budget on "a diversified portfolio managed by external experts"



  6. Saint-Germain's Poisonous Legacy of "Toxic Loans": Cautionary Tale for the EPO?

    Preface or background to a series of posts about Battistelli's French politics and why they can if not should alarm EPO workers



  7. Links 22/5/2018: Parrot 4.0, Spectre Number 4

    Links for the day



  8. Chamber of Commerce Lies About the United States Like It Lies About Other Countries for the Sole Purpose of Patent Maximalism

    When pressure groups that claim to be "US" actively bash and lie about the US one has to question their motivation; in the case of the Chamber of Commerce, it's just trying to perturb the law for the worse



  9. Links 21/5/2018: Linux 4.17 RC6, GIMP 2.10.2

    Links for the day



  10. The Attacks on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Have Lost Momentum and the Patent Microcosm Begrudgingly Gives Up

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), reaffirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) and now the Supreme Court as well, carries on preventing frivolous lawsuits; options for stopping PTAB have nearly been exhausted and it shows



  11. Software Patenting and Successful Litigation a Very Difficult Task Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

    Using loads of misleading terms or buzzwords such as "AI" the patent microcosm continues its software patents pursuits; but that's mostly failing, especially when courts come to assess pertinent claims made in the patents



  12. António Campinos Will Push Toward a France-Based Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    Frenchmen at EPO will try hard to bring momentum if not force to the Unified Patent Court; facts, however, aren't on their side (unlike Team UPC, which was always on Team Battistelli's side)



  13. In Apple v Samsung Patents That Should Never Have Been Granted May Result in a Billion Dollars in 'Damages'

    A roundup of news about Apple and its patent cases (especially Apple v Samsung), including Intel's role trying to intervene in Qualcomm v Apple



  14. Links 20/5/2018: KDevelop 5.2.2 and 5.2.3, FreeBSD 11.2 Beta 2

    Links for the day



  15. Aurélien Pétiaud's ILO Case (EPO Appeal) an Early Sign That ILO Protects Abusers and Power, Not Workers

    A famous EPO ‘disciplinary’ case is recalled; it’s another one of those EPO-leaning rulings from AT-ILO, which not only praises Battistelli amid very serious abuses but also lies on his behalf, leaving workers with no real access to justice but a mere illusion thereof



  16. LOT Network is a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing

    Another reminder that the "LOT" is a whole lot more than it claims to be and in effect a reinforcer of the status quo



  17. 'Nokification' in Hong Kong and China (PRC)

    Chinese firms that are struggling resort to patent litigation, in effect repeating the same misguided trajectories which became so notorious in Western nations because they act as a form of taxation, discouraging actual innovation



  18. CIPU is Amplifying Misleading Propaganda From the Chamber of Commerce

    Another lobbying event is set up to alarm lawmakers and officials, telling them that the US dropped from first to twelfth using some dodgy yardstick which favours patent extremists



  19. Patent Law Firms That Profit From Software Patent Applications and Lawsuits Still 'Pull a Berkheimer' to Attract Business in Vain

    The Alice-inspired (Supreme Court) 35 U.S.C. § 101 remains unchanged, but the patent microcosm endlessly mentions a months-old decision from a lower court (than the Supreme Court) to 'sell' the impression that everything is changing and software patents have just found their 'teeth' again



  20. A Year After TC Heartland the Patent Microcosm is Trying to 'Dilute' This Supreme Court's Decision or Work Around It

    IAM, Patent Docs, Managing IP and Patently-O want more litigation (especially somewhere like the Eastern District of Texas), so in an effort to twist TC Heartland they latch onto ZTE and BigCommerce cases



  21. Microsoft Attacks the Vulnerable Using Software Patents in Order to Maintain Fear and Give the Perception of Microsoft 'Safety'

    The latest patent lawsuits from Microsoft and its patent trolls (which it financially backs); these are aimed at feeble and vulnerable rivals of Microsoft



  22. Links 19/5/2018: Mesa 18.0.4 and Vim 8.1

    Links for the day



  23. Système Battistelli (ENArque) at the EPO is Inspired by Système Lamy in Saint-Germain-en Laye

    Has the political culture of Battistelli's hometown in France contaminated the governance of the EPO?



  24. In Australia the Productivity Commission Decides/Guides Patent Law

    IP Australia, the patent office of Australia, considers abolishing "innovation patents" but has not done so yet (pending consultation)



  25. Fishy Things Noticed Ahead of the Passage of a Lot of EPO Budget (Applicants' Money) to Battistelli's Other (and Simultaneous) Employer

    Observations and odd facts regarding the affairs of the council in St Germain; it certainly looks like Battistelli as deputy mayor and the mayor (Arnaud Péricard) are attempting to hide something



  26. Links 18/5/2018: AsteroidOS 1.0 Released, More Snyk/Black Duck FUD

    Links for the day



  27. Today's EPO Financially Rewards Abuses and Violations of the Law

    Battistelli shredded the European Patent Convention (EPC) to pieces and he is being rewarded for it, perpetuating a pattern of abuses (and much worse) being rewarded by the European Patent Organisation



  28. So-Called 'System Battistelli' is Destroying the EPO, Warn Insiders

    Low-quality patent grants by the EPO are a road to nowhere but a litigious climate in Europe and an unattractive EPO



  29. Rise in Patent Trolls' Activity in Germany Noted Amid Declining Patent Quality at the EPO

    The UPC would turn Europe into some sort of litigation ‘super-state’ — one in which national patent laws are overridden by some central, immune-from-the-law bureaucracy like the EPO; but thankfully the UPC continues its slow collapse



  30. EPO's Battistelli Taking Days Off Work for Political 'Duties' (Parties) in His French Theatre Where He'll Bring Buckets of EPO Budget (EPO Stakeholders' Money)

    More tales from Saint-Germain-en-Laye...


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts