EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.02.18

Team UPC Turns to a Spanish ‘Flavour’ of Unitary Patent Propaganda (Just Like Last Year)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 9:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Say what?!”

Don Quixote

Summary: Team UPC has found something new to latch onto in an effort to perpetuate the perception of UPC progress (something which came to a stop/halt a long time ago)

Last year (just over a year ago) IAM and others said that Spain was about to ratify the UPC or something to that effect; all this just because of something that someone had said. Suffice to say, as is typical among Team UPC, truth and expectation are totally different things.

At risk of stepping inside politics again, yesterday this thing happened in Spain. We don’t wish to go into it, at least not this time, because we prefer to focus on patents. But somehow Team UPC exploited it for its toxic agenda, even before it actually happened. This is already being spun by Team UPC, notably IAM again. Remember that IAM was paid by the EPO’s PR firm for UPC lobbying, even in the US. Unitary Patent – like the EPO itself – corrupts the media.

“Remember that IAM was paid by the EPO’s PR firm for UPC lobbying, even in the US.”Before the news even came from Spain IAM wrote: “Possible change of government in Spain today. Should that happen it will be interesting to see whether the country’s UPC position alters. PSOE has given every indication of being a lot more sympathetic than PP has been. Ciudadanos has not said much, but is very pro-EU.”

“UPC is dead,” I told them, “get over it. And it’s not because of Spain but because of the UK (Brexit) and Germany (the Unitary Patent lobbyists break laws and constitutions)…”

Spain should continue to deny (reject) the Unitary Patent which threatens to devastate SMEs all across Europe. The views of Spanish companies don’t magically change with a change of government. And besides, Spain does not matter to the Unitary Patent; it’s just used by Team UPC as a distraction and illusion of momentum (because it stalled). They’ve long used this trick.

“Whether it’s “willing to join” or not, the Spanish businesses do not want it and the UPCA is stuck anyway, so they would be wasting their time bothering with such a process. Spain is not a required signature; Germany is.”“With PSOE in power in Spain,” one person rushed to say, “UPC ratification is a matter of days…”

Not at all.

Someone else wrote about it in Spanish [1, 2] and a UPC booster (citing that) wrote: “It is reported that the new Spanish government is willing to join the UPC. This would render the UPC system substantially more attractive. It is to be seen if the government (without own majority) can convince the Spanish parliament.”

Whether it’s “willing to join” or not, the Spanish businesses do not want it and the UPCA is stuck anyway, so they would be wasting their time bothering with such a process. Spain is not a required signature; Germany is. So it’s not about Spain at all.

We can understand that Team UPC (even in Spain) is desperate for the UPC because it would mean a lot of frivolous litigation and thus business for them; but it’s not happening. We have been seeing these prophecies and projections time and time again for a number of years. And where are we now? Brexit remains an issue, Germany isn’t ratifying, and there’s barely any progress to report anywhere in Europe (Bristows scrapes the bottom of the barrel in nations with only dozens of European Patents).

“There are no trivial workarounds; they would need to start the whole process all over again. Unless they blatantly cheated, whereupon the constitutional violations would be further exacerbated.”Regarding British ratification, we already wrote more than half a dozen posts explaining that it had been expected since 2016 (a promise was made) and yet still — a couple of years later — Brexit remains a major barrier to any implementation of UPC. There are no trivial workarounds; they would need to start the whole process all over again. Unless they blatantly cheated, whereupon the constitutional violations would be further exacerbated.

Even a month later (after a rather awkward ratification) Morrison & Foerster LLP wrote this self-serving nonsense that’s supposed to give us the impression that Brexit is not a problem and Germany is just waiting to ratify. Yesterday we saw STA Law Firm, writing about UPC late in the week (on a Friday), still attempting to make it all seem like a certainty with future tense (“will”). Only way down in the article they’re trying to discuss obvious obstacles;

The Unitary Patent Court – caution ahead!

[...]

Post-Brexit Consequences

With Brexit casting its shadow over EU, it is making it difficult to understand how specific this decision of ratifying UPC will turn out for the UK. In spite of the fact that the UPC Agreement is (entirely) a global agreement as opposed to EU law, it remains an open analysis concerning whether the UK can lawfully continue as an individual from the UPC framework after Brexit, or significantly whether it will look to do as such. UK is in plans to leave the EU in March 2019 which would imply that a unitary patent framework without the UK would be less appealing which would put the entire idea of the unitary patent court in peril. The UK government has clarified in its Brexit policy document that it will bring a termination of the implication of CJEU in the UK and EU agreements will no longer apply to the UK. This clarification creates a hazy subject around the whole idea of whether legally or politically, how the UK could remain included and possibly still be liable to the EU courts.

