Back in October: IBM: The Word “Master” is Rude (Except When We Use It Ourselves)

Summary: There are corporate consortia and a media obsession with supposedly offensive language; little attention is being paid to the blood spilled by those same corporations, usually consciously and for profit

EVER noticed how large corporations and their media/chiefs just love accusing their critics of being "toxic", "negative" etc. while they themselves do vastly worse things, including killings of projects, companies, and sometimes even people?

"People’s feelings matter. Women who lost spouses and kids (or even their own lives) to racist/imperialistic wars of conquest are a lot more hurt than people who might feel uncomfortable with terms that are barely even connected to slavery (depending on the context)."The hypocrisy is surface-deep. It's not hard to spot. Companies and people who work for the Pentagon (to help bomb civilians) and for ICE (to kidnap children and forcibly sterilise imprisoned moms) tell us that having a Git branch called "master" is a bad idea and we should be shamed/humiliated until that gets 'corrected' (never mind if they don't own Git and actually attack Git through GitHub).

Days ago the Linux Foundation and IBM had the audacity to portray IBM as pro-Jamaica (hijacking the flag) and pro-black, perhaps consciously distracting from what IBM had done there.

People's feelings matter. Women who lost spouses and kids (or even their own lives) to racist/imperialistic wars of conquest are a lot more hurt than people who might feel uncomfortable with terms that are barely even connected to slavery (depending on the context). We've already written many articles on this matter, which seems to be a corporate ploy to distract the masses. ⬆