05.21.20
Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 7:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Buzzwords bonanza, no substance whatsoever!
Summary: European Patent Office (EPO) management is technically, in effect, incompetent; it’s like the Office is run by a bunch of children with no skills other than name-dropping buzzwords and bullcrap
THE Office in Munich would be better off run by the examiners — even the least experienced among them! At least they have some scientific background and some fundamental sense of integrity. Sure, they don’t have the connections (nepotism), but what good is a patent office where people are hired based on blind loyalty rather than actual skills?
“…what good is a patent office where people are hired based on blind loyalty rather than actual skills?”The infantile idiots (a bunch of kids with no babysitter) who run today’s EPO are doing a great disservice to Europe. They don’t know what the heck they’re doing. Or they simply don’t care; they just plunder this institution. Compare today’s leadership to people who led the Office a few decades back (their experience and accomplishments). Is this the best Europe has to offer? Surely not.
The EPO wrote a bunch of totally ridiculous tweets today. We’ve responded to them. I personally responded to about a dozen EPO tweets, many of which echoing the words of António Campinos, but some merit more attention because they deal — directly and indirectly — with software patents in Europe. This was strictly tied to some fake ‘event’ (webstream) ‘in’ Latvia. As readers are aware, such ‘presence’ in Latvia (no, nobody actually went there) is a stunt for buying the vote of Latvia (pop. 1,888,351, compared to 83,754,315 in Germany). It is relatively cheap and there's a powerful effect (it has the same voting power as Germany!). Benoît Battistelli did that routinely. Not just in Latvia…
“They don’t know what the heck they’re doing. Or they simply don’t care; they just plunder this institution.”But anyway, Latvia aside (nobody even went there, it was a lousy webstream), the EPO tweeted: “We’re grateful for Latvia’s contribution as a member of the European patent organisation. As a result of those efforts & all the others in the European patent Network, the quality of our patents is higher, nationally & throughout Europe, said President Campinos”
Speaking of “quality of our patents” as if they value quality at all.
Ask any EPO examiner about that statement. He or she would tell you…
The EPO also tweeted, lumping in COVID-19: “It’s crucial that we come together now to give IPR-intensive industries, and particularly SMEs, all the support they need, as we face the economic aftermath of #COVID19.”
The EPO worsens matters for SMEs. It very well knows this, so it has bribed the media and academia to say the very opposite. Then it spends half a decade citing these ‘studies’ every week, googlebombing information or overwhelming actual information with pure propaganda, cleverly-crafted junk, manufactured solely in order to mislead the public.
“As readers are aware, such ‘presence’ in Latvia (no, nobody actually went there) is a stunt for buying the vote of Latvia (pop. 1,888,351, compared to 83,754,315 in Germany).”Going back to Campinos, here’s another new tweet: “The IP system has supported useful technologies, like algorithms that help predict infection chains, drones that can deliver medicines, machines for diagnostics, & communications technologies that helped loved ones stay in touch said EPO President António Campinos #IPVision2020″
Once again leveraging COVID-19, this time for software patents propaganda (as if such patents save lives). Here he is subtly promoting patents on algorithms — an illegal practice, but what does he care? (Nobody holds the EPO accountable for lawbreaking)
Today’s EPO is run by totally incompetent people and nontechnical goons who are also abundantly unethical. Watch their “industrial revolution” BS along with “industry [some number]” as surrogates for software patents. As if this is the best they can do to justify illegal European Patents on algorithms.
In the outsourced (proprietary) webstreams Yann Ménière (so-called ‘economist’) showed that he had learned or memorised some new buzzwords, then resorted to shallow version inflation.
This tweet said: “Industry 5.0 points to how to best use emerging technologies to best serve people according to Yann Ménière, EPO Chief Economist at #IPVision2020 Watch it LIVE now…”
“Watch their “industrial revolution” BS along with “industry [some number]” as surrogates for software patents.”Wow. 2 years passed and now he’s up to “5.0″. Is next year “6.0″? This is how EPO management oftentimes promotes illegal patents on algorithms…
Here comes…
Tada! The “industrial revolution”…
“Yann Ménière, EPO Chief Economist, gives an overview of industrial revolutions and the patent system at #IPVision2020 Watch it LIVE now,” said this tweet.
History in the making.
An… “industrial revolution”!
This is very blatant promotion of software patents which are illegal, using meaningless or very vague buzzwords the EPO paid the media to spread (we covered evidence of those payments; they even bragged when they got Korean media to print this nonsense).
“This is very blatant promotion of software patents which are illegal, using meaningless or very vague buzzwords the EPO paid the media to spread (we covered evidence of those payments; they even bragged when they got Korean media to print this nonsense).”Last but not least there’s this (with an identical twin tweet; one with a little variation or a typo): “Innovation in #3Dprinting has exploded in the last years, says Yann Ménière, EPO Chief Economist at #IPVision2020. We’ll publish soon a study that looks at the innovation landscape in this disruptive & pervasive technology.”
Oh, a ‘study’…
Is that another one of those ‘studies’ that involve the EPO bribing scholars in exchange for reaffirmation/propaganda? Surely…
Like so-called ‘economists’, what we deal with here isn’t science but more like religion. Or patentism — including the belief (without evidence) that patents on algorithms are desirable and beneficial. Because “industrial revolution”… or something “5.0″. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 4:27 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
“We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger….If you’re going to kill someone, there isn’t much reason to get all worked up about it and angry. You just pull the trigger. Any discussions beforehand are a waste of time. We need to smile at Novell while we pull the trigger.”
–Jim Allchin, Microsoft’s Platform Group Vice President
Summary: Microsoft smiles at companies only to get closer for malicious purposes and nefarious intent; it has been done for decades and this time it’s no different (the media participates in the baiting and shameless entrapment)
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Bill Gates at 6:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Original full text here
THIS is an annotated full reproduction of the infamous letter from Bill Gates (photograph above).
February 3, 1976
An Open Letter to Hobbyists
I was born to one of the most affluent and powerful families in the US (and the world), to Bill Sr. and Mary Maxwell Gates*. I do, however, lecture the “Hobbyists”… (do I speak for them?)
To me, the most critical thing in the hobby market right now is the lack of good software courses, books and software itself.
What have I contributed towards that? Rhetorical question. But I want more good stuff available… to me.
Without good software and an owner who understands programming, a hobby computer is wasted.
I don’t understand it myself. So I need someone that understands programming to do the work for me, like Jobs with Woz. Heck, I cannot even graduate from college… with a law degree.
“Which moron wrote this brainless sh*t?”
–Martin Eller, Microsoft programmer (about Bill Gates’ own code)**
Will quality software be written for the hobby market?
For me to steal, as I did several times before as I fished dumpsters for other people’s hard work?
Almost a year ago, Paul Allen and myself, expecting the hobby market to expand, hired Monte Davidoff and developed Altair BASIC.
We don’t write code, but we hire people who wrote the code.
Though the initial work took only two months, the three of us have spent most of the last year documenting, improving and adding features to BASIC.
I supervised a couple of geeks.
Now we have 4K, 8K, EXTENDED, ROM and DISK BASIC. The value of the computer time we have used exceeds $40,000.
I also broke machines to steal computer time and I got punished for it. This was not my first crime.
The feedback we have gotten from the hundreds of people who say they are using BASIC has all been positive.
All of it. All. We do Microsoft-style statistics. Everybody is always happy.
Like I’ll tell FOCUS Magazine a couple of decades later:
Gates: No! There are no significant bugs in our released software that any significant number of users want fixed.
FOCUS: Oh, my God. I always get mad at my computer if MS Word swallows the page numbers of a document which I printed a couple of times with page numbers. If I complain to anybody they say “Well, upgrade from version 5.11 to 6.0″.
Gates: No! If you really think there’s a bug you should report a bug. Maybe you’re not using it properly. Have you ever considered that?
FOCUS: Yeah, I did…”
–Bill Gates, FOCUS Magazine, 1995
Two surprising things are apparent, however, 1) Most of these “users” never bought BASIC (less than 10% of all Altair owners have bought BASIC),
It’s all about money to me. Just money. Not code. Money.
and 2) The amount of royalties we have received from sales to hobbyists makes the time spent on Altair BASIC worth less than $2 an hour.
I didn’t steal enough computer time. Maybe next time I’ll just arrange a loan from mom’s banking family.
Why is this? As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software.
Copy, not steal. Unlike computer time I actually stole, taking it away from other people by sabotaging the computer systems. Because it’s all about me.
Hardware must be paid for, but software is something to share. Who cares if the people who worked on it get paid?
Software does not cost anything to copy. But I compare it to stealing, in effect calling software users “thieves” or “pirates”.
Maybe a number of decades in the future I’ll buy something called “GitHub”, in effect stealing billions of lines of code I never wrote.
Is this fair? One thing you don’t do by stealing software is get back at MITS for some problem you may have had. MITS doesn’t make money selling software.
MITS also doesn’t have a positive opinion of me.
“He [Bill Gates] acted like a spoiled kid, which is what he was.”
–Ed Roberts, Gates’ employer at MITS in the 1970′s (Atlanta Journal-Costitution, 04-27-97)
The royalty paid to us, the manual, the tape and the overhead make it a break-even operation. One thing you do do is prevent good software from being written.
This is precisely what my company will do for half a century to come.
Who can afford to do professional work for nothing?
Someone born to Bill Sr. and Mary Maxwell Gates.
What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free?
Something Microsoft could not do, with a budget of several billions, for several decades.
The fact is, no one besides us has invested a lot of money in hobby software.
I pretend nobody but me exists. Or… I claim to speak on behalf of actual hobbyists (of which I’m no part).
We have written 6800 BASIC, and are writing 8080 APL and 6800 APL, but there is very little incentive to make this software available to hobbyists. Most directly, the thing you do is theft.
I got a few geeks hired to do work and I want lots of money to impress my rich parents. If you disagree with me, then you are a thief.
What about the guys who re-sell Altair BASIC, aren’t they making money on hobby software? Yes, but those who have been reported to us may lose in the end. They are the ones who give hobbyists a bad name, and should be kicked out of any club meeting they show up at.
I may be young and privileged, but I am also quite blatantly a bully. If I cannot get my demands met, I will start kicking people (or maybe hire someone like dad’s lawyers to do the kicking).
I would appreciate letters from any one who wants to pay up, or has a suggestion or comment. Just write to me at 1180 Alvarado SE, #114, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108.
Where I was arrested and my well-connected father paid bail (to ensure I end up better off than a certain Epstein).
Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market with good software.
I want to hire people who actually write good code, unlike me, and then destroy the software industry by resuming my past crimes, sans the arrests (mom and dad have got my back, mom can get me a deal with IBM).
Bill Gates
General Partner, Micro-Soft
I called my company after my genitals. █
_____
* There are several aspects to it, but one has to dig deeper. “Her grandfather, James Willard Maxwell (1864–1951), was president of the National City Bank in Seattle from 1911 to 1929 and a director of the Seattle branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.” (Source: Sanitised-for reputation-laundering Wikipedia)
** Barbarians Led by Bill Gates, a book composed by the daughter of Microsoft’s PR mogul
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Bill Gates, Microsoft at 5:35 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
My Bribe, My Way
Summary: An all-time hit by none other than Microsoft’s co-founder, who certainly did everything his own way
And now, the end is near
And so I face the most uncertain
My foe, I’ll say it clear
I’ll state my demands, of which I’m certain
I’ve lived a life of crime
I traveled each and every public office
And more, much more than this, I bid it my way
Regrets, I’ve had a few
But then again, Epstein’s arrested
I did what I had to do
And saw it done without exemption
I planned each charted plane
Each careful flight along the byway
And more, much more than this, I flew it my way
Yes, there were times, I’m sure you knew
When I bribed more than I could get away with
But through it all, when there was doubt
I bribed the regulators too and spit them out
I faced it all and I paid the toll and did it my way
I’ve bribed, I’ve sabotaged and lied
I’ve had my fill, my share of losing
And now, as independent journalists subside
I find it all so amusing
To think I did all that
And may I say, not in a shy way
Oh, no, oh, no, not me, I bribed them my way
For what is a crook, what has he got?
If not himself, then he’s another Trump
To say the things he truly feels
And make every public official beg as he kneels
The record shows
I served the blows
And did it my way
Yes, it was my way █
Permalink
Send this to a friend