London is one of the three expected locations for the establishment of UPC’s Central Division. However, criticism surrounds the eventual fate of a London-based court. After Brexit, will the EU leave a lofty EU foundation sitting in a non-EU nation? If the UK figures out how to keep on participating in the UPC after Brexit, which is a long shot then conceivably the court will remain, and life sciences organizations would contest licenses that cover the whole EU in the London court.

The fate of the UPC framework remains in the air and corporations need to plan for all projections, whether UPC with UK or UPC without the UK. Whatever the result, patenting and litigation strategies depend on careful formulation with all possibilities especially with the political instability.

The German Question: Answer yet Awaited

For UPC to establish in the EU; three member-states are required to ratify the agreement including UK, France, and Germany for it to officially commence. If all goes well with the UK approving the agreement, the constitutional issues that surround Germany is also a vital reason which has stalled the ratification of UPC Agreement. The matter will take a while before UPC takes its charge in the EU, regardless of UK’s post-Brexit consequences.

Well, this is the classic echo chamber of Team UPC at work; they just keep repeating one another, giving one another hope and then hoping that their optimism can mislead politicians. The way things stand at the moment, the UPC isn’t taking off. Don’t let Team UPC sites (sites like IAM and Managing IP, which stopped its “UPC Progress” reports) fool the world. We suppose that tomorrow, as usual, Joff Wild will write something about it. How ludicrous a headline remains to be seen…

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/9/2019: Plasma 5.17 Beta in Kubuntu, Cockpit 203

    Links for the day



  2. IBM Cannot Become a True Friend of Free Software Because of Its Current Patent Policy

    IBM needs to quit bullying people/companies with software patents; that would help towards appeasement of IBM critics and sceptics



  3. When Patent 'Professionals' Sound Like Children Who Learned to Parrot Some Intentionally-Misleading Buzzwords, Myths and Lies

    With buzzwords like "AI" and misleading terms like "IP" the litigation zealots are trying to convince themselves (and the public) that software is a physical thing and a "property" which needs "protecting" from "theft"; it doesn't seem to bother these people that copyright law already covers software<



  4. The European Parliament Needs to Become More Outspoken About EPO Abuses

    There are few encouraging signs in Europe right now because the EPO's disregard for patent law (striving to just grant as many patents as possible) earned it much-needed backlash from the European Parliament



  5. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  6. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  7. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  8. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  9. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  10. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  11. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  12. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  13. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  14. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  15. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  16. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  17. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  18. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  19. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  20. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  21. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  22. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  23. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  24. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  25. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)



  26. Links 15/9/2019: Radeon ROCm 2.7.2, KDE Frameworks 5.62.0, PineTime and Bison 3.4.2

    Links for the day



  27. Illegal/Invalid Patents (IPs) Have Become the 'Norm' in Europe

    Normalisation of invalid patents (granted by the EPO in defiance of the EPC) is a serious problem, but patent law firms continue to exploit that while this whole 'patent bubble' lasts (apparently the number of applications will continue to decrease because the perceived value of European Patents diminishes)



  28. Patent Maximalists, Orbiting the European Patent Office, Work to 'Globalise' a System of Monopolies on Everything

    Monopolies on just about everything are being granted in defiance of the EPC and there are those looking to make this violation ‘unitary’, even worldwide if not just EU-wide



  29. Unitary Patent (UPC) Promotion by Team Battistelli 'Metastasising' in Private Law Firms

    The EPO's Albert Keyack (Team Battistelli) is now in Team UPC as Vice President of Kilburn & Strode LLP; he already fills the media with lies about the UPC, as one can expect



  30. Microsoft Targets GNU/Linux Advocates With Phony Charm Offensives and Fake 'Love'

    The ways Microsoft depresses GNU/Linux advocacy and discourages enthusiasm for Software Freedom is not hard to see; it's worth considering and understanding some of these tactics (mostly assimilation-centric and love-themed), which can otherwise go unnoticed


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts